Entropy of spacetime relative to vacuum impedance

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

Illuminating, with a bright light source, an active spark gap reduces the impedance of the vacuum measured across the spark gap.
Photons of light actively transitioning the fabric of spacetime decreases the entropy of the space time.
Gravity is the state of entropy of the fabric of space time balancing energy

[John Heath]

I like it. I would take it one more step. Mass is the temperature of a vacuum. If the temperature mass forms a tiny black hole then the temperature can not escape therefore a tiny stable bit of mass such as a pion or something depending on the energy. There are a few theories out there that use tiny black holes for mass stability and quantification into electron muon tau. If energy is put into a vacuum it will render particles of equivalent mass under the right conditions such as pair separation of a photon into an electron and positron.

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

Also the CMBR would Directly influence the absolute impedance of the vacuum causing a lower vacuum impedance.

The CMBR would add Siemens of conductance to space time drawing it below 376.730313 ohms

This could be flipped, and the CMBR could be the direct measure of the gravitational curvature of absolute time in the universe.

The vacuum impedance drop because of the presence of the CMBR would be causing a dark energy / dark matter like (spatial expansion temporal contraction)

Einstiens cosmologic constant.

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

Making the CMBR the evidence of the increasing the universe
2.7 K per second per cubic meter is LEAVING the universe so time can tick forward.

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

Making the CMBR the evidence of the "increasing entropy" of the universe.

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

Making the CMBR the evidence of the "increasing entropy" of the universe.


2.7 K per second per cubic meter is LEAVING the universe so time can tick forward

(((160.2 gHz) / (c^2)) * sqrt(0.5)) / ((4 * pi) * (10^(-7))) = 1.00298917 s / m2

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

(((160.2 gHz) / (c^2)) * sqrt(0.5)) / ((4 * pi) * (10^(-7))) = 1.00298917 s / m2

With out the seconds, Which would be equivalent to......
(((160.2 gHz) / (c^2)) * sqrt(0.5)) / ((4 * pi) * (10^(-7))) = 1.00298917 per meter^3

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

I like it. I would take it one more step. Mass is the temperature of a vacuum.

The vacuum of space time as the perfect black body radiator


Although crossing the event horizon has enormous effect on the fate of the object crossing it, it appears to have no locally detectable features. In many ways a black hole acts like an ideal black body, as it reflects no light.[4][5] Moreover, quantum field theory in curved spacetime predicts that event horizons emit Hawking radiation, with the same spectrum as a black body of a temperature inversely proportional to its mass. This temperature is on the order of billionths of a kelvin for black holes of stellar mass, making it essentially impossible to observe.

What is the mass of a black holes emitting Hawking radiation of 160.2 gHz ?

[John Heath]

The CMBR could be a reflection of ourselves. We could be looking at a mirror red shifted by the expansion of the bubble mirror. Better red than blue shifted as we would all be toast.

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

It doesn't matter if the energy is coming in or going out as it is just the "energy transfer" is simply causing agitation of the field

And the CMBR is the agitation from the energy transfer

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

Again (4pi * 10^-7) as the reference mass causing the impedance which sets the speed light to c

c * (4pi * (10^(-7))) = 376.730313 m / s

[John Heath]

On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 11:24:59 PM UTC-5, fuller...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Again (4pi * 10^-7) as the reference mass causing the impedance which sets the speed light to c
>
> c * (4pi * (10^(-7))) = 376.730313 m / s

This being the case then 376 impedance must also be a constant for a given frame of reference as c is constant for all frames of reference!


I have to do it the hard way Z = R ( speed of light )* L ( mu 1.2e-6 henry )

From this mu is also constant so epsilon = 8.8e-12 farad must also be constant. I guess we knew that anyways. It seems like we are using the wrong SI units. If I change the unit of time we use from 1 second to 3.3125 n second 3.3125e-9 then the constant properties for a vacuum for all frames of reference in J units becomes:

376 to 1 J.impedance
8.8e-12 to 1 J.farad epsilon elasticity
3.3125e-7 to 1 J.second
1.2e-6 to 1 J.henry mu inertia
300e6 to 1 J.c

If this is the universal properties of a vacuum everywhere for all FoR then these numbers should be set to 1 as a starting point yes/no?

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

(pi / (((4 * pi * (10^(-7)))^2) * 2)) / (10^12) =
0.99471839432

375 / ((1 / Octave) * (10^(-5))) = 300000000

(1/800000) = 1/(one hundred thousand octaves) = 0.00000125

(1 / 800000) / ((4 * pi) * (10^(-7))) = 0.99471839432

(5^2/8) / pi = 0.99471839432

1 / ((4 * pi * (10^(-7))) * 800000) = 0.99471839432

Truncated octahedral tessellation

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

http://i62.tinypic.com/14liyqc.jpg

http://i61.tinypic.com/2hd0cug.jpg

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

Truncated octahedral tessellation

http://i57.tinypic.com/14bhjq8.jpg

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

If this is the universal properties of a vacuum everywhere for all FoR then these numbers should be set to 1 as a starting point yes/no?

All line segments of the truncated octahedral Tessellation are set to "one" and of equal length.

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

The CMBR could be a reflection of ourselves. We could be looking at a mirror red shifted by the expansion of the bubble mirror. Better red than blue shifted as we would all be toast.

http://i62.tinypic.com/rcosva.jpg

[fuller...@hotmail.com]

(1/(1 + 0.00298917*2))/0.99471839432 = 0.999335283


(((160.2 gHz) / (c^2)) * sqrt(0.5)) / ((4 * pi) * (10^(-7))) = 1.00298917 s / m^2