Jonathan <
WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote on Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:34:27
-0400:
>On 3/11/2018 3:49 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> Jonathan <
WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote on Sun, 11 Mar 2018 08:44:05
>> -0400:
>>
>>> On 3/10/2018 1:52 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>> Jonathan <
WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote on Fri, 9 Mar 2018 22:11:16
>>>> -0500:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To do such a thing without telling anyone
>>>>> at all in his administration first, without
>>>>> seeking any advice whatsoever, is the
>>>>> penultimate example of shear ignorance,
>>>>> irresponsibility and arrogance.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You complain because he's antagonizing the NORKS. You complain when
>>>> he agrees to not do that and actually talk to them. The Secretary of
>>>> State works for the President, not the other way around.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ya, who needs the State Dept with diplomacy, who
>>> needs the FBI with law enforcement, who needs
>>> the Pentagon with war plans.
>>>
>>
>> Ask yourself how the Berlin Wall came down, Jonthy. Hint: It wasn't
>> the US State Department.
>>
>
>Donald Trump is no Ronald Reagan. But I'm not surprised
>you think so.
>
Where did I say I thought he was, Jonathan? You know, you'd sound at
least a little more sane if you only responded to things that actually
occurred. I merely offered a counter-example to your raving about
"who needs the State Department", as if everyone did.
>
>And if Trump agrees to a deal with N Korea without
>checking with his staff first? Do you think Reagan
>would do such a thing?
>
You might want to look at some of the meetings with the Russians over
nuclear arms that Reagan attended, Jonathan.
>
>>
>>>
>>> You're hero is running America into the ground Fred.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, sure, Jonthy. You know, you'd think if Trump was my 'hero' I'd
>> have voted for him. I didn't.
>>
>
>You support Trump like Trump supports Putin, by
>only saying positive things about him while
>at the same time saying he's a bad man.
>
See my advice above about only responding to things that actually
occurred, Jonathan.
>
>That's called, and I'm putting it nicely, hypocrisy.
>
That's called, and I'm putting it accurately, delusional.
>
>You make your feelings clear about Trump in many
>ways and for you to claim otherwise is just plain
>being dishonest.
>
Again, see my advice above about only responding to things that
actually occurred, Jonathan.
>
>But lying is Trump's middle name, so his followers
>believe lying is a good thing too.
>
So you're a follower of Trump now?
>
>>
>>As for "running America into the
>> ground", that's you TDS ANTIFA fuckers, not Trump.
>>
>
>No one heard of ANTIFA, the anti fascist group, before
>Trump ...
>
Because the inmates were running the asylum. Trump won the election
and all you dipshits were apparently permanently deranged.
>
>... and his neo-fascist agenda you so love and admire
>came into town.
>
Liar.
--
You are
What you do
When it counts.