Flynn a Felon - {chanting } 'Lock him up - lock him up - lock him up

[Jonathan]

Watergate was never this good.

I wonder what Flynn told the SC for the sweetheart deal
he just agreed to?

Who is this 'very senior transition official'
that told him to tell the Russians not to worry
about the sanctions...during the transition, which
is a...crime btw?

The list I understand of people that stand between
Flynn and Trump is VP Pence, Jared Kushner and
Reince Priebus. We know Pence is a bystander
in all this and Priebus appears to be clean
as well.

It appears to me the suspect #1 would be Trump
son in law Jared Kushner.

SOO will Trump fall on his sword to save his
son in law from prosecution as Flynn just did to
save his son from prison?

Not a chance in hell, Trump is a low-life that
would toss his own mom in jail if it would
save himself from a traffic ticket.

SOO will son in law (not blood family) fall
on his sword to save disloyal lying cheating
piece of shit daddy in law???

We'll see soon enough.


Watergate was never this dramatic.
These are the good 'ol days.
I bet Trump does something drastic
and soon, maybe firing the SC, or
something, maybe even start a war
with N Korea.

Diverting is Trump's primary strategy
to avoid accountability, and I wouldn't
put it above him to take the ultimate
diversion, a war.

Dictator 101 tactic for saving fearless leader's
own sorry ass.


Jonathan


s

[Vincent]

On 12/1/2017 12:44 PM, Jonathan wrote:

*This is a Naval News Group you little cocksucker*

Jeez..Little Jonthy is a damned Drama Queen. You should note that the
arrest was timed at the same time the tax cut was voted on. So what are
the 2 parties hiding? Actually looking at the charges...they appear to
be meaningless and without real merit. As for taking down Trump... You
better hope not. It will piss at least half of America off at the
blatantly corrupt power grab by the Liberals and could culminate in
violence. Having nothing to do with the current political situation...I
personally would shove a log down Jonthies throat as a gift to the news
groups. As for Trump going down...Can you imagine who or what would
replace him? Now that is scary. The Klintons would be slaughtered by the
masses and we would be rudderless in a very dangerous world that the
Democrats and Rinos have created.

>
> Watergate was never this good.

*Menopausal screams by useless News Group cancer snipped.*

[Jonathan]

Trump is the Commander in Chief, so his problems are
on topic to any military ng, on topic to just about
anywhere Americans are found for that matter.

And Trump's right hand man, the one guy he's been
desperately trying to protect, even firing Comey
is telling the Special Council everything he knows
even being hooked up to lie detectors no doubt.

The countless lies by Trump and all around him
are an attempt to cover up something important.
And we're about to find out what that is.

Trump should have pardoned Flynn while he could
it's too late once Flynn turned informer.
It'll be like with Watergate that Nixon should
have burned the tapes while he still could.

Should be great fun to watch Trump take the
Big Fall, and officially become...

The 'Biggest Loser' in American history.

He deserves it.


s

[Vincent]

On 12/1/2017 8:00 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> On 12/1/2017 8:13 PM, Vincent wrote:
>
>> On 12/1/2017 12:44 PM, Jonathan wrote:
>>
>> *This is a Naval News Group you little cocksucker*
>>
>> Jeez..Little Jonthy is a damned Drama Queen. You should note that the
>> arrest was timed at the same time the tax cut was voted on. So what
>> are the 2 parties hiding? Actually looking at the charges...they
>> appear to be meaningless and without real merit. As for taking down
>> Trump... You better hope not. It will piss at least half of America
>> off at the blatantly corrupt power grab by the Liberals and could
>> culminate in violence. Having nothing to do with the current political
>> situation...I personally would shove a log down Jonthies throat as a
>> gift to the news groups. As for Trump going down...Can you imagine who
>> or what would replace him? Now that is scary. The Klintons would be
>> slaughtered by the masses and we would be rudderless in a very
>> dangerous world that the Democrats and Rinos have created.
>>>
>>> Watergate was never this good.
>>
>> *Menopausal screams by useless News Group cancer snipped.*

*More Menopausal diatribe by the little cunt Jonathon snipped!*

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Watergate was never this good.
>
>I wonder what Flynn told the SC for the sweetheart deal
>he just agreed to?
>

Maybe they just couldn't find anything else that was actually illegal
(his discussion with the Russians was not, by the way) to charge him
with?

>
>Who is this 'very senior transition official'
>that told him to tell the Russians not to worry
>about the sanctions...
>

You're misinterpreting things again.

>
>... during the transition, which
>is a...crime btw?
>

Nope. Not a crime. It would have been a crime if done before the
election, but not during the transition.

>
>The list I understand of people that stand between
>Flynn and Trump is VP Pence, Jared Kushner and
>Reince Priebus. We know Pence is a bystander
>in all this and Priebus appears to be clean
>as well.
>
>It appears to me the suspect #1 would be Trump
>son in law Jared Kushner.
>

Since what you claim doesn't seem to have occurred and wouldn't be a
crime if it had, I'm not sure it matters.

>
>SOO will Trump fall on his sword to save his
>son in law from prosecution as Flynn just did to
>save his son from prison?
>

What would they be sending his son to prison for and just where do you
think Flynn "fell on his sword" to save his son?

<snip JonthyShite>

>
>Watergate was never this dramatic.
>

You weren't around for Watergate, were you?

<snip JonthyShite>


--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Trump is the Commander in Chief, so his problems are
>on topic to any military ng, on topic to just about
>anywhere Americans are found for that matter.
>

Bullshit. Stop trying to justify your ill-mannered behavior.

<snip JonthyShite>


--
You are
What you do
When it counts.

[Jonathan]

On 12/2/2017 3:52 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Trump is the Commander in Chief, so his problems are
>> on topic to any military ng, on topic to just about
>> anywhere Americans are found for that matter.
>>
>
> Bullshit. Stop trying to justify your ill-mannered behavior.
>

Mine! How many times have you called me a cunt just
this week? Talk about a hypocrite?

I noticed, however, for this post you cleaned it up, kinda
hard to say 'stop trying to justify your ill-mannered
behavior you fucking lying little cunt'.

Eh Comrade Fred?

I told you two days ago the hammer was gonna fall soon
and yesterday it did. Man oh man can I call 'em?

Shame how on the same day Trump finally had some
real news to crow about with the Middle Class
tax hike, everyone is instead talking his best friend
and confident is now a convicted felon that's
squealing-and-revealing.

Tough luck Trump~

I'm loving this like no tomorrow.


> <snip JonthyShite>
>
>

[Jonathan]

On 12/2/2017 3:45 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Watergate was never this good.
>>
>> I wonder what Flynn told the SC for the sweetheart deal
>> he just agreed to?
>>
>
> Maybe they just couldn't find anything else that was actually illegal
> (his discussion with the Russians was not, by the way) to charge him
> with?
>

To get such a great plea bargain he gave up
the goods on someone, and someone higher
up than he was, that's only a few people
most of them named Trump.

But we can be sure everything Trump told
Flynn is now in evidence. And we all know
Trump has a big fat mouth.

Oh, but Trump is silent now, something
finally shut him up, funny about that.

>>
>> Who is this 'very senior transition official'
>> that told him to tell the Russians not to worry
>> about the sanctions...
>>
>
> You're misinterpreting things again.
>
>>
>> ... during the transition, which
>> is a...crime btw?
>>
>
> Nope. Not a crime. It would have been a crime if done before the
> election, but not during the transition.
>

Flynn didn't get a sweetheart plea for giving up
nothing of consequence. You can count on that.
If Flynn had nothing they'd just toss the book
at him and let him AND his son face decades
in jail with a half dozen felonies each.

Are you new to how our court system works?

>>
>> The list I understand of people that stand between
>> Flynn and Trump is VP Pence, Jared Kushner and
>> Reince Priebus. We know Pence is a bystander
>> in all this and Priebus appears to be clean
>> as well.
>>
>> It appears to me the suspect #1 would be Trump
>> son in law Jared Kushner.
>>
>
> Since what you claim doesn't seem to have occurred and wouldn't be a
> crime if it had, I'm not sure it matters.
>

No one knows what Flynn is telling the SC, but
you can be sure it's worth the slap Flynn got.

>>
>> SOO will Trump fall on his sword to save his
>> son in law from prosecution as Flynn just did to
>> save his son from prison?
>>
>
> What would they be sending his son to prison for and just where do you
> think Flynn "fell on his sword" to save his son?
>
> <snip JonthyShite>
>
>>
>> Watergate was never this dramatic.
>>
>
> You weren't around for Watergate, were you?
>

I did a paper on it in college, I took John Dean
to be my study case. I know all about this stuff
Fred.

When a kid my older brother worked for Sen Ted Kennedy
and he took me in the office a bunch of times.

The annual staff vs interns softball games Kennedy
hosted was a blast. I grew up in DC and my dad
also was a political junky as he worked for the
Pentagon back then as a behavioral psychologist.

Wanna know how corrupt Nixon was?

John Dean flunked his first couple attempts at
the Bar exam, finally passed it but just a few
months into his first job as a lawyer was fired.

Dean then applied for jobs all over DC but
no one called back, he figured his career
in law was over. Of course Dean didn't
bother to apply at the White House.

But viola! Like a gift from God he got
a phone call asking if he wanted to
be the President's personal attorney.

And without even an interview or resume
they told him to show up at the White
House...the next day.

The reason, of course, is the best way
to get the dirty work done is to get someone
that wants or needs the job so badly, they'd do
anything to keep the job.

The three F's, the surest sign of an
entirely corrupt politician.

Hire Friends, family or flunkies.

The three F's, like Trump has been
doing for almost every position
around him.

Trump is the King of corruption, even
Nixon wouldn't be so callous and ignorant
to hire his own family members to do his
dirty work, as with Jared.





> <snip JonthyShite>
>
>

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/2/2017 3:52 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Trump is the Commander in Chief, so his problems are
>>> on topic to any military ng, on topic to just about
>>> anywhere Americans are found for that matter.
>>>
>>
>> Bullshit. Stop trying to justify your ill-mannered behavior.
>>
>
>Mine!
>

Yes, yours. Are you trying to take a page from Hillary's book and say
it's everyone's fault but yours?

>
>How many times have you called me a cunt just
>this week? Talk about a hypocrite?
>

That's merely description. Stop acting like a lying cunt and I'll
stop calling you one.

>
>I noticed, however, for this post you cleaned it up, kinda
>hard to say 'stop trying to justify your ill-mannered
>behavior you fucking lying little cunt'.
>
>Eh Comrade Fred?
>

Not hard at all. However, I only call you a lying little cunt when
you lie, so I didn't there.

And once again, I am not now, nor will I ever be, your comrade.

>
>I told you two days ago the hammer was gonna fall soon
>and yesterday it did. Man oh man can I call 'em?
>

Just what 'hammer' do you think 'fell'? Did anyone NOT expect that
they'd indict Flynn for SOMETHING? Why, you ought to change your name
to 'Captain Obvious' you're so good!

>
>Shame how on the same day Trump finally had some
>real news to crow about with the Middle Class
>tax hike, everyone is instead talking his best friend
>and confident is now a convicted felon that's
>squealing-and-revealing.
>

They indicted Ivanka and convicted her?

>
>Tough luck Trump~
>
>I'm loving this like no tomorrow.
>

Oh, I'm sure you are. You've always enjoyed your delusions and that's
what most of what you've said is.


--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/2/2017 3:45 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Watergate was never this good.
>>>
>>> I wonder what Flynn told the SC for the sweetheart deal
>>> he just agreed to?
>>>
>>
>> Maybe they just couldn't find anything else that was actually illegal
>> (his discussion with the Russians was not, by the way) to charge him
>> with?
>>
>
>To get such a great plea bargain he gave up
>the goods on someone, and someone higher
>up than he was, that's only a few people
>most of them named Trump.
>

You don't know any of that. You don't know there was a plea bargain.
You don't know it involved "giving up the goods on someone" even if
there was one.

>
>But we can be sure everything Trump told
>Flynn is now in evidence. And we all know
>Trump has a big fat mouth.
>

You and that mouse in your pocket are frequently 'sure' of all sorts
of things that turn out to not be in precise 1:1 accord with our
current reality.

>
>Oh, but Trump is silent now, something
>finally shut him up, funny about that.
>

Really? I hadn't noticed. But then, I guess I don't hang on his
every word like you do.

>
>>
>>>
>>> Who is this 'very senior transition official'
>>> that told him to tell the Russians not to worry
>>> about the sanctions...
>>>
>>
>> You're misinterpreting things again.
>>
>>>
>>> ... during the transition, which
>>> is a...crime btw?
>>>
>>
>> Nope. Not a crime. It would have been a crime if done before the
>> election, but not during the transition.
>>
>
>Flynn didn't get a sweetheart plea for giving up
>nothing of consequence. You can count on that.
>

Perhaps they just charged him with what they could prove.

>
>If Flynn had nothing they'd just toss the book
>at him and let him AND his son face decades
>in jail with a half dozen felonies each.
>

Name those felonies. Provide sufficient legal proof to convince a
jury.

>
>Are you new to how our court system works?
>

No, but you obviously are. You know it doesn't work off your
delusions, right?

I note you failed to answer ANY of the questions you were asked.

>
>>>
>>> The list I understand of people that stand between
>>> Flynn and Trump is VP Pence, Jared Kushner and
>>> Reince Priebus. We know Pence is a bystander
>>> in all this and Priebus appears to be clean
>>> as well.
>>>
>>> It appears to me the suspect #1 would be Trump
>>> son in law Jared Kushner.
>>>
>>
>> Since what you claim doesn't seem to have occurred and wouldn't be a
>> crime if it had, I'm not sure it matters.
>>
>
>No one knows what Flynn is telling the SC, but
>you can be sure it's worth the slap Flynn got.
>

I repeat, what you claim doesn't seem to have occurred and wouldn't be
a crime if it had. So perhaps that 'slap' is what they could actually
prove. You understand that your ignorance and innuendo don't turn
other people into criminals, right?

>
>>
>>>
>>> SOO will Trump fall on his sword to save his
>>> son in law from prosecution as Flynn just did to
>>> save his son from prison?
>>>
>>
>> What would they be sending his son to prison for and just where do you
>> think Flynn "fell on his sword" to save his son?
>>
>> <snip JonthyShite>
>>
>>>
>>> Watergate was never this dramatic.
>>>
>>
>> You weren't around for Watergate, were you?
>>
>
>I did a paper on it in college, I took John Dean
>to be my study case. I know all about this stuff
>Fred.
>

Of course you do, Jonthy. Of course you do...

>
>When a kid my older brother worked for Sen Ted Kennedy
>and he took me in the office a bunch of times.
>

Proximity does not equate to, well, anything, really.

<snip irrelevant JonthySpew>

[tRudy Crayola]

On 12/2/2017 7:48 AM, Jonathan wrote:
> On 12/2/2017 3:52 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Trump is the Commander in Chief, so his problems are
>>> on topic to any military ng, on topic to just about
>>> anywhere Americans are found for that matter.
>>>
>>
>> Bullshit.  Stop trying to justify your ill-mannered behavior.
>>
>
>
> Mine! How many times have you called me a cunt just
> this week?

Fred is pretty much on target with that one.

Talk about a hypocrite?

Yes you are... A Liberal Hypocrite of the worst kind.
You are damned idiot with a motormouth that emits nothing but
Anti-Americanism and garbage.

> Eh Comrade Fred?

Typical Communist/Democrat/liberal come on. You Commy Cocksukers are
a dying breed that is not allowed outside of Californiastan.

>
> I told you two days ago the hammer was gonna fall soon
> and yesterday it did. Man oh man can I call 'em?

What Hammer? It was a forgone conclusion that Flynn had lied on the
stand. Nobody refuted that. As usual...You flogged a dead horse...Kind
of like your support of the Hillary Clinton political crime syndicate.


--
Rudy's Nut & Fruit farm- Sacramento

[Jonathan]

On 12/2/2017 7:46 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/2/2017 3:52 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Trump is the Commander in Chief, so his problems are
>>>> on topic to any military ng, on topic to just about
>>>> anywhere Americans are found for that matter.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bullshit. Stop trying to justify your ill-mannered behavior.
>>>
>>
>> Mine!
>>
>
> Yes, yours. Are you trying to take a page from Hillary's book and say
> it's everyone's fault but yours?
>
>>
>> How many times have you called me a cunt just
>> this week? Talk about a hypocrite?
>>
>
> That's merely description. Stop acting like a lying cunt and I'll
> stop calling you one.
>
>>
>> I noticed, however, for this post you cleaned it up, kinda
>> hard to say 'stop trying to justify your ill-mannered
>> behavior you fucking lying little cunt'.
>>
>> Eh Comrade Fred?
>>
>
> Not hard at all. However, I only call you a lying little cunt when
> you lie, so I didn't there.
>
> And once again, I am not now, nor will I ever be, your comrade.
>

You're Putin's comrade by so strongly supporting
our Putin-lovin' President.

Used to be there were ONLY TWO people on the planet
Trump consistently heaped praise upon, Putin and
Flynn.

Now there are only one...as Trump is certain
to turn on Flynn and start calling him
the biggest liar the world has ever seen.

And did you notice how Trump admitted to
obstruction of justice yesterday?

Trump admitted he knew Flynn was lying
to the FBI when he asked Comey to
'let go' of the Flynn investigation.

That's like saying to the prosector
'I know he murdered the guy but I
want you to let the guy go.'

You can't write this stuff, I mean...
someone pinch me please.

I'm literally laughing out loud as I type.

>>
>> I told you two days ago the hammer was gonna fall soon
>> and yesterday it did. Man oh man can I call 'em?
>>
>
> Just what 'hammer' do you think 'fell'? Did anyone NOT expect that
> they'd indict Flynn for SOMETHING?

Here we go, 'you knew it all along'. I knew it.

[Jonathan]

Why did he lie? What was he trying to hide if Trump
has said a hundred times Flynn was doing nothing
illegal, so why lie about it?

As Comey just said the other day, the hidden truth will be
coming out soon.


I'm loving to death watching Trump unravel day by day.

[Jonathan]

On 12/2/2017 7:59 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/2/2017 3:45 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Watergate was never this good.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder what Flynn told the SC for the sweetheart deal
>>>> he just agreed to?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe they just couldn't find anything else that was actually illegal
>>> (his discussion with the Russians was not, by the way) to charge him
>>> with?
>>>
>>
>> To get such a great plea bargain he gave up
>> the goods on someone, and someone higher
>> up than he was, that's only a few people
>> most of them named Trump.
>>
>
> You don't know any of that. You don't know there was a plea bargain.
> You don't know it involved "giving up the goods on someone" even if
> there was one.
>

Oh I see, they gave Flynn a slap, and his son a pass
because he's a nice guy. Because he kept his mouth
shut.

heheheeee....it's obvious he's squealing and revealing
Flynn said he was cooperating in his statement.

Cooperating doesn't mean he said nothing of import.

>>
>> But we can be sure everything Trump told
>> Flynn is now in evidence. And we all know
>> Trump has a big fat mouth.
>>
>
> You and that mouse in your pocket are frequently 'sure' of all sorts
> of things that turn out to not be in precise 1:1 accord with our
> current reality.
>
>>
>> Oh, but Trump is silent now, something
>> finally shut him up, funny about that.
>>
>
> Really? I hadn't noticed. But then, I guess I don't hang on his
> every word like you do.
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Who is this 'very senior transition official'
>>>> that told him to tell the Russians not to worry
>>>> about the sanctions...
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're misinterpreting things again.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ... during the transition, which
>>>> is a...crime btw?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nope. Not a crime. It would have been a crime if done before the
>>> election, but not during the transition.
>>>
>>
>> Flynn didn't get a sweetheart plea for giving up
>> nothing of consequence. You can count on that.
>>
>
> Perhaps they just charged him with what they could prove.
>

Ya, hold onto that, it'll give you comfort
for a few months.

>>
>> If Flynn had nothing they'd just toss the book
>> at him and let him AND his son face decades
>> in jail with a half dozen felonies each.
>>
>
> Name those felonies. Provide sufficient legal proof to convince a
> jury.
>

Who needs to when he admitted his guilt Fred?
He admitted to lying about four different events
and lying about his dealings with Turkey.

That's five different felonies he admitted to
and he was only charged with one.

Here's his admitting to the five felonies.
Read the section 'statement of offense'

http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/01/politics/michael-flynn-court-filing/index.html


Or should I say read it and weep~

[Andrew Swallow]

Flynn may be protecting Obama or Mrs Clinton.

[David E. Powell]

This reminds me of something.

A lot of people were afraid that they would be called Communists and blasted in the Press if they said that Dalton Trumbo should be allowed to write movies, or that Paul Robeson should be allowed to act in them.

This is just a thought, but it has come to me a few times, lately.

Not everybody who asks for the benefit of the doubt or the presumption of innocence in lieu of a conviction to be observed in the process of justice is in favor of a foreign enemy.

[Fred J. McCall]

You're deranged. Part of your derangement is stereotyping anyone who
doesn't share your derangement. Jonthy, calling you on your constant
lies isn't support for anything other than the truth.

>
>Used to be there were ONLY TWO people on the planet
>Trump consistently heaped praise upon, Putin and
>Flynn.
>

Liar.

>
>Now there are only one...as Trump is certain
>to turn on Flynn and start calling him
>the biggest liar the world has ever seen.
>

Your delusions are not facts.

>
>And did you notice how Trump admitted to
>obstruction of justice yesterday?
>

No, since he didn't.

>
>Trump admitted he knew Flynn was lying
>to the FBI when he asked Comey to
>'let go' of the Flynn investigation.
>

He never asked Comey that. He expressed a wish that he could. That's
the problem with delusional lying cunts like you, Jonthy. You repeat
your lies so much that you start believing things actually happened
that way.

>
>That's like saying to the prosector
>'I know he murdered the guy but I
>want you to let the guy go.'
>

Only in your deranged head.

>
>You can't write this stuff, I mean...
>someone pinch me please.
>
>I'm literally laughing out loud as I type.
>

I don't doubt you are. It's the sort of semi-sane behaviour I'd
expect of you.

>
>>
>>>
>>> I told you two days ago the hammer was gonna fall soon
>>> and yesterday it did. Man oh man can I call 'em?
>>>
>>
>> Just what 'hammer' do you think 'fell'? Did anyone NOT expect that
>> they'd indict Flynn for SOMETHING?
>>
>
>Here we go, 'you knew it all along'. I knew it.
>

Delusional, I tell you. Seek treatment, Jonthy. What do we have
after seven months of this special prosecutor, Jonthy? We have an
indictment on things that have been under investigation for years and
we have a guy who lied to the FBI. What we DON'T have is one iota of
evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russians with regard to
the 2016 Presidential election. You know, that thing Mueller is
supposed to be investigating?

<snip usual stupid Jonthy overquote>

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/2/2017 7:59 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/2/2017 3:45 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Watergate was never this good.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder what Flynn told the SC for the sweetheart deal
>>>>> he just agreed to?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe they just couldn't find anything else that was actually illegal
>>>> (his discussion with the Russians was not, by the way) to charge him
>>>> with?
>>>>
>>>
>>> To get such a great plea bargain he gave up
>>> the goods on someone, and someone higher
>>> up than he was, that's only a few people
>>> most of them named Trump.
>>>
>>
>> You don't know any of that. You don't know there was a plea bargain.
>> You don't know it involved "giving up the goods on someone" even if
>> there was one.
>>
>
>Oh I see, they gave Flynn a slap, and his son a pass
>because he's a nice guy. Because he kept his mouth
>shut.
>
>heheheeee....it's obvious he's squealing and revealing
>Flynn said he was cooperating in his statement.
>
>Cooperating doesn't mean he said nothing of import.
>

Jonthy, your lunatic surmises are NOT facts. They're not even decent
surmises, since they're based on your own lunatic interpretation of
the facts.

>
>>
>>>
>>> But we can be sure everything Trump told
>>> Flynn is now in evidence. And we all know
>>> Trump has a big fat mouth.
>>>
>>
>> You and that mouse in your pocket are frequently 'sure' of all sorts
>> of things that turn out to not be in precise 1:1 accord with our
>> current reality.
>>
>>>
>>> Oh, but Trump is silent now, something
>>> finally shut him up, funny about that.
>>>
>>
>> Really? I hadn't noticed. But then, I guess I don't hang on his
>> every word like you do.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Who is this 'very senior transition official'
>>>>> that told him to tell the Russians not to worry
>>>>> about the sanctions...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're misinterpreting things again.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ... during the transition, which
>>>>> is a...crime btw?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope. Not a crime. It would have been a crime if done before the
>>>> election, but not during the transition.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Flynn didn't get a sweetheart plea for giving up
>>> nothing of consequence. You can count on that.
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps they just charged him with what they could prove.
>>
>
>Ya, hold onto that, it'll give you comfort
>for a few months.
>

Thanks for telling us what YOU do.

>
>>
>>>
>>> If Flynn had nothing they'd just toss the book
>>> at him and let him AND his son face decades
>>> in jail with a half dozen felonies each.
>>>
>>
>> Name those felonies. Provide sufficient legal proof to convince a
>> jury.
>>
>
>Who needs to when he admitted his guilt Fred?
>He admitted to lying about four different events
>and lying about his dealings with Turkey.
>

Cite?

>
>That's five different felonies he admitted to
>and he was only charged with one.
>
>Here's his admitting to the five felonies.
>Read the section 'statement of offense'
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/01/politics/michael-flynn-court-filing/index.html
>
>Or should I say read it and weep~
>

Why would I 'weep'? You need to go back and read it again yourself.
Then try telling the truth. There are TWO potential charges listed;
false statements during his January 24 interview (which is what they
charged him with and what he pled guilty to) and the FARA violations
with regard to lobbying for Turkey (which they didn't charge him with,
because proving the filings were deliberately false would probably be
difficult). Both of those charges and their details are pretty much
'old news'. None of the details are crimes in and of themselves; it's
the two cases of false statements that are potentially crimes. And
just why did the FBI have these details, again?

You can't just stupidly count the paragraph numbers and call each a
'felony', Jonthy.

<snip usual stupid Jonthy overquote>

Jesus, do you not know where the 'cut' key in your editor is?

[Jonathan]

Each lie is a separate felony Fred, lie four times
that's four counts.

Nice try

[Jonathan]

Hang onto that 'wish' Fred.

He 'wished' three times to Comey, that makes it a
request, and having everyone else to leave the room
moments before shows a clear consciousness of guilt.


"I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go,
to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can
let this go."


And Trump said the other day he knew Flynn had
lied to the FBI already, that makes it obstruction
of justice.

And did you read what Comey tweeted the other day
I love this...


‪Beautiful Long Island Sound from Westport, CT. To paraphrase
the Buddha — Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun;
the moon; and the truth. ‬
1 DAY AGO


“But let justice roll down like waters and righteousness
like an ever-flowing stream” Amos 5:24
2 DAYS AGO


What's that old saying about payback?

You can't write this, it's the stuff of legends.



s

[Jonathan]

Reminds me of the email just found /yesterday/ from
Trump's Dep NSA and top Trump election official...


KT McFarland, a top official on President Donald Trump's
transition team, said in an email last December that
they should reassure Russia...

“If there is a tit-for-tat escalation Trump will have
difficulty improving relations with Russia, which
has just thrown U.S.A. election to him,” she wrote.

http://www.businessinsider.com/emails-kt-mcfarland-russia-thrown-election-to-trump-flynn-2017-12


/Explaining why/ all the attempts to get Putin to not
retaliate for the Obama sanctions by assuring Putin
Trump would dump the sanctions once he got into
office.

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

<big snip of superfluous quotes>

>
>Each lie is a separate felony Fred, lie four times
>that's four counts.
>

Bullshit.

<big snip of superfluous quotes>

Learn to edit. Learn to stay on topic. Hell, just LEARN ANYTHING,
you ignorant twat.


--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson

[Fred J. McCall]

>request, ...
>

That's really quite funny! Is Comey the Genie of the Lamp or
something?

>
>... and having everyone else to leave the room

>moments before shows a clear consciousness of guilt.
>

Hogwash.

>
>"I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go,
>to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can
>let this go."
>

So not what you claimed was said earlier, then.

>
>And Trump said the other day he knew Flynn had
>lied to the FBI already, that makes it obstruction
>of justice.
>

Don't be silly!

>
>And did you read what Comey tweeted the other day
>I love this...
>

I can't imagine caring what anyone tweets, much less someone like
Comey.

[Fred J. McCall]

"It is unclear whether McFarland actually believed that Russia had
"thrown" the election to Trump, or whether she was being sarcastic."

She must have been channeling Hillary.

>
>/Explaining why/ all the attempts to get Putin to not
>retaliate for the Obama sanctions by assuring Putin
>Trump would dump the sanctions once he got into
>office.
>

You're lying again. Never happened. Sure, people talked to the
Russian ambassador to try to convince him to counsel that Russia not
retaliate. That's only good sense. Who the hell wants a diplomatic
war? OBAMA should have been doing that (and perhaps he was, back
channeled through Trump's transition team). Everything in your
statement starting with "by assuring..." is an outright lie.


--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
soul with evil."
-- Socrates

[tRudy Crayola]

As soon as we find out why you constantly lie, we will take a lookat
Flynn's indiscretions ..if any exist.

>
> As Comey just said the other day, the hidden truth will be
> coming out soon.

I guess that means Comey and Hillary will be citizens of Uncle Sammy's
crossbar hotel.

>
>
> I'm loving to death watching Trump unravel day by day.

You mean like you unraveled many years ago and stayed that way permanently?

[Dean Markley]

Bullshit, you're just an attention whore. Now knock off the off topic posts.

[Jonathan]

On 12/3/2017 9:52 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:

> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>


>>
>> Reminds me of the email just found /yesterday/ from
>> Trump's Dep NSA and top Trump election official...
>>
>> KT McFarland, a top official on President Donald Trump's
>> transition team, said in an email last December that
>> they should reassure Russia...
>>
>> “If there is a tit-for-tat escalation Trump will have
>> difficulty improving relations with Russia, which
>> has just thrown U.S.A. election to him,” she wrote.
>>
>> http://www.businessinsider.com/emails-kt-mcfarland-russia-thrown-election-to-trump-flynn-2017-12
>>
>
> "It is unclear whether McFarland actually believed that Russia had
> "thrown" the election to Trump, or whether she was being sarcastic."
>

Oh and btw she emailed that statement to just about
everyone of note in Trump's campaign.

> She must have been channeling Hillary.
>

Judge: when you stated you robbed that bank
were you being sarcastic?


Defendent: yes I was being sarcastic, just kidding
around.

Judge: CASE DISMISSED~


Judge: when you said you knew your partner in crime
shot the guard did you mean that?

Defendent: well my lawyer drafted that statement


Judge: CASE DISMISSED~



You're a laugh a day Fred, thanks.

>>
>> /Explaining why/ all the attempts to get Putin to not
>> retaliate for the Obama sanctions by assuring Putin
>> Trump would dump the sanctions once he got into
>> office.
>>
>
> You're lying again. Never happened. Sure, people talked to the
> Russian ambassador to try to convince him to counsel that Russia not
> retaliate. That's only good sense. Who the hell wants a diplomatic
> war? OBAMA should have been doing that (and perhaps he was, back
> channeled through Trump's transition team). Everything in your
> statement starting with "by assuring..." is an outright lie.
>
>

So why lie about it then? What is it we don't know yet
that caused not only Flynn to lie about all this but
for literally everyone from the President on down
to deny deny deny all things connected to Russia?

It's obvious Fred, Trump says almost every day
the same thing...'no collusion..no collusion
over and over.

That's what he's hiding, collusion.

And Jared was in charge of the election data
and I bet you he turned it over to the Russians
so they could target exactly the places
Trump needed to win.

Flynn's deal and his implicating Jared could be
the leverage the SC needs to prove collusion.

Oh and btw I was wrong the other day when
I said there are three republican started
and led investigations of Trump.

I forgot about the Republican led investigation
into obstruction by the Senate Judiciary committee.

There are four investigations~

Sorry

[Jonathan]

On 12/3/2017 9:40 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <big snip of superfluous quotes>
>
>>
>> Each lie is a separate felony Fred, lie four times
>> that's four counts.
>>
>
> Bullshit.
>

Maybe if you put that in all caps it
might become true, or say it three
times in quick succession.

[Jonathan]

On 12/3/2017 9:45 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:


>> And did you read what Comey tweeted the other day
>> I love this...
>>
>
> I can't imagine caring what anyone tweets, much less someone like
> Comey.
>
>

Trump has said his tweets are official policy.

And the claim his lawyer drafted that one
tweet is just plain silly, he's going to
be asked eventually to prove that.

But it's obvious Trump didn't know Flynn
had lied to the FBI when he fired him.
That tweet was just Trump talking out
his ass, as usual, incriminating himself
for something that didn't happen.

What a buffoon.

And what Comey tweeted is worth repeating, as
he knows what's what being the head of the
FBI investigation while in office.

To paraphrase the Buddha — Three things cannot be
long hidden: the sun; the moon; and the truth. ‬
1 DAY AGO


“But let justice roll down like waters and righteousness
like an ever-flowing stream” Amos 5:24
2 DAYS AGO

You can't write this stuff~


s

[Jonathan]

Ya just like that.

I'm Jonathan Ball from Sacramento that melted down
many years ago.

I forgot!

Hey, have you been looking for that white van
sitting outside your place? Might want to keep
a low profile until it's gone.



>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Jonathan]

What's wrong with that? Silence is a crime
ya know, which is my main message at my
Twitter page.

https://twitter.com/Non_Linear1

> Now knock off the off topic posts.
>

Sir yes sir!

Our Liar in Chief is 'falling down' and
you don't think that's on topic to a
military ng?

It could give us a war with N Korea as
Dictatorship 101 is when fearless leader
is in trouble, start something patriotic
like a war to divert and cower the press
and people.

We have carriers and jets buzzing all around
N Korea like never before as we type.





s

[Dean Markley]

Holy Hell Jonathan, you're the newest incarnation of that Vinnie Quinn asshole who used to be here.

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

<remove Jonthy delusional dreams - nothing left>

Buy a clue. Learn to think. Learn netiquette. Learn to edit.

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/3/2017 9:40 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> <big snip of superfluous quotes>
>>
>>>
>>> Each lie is a separate felony Fred, lie four times
>>> that's four counts.
>>>
>>
>> Bullshit.
>>
>
>Maybe if you put that in all caps it
>might become true, or say it three
>times in quick succession.
>

I'll leave the "He said it three times so now it means something else"
magic to you.

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/3/2017 9:45 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>
>>> And did you read what Comey tweeted the other day
>>> I love this...
>>>
>>
>> I can't imagine caring what anyone tweets, much less someone like
>> Comey.
>>
>
>Trump has said his tweets are official policy.
>

Cite? Cite to law that would allow that? Yeah, I thought not.

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/4/2017 3:17 AM, Dean Markley wrote:
>>
>> Bullshit, you're just an attention whore.
>>
>
>What's wrong with that?
>

at·ten·tion whore
nounUSderogatory
a person who behaves in a provocative, outrageous, or reprehensible
manner in order to attract attention.
"her mother is a greedy attention whore who wanted her daughter to be
famous"

You don't see what's wrong with that?

>
>Silence is a crime ya know, which is my main message at my
>Twitter page.
>

No, silence is not a crime and there is a vast difference between
speaking truth to power and spewing loony delusions to get attention.

>
>>
>> Now knock off the off topic posts.
>>
>
>Sir yes sir!
>
>Our Liar in Chief is 'falling down' and
>you don't think that's on topic to a
>military ng?
>

Learn to read the heirarchies. First, no, it is not on topic for "a
military ng". Second, this is not "a military ng", but rather a
newsgroup about NAVAL SCIENCE (which is why it starts with 'sci').

>
>It could give us a war with N Korea ...
>

Politics, not military science.

>
>... as

>Dictatorship 101 is when fearless leader
>is in trouble, start something patriotic
>like a war to divert and cower the press
>and people.
>

Delusional bullshit, not military science.

>
>We have carriers and jets buzzing all around
>N Korea like never before as we type.
>

No, we don't. You need to learn to leave out your delusional
hyperbole.

[Jonathan]

On 12/4/2017 11:09 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/3/2017 9:45 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>
>>>> And did you read what Comey tweeted the other day
>>>> I love this...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can't imagine caring what anyone tweets, much less someone like
>>> Comey.
>>>
>>
>> Trump has said his tweets are official policy.
>>
>
> Cite? Cite to law that would allow that? Yeah, I thought not.
>
>

Fool, read the news once in a while.


Spicer: Trump Tweets 'Official Statements By The President'

video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ef8RLQU-Ugk



Jonathan

"To paraphrase the Buddha — Three things cannot be
long hidden: the sun; the moon; and the truth."

“But let justice roll down like waters and righteousness
like an ever-flowing stream” Amos 5:24

~ Former FBI Director Comey



s

[Jonathan]

On 12/4/2017 11:17 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/4/2017 3:17 AM, Dean Markley wrote:
>>>
>>> Bullshit, you're just an attention whore.
>>>
>>
>> What's wrong with that?
>>
>
> at·ten·tion whore
> nounUSderogatory
> a person who behaves in a provocative, outrageous, or reprehensible
> manner in order to attract attention.
> "her mother is a greedy attention whore who wanted her daughter to be
> famous"
>
> You don't see what's wrong with that?
>
>>
>> Silence is a crime ya know, which is my main message at my
>> Twitter page.
>>
>
> No, silence is not a crime and there is a vast difference between
> speaking truth to power and spewing loony delusions to get attention.
>

No it isn't.

>>
>>>
>>> Now knock off the off topic posts.
>>>
>>
>> Sir yes sir!
>>
>> Our Liar in Chief is 'falling down' and
>> you don't think that's on topic to a
>> military ng?
>>
>
> Learn to read the heirarchies. First, no, it is not on topic for "a
> military ng". Second, this is not "a military ng", but rather a
> newsgroup about NAVAL SCIENCE (which is why it starts with 'sci').
>

No it isn't.

>>
>> It could give us a war with N Korea ...
>>
>
> Politics, not military science.
>

No it isn't.

>>
>> ... as
>> Dictatorship 101 is when fearless leader
>> is in trouble, start something patriotic
>> like a war to divert and cower the press
>> and people.
>>
>
> Delusional bullshit, not military science.
>
>>
>> We have carriers and jets buzzing all around
>> N Korea like never before as we type.
>>
>
> No, we don't. You need to learn to leave out your delusional
> hyperbole.
>
>

No it isn't.



--

"To paraphrase the Buddha — Three things cannot be long hidden:
the sun; the moon; and the truth. ‬

“But let justice roll down like waters and righteousness
like an ever-flowing stream” Amos 5:24

~ Former FBI Director James Comey

[tRudy Crayola]

On 12/4/2017 10:06 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <remove Jonthy delusional dreams - nothing left>
>
> Buy a clue. Learn to think. Learn netiquette. Learn to edit.

And Jonthy...Take up bowling or something...Anything but posting here.

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/4/2017 11:09 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/3/2017 9:45 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And did you read what Comey tweeted the other day
>>>>> I love this...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can't imagine caring what anyone tweets, much less someone like
>>>> Comey.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Trump has said his tweets are official policy.
>>>
>>
>> Cite? Cite to law that would allow that? Yeah, I thought not.
>>
>
>Fool, read the news once in a while.
>

Dipshit, learn to hear and understand English

>
>Spicer: Trump Tweets 'Official Statements By The President'
>
>video
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ef8RLQU-Ugk
>

So it has been said that his statements on Twitter are 'official
statements' (not "official policy", which is something different) and
it was said by Spicer, not Trump. Jesus, Jonthy, two major errors in
a single sentence with only eight words in it? That's going some,
even for you.

Now, an 'official statement' (and everything the President says is an
'official statement', given that he's the President, which is what
Spicer said) may become 'official policy', but it's certainly not a
given.

[tRudy Crayola]

On 12/4/2017 7:10 AM, Jonathan wrote:
> On 12/4/2017 3:17 AM, Dean Markley wrote:

>> Bullshit, you're just an attention whore.
>
>
> What's wrong with that? Silence is a crime
> ya know, which is my main message at my
> Twitter page.

No! Silence is Golden you smelly little blabbermouth.

[Fred J. McCall]

Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12/4/2017 11:17 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/4/2017 3:17 AM, Dean Markley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit, you're just an attention whore.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What's wrong with that?
>>>
>>
>> at·ten·tion whore
>> nounUSderogatory
>> a person who behaves in a provocative, outrageous, or reprehensible
>> manner in order to attract attention.
>> "her mother is a greedy attention whore who wanted her daughter to be
>> famous"
>>
>> You don't see what's wrong with that?
>>
>>>
>>> Silence is a crime ya know, which is my main message at my
>>> Twitter page.
>>>
>>
>> No, silence is not a crime and there is a vast difference between
>> speaking truth to power and spewing loony delusions to get attention.
>>
>
>No it isn't.
>

That response doesn't even make sense. What "it" "isn't" what?

>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now knock off the off topic posts.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sir yes sir!
>>>
>>> Our Liar in Chief is 'falling down' and
>>> you don't think that's on topic to a
>>> military ng?
>>>
>>
>> Learn to read the heirarchies. First, no, it is not on topic for "a
>> military ng". Second, this is not "a military ng", but rather a
>> newsgroup about NAVAL SCIENCE (which is why it starts with 'sci').
>>
>
>No it isn't.
>

Well, yeah, it is. Again, learn something. Hell, ANYTHING would be
refreshing.

>
>>
>>>
>>> It could give us a war with N Korea ...
>>>
>>
>> Politics, not military science.
>>
>
>No it isn't.
>

Yeah, it is.

>
>>
>>>
>>> ... as
>>> Dictatorship 101 is when fearless leader
>>> is in trouble, start something patriotic
>>> like a war to divert and cower the press
>>> and people.
>>>
>>
>> Delusional bullshit, not military science.
>>
>>>
>>> We have carriers and jets buzzing all around
>>> N Korea like never before as we type.
>>>
>>
>> No, we don't. You need to learn to leave out your delusional
>> hyperbole.
>>
>
>No it isn't.
>

Again your reply doesn't even make sense. Will someone smack Jonthy?
I think his needle is stuck.

[Peter Stickney]

On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 09:07:24 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:

> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 12/3/2017 9:40 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>> Jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> <big snip of superfluous quotes>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Each lie is a separate felony Fred, lie four times that's four
>>>> counts.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Bullshit.
>>>
>>>
>>Maybe if you put that in all caps it might become true, or say it three
>>times in quick succession.
>>
>>
> I'll leave the "He said it three times so now it means something else"
> magic to you.

Perhaps the Snark is a Boojum. (One can only hope)

--
Pete Stickney
“A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures.” ― Daniel Webster