Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

MAPP gas versus Acetylene

791 views
Skip to first unread message

Jack Bauer

unread,
Aug 7, 2007, 10:58:23 PM8/7/07
to
I have asked this question and seen others ask, but have yet to read an
a answer that seems satisfactory.

If MAPP gas and acetylene have almost the same flame temp, MAPP has more
heat in it, MAPP gas is cheaper and safer to handle, and MAPP gas is
known as being as good or better than acetylene at heating, cutting and
brazing, then WHY, other than availability of the tanks and gas, would
MAPP gas NOT be used for welding? And be highly preferable to acetylene?

I did see someone comment that copper and MAPP gas could be explosive.
Is that true?

Grant Erwin

unread,
Aug 7, 2007, 11:14:38 PM8/7/07
to
Jack Bauer wrote:

It's not anything to do with copper and MAPP. It's chemistry. There is a
lot more hydrogen available in the MAPP flame then in the acetylene flame, so
welds done with MAPP (or any other LP derivative) suffer from hydrogen
embrittlement.

Here is the section on fuel gases out of the notes from Ernie's gas welding class:

Fuel gases:

Acetylene:
made from dripping water on calcium carbide, acetylene used to be user-
generated for everything from toy "carbide cannons" to household gas
installations which had an acetylene generator in an outbuilding,
generally a blockhouse about 100 feet from the main home with 3 walls
made of concrete blocks and the 4th wall (the one that faced away from
the house) made of wood so that if the acetylene exploded, the wood wall
would fail and the blast energy would be directed away from the home.
Acetylene generators were also used in industry and are still around as
quaint period pieces, but insurance practices now dictate that acetylene
production all be done in large plants. The welding gas industry would
love to see acetylene go away entirely because of the astronomical
insurance costs associated with handling it, but it is necessary for
welding as no other gas has its attributes of heat without excessive
amounts of elemental hydrogen being introduced into the weld metal.

very expensive fuel
only fuel gas appropriate for welding steel

Propane/Chemtane/MAPP/Propylene/Flameall: (LP gasses)
not suitable for welding, best choice for heating or cutting
use same regulator as acetylene
propane is a much cheaper gas than acetylene

Grant Erwin
Kirkland, Washington
Seattle Metalheads welding class facilitator
(Ernie Leimkuhler, teacher)

Ernie Leimkuhler

unread,
Aug 8, 2007, 12:20:26 AM8/8/07
to
In article <46b93530$0$14042$baae...@news.mindlink.net>,
Jack Bauer <j...@nowhere.com> wrote:

Besides Grant's quote from my seminar you will soon find MAPP
non-existent.
This has to do with one of it's constituent gasses.
MAPP is Methyl-Acetylene Poly-Propylene.
One of the gasses used to make MAPP is Propadiene.
Propadiene is now worth more to the plastics industry than it is to the
welding industry, so MAPP is being phased out.
In Seattle it is almost impossible to get in anything bigger than a
disposable propane torch sized can.

The replacements for MAPP are numerous.
I have used Flamal, Propylene, and Chemtane, and all work fine for
cutting, heating, and brazing.
They are all hotter than basic Propane.

Honestly I gave away my large acetylene tank in my shop 3 years ago, and
have never missed it.

Leo Lichtman

unread,
Aug 8, 2007, 3:27:59 PM8/8/07
to

"Ernie Leimkuhler" wrote: (clip) The replacements for MAPP are numerous. I
have used Flamal, Propylene, and Chemtane, and all work fine for cutting,
heating, and brazing. They are all hotter than basic Propane.
>
> Honestly I gave away my large acetylene tank in my shop 3 years ago, and
> have never missed it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm trying to figure out what this all means. I notice you did not list
welding among the uses for Mapp gas equivalents. Yet you gave away your
large acetylene tank. Do you do all your A/C welding with a smaller tank?
Since I use acetylene for light welding jobs as well as heating and brazing,
and I use medium and small tanks, should I just continue what I am doing?
Can you weld with these other gases? Will they work in the same torches
that are made for acetylene?

Thanx for any info and clarification.


Grant Erwin

unread,
Aug 8, 2007, 4:10:26 PM8/8/07
to
Leo Lichtman wrote:

You must have missed my post. The only fuel gas that doesn't inject too much
hydrogen into a weld is acetylene.

Ernie doesn't do torch welding, he does TIG welding.

Grant

Leo Lichtman

unread,
Aug 8, 2007, 5:08:07 PM8/8/07
to

"Grant Erwin" wrote: You must have missed my post. The only fuel gas that
doesn't inject too much
> hydrogen into a weld is acetylene.
>
> Ernie doesn't do torch welding, he does TIG welding.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thanks, Grant. I do remember reading your post, but it didn't sink in.
It's all clear now.


Grant Erwin

unread,
Aug 8, 2007, 5:55:52 PM8/8/07
to
Leo Lichtman wrote:

And yes indeed, you can use acetylene regulators for any propane gas or
derivative (MAPP, Chemtane, etc., see Ernie's post for a list). At least
they'll bolt up fine. I use mine for any fuel gas if I need to.

Grant

Ernie Leimkuhler

unread,
Aug 8, 2007, 10:05:21 PM8/8/07
to
In article <3Poui.25261$ax1....@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Leo Lichtman" <l.lic...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

I last gas welded in my shop around 10 years ago.
It has absolutely no commercial value to me as a fabricator.

Mind you, at school I spent 9 years gas welding almost every night.
That is because it is still the best way to TEACH welding.

I have even gas welded at the Divers Institute as a demo for the
students.

Everything I do is either MIG, TIG or Stick welded.

I do still have a tiny MC cylinder of Acetylene for jewelry work.

Leo Lichtman

unread,
Aug 8, 2007, 10:25:32 PM8/8/07
to

"Ernie Leimkuhler" wrote: (clip) I do still have a tiny MC cylinder of
Acetylene for jewelry work.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Wouldn't MAPP gas and equivalents be suitable for that also?


Don Young

unread,
Aug 8, 2007, 10:45:34 PM8/8/07
to

"
> Here is the section on fuel gases out of the notes from Ernie's gas
> welding class:
>
> Fuel gases:
>
> Acetylene:
> made from dripping water on calcium carbide, acetylene used to be
> user-
> generated for everything from toy "carbide cannons" to household gas
> installations which had an acetylene generator in an outbuilding,
> generally a blockhouse about 100 feet from the main home with 3
> walls
> made of concrete blocks and the 4th wall (the one that faced away
> from
> the house) made of wood so that if the acetylene exploded, the wood
> wall
> would fail and the blast energy would be directed away from the
> home.
> (Ernie Leimkuhler, teacher)
One of my memories from about 1940 is of my uncle and cousins removing the
acetylene generator from the basement of a Kansas farm house. There was no
particular blast or fire protection evident. There was no electricity yet
and the gas had not been used for many years but there were still outlets
for acetylene lights in each room. I remember they dumped the generator and
it was full of the same carbide residue I remember my dad removing from a
welding acetylene generator some years later.

Don Young


Ernie Leimkuhler

unread,
Aug 9, 2007, 12:38:58 AM8/9/07
to
In article <wWuui.25736$ax1...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Leo Lichtman" <l.lic...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

No, because acetylene is still the hottest gas and is able to be focused
to a much tinier point than any LP gas.

So for jewelry work using a micro torch, you can work faster and cleaner.

A lot of jewelers and plumbers use acetylene/air torches, often called
Prestolite torches.
They give a soft heat that is very controllable, and with the size of
the work being done, a MC tank lasts a while.

mbstevens

unread,
Aug 9, 2007, 8:25:32 AM8/9/07
to
Since the majority of jewelry work is hard soldered (brazed), many jewelers use
a big bushy flame that heats the whole piece. I have an oxy-acetylene Little Torch,
but only use it for fusion and casting. For most work I use propane or air-acetylene.
--
mbstevens
http://www.mbstevens.com/x4x2002/index.html

Leo Lichtman

unread,
Aug 9, 2007, 4:04:42 PM8/9/07
to

"mbstevens" wrote: Since the majority of jewelry work is hard soldered
(brazed), many jewelers use a big bushy flame that heats the whole piece.
(clip)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This makes sense for a piece of jewelry that doesn't have other hard
soldered joints that must not remelt. Ernie's use of a small oxy/acet torch
would be best for restricting the spread of heat from other joints.

A second thought: You can always spread the heat by moving a sharp flame,
but you can't focus the heat from a bushy flame.


mbstevens

unread,
Aug 9, 2007, 6:06:46 PM8/9/07
to
Leo Lichtman wrote:
> "mbstevens" wrote: Since the majority of jewelry work is hard soldered
> (brazed), many jewelers use a big bushy flame that heats the whole piece.
> (clip)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This makes sense for a piece of jewelry that doesn't have other hard
> soldered joints that must not remelt. Ernie's use of a small oxy/acet torch
> would be best for restricting the spread of heat from other joints.

Actually, the usual practice is to use 'hard', 'medium', and 'easy' hard solder.
These are more like brazing fillers (not soft solders) that have slightly different
melting points. You start with the highest melting 'hard' solder, then work through
lower melting points on successive attachments. It is very unusual to have a piece
that needs more than these three melting point fillers. The three are available in
both gold and silver from jewelry supply houses.

It is certainly possible to use a small hard flame to hard-solder gold successfully,
but with small pieces of silver you can easily cause the base metal to collapse before
the solder has even had a chance to finish flowing. The other problem with small
oxy-acetylene flames for hard-soldering gold and silver is that it gets quite hard to see
what is going on.

The hard flame does make sense for repairs when you don't know the melting points
of the joins on the already soldered piece.

0 new messages