NASA scientists rebel against man made global warming theory - I am agnostic, but oppose hysteria and bandwagon mentality

[calderco...@gmail.com]

I am concerned that science is being lost in the current man made global warming debate. I do not think man made global warming is either 100% proven or 100% disproven. *Group think* predominates, and we should avoid hysteria. Recent NASA satellite data says there is no shutting of the door to space, that there is no unusual blocking of radiation back into space caused by CO2 levels. Other studies show the earth has warmed in the past with no increase in CO2 levels, and that it is solar radiation levels that drive earth temperature, not CO2 levels. I have done no studies, but do not like the claims that something is absolutely proven beyond doubt when that is not the case at all. See below.

http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/10321/Climate-Dissent-Launches-at-NASA - Rebellion at NASA over man made global warming theory

http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/9908/Is-The-Window-Closing? - Satellites say no man made global warming

Composition of Earth’s atmosphere
FROM: http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7a.html

Nitrogen 78.08%
Oxygen O2 20.95%
Water H2O 0 to 4% depending on location
Argon 0.93%
Carbon Dioxide CO2 0.0360% (Wikipedia says .039% - all sources agree less than .04% - C02 levels fluctuate up and down during the year)
Neon 0.0018%
Helium 0.0005%
Methane CH4 0.00017%
Hydrogen H2 0.00005%
Nitrous Oxide N2O 0.00003%
Ozone O3 0.000004%

[T. Keating]

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:20:58 -0700 (PDT), calderco...@gmail.com
wrote:

>I am concerned that science is being lost in the current man made global warming debate.

> I do not think man made global warming...

snip.. that's right you "do not think"..
That's what makes you so gullible and easy to deceive.

>
>http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/10321/Climate-Dissent-Launches-at-NASA -
>Rebellion at NASA over man made global warming theory

Hah,, a bunch of FORMER engineers and astronauts that used to be
employed at the johnson space center.. (none from NOAA or earth
science divisions).

Not a single one of them is a climate scientist, nor have any morals..
Getting in bed with a coal industry lobbyist..tsk.. tsk.. totally
stupid...

Lastly I snipped, el-dumbbo sat link which doesn't measure surface
temp. (Which is what global warming is all about.. surface get's
warmer, upper atmosphere get's cooler... p.s. you don't average them
together. )

Here is a somewhat rational discussion about your so called
non-rebellion..
http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/04/12/176200/ex-nasa-employees-accuse-agency-of-extreme-position-on-climate-change
"Ex-NASA Employees Accuse Agency of 'Extreme Position' On Climate
Change".

[calderco...@gmail.com]

So all of the many thousands of respected scientists around the world who do not believe that the man made global warming theory is 100% proven are working for the coal industry?

Here is another one.

“We Live in Nineteen Eighty Twelve” (How the political establishment has altered scientific data to fit their cause)

http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/10348/We-Live-in-Nineteen-Eighty-Twelve