Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

How to biuld a home CO2 carbonation system (the nozzle part)

12 views
Skip to first unread message

Elmo

unread,
Apr 3, 2010, 8:36:34 PM4/3/10
to
I've built a home CO2 carbonation system but I have a question about carbon
dioxide flow (see pictures below).
http://yfrog.com/13homec02system5jx

Using a tire valve and a tire chuck, I can easily fill the soda bottle
empty space with 50 psi of carbon dioxide, but that only gets the water
slightly bubbly.

The build-it-yourself tutorials on the web say the carbon dioxide must be
FLOWING and they say they remove the inside part of the automotive tire
valve.

I have tried both ways and have two subsequent questions:

If I keep the tire valve stem (i.e., the white soda top in the photo):
Q: Why doesn't the cold water get more bubbly (like soda) at 50psi?

If I remove the tire valve stem (i.e., the red soda top in the photo):
Q: How do I get the tire chuck to work since it won't flow w/o the stem?
Q: Even if I attach the hollow tire valve directly to the CO2 hose, how can
more than the headspace of the bottle FLOW into the bottle?

I don't get how I can get the CO2 to "flow"; seems to me it would just be
static and fill the headspace.

What am I doing wrong?
See pictures here: http://yfrog.com/13homec02system5jx

Elmo

unread,
Apr 3, 2010, 9:02:24 PM4/3/10
to
> I've built a home CO2 carbonation system but I have a question about carbon
> dioxide flow (see pictures below).
> Q: How do I get the tire chuck to work since it won't flow w/o the stem?
> Q: Even if I attach the hollow tire valve directly to the CO2 hose, how can
> more than the headspace of the bottle FLOW into the bottle?

I forgot to list the URL which said the C02 has to flow:
"Carbonating at Home with Improvised Equipment and Soda Fountains"
(http://www.truetex.com/carbonation.htm)

If I leave the inside of the tire valve in (see white cap in the
pictures at http://yfrog.com/13homec02system5jx), the CO2 carbonization
does not get to the 50psi you'd like that is in the bottle headspace; but
at least the tire valve attached to the hose is operated by the center stem
in the tire valve attached to the soda bottle cap.

Yet, if I remove the center stem from the tire valve (see the red cap
in the pictures at http://yfrog.com/13homec02system5jx), I can't get the
air chuck to operate (since it depends on the center valve to open up).

I'm thinking of just attaching the red cap open tire valve stem
directly to the carbonization hose but even then, I can't, for the
life of me, understand the article's wording that says the CO2 needs to
"flow". (Specifically it says leaving the valve stem on the valve "does not
work because the process requires a continuous flow of CO2 into the
bottle via an open connection".)

What I don't understand is where is the continuous flow into an "open
connection"?

If I clamp the red bottle cap onto the yellow hose (thereby eliminating the
air chuck), it's still a closed system, isn't it? Where does the "flow" of
C02 occur (except momentarily until the headspace of the bottle is
filled to 50psi or so)?

I'm sure I'm missing something simple ... I just do not understand
what I'm missing and I'm hoping someone can point me in the right
direction.

Allodoxaphobia

unread,
Apr 3, 2010, 10:47:41 PM4/3/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 01:02:24 +0000 (UTC), Elmo wrote:
>
> I'm sure I'm missing something simple ...

Indeed!
Like posting in an electronics newsgroup instead of a pneumatics newsgroup.

Dean Hoffman

unread,
Apr 3, 2010, 11:02:19 PM4/3/10
to

Are you suggesting there will be a shortage of hot air?

Jeff Liebermann

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 12:22:39 AM4/4/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 01:02:24 +0000 (UTC), Elmo
<dcdraf...@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote:

>I forgot to list the URL which said the C02 has to flow:
>"Carbonating at Home with Improvised Equipment and Soda Fountains"
>(http://www.truetex.com/carbonation.htm)

I built a carbonator once and made several huge mistakes, some of
which I see in the article. One mistake resulted in 2 liters of
sticky sugar water sprayed all over the kitchen.

The carbonation bottle, as shown, is upside down. You need to bubble
the CO2 gas THROUGH the liquid, not on top of it. A seltzer bottle
does with with a "siphon tube". That will work allowing right side up
carbonation.
<http://www.seltzersisters.com/graphics/bottles/plastic.jpg>

You need a way to bleed off the pressure after carbonating the liquid
or you will have the equivalent of a bottle rocket. The shutoff valve
shown is only part of the puzzle. There needs to be a bleeder valve
between the valve and the seltzer bottle. With a siphon tube, you'll
need to make sure that you don't suck liquid back into the regulator.
Think about a ball-spring type of one-way valve in the filler hose,
near the bottle end.

The tire valve stem and air chuck are a lousy idea but do solve an
important problem. You need to maintain pressure in the bottle after
removing the filler hose. Lots of ways to do that, but the bicycle
valve is probably the least effective. Like a selzer bottle, you need
seperate paths to fill the bottle and to empty the bottle. If vent
the bottle (especially when warm) the gas will simply come out of
solution into the air, leaving you with a flat tasting drink.

Chill or cool the liquid BEFORE filling. It will hold more CO2 and
taste better.

50 PSI is the recommended maximum pressure for the average bottle
rocket. Some maniacs have gone to 100 PSI and up by reinforcing the
bottle with duct tape, but methinks 50 PSI is a good safe limit. If
you want more pressure, get a heavy wall glass bottle (i.e. seltzer
bottle) or aluminum container:
<http://www.amazon.com/b?ie=UTF8&node=49572011>
Note that the tiny CO2 cartridges used in commercial siphon bottle
chargers are filled to about 850 PSI. Commercial bottled seltzer
water is delivered at 135 PSI.

Gourmet Syrup
<http://www.1883.com>

--
Jeff Liebermann je...@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Elmo

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 9:33:46 AM4/4/10
to
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:22:39 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

> I built a carbonator once and made several huge mistakes, some of
> which I see in the article.
> The carbonation bottle, as shown, is upside down.

Hi Jeff,
I solved the problem after reading your response!

I thank you for taking your time to help others. I like the upside-down
idea and I understand your points about the internal pressure and the need
to bleed it off separately - but I wanted to make the right-side-up idea
work first.

The original article said, I had to bubble 4 volumes of carbon dioxide into
the bottle so I had to figure out how to bubble 4 liters of co2 into a 1
liter bottle.

It worked when I removed the stem of the tire valve (pictures here):
http://yfrog.com/13updatehomeco2carbonatiojx

My problem was there is no measurable laminar gas "flow" in either system
(1) tire valve with stem, or (2) tire valve w/o stem.

But, without the stem, the c02 molecules continue to "infuse" into the
liquid until there are 4 liters of c02 in the 1 liter of liquid.

So, I think the word "infuse" would have been better than "flow".

Now I have really good tasting seltzer water, grape juice soda, orange
juice soda, etc.

Thanks all!


Elmo

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 9:35:47 AM4/4/10
to
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:02:19 -0500, Dean Hoffman wrote:

>> Like posting in an electronics newsgroup instead of a pneumatics newsgroup.
> Are you suggesting there will be a shortage of hot air?

Since google sucks at newsgroup searches, I searched both Newsparrot and
Giganews to find a pneumatics newsgroup.

I didn't find any.


Elmo

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 9:41:07 AM4/4/10
to
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:22:39 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

> Some maniacs have gone to 100 PSI and up by reinforcing the
> bottle with duct tape, but methinks 50 PSI is a good safe limit.

The article suggested 150psi (and says 100psi is generated internally if
you drop any common soda bottle); so, as an experiment, I donned welders
garb (helmet, bib, and heavy gloves) and pressurized the 1 liter seltzer
bottle filled with orange juice to 150psi ... and ... nothing happened.

Well, the orange juice was really fizzy when I removed the pressure and
removed the cap; but what I mean is the bottle held 150 psi with aplomb!

I was too scared to go higher than 150 psi though (I had ammo of 800 psi of
c02 available).

I remember reading somewhere they test automotive tires by filling them to
200 psi of water to see if they'll blow (the water apparently lessens the
danger).

Anyway, it's amazing how well engineered a 10 cent throw-away soda bottle
is!

Engineer

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 11:34:32 AM4/4/10
to
On Apr 4, 9:41 am, Elmo <dcdraftwo...@Use-Author-Supplied-

Address.invalid> wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:22:39 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> > Some maniacs have gone to 100 PSI and up by reinforcing the
> > bottle with duct tape, but methinks 50 PSI is a good safe limit.

(snip)

> I remember reading somewhere they test automotive tires by filling them to
> 200 psi of water to see if they'll blow (the water apparently lessens the
> danger).

(snip)

Yes, there's no danger because, being incompressible, it does not
store energy like a pressurized gas. The only stored energy with
water pressurization is strain energy in the vessel, usually quite
small. If the vessel ruptures the pressure instantly goes to zero and
the water just runs out.
Cheers,
Roger

Jeff Liebermann

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 1:24:07 PM4/4/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 13:33:46 +0000 (UTC), Elmo
<dcdraf...@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote:

>It worked when I removed the stem of the tire valve (pictures here):
>http://yfrog.com/13updatehomeco2carbonatiojx

Ok, that's fine. Now, clean up the rest of the mess. The natural
rubber hose is not suitable for dealing with freezing liquids. Put a
piece in the fridge and watch it get stiff and brittle. I suggest you
use clear vinyl or PVC "food grade" hoses, and nylon fittings.

>My problem was there is no measurable laminar gas "flow" in either system
>(1) tire valve with stem, or (2) tire valve w/o stem.
>
>But, without the stem, the c02 molecules continue to "infuse" into the
>liquid until there are 4 liters of c02 in the 1 liter of liquid.

You can measure the amount of dissolved CO2 with a pH meter or pH
testing paper:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonic_acid>
See chart on acidity.

>So, I think the word "infuse" would have been better than "flow".

Why so complexicated? Infusion is more like a slow leak into the
liquid. What you're really complaining about it is that it takes some
time for the gas to dissolve in the liquid. It doesn't happen
instantly. Patience. You can speed things up by increasing the
surface area of the gas bubbles, using smaller bubbles or a manifold
like contraption with more holes. Even so, it does take a while for
the gas to dissolve.

>Now I have really good tasting seltzer water, grape juice soda, orange
>juice soda, etc.

Light reading:
<http://www.ehow.com/carbonated-water/>

Have fun... (burp, belch, hiccup).

Message has been deleted

Elmo

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 2:05:47 PM4/4/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 13:41:07 +0000 (UTC), Elmo wrote:

> The article suggested 150psi (and says 100psi is generated internally if
> you drop any common soda bottle); so, as an experiment, I donned welders
> garb (helmet, bib, and heavy gloves) and pressurized the 1 liter seltzer
> bottle filled with orange juice to 150psi ... and ... nothing happened.

Correction!

The article suggested 50psi! (not 150psi).
http://www.truetex.com/carbonation.htm

Elmo

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 2:10:33 PM4/4/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:34:32 -0700 (PDT), Engineer wrote:

> Path: aioe.org!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z3g2000yqz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Engineer <junk...@rogers.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.home.repair,sci.electronics.repair
> Subject: Re: How to build a home CO2 carbonation system (the nozzle part)
> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 22
> Message-ID: <8a8bf04f-e954-4e88...@z3g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>
> References: <hp8muh$1v7$1...@tioat.net> <hp8oev$2dl$1...@tioat.net>
> <693gr51633o5copge...@4ax.com> <hpa4tj$eka$1...@tioat.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.112.36.42
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1270395272 4072 127.0.0.1 (4 Apr 2010 15:34:32 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 15:34:32 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
> Injection-Info: z3g2000yqz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.112.36.42;
> posting-account=7eatwQoAAAA7jEgZiH-tBO0RJMP2eeGB
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3)
> Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
> Xref: aioe.org alt.home.repair:89991 sci.electronics.repair:20732
>
> On Apr 4, 9:41=A0am, Elmo <dcdraftwo...@Use-Author-Supplied-


> Address.invalid> wrote:
>> On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:22:39 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>>> Some maniacs have gone to 100 PSI and up by reinforcing the
>>> bottle with duct tape, but methinks 50 PSI is a good safe limit.
>
> (snip)
>

>> I remember reading somewhere they test automotive tires by filling them t=


> o
>> 200 psi of water to see if they'll blow (the water apparently lessens the
>> danger).
>
> (snip)
>
> Yes, there's no danger because, being incompressible, it does not
> store energy like a pressurized gas. The only stored energy with
> water pressurization is strain energy in the vessel, usually quite
> small. If the vessel ruptures the pressure instantly goes to zero and
> the water just runs out.
> Cheers,
> Roger

Does that mean that, if I fill the juice bottle with juice, and then
pressurize the head space to, say 200 psi (or whatever it takes to burst
the bottle or cap), that the danger is less (than if I filled it purely
with gas)?

The hose is beverage hose so it seems to take 150psi without problems.
The bottle seems to take 150psi without problems and the tire valve doesn't
seem to leak from the top so I wonder what happens if I fill it to
bursting.

What can we predict will happen if I have, say, an inch or two of headspace
and I pressurize the bottle to bursting (either glass or plastic)?

I suspect the glass would be too dangerous to even try (although glass
would hold up to higher pressure ... maybe even the 800 psi of the carbon
dioxide tank???).

I suspect the bottle top will blow off the threads before the bottle
explodes or before the hose expands. The top has a brass tire valve in it
so obviously you'd want it to be aimed the other way from your face.

Unanswered questions:
Do you think the bottle will blow first or the cap off the threads?
Do you think glass will withstand the entire 800 psi of the C02 tank?

Jeff Liebermann

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 4:21:31 PM4/4/10
to
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 10:24:07 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com>
wrote:

>Infusion is more like a slow leak into the
>liquid. What you're really complaining about it is that it takes some
>time for the gas to dissolve in the liquid. It doesn't happen
>instantly. Patience. You can speed things up by increasing the
>surface area of the gas bubbles, using smaller bubbles or a manifold
>like contraption with more holes. Even so, it does take a while for
>the gas to dissolve.

I just re-read the original article and noticed that the author
recommends agitation under pressure to help with dissolution. That
strikes me as a bit dangerous as aggitation is a great way to trigger
a rupture, but will help disolved the gas. Hmmm.... maybe a paint
shaker?

Bob F

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 4:54:45 PM4/4/10
to


Just keep adding CO2 every several hours until you reach the desired carbonation
level. After you pressurize the airspace, the CO2 will be gradually absorbed
into the water, and the pressure in the airspace will drop until it reaches
equilibrium. Or, you can attach the CO2, and shake the bottle to speed the
absorbtion. Beginning with the water very cold will speed the process. As you
shake the bottle, the CO2 quickly disolves into the water, and you will likely
hear the CO2 flow out of the regulator as you do. Do this for a bit, then turn
off the CO2 (leaving it attached) and continue shaking until the pressure at the
guage quits going down. The guage will then show approximately the equilibrium
pressure at the current temperature of the water in the bottle. You can repeat
this until you reach the desired carbonation.


Jeffrey D Angus

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 5:07:13 PM4/4/10
to
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> I just re-read the original article and noticed that the author
> recommends agitation under pressure to help with dissolution. That
> strikes me as a bit dangerous as aggitation is a great way to trigger
> a rupture, but will help disolved the gas. Hmmm.... maybe a paint
> shaker?

It's beginning to sound as dangerous as the new "Shake and
Bake" method for making Meth in 2 liter bottled.

Jeff

--
“Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity.”
Frank Leahy, Head coach, Notre Dame 1941-1954

http://www.stay-connect.com

Elmo

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 6:32:48 PM4/4/10
to
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 13:21:31 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

> aggitation is a great way to trigger a rupture,
> but will help disolved the gas.

The agitation works. My orange juice is now fully carbonated.

As for the explosion ... in all the home carbonation articles I could find
on the net (see below), not one discusses a rupture actually occuring.
http://www.truetex.com/carbonation.htm
http://jmillerid.com/wordpress/2010/03/home-carbonation/
http://foo.net/~jmgray/carbonation/
http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/001818.php
http://www.instructables.com/id/DIY-Soda-Water-&-Home-Carbonation---Pays-For-Itsel/
http://mendax.org/2008/05/02/carbonating-water-at-home/
http://www.inventionsthatwork.com/carbonator.htm
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.home.repair/msg/24e7cf7f24d463e5

I'm not brave enough to go over 150psi for a soda bottle, so, I'll have to
leave it to others to say exactly what overpressure causes an explosion ...
but I'd say, based on my one experience and my search, that explosion
rarely (if ever) occurs at the pressures needed for home carbonation.

I agree that your upside-down suggestion is better from the standpoint of
C02 contact with the liquid (no need to shake) ... but it's just so much
harder to accomplish that the right-side up with agitation method seems
safe for most of us.

Elmo

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 6:36:15 PM4/4/10
to
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:07:13 -0500, Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

> It's beginning to sound as dangerous as the new "Shake and
> Bake" method for making Meth in 2 liter bottled.

Let's be serious. Out of the entire google record, there's not one recorded
case of a bottle exploding (that I can find) ... so is it that dangerous?

Maybe the danger you speak of is regarding the C02 tank itself (admittedly
a bomb if the neck ever failed); however, lots of people have oxygen tanks
in their homes which is far more dangerous than C02 (I would think), and
they're not scared.

If anyone can find, on record, a case of a home carbonation system
exploding the bottle (there's one case where the hose melted because it was
too close to heat), then that would be interesting.

Elmo

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 6:42:43 PM4/4/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 13:54:45 -0700, Bob F wrote:

> The guage will then show approximately the equilibrium
> pressure at the current temperature of the water in the bottle. You can repeat
> this until you reach the desired carbonation.

I was able to carbonate (explained in a thread where I corrected the
spelling of "build" in the title).

Basically, there are two fundamental methods:
1. Tire valve with the stem intact ... or ...
2. Tire valve with the stem removed.

It takes only about a minute to fully carbonate a liter of liquid with the
stem removed. The "flow" I had trouble understanding was a static
"infusion" of carbon dioxide molecules into the fluid based on the partial
pressure of C02 in the air space above the liquid and the partial pressure
of C02 in the liquid; not a literal air-stream flow that was discernible.

Method 1, as you noted, will work; it just takes a LOT longer with static
C02 pressure because it takes about 4 volumes of C02 (i.e., 4 liters) to
fully carbonate 1 volume of liquid (i.e., 1 liter).

aemeijers

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 7:59:21 PM4/4/10
to

Perhaps a stupid question, but have you tried simply mixing frozen
concentrate with fizzy water? Or for that matter, just mixing the jug
juice half-and-half with fizzy water? I'd bet in a blind taste test,
your mouth could not tell the difference after the first sip, between
that and your injected fizzy.

I know, it's an engineer thing- I wouldn't understand. Anybody remember
how they did 'needle beer' during prohibition?

--
aem sends...

k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 9:06:51 PM4/4/10
to

Dunno, but according to my parents "bathtub gin" was all the rage. ;-)

Bob F

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 9:37:54 PM4/4/10
to
Elmo wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 13:21:31 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>
>> aggitation is a great way to trigger a rupture,
>> but will help disolved the gas.
>
> The agitation works. My orange juice is now fully carbonated.
>
> As for the explosion ... in all the home carbonation articles I could
> find on the net (see below), not one discusses a rupture actually
> occuring. http://www.truetex.com/carbonation.htm
> http://jmillerid.com/wordpress/2010/03/home-carbonation/
> http://foo.net/~jmgray/carbonation/
> http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/001818.php
> http://www.instructables.com/id/DIY-Soda-Water-&-Home-Carbonation---Pays-For-Itsel/
> http://mendax.org/2008/05/02/carbonating-water-at-home/
> http://www.inventionsthatwork.com/carbonator.htm
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.home.repair/msg/24e7cf7f24d463e5
>
> I'm not brave enough to go over 150psi for a soda bottle, so, I'll
> have to leave it to others to say exactly what overpressure causes an
> explosion ... but I'd say, based on my one experience and my search,
> that explosion rarely (if ever) occurs at the pressures needed for
> home carbonation.
>

There's really no reason to go anywhere near 150 psi. 50 psi is more than you'll
ever need unless your just in a panic of a hurry. And there's no danger in
agitating it as long as you are not hitting the bottle with a sharp object. Just
shake the bottle. Even just shake the top back and forth to make crashing waves,
which increases surface area and CO2 absorbtion. Shaking the bottle decreases
the pressure, as the CO2 disolves into the water. It does not increase the
pressure because the pressure at the top is higher than the stabile pressure in
the CO2 in solution.


> I agree that your upside-down suggestion is better from the
> standpoint of C02 contact with the liquid (no need to shake) ... but
> it's just so much harder to accomplish that the right-side up with
> agitation method seems safe for most of us.

You could make a filler cap with a 5 micron air stone that reaches to the bottom
of the bottle. Or, you can shake the bottle, or just be more patient.


Elmo

unread,
Apr 4, 2010, 11:41:48 PM4/4/10
to
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:59:21 -0400, aemeijers wrote:

> Perhaps a stupid question, but have you tried simply mixing frozen
> concentrate with fizzy water? Or for that matter, just mixing the jug
> juice half-and-half with fizzy water?

Hmmm... That might be interesting.

I did understand your point. What you're saying is that a blind taste test
might not know the difference if we either
(a) Mix 1/2 seltzer + 1/2 water, or,
(b) Mix 1/2 seltzer + 1/2 juice.

The pro is that this is as simple as it gets ... Of course, the obvious con
might be that test (a) isn't bubbly enough and test (b) is too diluted (in
addition to potentially not being bubbly enough).

But it's worth a try from someone out there.

BTW, I saw articles suggesting dropping a chunk of dry ice into the liquid
(outside, in case it pops the top when the very cold dry ice fizzes into
the not as cold liquid). That would accomplish the same thing as you are
suggesting.

Bob F

unread,
Apr 5, 2010, 1:06:42 AM4/5/10
to

I keep a "corney keg" of water (5 gal soda keg) full of water and carbonated,
with a tap. I often just put a spoonful of flavoring, like "coffee syrup
flavors" into a glass and top it off with the soda water.


Elmo

unread,
Apr 5, 2010, 1:06:46 AM4/5/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:37:54 -0700, Bob F wrote:

>> I agree that your upside-down suggestion is better from the
>> standpoint of C02 contact with the liquid (no need to shake)
> You could make a filler cap with a 5 micron air stone that reaches to the bottom
> of the bottle. Or, you can shake the bottle, or just be more patient.

That's another interesting idea!

Looking up air stones, I find such a thing exists (aka diffusion stone):
http://www.homebrewing.com/equipment/stainless-steel-air-stone.php
http://www.baderbrewing.com/store/product.php?productid=21801
http://www.brewingkb.com/equipment/diffusion-stone-687.html

Right now, I have August Schrader's valve (.305" OD, 32 tpi or 7.7 mm OD,
32 threads per inch), which was chosen for ease of installation (5/16th
inch hole) and sealability (rubber gaskets & tie-down nut).

We could put a similar threaded pipe sticking halfway on each side of the
soda cap. On the bottom half (the half that goes into the bottle), we could
put a hose and the 5 痠 "air stone".

I would assume the air stone should be large in relation to the bottom of
the bottle so as to get as great a surface area as possible to bubble up
since the pressure will soon equilibrate, hence the bubbling would (I
guess) stop in seconds.

Of course, the partial pressure of C02 is what matters so, even though the
bubbling that pressurizes the 1 liter soda bottle stops, the inside of the
bottle will be pressurized to 50 psi.

This diffusion stone idea just might work.

Elmo

unread,
Apr 5, 2010, 1:08:12 AM4/5/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:37:54 -0700, Bob F wrote:

> Shaking the bottle decreases the pressure, as the CO2 disolves into the water.
> It does not increase the pressure because the pressure at the top is higher
> than the stabile pressure in the CO2 in solution.

Very astute observation!

I love the healthy exchange of ideas!

LM

unread,
Apr 5, 2010, 2:33:38 AM4/5/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 22:32:48 +0000 (UTC), Elmo wrote:

This guy carbonates in GLASS bottles (using a 2 micron carbonation stone)!
http://www.winslam.com/laramee/blog/_entry/2008/07/26/Advancing-the-State-of-DIY-Carbonation.html

By the way, the air-chuck idea promoted in some of these articles doesn't
work as well as connections that are constantly open to the carbon dioxide.

Also, a quick call to the 800 Coca-Cola number confirms the 2-liter Coke
bottles are tested at 200 psi (amazing that they get this question often).

WARNING: California outlawed many brass fittings as of January 1, 2010, so
those of you in the tax state may have trouble buying lead-free fittings on
line (most non-California brass fittings have up to 2% lead for ease of
machining).

LM

unread,
Apr 5, 2010, 2:56:14 AM4/5/10
to

Bob F

unread,
Apr 5, 2010, 3:05:13 AM4/5/10
to

I think I'll just stick to a CO2 tank and regulator.

Bob F

unread,
Apr 5, 2010, 3:10:34 AM4/5/10
to
Elmo wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:37:54 -0700, Bob F wrote:
>
>>> I agree that your upside-down suggestion is better from the
>>> standpoint of C02 contact with the liquid (no need to shake)
>> You could make a filler cap with a 5 micron air stone that reaches
>> to the bottom of the bottle. Or, you can shake the bottle, or just
>> be more patient.
>
> That's another interesting idea!
>
> Looking up air stones, I find such a thing exists (aka diffusion
> stone):
> http://www.homebrewing.com/equipment/stainless-steel-air-stone.php
> http://www.baderbrewing.com/store/product.php?productid=21801
> http://www.brewingkb.com/equipment/diffusion-stone-687.html
>
> Right now, I have August Schrader's valve (.305" OD, 32 tpi or 7.7 mm
> OD, 32 threads per inch), which was chosen for ease of installation
> (5/16th inch hole) and sealability (rubber gaskets & tie-down nut).
>
> We could put a similar threaded pipe sticking halfway on each side of
> the soda cap. On the bottom half (the half that goes into the
> bottle), we could put a hose and the 5 �m "air stone".

>
> I would assume the air stone should be large in relation to the
> bottom of the bottle so as to get as great a surface area as possible
> to bubble up since the pressure will soon equilibrate, hence the
> bubbling would (I guess) stop in seconds.
>
> Of course, the partial pressure of C02 is what matters so, even
> though the bubbling that pressurizes the 1 liter soda bottle stops,
> the inside of the bottle will be pressurized to 50 psi.
>
> This diffusion stone idea just might work.

Myself - I wouldn't bother. I've read a lot about this kind of thing for corney
kegs, but find for myself that just applying pressure and shaking them does the
job just fine. Other times, I just turn on the high pressure every time I wander
by the keg for a few seconds, until I get the pressure I want. You could do
either with your bottles and It will work fine too. The more open space at the
top of the bottle, the less times you will need to repeat the CO2 addition for
the desired result.


Wild_Bill

unread,
Apr 6, 2010, 12:39:48 AM4/6/10
to
http://www.truetex.com/carbonation.htm

--
Cheers,
WB
.............


"Elmo" <dcdraf...@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote in message
news:hp8muh$1v7$1...@tioat.net...

Elmo

unread,
Apr 6, 2010, 3:28:32 PM4/6/10
to
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 00:39:48 -0400, Wild_Bill wrote:

> http://www.truetex.com/carbonation.htm

Indeed! That Richard J. Kinch treatise, titled " Carbonating at Home with
Improvised Equipment" was what gave me the idea to build my own carbonator.
He delved into the SCIENCE of it all; which gave me courage!

But even that wonderful tutorial missed out on a few points. For example,
"infusion" and not "flow" are what he should have used to describe how you
get 4 liters of CO2 into a 1 liter bottle of Orange Juice in a closed
system.

Also, he didn't describe some technical points, some of which are listed in
this CO2 Dynamics web site
(http://www.warpig.com/paintball/technical/gasses/co2dynamics.shtml)
such as a "full" tank contains only about 34% liquid CO2.

But most surprising (to me), was the statement that the pressure of a co2
tank has nothing to do with the amount of co2 in the tank; the pressure (as
long as there is "some" liquid in it) is always dependent solely upon the
temperature.

"At room temperature (70°F) it's about 853 psi."

So, with my new carbon dioxide tank, I'm not sure how I tell how much co2
is left in the tank. Does anyone know how you tell when it's getting low?

Elmo

unread,
Apr 6, 2010, 3:33:56 PM4/6/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC), Elmo wrote:

> http://www.truetex.com/carbonation.htm

Given a co2 tank at 72°F has a pressure of 860 psi (as long as there is
some liquid still in the tank) according to this nice C02 tank care
article:
http://www.reefscapes.net/articles/breefcase/co2_tanks.html

I'm curious ...
Q1: How do you know when you're "almost out" of liquid in a C02 tank???

Sjouke Burry

unread,
Apr 6, 2010, 3:41:04 PM4/6/10
to
Shake it, dont stir. (according to J.B.)

Elmo

unread,
Apr 6, 2010, 3:44:13 PM4/6/10
to
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 23:33:38 -0700, LM wrote:

> Also, a quick call to the 800 Coca-Cola number confirms the 2-liter Coke
> bottles are tested at 200 psi (amazing that they get this question often).

I'm learning more and more how to build (and maintain for safety) a home
carbonating system!

Since C02 pressure is around 800 psi, I was wondering why my C02 gauge goes
muuuch higher. I found out the Co2 pressure is logarithmically temperature
related ... so at reasonably warm summer temperatures (over 90°F), the C02
tank pressure could climb over 1200psi!

So, the first thing is to keep the tank covered from sunlight!

Also keep the C02 tank vertical! This article explains why.
http://www.csd.net/~cgadd/aqua/diy_co2rig.htm

BTW, some people use C02 tanks to fill large off-road tires because a
typical air tank (they say) doesn't hold enough air. Interesting:
http://www.stu-offroad.com/recovery/co2/co2-1.htm

Elmo

unread,
Apr 6, 2010, 3:55:20 PM4/6/10
to
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:59:21 -0400, aemeijers wrote:

> I know, it's an engineer thing- I wouldn't understand.

Yes. I'm trying to learn as much as I can about the proper assembling & use
of a home carbon dioxide soda fountain.

Another thing I learned is that I should NOT have used that Teflon tape to
seal all the joints in the regulators and hoses! :()

According to this article (http://www.thekrib.com/Plants/CO2/bottle.html),
Teflon "flows" and refuses to "wet" but it "shreds", thereby fouling the
regulators.

So far, I think I've made every mistake you can make! :(
- I had the C02 bottle on its side
- I pressurized the soda bottle to 150psi
- I used Teflon tape to seal the high-pressure fittings
- I used a tire chuck with an intact Schrader valve (instead of removing
the stem of the Schrader valve)
etc.

But, I'm learning ... Any advice you can give is always welcome!

Don Klipstein

unread,
Apr 6, 2010, 9:41:07 PM4/6/10
to

With a little personal experience, you can tell by the weight of the
tank.

And once the liquid is completely gone and the pressure starts dropping,
you probably have a few days of usefulness remaining. A few liters of CO2
at 800 PSI is enough to carbonate 10's of liters of soda before the
pressure in the tank drops to the 100-120 PSI or so used for carbonation.

- Don Klipstein (d...@misty.com)

Jeff Liebermann

unread,
Apr 6, 2010, 10:23:43 PM4/6/10
to
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 19:28:32 +0000 (UTC), Elmo
<dcdraf...@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote:

>So, with my new carbon dioxide tank, I'm not sure how I tell how much co2
>is left in the tank. Does anyone know how you tell when it's getting low?

Ummm... arithmetic? Weigh the empty tank (or ask the supplier for the
empty weight). Weigh the tank with whatever amount of C02 you have
left. The difference is how many pounds of C02 you have left.

You can also sorta do it the same way as with a propane tank. Get a
liquid crystal thermometer strip and glue it vertically to the side of
the tank. Leak a little gas and you should see the warm/cold liquid
dividing line. The problem is that the propane tank is quite thin
compared to most CO2 tanks, thus making the thicker CO2 tank more
difficult to see the dividing line. It also works best with steel
tanks, and doesn't work at all with aluminum.
<http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=gTkeAAAAEBAJ&dq=4358955>
You can also use an IR thermometer to locate the liquid level.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com je...@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS

Bob F

unread,
Apr 7, 2010, 11:18:00 AM4/7/10
to

Weigh it, perhaps?


0 new messages