>God's invention of top grade cannabis. Beats them all
>chronologically and functionally.
That was botanists and chemists, hail to the botanists and chemists, praise them ! Glory !
But I was thinking, the transistor. Without that the computer you are looking at right now would take a whole building and draw probably 1,000 amps to run.
That good smoke has been around for some time, my cousin knew where to get it. It was $400 an ounce just like today but $400 was a hell of alot more money back then. but do you really call a little cross breding n shirt like that INVENTING ? I am not so sure.
Like the transistor, with that one discovery they went on to build myriads of devices once they figured out how to handle the dopants n shit, and photography does play a role in that
Actually thinking about it, nothing in electronics has been invented since 1957, it is all an extension of the old invention. Actually do all inventions count ? Like ovonics, that idea could have passed the transistor but they had years to better the transistor and ovonics was not looking like it would beat crystal silicon in performance. It did however have the advantage of being able to withstand much higher temperatures.
Not a real expert on it but from what I have gleaned ovonics is part of the technology now used in PVs. Developed in the 1970s by a gut named Olshevski I think, something like that. Maybe that was a real invention, but does it count when it sat dormant for decades ?
Since this is sci.ELECTRONICS.design I figured we were talking within that paradigm. However if we are to go back farther, I think language was the most important. And that means all language. Even a deaf mute species can use body language and pictures. Pretty important, if them guys at Bell could not talk to each other it would be damn hard to invent a transistor. If ovonics had come out at the same time it might have been competition, but they had a couple decades to figure out how to make better transistors. I got this old transistor spec book, I joke that it goes back to 2N1. Tht is not literally true but some of those old transistors, well all I can say is I can see why there were still tubes in stuff. I mean you got Vcemax 25, Icmax 0.100, hfe 5, Ft 35KHz. Who the hell wants it ? Ovonics could have been a real player if they had all kinds of time to develop it. Actually it is silicon, but not crystalline, no lattice. Amorphous.
I read something it had no problem with like 400ºF but much higher and the glass, which is what it is, loses its viscosity. I hope I can assume that everybody here knows glass is a liquid. Once it is not really "ice" anymore shit will happen.
They could build a power device, in fact some really interesting ones that you would derate at X Watts/degree centigrade to 400ºC. However the gain and frequency response would be such that it just ain't worth it. But since a paart of the ttechnology is used maybe it does count.
We have to watch what we call an invention. you design a circuit, you did not design all the components. Even Jim didn't. even fucking with designing masks and all this shit for ICs, the devices printed in those chips are still extant.
And we do need to look for prior art. Not so much in the patent realm but for example, disk brakes-Cord. Lockup torque convertor, if I remembered the year that came out few would believe there were even automatic transmissions back then. Electric car, before 1910. At one time they had mechanical computers and I don't mean an abacus. I mean motors and gears and cams and pawls and all that cool shit.
Even the old automatic transmissions before the car computers, the valve body actually did constitute an analog hydraulic computer. it took inputs for the vacuum, speed, throttle and convertor presure that tells it the actual load and took actions to keep the engine in its optimum torque (and efficiency) range. Bosch had a totally mechanical fuel injection system, had the mass air flow sensor, AND a vacuum sensor and a few other inputs and regulated the mixture better than any simple carb could ever do, and not one transistor or diode in it. Diesel engines... oh that remonds me;
We (meaning our crowd) bought a car from this young dude, it had a diesel engine in it. He is trying to show us he can get it started and he is pumping the gas. I said that does no good. He said "I heard you pump any engine that is not fuel injected". Yeah well that is not true, maybe of old Fords but not GM, you hit it twice and THEN turn the key and she will go. But it was a diesel, it IS fuel injected. Where do they get that superior education from ?
The car is not a bad entry in and of itself. Before that they used to burn gasoline outside, it was a byproduct. but thanks to Henry Ford and Adolf Hitler who put cars in the hands of the commoners this changed drastically. Before that, well there was Ransom Eli Olds, got the thing started but cars were only for the rich. Not much demand. People did not want it in their houses for heat of light because it stinks. Plus it is TOO flammable. Yeah i know you can throw a match into a bucket of gasoline and it won't light, but if you look at it wrong it might. Burning it in the fields was a way to get the land to grow fallow, so that crops would grow better, and better food later. They understood about played out land. Nobody thinks about that today and now we got diseases by the truckload. About 70% of them can be traced back to malnutrition. I got the fucking data. Even on this piece of shit PC, I copied in on here a while back for quick reference.
I got a killer design for an audiophile quality amp. I know what those people want and I have come up with something really new. It uses a resistive divider network that keeps the drivers and predrivers in their most linear operating range, and with balls behind it. So I get the good damping factor as well as low distortion, and there is ot global feedback loop. it has everything these lunatics want.
Did I invent something ? All I did was use the parts in a different way. Is it patentable ? I am damn sure it is, but does it really qualify as an invention ?
The question in the OP is too broad unless you write a book about it. I am not abject to doing so but nobody wants to read it.
So in that I yield the floor with this - define invention.