Well, it says "Flammable" right on the white out bottle and sure smells
like a volitile hydrocarbon to me!
So what would the formerly-available whiteout-thinner have been? Is it a
product easily available from a chemical supply house? I imagine several
things could substitute. If possible I wouldn't want one that stinks
worse than the whiteout itself.
Thanks!
-Ron Snider-
--
***My Karma ran over my Dogma***
- Anonymous (?)
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
ron_s...@my-deja.com schrieb:
> I used to be able to buy "whiteout thinner" at rediculously
> expensive-for-the-quantity prices, in little white-out sized bottles.
> Now the local Office Depot, etc. doesn't carry it....with one clerk
> claiming that the thinner "was banned and the whiteout's are now
> water-based anyway"!
AFAIK, the thinner used to be 1,2-dichloroethane until a few years ago, at
least here in europe. I suppose it was exchanged because of possible
toxicity/cancerogenity, but I do not know what it has been replaced by. The
original liquid might be available from pharmacies, an of course from
chemical suppliers/wholesalers.
aggy
The real stuff used 1,1,1-trichlorethane as solvent which was cheap,
effective, and safe. This violated the Three Cardinal Rules of
Environmntalism: Expensive, Shabby, Deadly. Consider airbags or MTBE
in gasoline.
--
Uncle Al Schwartz
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
http://www.ultra.net.au/~wisby/uncleal/
http://www.guyy.demon.co.uk/uncleal/
http://uncleal.within.net/
(Toxic URLs! Unsafe for children, Democrats, and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
While I have your attention: what is a good general purpose thinner for
dried-out "magic markers"?
-Ron Snider-
ron_s...@my-deja.com wrote:
Plain old ethanol works quite well on most types. Ethyl acetate if you want
a slower evap. rate.
regards
Barry Hunt
ron_s...@my-deja.com wrote:
> I used to be able to buy "whiteout thinner" at rediculously
> expensive-for-the-quantity prices, in little white-out sized bottles.
> Now the local Office Depot, etc. doesn't carry it....with one clerk
> claiming that the thinner "was banned and the whiteout's are now
> water-based anyway"!
>
> Well, it says "Flammable" right on the white out bottle and sure smells
> like a volitile hydrocarbon to me!
>
> So what would the formerly-available whiteout-thinner have been? Is it a
> product easily available from a chemical supply house? I imagine several
> things could substitute. If possible I wouldn't want one that stinks
> worse than the whiteout itself.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Ron Snider-
>
> --
> ***My Karma ran over my Dogma***
> - Anonymous (?)
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Here in Aus. we used to have 111Trichloroethane which was banned mainly for
ozone-layer reasons (rather than toxicity as such).
Then we had Hydrocarbon - prob. hexanes/heptanes fraction. This is of course
flammable!!
Now we have water-based, which is environmentally low-impact, fairly low
toxicity, and doesn't work very well - if it did we would have used it in
the first place. The water makes the stuff horribly slow drying, and it
swells the fibres in the paper leaving a permanent blotch.
regards
Barry Hunt
Spow.
p.s. Why don't you just buy some new liquid paper or, alternatively,
remember to shake the bottle before and after use, after tightening the cap
correctly.
The caps are always put back on tightly...but still the shelf-life of
the current crop of whiteout's seems awfully short. Maybe it's the
brand.
In article <7j9int$1k0$1...@epos.tesco.net>,
--
Original Liquid Paper: Inexpensive, excellent, safe.
Environmentalist-improved Liquid Paper: Expensive, shoddy, deadly.
Eden has been reborn. If you do not like it, then you are not qualified
to judge. THOUGHTCRIME!