I've got an http webhook endpoint configured and working, and I'm trying to configure an https webhook endpoint but am meeting with difficulty. Both http and https endpoints are the same server, an nginx frontend proxying to gunicorn/Flask.
I can POST data to my https endpoint (using curl) from my scalr server with no issues, but any scalr-triggered notifications are failing.
[01/Nov/2016 21:05:31][ dbqueue_event][ 16163] ERROR Unable to process webhook: 1B700AFC1B9B443DA4CDAE8520DC69FC, reason: <type 'exceptions.TypeError'> __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'server_hostname'
I've got debug logging enabled on my webhook endpoint, and am not seeing any access attempts (in nginx/access.log), any errors (in nginx/errors.log), or any indication that the notification payload has reached my endpoint (the first thing my endpoint does on entry is print to the logger "Data received" or something similar)
tcpdump output showing syn/ack and fin/ack but no push between the scalr server (10.100.252.28) and the relay (10.2.209.162):
21:25:48.118617 IP 10.100.252.28.56594 > 10.2.209.162.https: Flags [S], seq 1803375911, win 26883, options [mss 1379,sackOK,TS val 3392812082 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
21:25:48.118666 IP 10.2.209.162.https > 10.100.252.28.56594: Flags [S.], seq 2422394964, ack 1803375912, win 26844, options [mss 8960,sackOK,TS val 2308329776 ecr 3392812082,nop,wscale 7], length 0
21:25:48.118752 IP 10.100.252.28.56595 > 10.2.209.162.https: Flags [S], seq 4126344781, win 26883, options [mss 1379,sackOK,TS val 3392812082 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
21:25:48.118762 IP 10.2.209.162.https > 10.100.252.28.56595: Flags [S.], seq 3138004224, ack 4126344782, win 26844, options [mss 8960,sackOK,TS val 2308329776 ecr 3392812082,nop,wscale 7], length 0
21:25:48.130091 IP 10.100.252.28.56594 > 10.2.209.162.https: Flags [.], ack 1, win 211, options [nop,nop,TS val 3392812094 ecr 2308329776], length 0
21:25:48.130116 IP 10.100.252.28.56595 > 10.2.209.162.https: Flags [.], ack 1, win 211, options [nop,nop,TS val 3392812094 ecr 2308329776], length 0
21:25:48.138606 IP 10.100.252.28.56594 > 10.2.209.162.https: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 211, options [nop,nop,TS val 3392812102 ecr 2308329776], length 0
21:25:48.138652 IP 10.2.209.162.https > 10.100.252.28.56594: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 2, win 210, options [nop,nop,TS val 2308329796 ecr 3392812102], length 0
21:25:48.147263 IP 10.100.252.28.56595 > 10.2.209.162.https: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 211, options [nop,nop,TS val 3392812110 ecr 2308329776], length 0
21:25:48.147300 IP 10.2.209.162.https > 10.100.252.28.56595: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 2, win 210, options [nop,nop,TS val 2308329805 ecr 3392812110], length 0
21:25:48.149932 IP 10.100.252.28.56594 > 10.2.209.162.https: Flags [.], ack 2, win 211, options [nop,nop,TS val 3392812113 ecr 2308329796], length 0
21:25:48.158661 IP 10.100.252.28.56595 > 10.2.209.162.https: Flags [.], ack 2, win 211, options [nop,nop,TS val 3392812122 ecr 2308329805], length 0
Does anyone have any guidance here? The http webhook is working and I can continue using it for now, but I really would rather have a secure endpoint - there are credentials stored in global variables that I need to access on my webhook endpoint, so I can't just toggle "Don't expose private global variables".