Hi Bikram,
I moved this post to it's own thread as, previously, it was a response to the survey announcement. The short answer to your question is that this is not, by itself, necessarily a serious error or problem.
This means that salmon detected that > 5% of the data disagreed with (i.e. was not compatible with) the fragment library type you provided. For example, you said the data was paired end, but the strand
specificity was less than 95%, or you said it was unstranded and there was a strand bias > 5%. This threshold (5%) is fairly conservative, and we decided it's better to warn the user of a potential issue than
to let it go undiscovered. Of course, you should take a look at the json file to see how different the rate actually is, and double-check that you are passing the right library type.
Best,
Rob