Groups
Sign in
Groups
sage-support
Conversations
Labels
About
Send feedback
Help
ideal in ring of integers: QQ vs number field
54 views
Skip to first unread message
Samuel Lelièvre
unread,
May 23, 2015, 8:33:54 AM
5/23/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Sage-support
Just to bring atttention to a question at math.stackexchange:
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1294942/mathbbq-isnt-a-number-field-for-sage
Nils Bruin
unread,
May 23, 2015, 12:33:43 PM
5/23/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to sage-s...@googlegroups.com
The same workaround that works in magma, also works in sage:
sage: K=NumberField(x-1,'a')
sage: OK=K.ring_of_integers()
sage: 3*OK/5*OK
Fractional ideal (3/5)
So at least it's possible to construct a number field in Sage that is isomorphic to QQ.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages