Call for vote: remove MoinMoin?
John H Palmieri
Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
[ ] Convert to optional
[ ] Get rid of altogether
(It's easy to get rid of: see <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12713>.)
--
John
Jason Grout
> This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various
> threads, but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
>
> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
>
> [ ] Yes
> [ ] No
Yes
>
> If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or
> does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
>
> [ ] Convert to optional
> [ ] Get rid of altogether
Convert to optional only if someone volunteers to maintain it. If not,
get rid of it altogether.
Thanks,
Jason
leif
> On 3/27/12 12:10 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> > This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various
> > threads, but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
>
> > Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
>
> > [ ] Yes
> > [ ] No
>
> Yes
> > If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or
> > does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
>
> > [ ] Convert to optional
> > [ ] Get rid of altogether
>
> Convert to optional only if someone volunteers to maintain it. If not,
> get rid of it altogether.
version will still be available online)
-leif
P.S.: IIRC we already had some (probably to hidden?) poll on another
thread, which led to the ticket [1] we already have.
[1] http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12713
John H Palmieri
I don't know if there was actually a poll, or just several people agreeing that it was a good idea. I started this thread to clarify the discussion and make sure we heard whether there were objections to removing MoinMoin.
--
John
Julien Puydt
> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
Yes.
> Or does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
Get rid of it altogether.
Snark on #sagemath
Michael Orlitzky
> This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various
> threads, but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
>
> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
>
[X] Yes
[X] Get rid of altogether
Georg S. Weber
On Tuesday, 27 March 2012 19:10:50 UTC+2, John H Palmieri wrote:
This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various threads, but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
[x ] Yes
[ ] No
If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
[ ] Convert to optional
[ x] Get rid of altogether
(It's easy to get rid of: see <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12713>.)
--
John
Cheers,
Georg
William Stein
> This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various threads,
> but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
>
> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
>
> [ ] No
>
> If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or
> does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
>
> [ ] Convert to optional
> [ ] Get rid of altogether
[x] Experimental
>
> (It's easy to get rid of: see
> <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12713>.)
>
> --
> John
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
> sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
Robert Bradshaw
<jhpalm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various threads,
> but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
>
> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
>
> [ ] No
>
> If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or
> does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
>
> [ ] Convert to optional
> [ ] Get rid of altogether
[x] Experimental
David Roe
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:10 PM, John H Palmieri <jhpalm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various threads,
> but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
>
> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
[ ] No
> If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or
> does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
>
> [ ] Convert to optional
> [ ] Get rid of altogether
[x] Experimental
John Foster
This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various threads, but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
[ X] Yes
[ ] No
If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
[ X] Convert to optional
[ ] Get rid of altogether
(It's easy to get rid of: see <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12713>.)
--
John
Dan Drake
> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
>
> [ ] Yes
> [ ] No
Yes
> If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or
> does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
>
> [ ] Convert to optional
> [ ] Get rid of altogether
>
> (It's easy to get rid of: see
> <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12713>.)
Convert to optional or experimental. I don't have much of an opinion.
Dan
--
--- Dan Drake
----- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake
-------
mhampton
there now. I used to use it through Sage for some collaborative work,
but being packaged in Sage doesn't really have any extra added value.
With the improvements in notebook editing (tinymce editor), I have
moved my collaborations to just using the notebook.
No one sounds fired up about it so I think it should be moved to
experimental packages.
-Marshall
William Stein
> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
> I think that would be OK, most users probably have no idea its in
> there now. I used to use it through Sage for some collaborative work,
> but being packaged in Sage doesn't really have any extra added value.
It would have more value if it were well tested in Sage, but
I don't think it actually is.
> With the improvements in notebook editing (tinymce editor), I have
> moved my collaborations to just using the notebook.
>
> No one sounds fired up about it so I think it should be moved to
> experimental packages.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On Mar 27, 12:10 pm, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various
>> threads, but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
>>
>> Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
>>
>> [ ] Yes
>> [ ] No
>>
>> If "yes", I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or
>> does anyone support getting rid of it altogether?
>>
>> [ ] Convert to optional
>> [ ] Get rid of altogether
>>
>> (It's easy to get rid of: see
>> <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12713>.)
>>
>> --
>> John
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org
--
leif
> > Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
> > I think that would be OK, most users probably have no idea its in
> > there now. I used to use it through Sage for some collaborative work,
> > but being packaged in Sage doesn't really have any extra added value.
>
> It would have more value if it were well tested in Sage, but
> I don't think it actually is.
are any Sage scripts related to it.
It also takes a lot of disk space in every "standard" Sage
installation (the actual amount depends on your filesystem's block
size), mostly the JSMath fonts, which are probably redundant anyway.
So I'll be happy when it gets optional or experimental.
-leif