On 1 December 2017 at 05:49, Nate Sullivan
<
nathaniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the most natural way read the code created_at < 10.minutes.ago is
> "created_at is less than ten minutes ago," but that reading suggests the
> mistaken interpretation that created_at is fewer than ten minutes ago. The
> correct interpretation is that created_at is earlier than ten minutes ago.
It never occurred to me that there is any confusion over this syntax.
created_at is a time, 10 minutes ago is a time, time a < time b is
unambiguous.
Colin