Unable to update tpo Fedora 28 / rspamd dependencies on libevent-2.0

[Patrick Pichon]

While tryingto update from fedora 27 to 28 I got an erreor message which stop the upgrade
Error:
 Problem: package rspamd-1.7.4-2.x86_64 requires libevent-2.0.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - libevent-2.0.22-6.fc27.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package rspamd-1.7.4-2.x86_64


If now on an existing Fedora 28, I tried to install rspamd I get a similar update
dnf install rspamd
Fedora 28 - x86_64 - Updates                    187 kB/s | 5.6 MB     00:30   
Fedora 28 - x86_64                              1.8 MB/s |  60 MB     00:34   
Importing GPG key 0xBF21E25E:
 Userid     : "Rspamd Nightly Builds (Rspamd Nightly Builds) "
 Fingerprint: 3FA3 47D5 E599 BE45 95CA 2576 FFA2 32ED BF21 E25E
 From       : http://rspamd.com/rpm/gpg.key
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Rspamd stable repository                        272 kB/s | 9.4 kB     00:00   
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Wed 09 May 2018 12:01:55 CEST.
Error:
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides libevent-2.0.so.5()(64bit) needed by rspamd-1.7.4-2.x86_64

[Patrick Pichon]

In case you come to that issue, I have created a Copr Fedora Repository on which I have build 1.7.4 for F27 and F28 ( x86_64 )

[Patrick Pichon]

If you want to enable that repository which is available at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pipiche/rspamd/

you can do :

dnf copr enable pipiche/rspamd

[Jason White]

Patrick Pichon <pip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> you can do :
>
> dnf copr enable pipiche/rspamd

Thank you. I installed the above in an attempt to upgrade from lorbus/rspamd,
which is also in copr. Unfortunately, it gave a termination signal whenever I
tried to start the daemon.

Has anyone else on the list experienced this? It's a Fedora 28 system.

[Patrick Pichon]

Did you have a look to the logfile ?

As I have aligned it with the rspamd repository, the ownership are on _rspamd:_rspamd while lorbus was on rspamd:rspamd
So I suggest you to have a look to /var/lib/rspamd if you have the right ownership on the directory and the files

[Jason White]

Thank you. The log file only showed a termination signal. I did temporarily switch SELinux to permissive mode, but that didn’t help.

 

I’ll re-install and check the ownership and permissions.t help.

 

I’ll re-install and check the ownership and permissions.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rspamd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rspamd+un...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rspamd.

[Patrick Pichon]

This looks strange. Are you on i686 or x86_64 architecture ?

[Jason White]

Patrick Pichon <pip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This looks strange. Are you on i686 or x86_64 architecture ?

It's x86_64. I'll be away next week but expect to have time to debug it after
I return.

[Jason White]

Patrick Pichon <pat...@pichon.me> wrote:
> I’m currently working to get lorbus repo updated to 1.7.4


Which repo should I follow for a smooth transition to the eventual "official"
Fedora packages? Or is the plan not yet settled?