rmilter - extended headers options are missing

[Dima Saveliev]

Hi, is it ok to have rspamd header options missing in message source?

X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.02 / 15.00]
 IP_SCORE(-1.02)[]
 PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[]
 ASN(0.00)[]
 R_SPF_FAIL(0.00)[]
 HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[]
 BAYES_HAM(-0.00)[]
 SPF_FAIL_FORWARDING(0.00)[]
 R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[]
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[]
 FORGED_SENDER_FORWARDING(0.00)[]
 REPLYTO_DN_EQ_FROM_DN(0.00)[]
 FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]
 MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.00)[]
 REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]
 FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]
 TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]
 FORWARDED(0.00)[]
 MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]
 RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[]
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]
 RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]
 RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[]
 MX_GOOD(0.00)[]
 SUBJECT_ENDS_EXCLAIM(0.00)[]
 TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]
X-Rspamd-Server: localhost
X-Rspamd-Scan-Time: 1.39
X-Rspamd-Queue-ID: 005E0C0F18

while they are in plase in rspamd history:

IP_SCORE(-1.018539)[asn: 32748(-4.50), country: US(-0.60)]
MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.2)
R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.2)[yves-rocher.com]
BAYES_HAM(-0.004742)[44.65%]
RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0)[3]
FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0)[con...@etudes.yves-rocher.com,bou...@etudes.yves-rocher.com]
REPLYTO_DN_EQ_FROM_DN(0)
SPF_FAIL_FORWARDING(0)
MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0)
R_SPF_FAIL(0)[-all]
RCVD_TLS_ALL(0)
SUBJECT_ENDS_EXCLAIM(0)
REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0)
MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0)
PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0)[an...@domain.com]
FROM_NO_DN(0)
FORGED_SENDER_FORWARDING(0)
DMARC_NA(0)[yves-rocher.com]
FORWARDED(0)[]
HAS_REPLYTO(0)
TO_DN_NONE(0)
TAGGED_FROM(0)[767158-3a93-anna=domain.com]
RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0)[1]
TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0)
MX_GOOD(0)[mxa-0021d901.gslb.pphosted.com,mxb-0021d901.gslb.pphosted.com]
ASN(0)[asn:32748, ipnet:50.31.32.0/19, country:US]

Although the log says it's skipping the options, looking at the code, I can not understand how could it reflect on message headers:

Apr 21 22:30:13 mail rmilter[637]: <ddd051e03e>; spamdscan: start scanning message on localhost
Apr 21 22:30:14 mail rmilter[637]: <ddd051e03e>; spamdscan: finish scanning message on localhost
Apr 21 22:30:14 mail rmilter[637]: <ddd051e03e>; spamdscan: too large reply: 1038, skip options
Apr 21 22:30:14 mail rmilter[637]: <ddd051e03e>; spamdscan: scan, time: 1.388, server: localhost, metric: default: [-1.023 / 15.000], symbols: IP_SCORE(-1.02)[], PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[], ASN(0.00)[], R_SPF_FAIL(0.00)[], HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[], BAYES_HAM(-0.00)[], SPF_FAIL_FORWARDING(0.00)[], R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[], DMARC_NA(0.00)[], FORGED_SENDER_FORWARDING(0.00)[], REPLYTO_DN_EQ_FROM_DN(0.00)[], FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[], MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.00)[], REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[], FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[], TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[], TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[], FORWARDED(0.00)[], MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[], RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[], MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[], RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[], RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[], MX_GOOD(0.00)[], SUBJECT_ENDS_EXCLAIM(0.00)[], TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]
Apr 21 22:30:14 mail rmilter[637]: <ddd051e03e>; msg done: queue_id: <005E0C0F18>; message id: <20170421102925059.6229.616E6E6...@etudes.yves-rocher.com>; ip: 50.31.47.101; from: <bounces+767158-3a93-anna=domai...@etudes.yves-rocher.com>; rcpt: <an...@domain.com> (1 total); user: unauthorized; spam scan: no spam; virus scan: skipped, no av servers; dkim: not signed, ignored