fuzzy check IO timeout with server rspamd.com

453 views
Skip to first unread message

Patrick Pichon

unread,
Aug 15, 2016, 12:44:19 PM8/15/16
to rspamd
I'm getting a lot of error in syslog in regards to fuzzy_check.

What can be wrong  ?

 telnet rspamd.com
Trying 5.9.155.182...
telnet: connect to address 5.9.155.182: No route to host


Aug 15 15:52:58 mail.pipiche.net rspamd[4118]: <353a1d>; task; fuzzy_check_timer_callback: got IO timeout with server rspamd.com(5.9.155.182), after 3 retransmits
Aug 15 16:06:19 mail.pipiche.net rspamd[4118]: <638225>; task; fuzzy_check_timer_callback: got IO timeout with server rspamd.com(5.9.155.182), after 3 retransmits

Alexander Moisseev

unread,
Aug 15, 2016, 1:08:54 PM8/15/16
to rsp...@googlegroups.com
On 15.08.16 19:44, Patrick Pichon wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of error in syslog in regards to fuzzy_check.
>
> What can be wrong ?
>
> telnet rspamd.com
> Trying 5.9.155.182...
> telnet: connect to address 5.9.155.182: No route to host
>
It seems you have a routing problem. You can use 'traceroute rspamd.com' for troubleshooting.
Fuzzy worker uses port UDP 11335, you can't test it with telnet.

Patrick Pichon

unread,
Aug 15, 2016, 2:46:54 PM8/15/16
to rspamd
traceroute , ping  and ssh works

traceroute to rspamd.com (5.9.155.182), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  62-210-214-1.rev.poneytelecom.eu (62.210.214.1)  0.626 ms  0.662 ms  0.735 ms
 2  a9k2-49e-s46-5.dc3.poneytelecom.eu (195.154.1.90)  2.433 ms  2.540 ms  2.646 ms
 3  hetzner.interxionfra4.nl-ix.net (193.239.117.110)  10.867 ms  10.848 ms  10.799 ms
 4  core23.hetzner.de (213.239.229.74)  15.474 ms  15.453 ms  15.404 ms
 5  ex9k1.rz19.hetzner.de (213.239.229.54)  15.480 ms  15.463 ms ex9k1.rz19.hetzner.de (213.239.229.50)  15.424 ms
 6  l.highsecure.ru (5.9.155.182)  15.429 ms !X  15.425 ms !X  15.394 ms !X

 ping rspamd.com
PING rspamd.com (5.9.155.182) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from l.highsecure.ru (5.9.155.182): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=15.5 ms
64 bytes from l.highsecure.ru (5.9.155.182): icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=15.4 ms
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages