I encourage everyone to use this microformat. It will make tools for
searching web pages and copying data from a web page into your online
tree much easier to write.
Historical-data.org was able to get their schema officially santioned by
Schema.org, but as part of doing that they were asked to make a few
changes - see
https://github.com/historical-data/schema/pull/32 for
example. I don't believe there are any more major changes forthcoming.
I believe that around 40 websites have implemented it so far. I've
implemented it at WeRelate.org - took a couple of hours is all.
The blog appears to be inactive unfortunately. Most of the recent work
is happening at the github site. (I'll ask them to address this.)
-dallan
http://www.werelate.org/wiki/User:Dallan
> <
http://historical-data-schema.blogspot.nl/?view=classic>
>
> Genealogie Online was one of the early adopters of this microdata schema
> (initiated by Google , Geni & Familysearch and presented at RootsTech
> 2012). Today I discovered that the scheme had changed significantly...
> well, let's call it progress on a standard.
>
> What's the opinion of this group participants about this microdata schema?
>
> Regards,
> Bob Coret
> Coret Genealogie <
http://genealogie.coret.org/en/>
>
> --
>
>
>