On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 7:22:49 PM UTC-6, -MIKE- wrote:
> Sonny, I'm not trying to be argumentative here. This is a safety issue,
not a "who's right, who's wrong" issue.
I understand completely. I didnt take anything you said as offensive or challenging.
> I'm telling you that is not safe.
> All the weight is on the cross braces which aren't designed for it.
> They are designed for tension, not compression. They are acting the
> same as a cable would in a suspension bridge and were never meant to
> take the force of being compressed.
> I'm trying to warn you now. If those bench-dogs slip while you're
> cutting something, you'll be sorry.
> That thing was designed to only be used with the legs touching the
> ground. Unless it is fully extended, they are not.
>
You are correct regarding the cross pieces and the legs not touching a firm base, when partially extended. The cross pieces are metal bars and do supply some rigidity. They aren't "loose" as dangling (sic) cable. For a small project, as my "test" birdhouse and pole use, both not being very heavy, the partial extension was fine. If the support was to collapse, it would collapse as a whole, not on one side. It would simple drop straight down. With a small or moderate amount of weight, I think any collapse would either not happen or be a slow descend, because of the resistance of the feet touching the ground and of the ply top. The "ridgid" cross pieces do supply some support and with a small or moderate weight, on top, there is sufficient stability.
I wouldn't work all day, with lots of weighty goings on, on a partially extended support, though. I understand your concern, in that respect and with the cross pieces.
Using a little common sense, a partially extended support and small to moderate weights/projects, as with my birdhouse/pole projects, I think it is safe to use partially extended. The initial thought, when Centipede was first mentioned, was the limited space one had to work in, hence the smaller 2X4 support was considered/preferred. To me, this meant the project, for the limited work area, would be somewhat small, also. My testing/review included the partial extended methods, also, to accommodate a limited work area, yet using the larger 4X8 support system.
During the sawing of the birdhouse pole, one of the holddowns did disengage. The holddowns aren't that great. There was no effect on the sawing job, the ply remained in position and the support didn't readjust or falter/fail, in any way.
I certainly wouldn't be comfortable with tossing something like a 100 lb sack of corn on top of a partially extended support. I would be comfortable with working on a smaller sized project, though. Those metal cross pieces do have some rigidity, to them, and will support smaller projects, in a limited/small work area, without failure.
None of my work areas are limited. I would likely always fully extend the support, when using it. I can see using it as a 30" tall scaffold/platform, to stand on, say when painting a ceiling or something just out of reach, yet too low for a regular size scaffold.
I think this support will suit me well, often, in place of the 3 sets of wooden saw horses I regularly use (and build new ones annually, as older ones become unusable), especially as to hauling the bulky wooden saw horses from one place to another.
Sonny