On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:48:08 -0600, -MIKE- <mi...@mikedrumsDOT.com>
wrote:
>On 11/26/15 12:18 PM, krw wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:42:19 -0600, -MIKE- <mi...@mikedrumsDOT.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/26/15 10:25 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>> On 11/26/2015 10:18 AM, krw wrote:
>>>>>>> I stain parts that will be difficult to stain after assembly, inset
>>>>>>> corners and inset panels for example. I often leave the easier outer
>>>>>>> surfaces unstained until after the clamps come off for good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think Leon meant
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I stain _before_; the parts that will be difficult to stain after
>>>>>> assembly.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, he's right, though the language may be ambiguous to some. The
>>>>> parts that will be difficult to stain after assembly, he stains before
>>>>> assembly.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If I had put a comma between stain and after it would be totally wrong.
>>>>
>>>> So! I stain before assembly if parts are going to be difficult to
>>>> stain after assembly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you all for you skrew'nee. ;~)
>>>
>>> The wrong punctuation, but at least you used some.
>>
>> How so? His punctuation looked fine to me (though perhaps his comma
>> could have been a hyphen).
>>
>
>It was a joke. His sentence is substantially easier to read than
>certain posters who refuse to use any punctuation at all.
I got the joke (it was something to do with cauls, right?) but thought
you had a punctuation point, too. ;-)