On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 2:14:21 AM UTC-5, J. Clarke wrote:
> In article <
f64c99ec-8fcd-4d6b...@googlegroups.com>,
>
russell...@yahoo.com says...
> >
> > On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 2:14:27 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > > On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 2:47:01 PM UTC-4,
russell...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 9:47:34 AM UTC-5, Brewster wrote:
> > > > > Then the question begs, is it square?
> > > > >
> > > > > -BR
> > > >
> > > > Does it really make much/any difference? These are used for drywall cutting. All the drywall I have ever done had 1/8", 1/4" gaps between sheets. Every edge is covered with tape and filled with mud. Precision is not necessary with drywall work. And even if you use the square for cutting plywood for exterior sheathing, precision is not that crucial. You're putting subfloor on. 1/8" gaps over a joist are not important. And you can always pound it in. Or smash
> the edges until it fits. The T-square is not used on James Krenov furniture.
> > >
> > > umm...you may not have noticed that we're no longer talking about a drywall
> > > square.
> >
> > Its a 48 inch T square.
>
> Perhaps you are not a native speaker of American--the discussion has
> gone from a square to a Johnson, which is used for a rather different
> kind of woodworking.
>
I missed the "Johnson" part until now. That's good. The "woodworking" is a little coarser than I care to tread.