Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OT: And look what the FOIA brings (just in case you thought Russia had gone away)

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 24, 2017, 7:19:18 PM8/24/17
to
'Earlier this week i met separately with James Comey and DNI Jim
Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature,
and intent of Russian interference in our recent Presidential election.
The three of us also agree that our organizations, along with others,
need to focus on completing the thorough review of this issue that has
been directed by President Obama and which is being led by the DNI.'

<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3955473-CIA-Director-John-Brennan-Internal-Memos-Russia.html>

Carbon

unread,
Aug 24, 2017, 10:22:38 PM8/24/17
to
The snowflakes have been told that Trump's collusion with Russia is a
non-issue, so when the hammer drops the shitstorm of shock and denial is
going to be something to behold. And Trump, like all good grifters, will
know when to resign in an attempt to escape responsibility for his crimes.

I normally find this kind of thing amusing, honestly I am worried about
the future if so many suckers can be conned into voting for such an
obvious fraud. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 1:25:32 AM8/25/17
to
On 2017-08-24 8:22 PM, Moderate wrote:
> Carbon <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> Wrote in message:
>>>
>>> <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3955473-CIA-Director-John-Brennan-Internal-Memos-Russia.html>
>>
>> The snowflakes have been told that Trump's collusion with Russia is a
>> non-issue, so when the hammer drops the shitstorm of shock and denial is
>> going to be something to behold. And Trump, like all good grifters, will
>> know when to resign in an attempt to escape responsibility for his crimes.
>>
>> I normally find this kind of thing amusing, honestly I am worried about
>> the future if so many suckers can be conned into voting for such an
>> obvious fraud. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy
>>
>
> A nine month old, debunked document

When was John Brennan's memo to the CIA "debunked", doofus?

You've got a cite for that, do you?

>
> Maybe someone will carve this into the DNC tombstone.
>
> 2018 :-)
>

MNMikeW

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 9:55:25 AM8/25/17
to
Moderate wrote:
> Carbon<nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> Wrote in message:
>>>
>>> <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3955473-CIA-Director-John-Brennan-Internal-Memos-Russia.html>
>>
>> The snowflakes have been told that Trump's collusion with Russia is a
>> non-issue, so when the hammer drops the shitstorm of shock and denial is
>> going to be something to behold. And Trump, like all good grifters, will
>> know when to resign in an attempt to escape responsibility for his crimes.
>>
>> I normally find this kind of thing amusing, honestly I am worried about
>> the future if so many suckers can be conned into voting for such an
>> obvious fraud. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy
>>
>
> A nine month old, debunked document
>
> Maybe someone will carve this into the DNC tombstone.
>
> 2018 :-)

They need to keep beating the Russia drum. They have nothing else. The
hammer drops, BWHAHAHAHAHA. You have a rich fantasy life Carby.


Carbon

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 10:11:37 AM8/25/17
to
And you're imagining the Mueller investigation is going to just collapse
into nothing, like Trump's failed Obamacare repeal? Hmmm?

MNMikeW

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 10:13:15 AM8/25/17
to
Yes, it will.

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 12:10:05 PM8/25/17
to
What is that based on, Mikey?

Other than blind faith, do you have ANYTHING?

Carbon

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 12:26:40 PM8/25/17
to
No doubt you'll remember when news got out that Mueller's team was
investigating Trump's curiously profitable real estate deals with Russian
nationals, Trump freaked out and claimed to have the right to pardon
anyone, even himself. This is what's known in poker circles as a tell.
It's like rising out of your chair and shouting, "HOLY FUCKING SHIT!" when
you're dealt a full house.

Read this: https://goo.gl/Zzt4ru

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 12:30:01 PM8/25/17
to
The other thing that the right-wing-nuts seem not to get is that if the
investigation were going nowhere...

...someone would have leaked that by now.

Carbon

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 12:51:12 PM8/25/17
to
Only the baseless claims of Trump's inept legal team and various other
diehard Trump shills who are nearly as clueless as Mike.

Mueller and his team have wide discression to follow up on anything
related to Trump and his dealings with Russia. Trump is going to have no
more success stopping this investigation than he did with the Obamacare
repeal, and for the same reason: he doesn't have the support within the
Republican party to get away with it.

MNMikeW

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 1:49:59 PM8/25/17
to
Idiot Mueller and his hand picked partisan Hillary donor team will drag
this out for years.

B...@onramp.net

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 1:59:20 PM8/25/17
to
C'mon Mike. Mueller is an idiot?

When he was named to head this investigation it was met by replies
saying that he was able and well trusted to be fair and diligent by
both Democrats and Republicans in Congress.

MNMikeW

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 2:11:27 PM8/25/17
to
Then he started building his team.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/07/05/as-mueller-grows-his-russia-special-counsel-team-every-hire-is-under-scrutiny/?utm_term=.23e214c8c1f7


Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 2:15:51 PM8/25/17
to
The cognitive dissonance you display is absolutely stunning, Mikey.

Who are this "hand picked partisan" team supposed to be, exactly?

B...@onramp.net

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 2:33:10 PM8/25/17
to
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:11:25 -0500, MNMikeW <mnmi...@aol.com> wrote:

>>
>> C'mon Mike. Mueller is an idiot?
>>
>> When he was named to head this investigation it was met by replies
>> saying that he was able and well trusted to be fair and diligent by
>> both Democrats and Republicans in Congress.
>
>Then he started building his team.
>
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/07/05/as-mueller-grows-his-russia-special-counsel-team-every-hire-is-under-scrutiny/?utm_term=.23e214c8c1f7

Some normal partisan responses Mike. Specifically from Trump who is
building excuses if the outcome is negative for him.

If you read the complete article there's no reason to think that the
investigation will be anything but unfair.

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 2:37:34 PM8/25/17
to
In Mikey's worldview if Mueller hires someone who ever donated to the
Democratic Party (regardless of their current leanings), then the whole
thing is biased...

...but when a former Republican administration's Solicitor-General is
placed in charge of an investigation into Clinton, that's only right and
proper.

:-)

MNMikeW

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 3:25:28 PM8/25/17
to
Yes, though this was WaPo though. So of course they downplayed the
partisanship.


Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 3:30:44 PM8/25/17
to
Explain why you never once mentioned partisanship in relation to Kenneth
Starr...

B...@onramp.net

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 4:27:49 PM8/25/17
to
The quotes that said what I stated weren't from the Washington Post.

Carbon

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 5:44:48 PM8/25/17
to
He has nothing but factless certainty.
0 new messages