>has a prayer of being elected POTUS?
>
>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/01/just-in-gingrich-to-announce-exploratory-committee/?hpt=T2
he's got a prayer, probably recites daily... but he has a snowball's
chance in hell of getting elected...
--
"It’s been so difficult to get out of this recession because of the disequilibrium in the real economy.”" -- Paul Volcker
"Education is the progressive discovery of our own Ignorance" Will Durant
"One can't have a sense of perspective without a sense of Humor" -- Wayne Thiboux
"the Glass is not only half full, it has been delicious so far!!" -- ME
To reply, SCRAPE off the end bits.
My reaction was "WTF?"
He is angling for VP. I'd vote for the man, but then again I believe
that failure and mistakes improve a man....a concept most people have
trouble dealing with.
--
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in
overalls and looks like work. -- Thomas Edison
A prayer is about the limit of his chances.
Doug
No, but what can I say, I don't like his name.
> has a prayer of being elected POTUS?
>
> http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/01/just-in-gingrich-to-a...
<
<My reaction was "WTF?"
I saw read the link first and thought maybe he is looking for his
kitchen stool.
--Tedward
Four years ago people were asking if any Democrat could stop the
Hillary Machine.
No. He'd be a great president, so it would be cool. But no way in
hell.
-Tom Enright
"It occurs to me that I may have been a bit harsh on Gingrich. So let
me add that I do think he is a very intelligent man, a shrewd
rhetorician, and a gifted speaker.
However, if those things made a great president, we’d already have
one, wouldn’t we?"
-Eric Scheie
No. The oppo research machines would have so much fun with him....
A Palin/Gingrich ticket would be a dem oppo wet dream..
D00d, I live in Nebr. If he makes it to the general, my vote for the
Libertarian candidate will be a drop in the bucket. But I'd be happy
to see him take the state.
>has a prayer of being elected POTUS?
>
>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/01/just-in-gingrich-to-announce-exploratory-committee/?hpt=T2
I'd vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton before I'd vote for fuckin' Newt
Butt-Weasel Gingrich.
John M. Rogers
AU Class of 1985
The Al Del Greco of Atlanta
>Hey, Futbol Phan <sgz...@gmail.com>... keep the change, you filthy
>animal.
>
>>has a prayer of being elected POTUS?
>>
>>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/01/just-in-gingrich-to-announce-exploratory-committee/?hpt=T2
>
>
>I'd vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton before I'd vote for fuckin' Newt
>Butt-Weasel Gingrich.
so what are ya saying oh wise Atlanta Conservative?
Won't happen. Yes, I know Nixon pulled it off, but he had a bitterly
divided Democratic party in his favor. I don't see a serious challenge
to Obama on the Left.
>hey, John Rogers <tige...@yahoo.com>'s been through solid matter,
>for crying out loud. Who knows what's happened to his brain? Maybe
>it's scrambled his molecules...
>
>>Hey, Futbol Phan <sgz...@gmail.com>... keep the change, you filthy
>>animal.
>>
>>>has a prayer of being elected POTUS?
>>>
>>>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/01/just-in-gingrich-to-announce-exploratory-committee/?hpt=T2
>>
>>
>>I'd vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton before I'd vote for fuckin' Newt
>>Butt-Weasel Gingrich.
>
>so what are ya saying oh wise Atlanta Conservative?
I'm saying that (IMO at least) you can depend on Hillary doing what
she says she's going to do.
Newt the Butt-Weasel? He'll tell you anything you want to hear to get
elected.
>
> He'd be a great president, so it would be cool.
I just wanted to see this in all of its solitary glory ($1 to myself)
--
Lighthouses are more helpful than churches.
-- Benjamin Franklin
So it's up to conservatives to start funding one. An earnest useful
idiot like Maher/Sheehan.
Glad to see you are undead. But I say nope on the Veep. He's playing
for keeps due mainly to his age.
It took a Marxist.
You sound bitter. Are you bitter?
To pin it down a bit further, Marxist-Leninist.
> > He'd be a great president, so it would be cool.
> I just wanted to see this in all of its solitary glory ($1 to myself)
In all seriousness, this is why Gingrich can't win. He has instant
negative name recognition. You probably couldn't tell me anything
specific about him that is objectionable without googling. You hate
him because he's a conservative.
-Tom Enright
===Forgive me if you see this thrice, Google's acting up==
I don't like the guy, and think he's unelectable, but he'll bring
intellectual rigor tot he Republican nomination process. For sure he
has a brilliant mind, I can't imagine him letting any of them get away
with platitudes, and he'll call someone like Romney out devastatingly.
I think he'll be an excellent sharpener for whoever does get the
nomination.
> > has a prayer of being elected POTUS?
>
> >http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/01/just-in-gingrich-to-a...
>
> My reaction was "WTF?"
It bears repeating, whoever they put up has to LOOK and SOUND "nice"
and "reasonable" when coming up against Obama. Conservatives will
complain that that means electing a RINO, but you dont' have to elect
a RINO. Someone like Rep. Cantor, Gov. McConnell or Sen. Thune are
examples of that (not saying they'll run, just using them as
examples.)
Sure.
> -Tom Enright
>
>> --
>> Lighthouses are more helpful than churches.
>> -- Benjamin Franklin
>
--
When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and
carrying a cross - Not Sinclair Lewis
I didn't have to google to know that he served divorce papers on his
while while she was on her cancer deathbed, or that there were some
questionable things with the finances of his PAC that led to his
resignation. The Republicans didn't make him resign as speaker
because he was a good guy, d00d. .
I am alert and "in the know". I have the blood of a Tiger.
btw, Republicans don't like him that much either. Or at least not as
much they like their other choices. Even Tea Party supporters prefer
Romney over him, ouch:
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/few-winning-scenarios-for-gingrich/
a/k/a
I sure can. He divorced his first wife while she was in the hospital
recovering from cancer surgery. He then married his mistress. Who he
then divorced in order to marry a staffer he'd been sleeping with
DURING the Lewinsky scandal. He apparently has firm ideas about what
the "wife of a President" ought to look like and keeps "trading up" to
a newer model. I dislike him because he's a scumbag; he's not a
conservative. Real conservatives actually believe what they say about
family values. Fake-ass conservatives like Gingrich are simply in it
for the power.
He would be Clintonesque. A bad person but not necessarily a bad
president.
-Tom Enright
If he did become President, I could see him being a Republican
Clinton. But his lack of the personal warmth or empathy (real or fake,
depending on your view of the man) that helped get Clinton elected is
a handicap to Gingrich being elected.
Plus Clinton benefited significantly in 1992 from being a relatively
fresh face on the national scene, an advantage Gingrich doesn't have.
True, but it would be fun watching Gingrich mop the floors with Obama
in a debate.
No, your vote for the Libertarian candidate will be a drop in the
trash can.
But it won't be Newt versus Hillary. So you gonna vote for the
incumbent marxist?
That's what I meant :-)
I already had fun watching Hillary wipe the floor with him in 2008,
but it didn't make much difference.
>On Mar 1, 3:15 pm, John Rogers <tiger7...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hey, Futbol Phan <sgz...@gmail.com>... keep the change, you filthy
>> animal.
>>
>> >has a prayer of being elected POTUS?
>>
>> >http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/01/just-in-gingrich-to-a...
>>
>> I'd vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton before I'd vote for fuckin' Newt
>> Butt-Weasel Gingrich.
>
>But it won't be Newt versus Hillary. So you gonna vote for the
>incumbent marxist?
No, I'll probably end up voting for the Libertarian loser.