new POTA film: judged and found ...

Tonawanda Kardex

unread,

Jul 27, 2017, 11:16:44 PM7/27/17

to

A marked improvement over the last two "reboot" films.

But I still prefer the '70s stuff.

unclejr

unread,

Jul 28, 2017, 12:05:40 AM7/28/17

to

On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 10:16:44 PM UTC-5, Tonawanda Kardex wrote:
> A marked improvement over the last two "reboot" films.
>
> But I still prefer the '70s stuff.

POTA film?

jim brown

unread,

Jul 28, 2017, 12:33:28 AM7/28/17

to

Planet of the apes I would guess. Ex and I accidently walked into the Marky mark version about 15 years ago...it was not good.

unclejr

unread,

Jul 28, 2017, 12:40:45 AM7/28/17

to

Oh. Makes sense. Thankee.

Marty McMahone

unread,

Jul 28, 2017, 10:05:05 AM7/28/17

to

The sequels have been pretty good, though. It's not like the original material was brilliant. This newer series has been well done.

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,

Jul 28, 2017, 10:57:15 AM7/28/17

to

On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:05:01 -0700 (PDT), Marty McMahone
<mmcma...@hot.rr.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 11:33:28 PM UTC-5, jim brown wrote:
>> On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 11:05:40 PM UTC-5, unclejr wrote:
>> > On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 10:16:44 PM UTC-5, Tonawanda Kardex wrote:
>> > > A marked improvement over the last two "reboot" films.
>> > >
>> > > But I still prefer the '70s stuff.
>> >
>> > POTA film?
>>
>>
>>
>> Planet of the apes I would guess. Ex and I accidently walked into the Marky mark version about 15 years ago...it was not good.

My guess was about the presidential election - (Trump) Pissed Off The
Assholes.

Hugh

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

dotsla...@gmail.com

unread,

Jul 28, 2017, 6:35:13 PM7/28/17

to

Why you mad, bro?

Cheers.

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,

Jul 29, 2017, 9:31:59 AM7/29/17

to

On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:35:10 -0700 (PDT), dotsla...@gmail.com
wrote:

>Why you mad, bro?
>
>Cheers.

I have misplaced an "m". When speaking of liberals I say "them asses"
not "the masses".

Tonawanda Kardex

unread,

Jul 29, 2017, 7:46:33 PM7/29/17

to

On Saturday, July 29, 2017 at 6:31:59 AM UTC-7, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:35:10 -0700 (PDT), dotsla...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> >Why you mad, bro?
> >
> >Cheers.
>
> I have misplaced an "m". When speaking of liberals I say "them asses"
> not "the masses".

WTF is a liberal?

Ken Olson

unread,

Jul 29, 2017, 11:45:34 PM7/29/17

to

This the potential of being a decent conversation as law as no one takes
a big greasy shart all over it.

I'll do it in brief: A liberal tends to believe more in the rights of
the masses than they do the rights of the individual. Conservatives are
the reverse.

WTF do you think?

Some dued

unread,

Jul 29, 2017, 11:57:53 PM7/29/17

to

Dictionary.com

Conservative: disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.

Liberal: favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.

Ken Olson

unread,

Jul 30, 2017, 12:34:27 AM7/30/17

to

This is too big for dictionary definitions. They make for very small tents.

wolfie

unread,

Jul 30, 2017, 1:08:32 AM7/30/17

to

"Ken Olson" wrote

> I'll do it in brief: A liberal tends to believe more in the rights of
> the masses than they do the rights of the individual. Conservatives are
> the reverse.

Liberals are more for a level-playing field; conservatives are the
reverse.

Ken Olson

unread,

Jul 30, 2017, 2:14:48 AM7/30/17

to

Liberals keep finding more reasons for a larger Federal government.
What passes for conservative at the Federal level too often thinks the
same way.

agavi...@gmail.com

unread,

Jul 30, 2017, 7:54:27 AM7/30/17

to

Maybe I'm just old, but most of the recycled movies don't interest me.

Besides, having Moses as a time traveling astronaut is a great plot.

J. Hugh Sullivan

unread,

Jul 30, 2017, 8:09:12 AM7/30/17

to

Someone who doesn't comprehend consequences - or a good Samaritan gone
bad.