Simps and wimps!
John Smith I
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cecil Moore wrote:
> ...
> Legally, it is not a contract unless you agree to it.
> What would happen if you simply crossed out the antenna
> restrictions clause before signing the contract?
> --
> 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com
>
Wouldn't ya' rather stab the person who drafted it with a pen? <evil grin>
Regards,
JS
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
END OF MY RESPONSE POST
REASON WHY RRAM COULD NOT MORALLY/ETHICALLY ALLOW SUCH POST:
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Borderline inappropriate (advocacy of violence, even if joking, and
not much more). - K3FU
Your message has been rejected because it may require minor-to-moderate
rewriting. This may include things like "me too" posts with little
added content, excessive quoting on followup, credulous assertions with
insufficient documentary evidence, or even excessive spelling or grammar
errors affecting readability. The moderator reviewing your article has
provided specific diagnostic guidance at the beginning of this reply
message. Please consider incorporating this feedback into any
resubmission of this article such that it can eventually be approved for
posting to our moderated newsgroup.
Please read the charter of rec.radio.amateur.moderated at:
http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/rram/index.html
Please direct any queries to rec-radio-amateur...@panix.com.
Thank you,
- Moderation Team.
============================================ Full text of your message
follows
> > From ne...@alpha826.server4you.de Fri Mar 16 13:46:45 2007
> > Return-Path: <ne...@alpha826.server4you.de>
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on
> > mailcrunch2.panix.com
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none
autolearn=disabled
> > version=3.1.6
> > X-Original-To: rr...@panix.com
> > Delivered-To: rr...@panix.com
> > Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73])
> > by mailproc1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C7A7EDCB
> > for <rr...@panix.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
> > Received: by mail2.panix.com (Postfix)
> > id BF37BCACF1; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
> > Delivered-To: rec-radio-ama...@panix.com
> > Received: from pinatubo.switch.ch (pinatubo-2.switch.ch [130.59.1.10])
> > by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BACCACED
> > for <rec-radio-ama...@panix.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2007
13:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
> > Received: from [85.25.133.70] (helo=alpha826.server4you.de)
> > by pinatubo.switch.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
> > id 1HSGVX-00032D-NB
> > for rec-radio-ama...@moderators.isc.org; Fri, 16 Mar
2007 18:46:27 +0100
> > Received: from news by alpha826.server4you.de with local (Exim 4.50)
> > id 1HSGVW-0004jR-Ed
> > for rec-radio-ama...@moderators.isc.org; Fri, 16 Mar
2007 18:46:26 +0100
> > To: rec-radio-ama...@moderators.isc.org
> > Path: news.albasani.net!not-for-mail
> > From: John Smith I <assembl...@gmail.com>
> > Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.moderated
> > Subject: Re: PRB-1 and CCNR's
> > Organization: albasani.net
> > Message-ID: <etel5f$hbv$1...@news.albasani.net>
> > References: <1173494973....@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>
<KTyIh.2893$uo3....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net>
<1174064484....@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
<bkAKh.9112$FG1....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > X-Trace: news.albasani.net
B1trX12ebOQbBbwPbv1Z6qFJ3cPnNdnAgGPk3uzrKJKS8GjZA+I9+9bN9Rxdd9Gis/+O2yfjx9JJYFIpArUPQte8I5QRvASxNnz511Ey1hMDEkFLWpPGfLBD83EZDrQh
> > X-Complaints-To: ab...@albasani.net
> > NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:46:26 +0000 (UTC)
> > X-User-ID: PeiIQ0s50Kx8tUQkoOLa99SPpx/E3fvPrifN3rd2FAk=
> > User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
> > X-NNTP-Posting-Host:
IfhgqsQb65afI8fKmDSv/K5Upt00pCx+WNDaMFgyNEZNn/53YIvAvSaUpgtGbwvatWt/En/vPOlUetJkKmCGnA==
> > X-Virus-Status: No
> >
> > Cecil Moore wrote:
> >
> > > ...
>> > > Legally, it is not a contract unless you agree to it.
>> > > What would happen if you simply crossed out the antenna
>> > > restrictions clause before signing the contract?
>> > > --
>> > > 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com
>> > >
> >
> > Wouldn't ya' rather stab the person who drafted it with a pen?
<evil grin>
> >
> > Regards,
> > JS
> >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)
iQCVAwUBRfrhv0jvESE1wn77AQJDZgP+JTf2zxCx0u3qYAtPU2Kc0H8/v01HKXte
Ns7rNdOjl6wz6i16f8du8u5XqHYb8P2hXXjAf981/vErzjDv19Mb9p/8YaBJcEct
9saYvkdlWGAwquTg6kmM0acPe2G+FyCpIJw+7gF+cqBu4PprlpHxVLpENjaBJZSD
ANhEWW3LyYo=
=Chr2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
END OF THEIR GREAT MORAL/ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES!
Regards,
JS
an old freind
> THE POST I WAS RESPONDING TO, AND MY POST IN RESPONSE:
> ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>
> Cecil Moore wrote:
>
> > ...
> > Legally, it is not a contract unless you agree to it.
> > What would happen if you simply crossed out the antenna
> > restrictions clause before signing the contract?
> > --
> > 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com
> >
>
> Wouldn't ya' rather stab the person who drafted it with a pen? <evil grin>
>
> Regards,
> JS
> ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> END OF MY RESPONSE POST
>
> REASON WHY RRAM COULD NOT MORALLY/ETHICALLY ALLOW SUCH POST:
> ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Borderline inappropriate (advocacy of violence, even if joking, and
> not much more). - K3FU
where is violence advocated?
well MD claims that in asking what problems see with the fact you can
pass the written test while missing all the rules and reg question is
advocating no change at all
John Smith I
> ...
> where is violence advocated?
>
> well MD claims that in asking what problems see with the fact you can
> pass the written test while missing all the rules and reg question is
> advocating no change at all
>
Hey, we knew that it would be nothing but a group to amuse "at large."
They epitomize wacko leftist-ideas, ya' suppose they are all
closet-gay-democrats? :)
Regards,
JS
KH6HZ
> Hey, we knew that it would be nothing but a group to amuse "at large."
Recently while watching IMUS there was a commercial for some cellular
service.
In the skit, a woman is frantically looking for her blackberry. Her
coworkers enter, see her frantic, and smirk. Then, the phone rings -- it is
in one of the co-worker's shirt pockets.
Cut to the next scene, where they're in the hospital, the guy has an ice
pack on his head, and the woman text messages that he will be late.
The implication is the woman, upon discovering the dude hid her blackberry,
whacked the dude on the side of the head.
Now, let's reverse the scene. Let's replace the woman with a man, and the
man who hid the blackberry with a woman.
What would be the social outcry when the scene cuts over to the hospital and
the woman is sitting there with a black eye?
Why is it socially acceptable to suggest violence from women to men is
acceptable, but not vice-versa?
an old friend
> an old freind wrote:
>
> > ...
>
> > where is violence advocated?
>
> > well MD claims that in asking what problems see with the fact you can
> > pass the written test while missing all the rules and reg question is
> > advocating no change at all
>
> Hey, we knew that it would be nothing but a group to amuse "at large."
indeed and that amazing part is some discussion is manging to go onn
that I find truely shocking
>
> They epitomize wacko leftist-ideas, ya' suppose they are all
> closet-gay-democrats? :)
dems most likely certainly
>
> Regards,
> JS
Not Lloyd
"an old freind" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174083044.3...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
with a pen? " you can bet your Bagels Mark would have whined and cried that
somebody was threatening his life.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
pimps and whips!
shwoing clearly that he suports and promotes the sort cyber slime that
his pals Robeson and Wisemen have been enaging in for years
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
an old friend
> "an old freind" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1174083044.3...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
undid Mike eforts at thread jacking it was just another of your
worthless posts
John Smith I
> ...
> Why is it socially acceptable to suggest violence from women to men is
> acceptable, but not vice-versa?
>
>
I place it all on the "simp-a-sizing" and "wimp-a-sizing" of American males.
Remember the "Jackie Gleason Series" skits and "TO THE MOON ALICE, TO
THE MOON! :) Men have forgotten how to be men--so women have stepped up
and replaced 'em. :(
Limp-wristed wimps are dominate in society ... :(
Regards,
JS
KH6HZ
> pimps and whips!
>
> shwoing clearly that he suports and promotes the sort cyber slime that
> his pals Robeson and Wisemen have been enaging in for years
LMAO.
You're whacked.
How do you get promoting prostitution from pimps and whips?
Do you have to pay for it in Chassel?
KH6HZ
> I place it all on the "simp-a-sizing" and "wimp-a-sizing" of American
> males.
Perhaps. However, if it is socially unacceptable to suggest assaulting a
woman, then certainly the reverse should be true.
> Remember the "Jackie Gleason Series" skits and "TO THE MOON ALICE, TO THE
> MOON! :) Men have forgotten how to be men--so women have stepped up and
> replaced 'em. :(
Long before my time, unfortunately. I've only seen it passing in reruns.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> spewed forth the following excrement:
>
>> pimps and whips!
>>
>> shwoing clearly that he suports and promotes the sort cyber slime that
>> his pals Robeson and Wisemen have been enaging in for years
>
>LMAO.
>
>You're whacked.
you are whacked but then you think it is ok to defraud the FCC
>
>How do you get promoting prostitution from pimps and whips?
that what pips are agent for for whore Mike
KH6HZ
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>Does the thought of pimps and whips excite you, Mark?
>
why do you want to know?
when you going to fess it is wrong to defraud the fcc
when you going to stop being a hipocrite
KH6HZ
> when you going to fess it is wrong to defraud the fcc
When have I ever stated it is "right" to defraud the FCC (or any one else,
for that matter?)
Your synapses sure do fire in odd sequences.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote:
>
>> when you going to fess it is wrong to defraud the fcc
>
>When have I ever stated it is "right" to defraud the FCC (or any one else,
>for that matter?)
I said you stated it iwas ok
I stated you drefrauded the FCC and refuse to fess that it is wrong to
do so
indeed you refuse even now to agree with the obvious statement that it
is wrong to defraud the FCC
KH6HZ
> I said you stated it iwas ok
In which case, you lied, because I have never made any such statement.
> I stated you drefrauded the FCC and refuse to fess that it is wrong to
> do so
I've never defrauded the FCC. Nor have I ever been convicted, charged, or
even accused of doing so.
> indeed you refuse even now to agree with the obvious statement that it
> is wrong to defraud the FCC
People should never defraud the FCC, any other government agency, or anyone
else for that matter. Happy?
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote:
>
>> I said you stated it iwas ok
>
>In which case, you lied, because I have never made any such statement.
now you are altering quotes
>
>
>> I stated you drefrauded the FCC and refuse to fess that it is wrong to
>> do so
>
>I've never defrauded the FCC. Nor have I ever been convicted, charged, or
>even accused of doing so.
wrong Mike
you have been accused of it
>
>
>> indeed you refuse even now to agree with the obvious statement that it
>> is wrong to defraud the FCC
>
>People should never defraud the FCC, any other government agency, or anyone
>else for that matter. Happy?
now you need to come claen about your frauds
KH6HZ
> now you are altering quotes
Nope. Provide a link to a google posting where I have made such a statement.
>>I've never defrauded the FCC. Nor have I ever been convicted, charged, or
>>even accused of doing so.
>
> you have been accused of it
Your accusations (and Brian's) mean absolutely nothing.
If I accuse your wife of being a shemale, does that make it so?
> now you need to come claen about your frauds
I'm not a member of any clans.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote:
>
>> now you are altering quotes
>
>Nope. Provide a link to a google posting where I have made such a statement.
why since I never claimed you had
you are the one distorting quotes
>
>
>>>I've never defrauded the FCC. Nor have I ever been convicted, charged, or
>>>even accused of doing so.
>>
>> you have been accused of it
>
>Your accusations (and Brian's) mean absolutely nothing.
they mean you are lying
>
>If I accuse your wife of being a shemale, does that make it so?
that the acusatioin has been made yes it accusastion does make it it
true
>
>
>> now you need to come claen about your frauds
>
>I'm not a member of any clans.
no you are a proven fraud
KH6HZ
>>If I accuse your wife of being a shemale, does that make it so?
> that the acusatioin has been made yes it accusastion does make it it
> true
So, you are admitting publically your wife is a shemale?
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
no mike I admit the accusastion was made
you OTOH lied and claimed you have not been accused of fraud
Dloyd Lavies
>
> - Show quoted text -
Morkie, will you learn how to use a spell checker. Your butcher the
English language worse than a turkish cab driver.
Dloyd
Not Lloyd
"KH6HZ" <kh6...@Tarrl.net> wrote in message
news:%LFKh.104754$Ju2....@newsfe16.lga...
> Does the thought of pimps and whips excite you, Mark?
>
IS attracted to the gold lame' pants and purple hats the pimps wear. Mark is
probably the only guy who's ever sent the girl back and invited the pimp
over instead.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
no stlaking of mike in my refusaul
> Your butcher the
>English language worse than a turkish cab driver.
still no stlaking by my
>
>Dloyd
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>
>"KH6HZ" <kh6...@Tarrl.net> wrote in message
>news:%LFKh.104754$Ju2....@newsfe16.lga...
>> Does the thought of pimps and whips excite you, Mark?
>>
>Mark could not care less about the girls the pimps are "pimping",
lying again woger
Not Lloyd
<Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
news:urbmv2pr12iuviaq5...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:00:57 -0400, "KH6HZ" <kh6...@Tarrl.net> wrote:
>
> ><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>If I accuse your wife of being a shemale, does that make it so?
> >
> >> that the acusatioin has been made yes it accusastion does make it it
> >> true
> >
> >So, you are admitting publically your wife is a shemale?
> >
> no mike I admit the accusastion was made
>
> you OTOH lied and claimed you have not been accused of fraud
> http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
Marque. BIG difference between being accused and being guilty. You and
spam-and-cheese are all to quick to accuse (and thereby imply guilt) while
you go bananas whenever you are accused of spamming or abusing the
newsgroups.
Jan: 738 messages
Feb: 669 messages
Mar: 668 messages (and the month is only 1/2 over!)
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>
><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
>news:urbmv2pr12iuviaq5...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:00:57 -0400, "KH6HZ" <kh6...@Tarrl.net> wrote:
>>
>> ><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>>If I accuse your wife of being a shemale, does that make it so?
>> >
>> >> that the acusatioin has been made yes it accusastion does make it it
>> >> true
>> >
>> >So, you are admitting publically your wife is a shemale?
>> >
>> no mike I admit the accusastion was made
>>
>> you OTOH lied and claimed you have not been accused of fraud
>> http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
>
>Marque. BIG difference between being accused and being guilty. Y
agreed you point?
Mike said he had not been accused of fraud he lied
Dloyd Lavies
>
> no stlaking of mike in my refusaul
>
> still no stlaking by my
>
WTF???
LOL, my niece's two year old can spell better than you.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On Mar 16, 9:15?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
>
>>
>> no stlaking of mike in my refusaul
>>
>> still no stlaking by my
>>
>WTF???
>
still nothing of the stalking you alege occoured
it exists only in your dreams woger
Not Lloyd
<Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
news:2dgmv29kt81df3rm7...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:14:55 -0500, "Not Lloyd" <anon@anon> wrote:
>
> >
> >"KH6HZ" <kh6...@Tarrl.net> wrote in message
> >news:%LFKh.104754$Ju2....@newsfe16.lga...
> >> Does the thought of pimps and whips excite you, Mark?
> >>
> >Mark could not care less about the girls the pimps are "pimping",
> lying again woger
> http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
>
but the truth is I have sex with people dick ass pussy are just
important as to the mechanics of the low level interface as some say
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
yes woger?
Not Lloyd
<Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
news:3vgmv2164rsvt7b1t...@4ax.com...
> On 16 Mar 2007 18:25:39 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies" <N0vfp...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Mar 16, 9:15?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> no stlaking of mike in my refusaul
> >>
> >> still no stlaking by my
> >>
> >WTF???
> >
> still nothing of the stalking you alege occoured
>
> it exists only in your dreams woger
> http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
>
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
hardly woger but you are a stalker so you don't reconize it as a crime
Not Marque
<Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
news:2vhmv2hbq3a4ifmks...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:34 -0500, "Not Lloyd" <anon@anon> wrote:
>
> >
> ><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
> >news:3vgmv2164rsvt7b1t...@4ax.com...
> >> On 16 Mar 2007 18:25:39 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies" <N0vfp...@aol.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Mar 16, 9:15?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> no stlaking of mike in my refusaul
> >> >>
> >> >> still no stlaking by my
> >> >>
> >> >WTF???
> >> >
> >> still nothing of the stalking you alege occoured
> >>
> >> it exists only in your dreams woger
> >> http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >Stalking exists only in your dreams, Mark.
>
> hardly woger but you are a stalker so you don't reconize it as a crime
> >
not stlaking just garden variety jerking you around it does not rise
to stalking till somebody makes a threat of violence so not quite
Get your home-brewed "definitions" straight, Mark.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>
><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
>news:2vhmv2hbq3a4ifmks...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:34 -0500, "Not Lloyd" <anon@anon> wrote:
>>
>> >Stalking exists only in your dreams, Mark.
>>
>> hardly woger but you are a stalker so you don't reconize it as a crime
>> >
>To quote you just a week ago:
>not stlaking just garden variety jerking you around it does not rise
>to stalking till somebody makes a threat of violence so not quite
your point
>
>
>
>Get your home-brewed "definitions" straight, Mark.
I do you don't bother to pay attention
Dave Heil
> <Ma...@kb9rqz.org> spewed forth the following excrement:
>
>> pimps and whips!
>>
>> shwoing clearly that he suports and promotes the sort cyber slime that
>> his pals Robeson and Wisemen have been enaging in for years
>
> LMAO.
>
> You're whacked.
D'ya think?
> How do you get promoting prostitution from pimps and whips?
It's a trick, Mike. Mark clearly wrote "prostittuion".
If the girls go through hostess training, they have to pay their
prostituition.
Dave K8MN
Jesus
<Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
news:81jmv25viues7p8mn...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:00:20 -0500, "Not Marque" <anon@anon> wrote:
>
> >
> ><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
> >news:2vhmv2hbq3a4ifmks...@4ax.com...
> >> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:34 -0500, "Not Lloyd" <anon@anon> wrote:
> >>
>
> >> >Stalking exists only in your dreams, Mark.
> >>
> >> hardly woger but you are a stalker so you don't reconize it as a crime
> >> >
> >To quote you just a week ago:
> >not stlaking just garden variety jerking you around it does not rise
> >to stalking till somebody makes a threat of violence so not quite
>
> your point
> >
> >
> >
> >Get your home-brewed "definitions" straight, Mark.
>
> I do you don't bother to pay attention
> >
committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood
shall be upon them.
John Smith I
> <Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
> news:81jmv25viues7p8mn...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:00:20 -0500, "Not Marque" <anon@anon> wrote:
>>
>>> <Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
>>> news:2vhmv2hbq3a4ifmks...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:34 -0500, "Not Lloyd" <anon@anon> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stalking exists only in your dreams, Mark.
>>>> hardly woger but you are a stalker so you don't reconize it as a crime
>>> To quote you just a week ago:
>>> not stlaking just garden variety jerking you around it does not rise
>>> to stalking till somebody makes a threat of violence so not quite
>> your point
>>>
>>>
>>> Get your home-brewed "definitions" straight, Mark.
>> I do you don't bother to pay attention
> If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have
> committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood
> shall be upon them.
>
>
Well, it might say that in the bible alright, however, I can guarantee
the "feeling" won't be good for a real man ... and, their may indeed be
consequences to be paid elsewhere ... "youse' pays your money, youse'
take your chances"--has been told me by wise men ...
JS
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>KH6HZ wrote:
>> <Ma...@kb9rqz.org> spewed forth the following excrement:
>It's a trick, Mike. Mark clearly wrote "prostittuion".
stil mike propmotes the sort of behavoir he aleges to despise and so
do you Dave
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>
><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
>news:81jmv25viues7p8mn...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:00:20 -0500, "Not Marque" <anon@anon> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> ><Ma...@kb9rqz.org> wrote in message
>> >news:2vhmv2hbq3a4ifmks...@4ax.com...
>> >> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:34 -0500, "Not Lloyd" <anon@anon> wrote:
>> >>
>>
>> >> >Stalking exists only in your dreams, Mark.
>> >>
>> >> hardly woger but you are a stalker so you don't reconize it as a crime
>> >> >
>> >To quote you just a week ago:
>> >not stlaking just garden variety jerking you around it does not rise
>> >to stalking till somebody makes a threat of violence so not quite
>>
>> your point
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Get your home-brewed "definitions" straight, Mark.
>>
>> I do you don't bother to pay attention
>> >
> If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have
>committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood
>shall be upon them.
>
only in your dreams woger
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
indeed although I do wish these asshole would stop comiting the
blasphemy of pretending to be God himself
I am KNOW that viiolates the decalogge more often called by gentiles
the 10 comndments
>
>JS
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>
be adivised this a areply to known theif and cyber stalker
"Dloyd Lavies" youd better hope I never realiable pentrate your security
http://markmorgansucks.blogspot.com/
http://dloydlaviessweatlord.blogspot.com/
http://worldofdloyd.blogspot.com/2007/01/new-year.html
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable