Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
OT John Kasich
142 views
Skip to first unread message
nothermark
Mar 20, 2016, 9:19:56 AM3/20/16
to
Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
George Anthony
Mar 20, 2016, 10:45:57 AM3/20/16
to
nothermark <nothe...@not.here> wrote:
> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
>
He's a politician.
> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
>
nothermark
Mar 20, 2016, 11:04:13 AM3/20/16
to
humble. Not him.
Hank
Mar 20, 2016, 4:56:15 PM3/20/16
to
On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 9:19:56 AM UTC-4, nothermark wrote:
> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
He was pulled over by the police and given a ticket just before he was elected. After he was elected he called the cop an idiot at some function he was speaking at. Videos are available on u tube of the stop and the comments he made. He is not a big fan of cops/firefighters.
> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
I waste my vote on a libertarian before I vote for him. :-)
Hank
George Anthony
Mar 20, 2016, 5:03:26 PM3/20/16
to
debbie
Mar 20, 2016, 7:24:04 PM3/20/16
to
On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
>
You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
>
nothermark
Mar 20, 2016, 8:09:24 PM3/20/16
to
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
wrote:
the mighty o is not even close to kasich
wrote:
Lone Haranguer
Mar 20, 2016, 8:35:52 PM3/20/16
to
LZ
debbie
Mar 20, 2016, 8:50:04 PM3/20/16
to
more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
nothermark
Mar 20, 2016, 9:04:18 PM3/20/16
to
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:50:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
wrote:
>On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
>>>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
>>>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
>>>>
>>> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
>>
>> the mighty o is not even close to kasich
>>
>Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
>more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
Start watching Kasich.
>On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
>>>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
>>>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
>>>>
>>> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
>>
>> the mighty o is not even close to kasich
>>
>Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
>more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
debbie
Mar 20, 2016, 9:09:06 PM3/20/16
to
say, but I still maintain the president we have now is worse. My opinion
is my own and I know you will disagree.
nothermark
Mar 21, 2016, 9:26:35 AM3/21/16
to
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:09:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
Your opinion is yours and you are welcome to it.
That said I have never heard O as arrogant as K. Enough said.
That said I have never heard O as arrogant as K. Enough said.
dm_callier
Mar 21, 2016, 12:27:18 PM3/21/16
to
I find it quite interesting folks describe the current President as "arrogant"...I hear an echo of "uppity" in there some where. When I look at Presidents during my short lifetime, I'd have to rate Nixon and Clinton as the most arrogant...and I voted for both of them...twice...
Major Oz
Mar 21, 2016, 1:01:41 PM3/21/16
to
On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 11:27:18 AM UTC-5, dm_callier wrote:
> I find it quite interesting folks describe the current President as "arrogant"...I hear an echo of "uppity" in there some where.
...and some hear the voices of gods and aliens....
> I find it quite interesting folks describe the current President as "arrogant"...I hear an echo of "uppity" in there some where.
> When I look at Presidents during my short lifetime, I'd have to rate Nixon and Clinton as the most arrogant...and I voted for both of them...twice...
....
With few exceptions, those that reach the level of reaching for and sometimes attaining the presidency ARE -- kinda have to be -- somewhat arrogant, in the campaign.
Once in office, however, a level of adulthood should ensue.
Obama never achieved it.
...caveat: I realize that any criticism of The Messiah will be read, by the usual suspects, as racist. That speaks to them, not to me.
Where the media made the Kennedys into royalty and Hillary tried really hard for Bill -- and, by extension, her -- to be recognized as such, Obama did it for himself.
He has always seen himself as superior....above the "common folk". And if we have ever approached an Imelda Marcos, Michelle hit the jackpot.
Just observe his interaction with the military around him. See the looks on their faces (faces of all colors) when they are sure nobody is looking...
Ok, rev al, et all...........your turn.....
George Anthony
Mar 21, 2016, 1:02:00 PM3/21/16
to
self-important, pompous, arrogant individual to ever sit behind the
Resolute desk.
Owen McKenzie
Mar 21, 2016, 2:48:40 PM3/21/16
to
--
Owen McKenzie
I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding
because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have
not a single political argument left.
Margaret Thatcher
dm_callier
Mar 21, 2016, 3:47:46 PM3/21/16
to
On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 10:01:41 AM UTC-7, Major Oz wrote:
<snip>
Anywho...checking the InterWebs brought up some more tinder for the campfire; the following link doesn't even have the current President making the top 10:
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/11/18/most-and-least-narcissistic-u-s-presidents/
But I'm sure you can find plenty of other sites that would disagree in the great echo chamber of the ether.
Enjoy the day...dmc
<snip>
>
> Nixon was virtually terminally shy.......yes: shy. He was also a brilliant nerd, who had no clue of social niceties. My sources say, however, that he was as warm in person as LBJ or Reagan.
Really...well, shy or not, when he won re-election in a landslide he brought ruin upon himself by condoning and covering up a burglary by people who sought his re-election. Putting oneself above the law might qualify as arrogant.
> Nixon was virtually terminally shy.......yes: shy. He was also a brilliant nerd, who had no clue of social niceties. My sources say, however, that he was as warm in person as LBJ or Reagan.
Anywho...checking the InterWebs brought up some more tinder for the campfire; the following link doesn't even have the current President making the top 10:
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/11/18/most-and-least-narcissistic-u-s-presidents/
But I'm sure you can find plenty of other sites that would disagree in the great echo chamber of the ether.
Enjoy the day...dmc
Major Oz
Mar 21, 2016, 5:18:49 PM3/21/16
to
First......it's psychology.
Second.....published in Psychological (giggle,giggle) SCIENCE.
....apparently by those who claim psych to be science.
As such, it is eminently dismissable....even if it wasn't agenda based.
I love shit like this.
Publish....something....get promoted...publish more shit....get tenure....
In a universe without without rigor.
...but....interesting aid to discussion, as long as we don't synonymize arrogance and narcissism.
George Anthony
Mar 21, 2016, 5:28:00 PM3/21/16
to
"dm_callier" wrote in message
news:7791d614-83d8-4cab...@googlegroups.com...
On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 10:01:41 AM UTC-7, Major Oz wrote:
<snip>
>
> Nixon was virtually terminally shy.......yes: shy. He was also a
> brilliant nerd, who had no clue of social niceties. My sources say,
> however, that he was as warm in person as LBJ or Reagan.
Really...well, shy or not, when he won re-election in a landslide he brought
ruin upon himself by condoning and covering up a burglary by people who
sought his re-election. Putting oneself above the law might qualify as
arrogant.
Hmmm, seems like there's a democrat candidate running now that fits that
description.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
George Anthony
Mar 21, 2016, 6:42:12 PM3/21/16
to
the leather elbow pads, puffing on their pipes and waxing philosophically.
Not one has yet to contribute anything useful to society. People complain
about the cost of college education. Get rid of most of the administrators
and philosophers and tuition might be affordable. But... it's nice work if
you can get it.
nothermark
Mar 21, 2016, 7:53:19 PM3/21/16
to
can see it if you want to.
debbie
Mar 21, 2016, 8:23:07 PM3/21/16
to
said.
Bruce
Mar 21, 2016, 8:26:17 PM3/21/16
to
On 3/21/2016 9:58 AM, George Anthony wrote:
> dm_callier <dm.ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I find it quite interesting folks describe the current President as
>> "arrogant"...I hear an echo of "uppity" in there some where. When I look
>> at Presidents during my short lifetime, I'd have to rate Nixon and
>> Clinton as the most arrogant...and I voted for both of them...twice...
>>
>
> ....and if you include Obama, you're a three time loser. Obama is the most
> dm_callier <dm.ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I find it quite interesting folks describe the current President as
>> "arrogant"...I hear an echo of "uppity" in there some where. When I look
>> at Presidents during my short lifetime, I'd have to rate Nixon and
>> Clinton as the most arrogant...and I voted for both of them...twice...
>>
>
> self-important, pompous, arrogant individual to ever sit behind the
> Resolute desk.
That's easy to say from your perspective of having seen only a dozen (or
> Resolute desk.
fewer) presidents in action. From everything I have read and heard,
0bama is not near as bad as Theodore Roosevelt or Woodrow Wilson.
--
Bruce
"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from it's
government." -- Thomas Paine
Bruce
Mar 21, 2016, 8:33:15 PM3/21/16
to
a book I am reading:
9 Presidents Who Screwed Up America: And Four Who Tried to Save Her --
Brion McClanahan
This book is written from a slightly different perspective from other
Best and Worst Presidents lists in that is based on how well each of
them upheld their oath of office and fulfilled the duties and
limitations of the Constitution. Very different from the usual lists.
Vito
Mar 21, 2016, 9:47:38 PM3/21/16
to
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:28:14 -0500, "George Anthony"
<gant...@gmail.org> wrote:
>
>
>"dm_callier" wrote in message
>news:7791d614-83d8-4cab...@googlegroups.com...
>
>On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 10:01:41 AM UTC-7, Major Oz wrote:
><snip>
>>
>> Nixon was virtually terminally shy.......yes: shy. He was also a
>> brilliant nerd, who had no clue of social niceties. My sources say,
>> however, that he was as warm in person as LBJ or Reagan.
>
>Really...well, shy or not, when he won re-election in a landslide he brought
>ruin upon himself by condoning and covering up a burglary by people who
>sought his re-election. Putting oneself above the law might qualify as
>arrogant.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Hmmm, seems like there's a democrat candidate running now that fits that
>description.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
True ... but Watergate did NOT bring down Nixon, he was re-elected
<gant...@gmail.org> wrote:
>
>
>"dm_callier" wrote in message
>news:7791d614-83d8-4cab...@googlegroups.com...
>
>On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 10:01:41 AM UTC-7, Major Oz wrote:
><snip>
>>
>> Nixon was virtually terminally shy.......yes: shy. He was also a
>> brilliant nerd, who had no clue of social niceties. My sources say,
>> however, that he was as warm in person as LBJ or Reagan.
>
>Really...well, shy or not, when he won re-election in a landslide he brought
>ruin upon himself by condoning and covering up a burglary by people who
>sought his re-election. Putting oneself above the law might qualify as
>arrogant.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Hmmm, seems like there's a democrat candidate running now that fits that
>description.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
long after that scandal broke. Nobody cared because the Democrats had
done the exact same things and worse.
Vito
Mar 21, 2016, 9:51:02 PM3/21/16
to
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:53:18 -0400, nothermark <nothe...@not.here>
wrote:
wrote:
>You are really missing the point. Listen to O and listen to K and you
>can see it if you want to.
Only in the one we don't like. The other is a saint. Ask anybody.
>can see it if you want to.
George Anthony
Mar 21, 2016, 9:59:49 PM3/21/16
to
Bruce <bruce...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/21/2016 9:58 AM, George Anthony wrote:
>> dm_callier <dm.ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I find it quite interesting folks describe the current President as
>>> "arrogant"...I hear an echo of "uppity" in there some where. When I look
>>> at Presidents during my short lifetime, I'd have to rate Nixon and
>>> Clinton as the most arrogant...and I voted for both of them...twice...
>>>
>>
>> ....and if you include Obama, you're a three time loser. Obama is the most
>> self-important, pompous, arrogant individual to ever sit behind the
>> Resolute desk.
>
> That's easy to say from your perspective of having seen only a dozen (or
> fewer) presidents in action. From everything I have read and heard,
> 0bama is not near as bad as Theodore Roosevelt or Woodrow Wilson.
>
Not surprising, they were both progressives. But I still can't imagine them
> On 3/21/2016 9:58 AM, George Anthony wrote:
>> dm_callier <dm.ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I find it quite interesting folks describe the current President as
>>> "arrogant"...I hear an echo of "uppity" in there some where. When I look
>>> at Presidents during my short lifetime, I'd have to rate Nixon and
>>> Clinton as the most arrogant...and I voted for both of them...twice...
>>>
>>
>> ....and if you include Obama, you're a three time loser. Obama is the most
>> self-important, pompous, arrogant individual to ever sit behind the
>> Resolute desk.
>
> That's easy to say from your perspective of having seen only a dozen (or
> fewer) presidents in action. From everything I have read and heard,
> 0bama is not near as bad as Theodore Roosevelt or Woodrow Wilson.
>
being more self-centered than the Egoist in Chief.
kmiller
Mar 21, 2016, 11:19:32 PM3/21/16
to
On 3/21/2016 11:49 AM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> On 3/21/2016 9:26 AM, nothermark wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:09:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/20/2016 9:04 PM, nothermark wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:50:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
>>>>>>>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
>>>>>>>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the mighty o is not even close to kasich
>>>>>>
>>>>> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
>>>>> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
>>>>
>>>> Start watching Kasich.
>>>>
>>> I have not watched him but I did hear him on the radio and he is as you
>>> say, but I still maintain the president we have now is worse. My opinion
>>> is my own and I know you will disagree.
>>
>> Your opinion is yours and you are welcome to it.
>>
>> That said I have never heard O as arrogant as K. Enough said.
>>
> http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432981/barack-obamas-foreign-policy-narcissistic
>
http://www.cogwriter.com/barack-obama-prophecy-antichrist.htm
> On 3/21/2016 9:26 AM, nothermark wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:09:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/20/2016 9:04 PM, nothermark wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:50:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
>>>>>>>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
>>>>>>>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the mighty o is not even close to kasich
>>>>>>
>>>>> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
>>>>> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
>>>>
>>>> Start watching Kasich.
>>>>
>>> I have not watched him but I did hear him on the radio and he is as you
>>> say, but I still maintain the president we have now is worse. My opinion
>>> is my own and I know you will disagree.
>>
>> Your opinion is yours and you are welcome to it.
>>
>> That said I have never heard O as arrogant as K. Enough said.
>>
> http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432981/barack-obamas-foreign-policy-narcissistic
>
Vito
Mar 22, 2016, 6:50:15 AM3/22/16
to
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:19:31 -0700, kmiller
<i09...@removethisspamblockerstuff-yahoo.com> wrote:
>http://www.cogwriter.com/barack-obama-prophecy-antichrist.htm
And then people wonder why I do not trust superstitious people.
<i09...@removethisspamblockerstuff-yahoo.com> wrote:
>http://www.cogwriter.com/barack-obama-prophecy-antichrist.htm
And then people wonder why I do not trust superstitious people.
debbie
Mar 22, 2016, 7:44:17 AM3/22/16
to
nothermark
Mar 22, 2016, 9:45:38 AM3/22/16
to
George Anthony
Mar 22, 2016, 9:50:23 AM3/22/16
to
Owen McKenzie
Mar 22, 2016, 11:13:47 AM3/22/16
to
On 3/21/2016 11:19 PM, kmiller wrote:
> On 3/21/2016 11:49 AM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>>
>> http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432981/barack-obamas-foreign-policy-narcissistic
> On 3/21/2016 11:49 AM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>
> http://www.cogwriter.com/barack-obama-prophecy-antichrist.htm
Nah. He's not fooling nearly enough people.
kmiller
Mar 22, 2016, 11:28:35 AM3/22/16
to
On 3/22/2016 8:14 AM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> On 3/21/2016 11:19 PM, kmiller wrote:
>> On 3/21/2016 11:49 AM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432981/barack-obamas-foreign-policy-narcissistic
>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://www.cogwriter.com/barack-obama-prophecy-antichrist.htm
>
> Nah. He's not fooling nearly enough people.
>
How many is "enough"?
> On 3/21/2016 11:19 PM, kmiller wrote:
>> On 3/21/2016 11:49 AM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432981/barack-obamas-foreign-policy-narcissistic
>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://www.cogwriter.com/barack-obama-prophecy-antichrist.htm
>
> Nah. He's not fooling nearly enough people.
>
Lone Haranguer
Mar 22, 2016, 11:34:43 AM3/22/16
to
ignoring the Constitution and adding to his presidential powers.
When it comes to dealing with other heads of state, he's a toady.
LZ
Lone Haranguer
Mar 22, 2016, 5:24:49 PM3/22/16
to
reading material.
A psychiatrist would have some definite conclusions about your choices.
LZ
Vito
Mar 22, 2016, 7:35:44 PM3/22/16
to
Lone Haranguer
Mar 23, 2016, 10:33:40 AM3/23/16
to
LZ
Hunter Hampton
Mar 23, 2016, 1:03:49 PM3/23/16
to
On 3/20/2016 8:50 PM, debbie wrote:
> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
You need to get out more...... meet Donald Trump.
> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
Hunter
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
nothermark
Mar 23, 2016, 1:54:48 PM3/23/16
to
I have almost half the delegates". Kasich says "I should get the
nomination because I am the better man".
Lone Haranguer
Mar 23, 2016, 2:37:55 PM3/23/16
to
On 3/23/2016 10:03 AM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
> On 3/20/2016 8:50 PM, debbie wrote:
>> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
>> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
>
>
> You need to get out more...... meet Donald Trump.
>
> Hunter
>
The thing is, I think Trump knows he's an egotistical windbag whereas
> On 3/20/2016 8:50 PM, debbie wrote:
>> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
>> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
>
>
> You need to get out more...... meet Donald Trump.
>
> Hunter
>
Obama views himself as a royal personage.
LZ
Frank Howell
Mar 23, 2016, 4:26:30 PM3/23/16
to
--
Frank Howell
Hank
Mar 23, 2016, 5:07:15 PM3/23/16
to
On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 4:26:30 PM UTC-4, Frank Howell wrote:
> > The difference is that Trump says "I should get the nomination because
> > I have almost half the delegates". Kasich says "I should get the
> > nomination because I am the better man".
> >
> NO, NO, it's who has the biggest hands that will win!
>
> --
> Frank Howell
Oh, I get it now. That must be the reason Carly Fiorina dropped out. My dad always told me to marry a girl with small hands because the small hands make your dick look bigger. I should've listened to him.
> > The difference is that Trump says "I should get the nomination because
> > I have almost half the delegates". Kasich says "I should get the
> > nomination because I am the better man".
> >
> NO, NO, it's who has the biggest hands that will win!
>
> --
> Frank Howell
Hank
Lone Haranguer
Mar 23, 2016, 7:44:04 PM3/23/16
to
LZ
RMcBane
Mar 24, 2016, 12:48:07 AM3/24/16
to
--
Richard McBane
Technobarbarian
Mar 24, 2016, 9:51:20 AM3/24/16
to
"Hunter Hampton" <airstrea...@geemail.com> wrote in message
news:56f2cc73$0$28818$c3e8da3$88b2...@news.astraweb.com...
> On 3/20/2016 8:50 PM, debbie wrote:
>> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
>> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
>
>
> You need to get out more...... meet Donald Trump.
That's the thing that kills me about this discussion. A certain
>> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
>> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
>
>
> You need to get out more...... meet Donald Trump.
amount of narcissism is pretty much a job requirement for our politicians,
but Trump blows the top off the charts. He makes Obama, Kasich, and the rest
look shy and retiring. I would have expected anyone who leans Republican to
lose interest in this subject. By nominating Trump they have, in effect,
decided that this isn't an important problem and might even be a positive
attribute even though they've been whinging about narcissism for the last 8
years. Instead they're pointing everywhere but the orange elephant in the
room.
Vito
Mar 24, 2016, 10:32:08 AM3/24/16
to
vs narcissim. It's a cultural thing vs a personal thing. What is
considered normal in NYC could get you a broken face in SW Texas. NYrs
I have worked with sound just like Trump but in fact are teddy bears.
From the news, that goes for Trump too.
It's moot anyway. The GOP would rather see Hillary as president than
risk Trump putting them in prison.
debbie
Mar 24, 2016, 10:48:41 AM3/24/16
to
Abrasive and pushy.
nothermark
Mar 24, 2016, 12:08:20 PM3/24/16
to
Hunter Hampton
Mar 24, 2016, 12:20:36 PM3/24/16
to
On 3/24/2016 10:48 AM, debbie wrote:
> No fan of his, but he just seems like a typical New Yorker to me.
> Abrasive and pushy.
LOL..... as I said, You need to get out more. New Yorkers give what
> No fan of his, but he just seems like a typical New Yorker to me.
> Abrasive and pushy.
they get.
Major Oz
Mar 24, 2016, 1:54:53 PM3/24/16
to
der D's narcissism is, IMO, 90% bluster, and I view that as just fine.
(In the old days, Rush was 99% bluster, but, over the years, began to take himself seriously.)
D, however is brilliant man. You may not like him, but he is brilliant. He gets shit done. Were he to be the same blustery braggart in genuine, closed door, negotiations, he would never be able to pull of his successes.
So, for those who worry how he would deal with Merkel, Putin, Xi Jinping, or ISIS.........not to worry.
Major Oz
Mar 24, 2016, 1:56:58 PM3/24/16
to
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:20:36 AM UTC-5, Hunter Hampton wrote:
> On 3/24/2016 10:48 AM, debbie wrote:
> > No fan of his, but he just seems like a typical New Yorker to me.
> > Abrasive and pushy.
>
>
> LOL..... as I said, You need to get out more. New Yorkers give what
> they get.
So does most anyone.....NY CITIERS, however, are simply louder and nastier about it.
> > No fan of his, but he just seems like a typical New Yorker to me.
> > Abrasive and pushy.
>
>
> LOL..... as I said, You need to get out more. New Yorkers give what
> they get.
Technobarbarian
Mar 24, 2016, 2:20:06 PM3/24/16
to
"debbie" <deb...@area51outreach.com> wrote in message
news:nd0ui8$jqu$1...@dont-email.me...
remains the same. Republicans have been telling us what a terrible fault
this was in Obama, even though he isn't outstandingly narcissistic when
measured against other Presidents and many other politicians, and now that
Trump has taken that same trait to a whole new level it's seen as something
positive--for Trump, but only Trump. Normally I would expect Republicans to
either have a good explanation or shut up about the subject, and yet, here
we are with people going on about minor league narcissists like Trump wasn't
sitting in there in the middle of the subject in all his orange glory.
Vito
Mar 24, 2016, 2:56:56 PM3/24/16
to
narcisstic by having been successful in business. None of the others
have been. They are only successful at feeding on the public. That
may be an incorrect assessment of Trump but I think that is why many
are willing to forgive the same trait they condemn in, say, Obama.
Unknown
Mar 24, 2016, 3:16:27 PM3/24/16
to
I wonder if the REPUBLICANS in Alabama are going to willing to
"forgive" their "family values" Governor?
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/alabamas-family-values-governor-mired-sex-scandal
--
Pensacola, FL
http://www.travellogs.us/
nothermark
Mar 24, 2016, 3:39:39 PM3/24/16
to
Lone Haranguer
Mar 24, 2016, 5:29:20 PM3/24/16
to
LZ
debbie
Mar 24, 2016, 5:46:29 PM3/24/16
to
running. I am not a Republican, although in some ways I am a
conservative. That being said, I have voted for Democrats when I thought
they were not the worst choice.
Lone Haranguer
Mar 24, 2016, 6:20:33 PM3/24/16
to
LZ
Technobarbarian
Mar 24, 2016, 6:41:15 PM3/24/16
to
news:nd1n1i$me1$1...@dont-email.me...
Actually you did exactly that, but I'm not trying to single you out.
This whole thread is pretty insane, even by RORT standards. I thought Hunter
did a pretty good job of pointing that out.
This whole thread is pretty insane, even by RORT standards. I thought Hunter
did a pretty good job of pointing that out.
George Anthony
Mar 24, 2016, 7:58:18 PM3/24/16
to
Hunter Hampton
Mar 24, 2016, 8:16:48 PM3/24/16
to
On 3/24/2016 5:46 PM, debbie wrote:
> I am by no means defending any candidate. I do not like a single one
> running. I am not a Republican, although in some ways I am a
> conservative. That being said, I have voted for Democrats when I thought
> they were not the worst choice.
Good, we can count on your vote then.
> I am by no means defending any candidate. I do not like a single one
> running. I am not a Republican, although in some ways I am a
> conservative. That being said, I have voted for Democrats when I thought
> they were not the worst choice.
Major Oz
Mar 24, 2016, 8:24:39 PM3/24/16
to
Major Oz
Mar 24, 2016, 8:29:49 PM3/24/16
to
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 4:46:29 PM UTC-5, debbie wrote:
>
> I am by no means defending any candidate. I do not like a single one
> running. I am not a Republican, although in some ways I am a
> conservative. That being said, I have voted for Democrats when I thought
> they were not the worst choice.
That is what all intelligent people do.
>
> I am by no means defending any candidate. I do not like a single one
> running. I am not a Republican, although in some ways I am a
> conservative. That being said, I have voted for Democrats when I thought
> they were not the worst choice.
I voted for Dixie Lee Ray for gov the same year I voted for Gerald Ford.
She won....he didn't.
Next time around, I voted for her and Reagan.
He won....she didn't (but I met them both, in person)
George Anthony
Mar 24, 2016, 8:45:49 PM3/24/16
to
Major Oz
Mar 24, 2016, 9:32:38 PM3/24/16
to
Apparently ALWAYS includes ONLY the present.
...nice to know for future discussions....
Max
Mar 24, 2016, 10:16:37 PM3/24/16
to
On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 6:50:04 PM UTC-6, debbie wrote:
> On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
> >>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> >>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
> >>>
> >> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
> >
> > the mighty o is not even close to kasich
> On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
> >>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> >>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
> >>>
> >> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
> >
> > the mighty o is not even close to kasich
> >
> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
The Donald.
> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
Max
Mar 24, 2016, 10:18:37 PM3/24/16
to
On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 12:48:40 PM UTC-6, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> On 3/21/2016 9:26 AM, nothermark wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:09:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/20/2016 9:04 PM, nothermark wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:50:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> >>>
> >> I have not watched him but I did hear him on the radio and he is as you
> >> say, but I still maintain the president we have now is worse. My opinion
> >> is my own and I know you will disagree.
> >
> > Your opinion is yours and you are welcome to it.
> >
> > That said I have never heard O as arrogant as K. Enough said.
> >
> http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432981/barack-obamas-foreign-policy-narcissistic
>
> --
>
> Owen McKenzie
>
> I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding
> because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have
> not a single political argument left.
> Margaret Thatcher
Where's the "like" button? ;-)
> On 3/21/2016 9:26 AM, nothermark wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:09:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/20/2016 9:04 PM, nothermark wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:50:04 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
> >>>>>>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> >>>>>>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the mighty o is not even close to kasich
> >>>>>
> >>>> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
> >>>> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
> >>>
> >>> Start watching Kasich.
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
> >>>>>>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> >>>>>>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the mighty o is not even close to kasich
> >>>>>
> >>>> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
> >>>> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I have not watched him but I did hear him on the radio and he is as you
> >> say, but I still maintain the president we have now is worse. My opinion
> >> is my own and I know you will disagree.
> >
> > Your opinion is yours and you are welcome to it.
> >
> > That said I have never heard O as arrogant as K. Enough said.
> >
> http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432981/barack-obamas-foreign-policy-narcissistic
>
> --
>
> Owen McKenzie
>
> I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding
> because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have
> not a single political argument left.
> Margaret Thatcher
Where's the "like" button? ;-)
George Anthony
Mar 24, 2016, 10:25:37 PM3/24/16
to
standards, he would be as persona non grata as Ted Cruz. He is probably the
last of a dying breed of DINO, southern Blue Dog democrats.
George Anthony
Mar 24, 2016, 10:25:37 PM3/24/16
to
always strikes is?
Vito
Mar 25, 2016, 12:31:24 AM3/25/16
to
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 19:16:35 -0700 (PDT), Max <gmd...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Naw, asomebody else noted, he's just a typical New Yorker.
wrote:
nothermark
Mar 25, 2016, 7:44:01 AM3/25/16
to
Dusty
Mar 25, 2016, 10:06:53 AM3/25/16
to
that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many of our
folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down to the
differences in the choices between the makers and the takers. Sadly, as
history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
makers, than it is to find willing takers.
Dusty
--
"Belief is the blissful twilight that those without the courage of true
convictions cling to in order to escape the sometimes harsh
understanding of reality that comes with truth." -- Dusty 2006
Unknown
Mar 25, 2016, 10:38:08 AM3/25/16
to
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:24:37 -0700 (PDT), Major Oz <ozm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
OZ, Sam Nunn was as corrupt, if not more corrupt, than any Senator of
his time.
When they went about Closing bases during his reign they did not close
bases in Georgia instead they made them larger. Think Kings Bay!
Back in my working days I was eyeball deep in that stuff!
wrote:
his time.
When they went about Closing bases during his reign they did not close
bases in Georgia instead they made them larger. Think Kings Bay!
Back in my working days I was eyeball deep in that stuff!
Lone Haranguer
Mar 25, 2016, 10:53:10 AM3/25/16
to
On 3/24/2016 5:16 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
> On 3/24/2016 5:46 PM, debbie wrote:
>> I am by no means defending any candidate. I do not like a single one
>> running. I am not a Republican, although in some ways I am a
>> conservative. That being said, I have voted for Democrats when I thought
>> they were not the worst choice.
>
>
> Good, we can count on your vote then.
>
> Hunter
Who should she choose for a Democrat nominee? The criminal or the
> On 3/24/2016 5:46 PM, debbie wrote:
>> I am by no means defending any candidate. I do not like a single one
>> running. I am not a Republican, although in some ways I am a
>> conservative. That being said, I have voted for Democrats when I thought
>> they were not the worst choice.
>
>
> Good, we can count on your vote then.
>
> Hunter
socialist?
LZ
Lone Haranguer
Mar 25, 2016, 11:26:05 AM3/25/16
to
Mussolini's poses were just what he was looking for.
Obama is Il Duce the second.
LZ
George Anthony
Mar 25, 2016, 12:14:30 PM3/25/16
to
steal overtly. It all stealing. BUT... as long as they are democrats
(socialists, liberals, Marxists, etc) the obliviot entitled will vote for
them.
Hunter Hampton
Mar 25, 2016, 1:39:41 PM3/25/16
to
On 3/25/2016 10:06 AM, Dusty wrote:
> It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
> that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
> some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many of our
> folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
> always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down to the
> differences in the choices between the makers and the takers. Sadly, as
> history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
> makers, than it is to find willing takers.
>
> Dusty
Yeah. I'm sure that's why Bill Gates is a liberal, and Warren
> It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
> that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
> some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many of our
> folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
> always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down to the
> differences in the choices between the makers and the takers. Sadly, as
> history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
> makers, than it is to find willing takers.
>
> Dusty
Buffet..... they are both hoping to get free stuff.....
Fact is liberals care about people, righties care about money, guns and
Jesus....
HUnter
Major Oz
Mar 25, 2016, 1:50:13 PM3/25/16
to
On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 12:39:41 PM UTC-5, Hunter Hampton wrote:
> On 3/25/2016 10:06 AM, Dusty wrote:
> > It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
> > that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
> > some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many of our
> > folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
> > always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down to the
> > differences in the choices between the makers and the takers. Sadly, as
> > history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
> > makers, than it is to find willing takers.
> >
> > Dusty
>
>
> Yeah. I'm sure that's why Bill Gates is a liberal, and Warren
> Buffet..... they are both hoping to get free stuff.....
>
> Fact is liberals care about people, righties care about money, guns and
> Jesus....
...kinda like saying: birds have feet and fish have eyes.
> On 3/25/2016 10:06 AM, Dusty wrote:
> > It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
> > that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
> > some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many of our
> > folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
> > always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down to the
> > differences in the choices between the makers and the takers. Sadly, as
> > history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
> > makers, than it is to find willing takers.
> >
> > Dusty
>
>
> Yeah. I'm sure that's why Bill Gates is a liberal, and Warren
> Buffet..... they are both hoping to get free stuff.....
>
> Fact is liberals care about people, righties care about money, guns and
> Jesus....
There's more to each.
Lone Haranguer
Mar 25, 2016, 3:30:45 PM3/25/16
to
On 3/25/2016 10:39 AM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
> On 3/25/2016 10:06 AM, Dusty wrote:
>> It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
>> that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
>> some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many of our
>> folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
>> always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down to the
>> differences in the choices between the makers and the takers. Sadly, as
>> history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
>> makers, than it is to find willing takers.
>>
>> Dusty
>
>
> Yeah. I'm sure that's why Bill Gates is a liberal, and Warren
> Buffet..... they are both hoping to get free stuff.....
>
> Fact is liberals care about people, righties care about money, guns and
> Jesus....
>
> HUnter
Liberals are Communists in sheep's clothing. Once they gain power they
> On 3/25/2016 10:06 AM, Dusty wrote:
>> It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
>> that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
>> some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many of our
>> folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
>> always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down to the
>> differences in the choices between the makers and the takers. Sadly, as
>> history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
>> makers, than it is to find willing takers.
>>
>> Dusty
>
>
> Yeah. I'm sure that's why Bill Gates is a liberal, and Warren
> Buffet..... they are both hoping to get free stuff.....
>
> Fact is liberals care about people, righties care about money, guns and
> Jesus....
>
> HUnter
all emulate Josef Stalin...who created a paradise for his true believers.
"Dyadkin estimated that the USSR suffered 56 to 62 million "unnatural
deaths" during that period, with 34 to 49 million directly linked to
Stalin. In “Europe A History,” British historian Norman Davies counted
50 million killed between 1924-53, excluding wartime casualties.Mar 5, 2013"
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=how+many+deaths+are+attributed+to+joseph+stalin%3F
*******************************
Liberals care about people alright...Old Josef loved his people to death.
LZ
>
bill horne
Mar 25, 2016, 4:36:02 PM3/25/16
to
Lone Haranguer wrote:
> On 3/25/2016 10:39 AM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>> On 3/25/2016 10:06 AM, Dusty wrote:
>>> It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
>>> that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
>>> some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many
>>> of our
>>> folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
>>> always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down
>>> to the
>>> differences in the choices between the makers and the takers.
>>> Sadly, as
>>> history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
>>> makers, than it is to find willing takers.
>>>
>>> Dusty
>>
>>
>> Yeah. I'm sure that's why Bill Gates is a liberal, and Warren
>> Buffet..... they are both hoping to get free stuff.....
>>
>> Fact is liberals care about people, righties care about money, guns and
>> Jesus....
>>
>> HUnter
>
> Liberals are Communists in sheep's clothing. Once they gain power
> they all emulate Josef Stalin...who created a paradise for his true
> believers.
Yep.
> On 3/25/2016 10:39 AM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>> On 3/25/2016 10:06 AM, Dusty wrote:
>>> It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
>>> that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
>>> some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many
>>> of our
>>> folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
>>> always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down
>>> to the
>>> differences in the choices between the makers and the takers.
>>> Sadly, as
>>> history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
>>> makers, than it is to find willing takers.
>>>
>>> Dusty
>>
>>
>> Yeah. I'm sure that's why Bill Gates is a liberal, and Warren
>> Buffet..... they are both hoping to get free stuff.....
>>
>> Fact is liberals care about people, righties care about money, guns and
>> Jesus....
>>
>> HUnter
>
> Liberals are Communists in sheep's clothing. Once they gain power
> they all emulate Josef Stalin...who created a paradise for his true
> believers.
-------------------------------------------------------------
After someone wrote “Trump 2016” in colored chalk around campus,
several dozen student demonstrators objected that the banal campaign
message scared, upset, or offended them, and administrators responded
by going Orwellian.
The Emory Wheel reports that Wagner will review footage from campus
security cameras to uncover who made the chalkings. “He added that if
they’re students, they will go through the conduct violation process,”
the newspaper stated, “while if they are from outside of the
University, trespassing charges will be pressed.” Ponder the
precedent. An academic authority figure will use surveillance to track
down and punish someone for urging support for a political candidate.
If possible, he will marshal criminal law to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/a-letter-to-emory-please-stop-fueling-trumpism/475356/
> "Dyadkin estimated that the USSR suffered 56 to 62 million "unnatural
> deaths" during that period, with 34 to 49 million directly linked to
> Stalin. In “Europe A History,” British historian Norman Davies counted
> 50 million killed between 1924-53, excluding wartime casualties.Mar 5,
> 2013"
> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=how+many+deaths+are+attributed+to+joseph+stalin%3F
>
> *******************************
> Liberals care about people alright...Old Josef loved his people to death.
>
> LZ
>>
>
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Dusty
Mar 25, 2016, 5:05:23 PM3/25/16
to
On 25-Mar-16 10:39, Hunter Hampton wrote:
> On 3/25/2016 10:06 AM, Dusty wrote:
>> It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
>> that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
>> some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many of our
>> folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
>> always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down to the
>> differences in the choices between the makers and the takers. Sadly, as
>> history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
>> makers, than it is to find willing takers.
>>
>> Dusty
>
>
> Yeah. I'm sure that's why Bill Gates is a liberal, and Warren
> Buffet..... they are both hoping to get free stuff.....
>
> Fact is liberals care about people, righties care about money, guns and
> Jesus....
>
> HUnter
To be sure Gates and Buffet are certainly on the "takers" side...which
> On 3/25/2016 10:06 AM, Dusty wrote:
>> It's hard to "win" when the simple minded can be so easily convinced
>> that something promised to them is FREE, because it was fleeced from
>> some working stiff that they already know has too much. Too many of our
>> folks think that there really IS such a thing as a FREE LUNCH! As
>> always, this election, like all others, will inevitably come down to the
>> differences in the choices between the makers and the takers. Sadly, as
>> history continues to show us, it's always harder to get/make/create
>> makers, than it is to find willing takers.
>>
>> Dusty
>
>
> Yeah. I'm sure that's why Bill Gates is a liberal, and Warren
> Buffet..... they are both hoping to get free stuff.....
>
> Fact is liberals care about people, righties care about money, guns and
> Jesus....
>
> HUnter
is probably how they managed to get to where they are today. Sadly, I
don't recollect saying that there's a hard and fast line between those
that make and those that take. As with most things...that distinction
seems to be both soft and flexible. I was speaking about the
majorities, not every darn one of 'em. Then again, I'm sure that for
them it would seem to be good marketing PR to be ready and willing to
stand with their most ardent customers.
Liberals care about people? I can kind of agree with that. They seem
to think that if they'll just say and show that they care, it's the same
thing as actually doing something noteworthy or worthwhile for them.
Could you possibly help me out, my lady? Please point out any liberal
policy success stories? I've looked both high and low...and seem to
have missed 'em. So your help would be MOST appreciated.
Take care and be well all,
Dusty
Mar 25, 2016, 5:06:17 PM3/25/16
to
George Anthony
Mar 25, 2016, 7:05:23 PM3/25/16
to
brain.
Owen McKenzie
Mar 26, 2016, 3:10:16 PM3/26/16
to
On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>
> Fact is liberals care about people,
>
>
> Fact is liberals care about people,
>
> HUnter
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
kmiller
Mar 26, 2016, 4:13:55 PM3/26/16
to
On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>
>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>
>> HUnter
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>
Churches care about people, using other people's money...
> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>
>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>
>> HUnter
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>
Businesses care about people, until they've taken all the people's money...
Conservatives care about people, unless they have no money...
Owen McKenzie
Mar 26, 2016, 4:50:15 PM3/26/16
to
On 3/26/2016 4:13 PM, kmiller wrote:
> On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>>
>>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>>
>>> HUnter
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>>
>
> Churches care about people, using other people's money...
Voluntary contributions...
> On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>>
>>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>>
>>> HUnter
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>>
>
> Churches care about people, using other people's money...
>
> Businesses care about people, until they've taken all the people's money...
>
> Conservatives care about people, unless they have no money...
> Businesses care about people, until they've taken all the people's money...
>
> Conservatives care about people, unless they have no money...
Hunter Hampton
Mar 26, 2016, 5:44:06 PM3/26/16
to
On 3/26/2016 3:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>>
> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
What percentage of your money actually goes to helping people?
>>
> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
What percentage actually goes to hurting people?
What percentage of the military, both active and veterans are getting
snap benefits?
You can no issue with huge corporations getting billions in tax breaks,
many making billions and paying no taxes...... and churches who pay no
taxes.....
"A married person with one child who makes $50,000 a year will pay
$36.82 in taxes to ensure the food stamp program is fully funded. But
wait, there is more. That $36.82 is not only for food stamps. Indeed,
that money is allocated to two other programs that include the school
lunch program, and the special supplemental food program for women,
infants and children. Keep in mind, this comprises the totality of the
costs associated with the program including administrative."
Poor you, having to give someone a hand up.
Hunter
kmiller
Mar 26, 2016, 6:29:22 PM3/26/16
to
On 3/26/2016 1:50 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> On 3/26/2016 4:13 PM, kmiller wrote:
>> On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>>> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>>>
>>>> HUnter
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>
>>> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>>>
>>
>> Churches care about people, using other people's money...
> Voluntary contributions...
if tithing is a part of what you believe and if you also believe that, if you don't believe, you are damned to hell forever and ever and ever with no
> On 3/26/2016 4:13 PM, kmiller wrote:
>> On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>>> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>>>
>>>> HUnter
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>
>>> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>>>
>>
>> Churches care about people, using other people's money...
> Voluntary contributions...
chance of parole then it's not voluntary. Or, perhaps it's voluntary in the same way that you pay your taxes voluntarily...
nothermark
Mar 26, 2016, 6:30:57 PM3/26/16
to
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:10:15 -0400, Owen McKenzie
<owenwmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>
>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>
>> HUnter
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
That's the best kind. ;-)
<owenwmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>
>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>
>> HUnter
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
Major Oz
Mar 26, 2016, 6:42:15 PM3/26/16
to
On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 4:44:06 PM UTC-5, Hunter Hampton wrote:
> On 3/26/2016 3:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> >>
> > Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>
>
> What percentage of your money actually goes to helping people?
>
> What percentage actually goes to hurting people?
>
> What percentage of the military, both active and veterans are getting
> snap benefits?
>
> You can no issue with huge corporations getting billions in tax breaks,
> many making billions and paying no taxes...... and churches who pay no
> taxes.....
>
> "A married person with one child who makes $50,000 a year will pay
> $36.82 in taxes to ensure the food stamp program is fully funded. But
> wait, there is more. That $36.82 is not only for food stamps. Indeed,
> that money is allocated to two other programs that include the school
> lunch program, and the special supplemental food program for women,
> infants and children. Keep in mind, this comprises the totality of the
> costs associated with the program including administrative."
>
> Poor you, having to give someone a hand up.
You seem to have something to say..........but you never said it.
> On 3/26/2016 3:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> >>
> > Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>
>
> What percentage of your money actually goes to helping people?
>
> What percentage actually goes to hurting people?
>
> What percentage of the military, both active and veterans are getting
> snap benefits?
>
> You can no issue with huge corporations getting billions in tax breaks,
> many making billions and paying no taxes...... and churches who pay no
> taxes.....
>
> "A married person with one child who makes $50,000 a year will pay
> $36.82 in taxes to ensure the food stamp program is fully funded. But
> wait, there is more. That $36.82 is not only for food stamps. Indeed,
> that money is allocated to two other programs that include the school
> lunch program, and the special supplemental food program for women,
> infants and children. Keep in mind, this comprises the totality of the
> costs associated with the program including administrative."
>
> Poor you, having to give someone a hand up.
None of the points have meaning without details.
Owen McKenzie
Mar 26, 2016, 7:12:58 PM3/26/16
to
significantly, so my answers would not make sense to you.
Suffice it to say that I contribute more weekly to things I feel are
helpful to the community, including food banks, than your married person
pays in taxes for in a year.
You have no idea how many people I've given a hand up. Not a hand out.
And I do it voluntarily, with my own money, not someone elses.
Owen McKenzie
Mar 26, 2016, 7:16:19 PM3/26/16
to
On 3/26/2016 6:29 PM, kmiller wrote:
> On 3/26/2016 1:50 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>> On 3/26/2016 4:13 PM, kmiller wrote:
>>> On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>>>> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>>>>
>>>>> HUnter
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>
>>>> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Churches care about people, using other people's money...
>> Voluntary contributions...
>
> if tithing is a part of what you believe and if you also believe that,
> if you don't believe, you are damned to hell forever and ever and ever
> with no chance of parole then it's not voluntary. Or, perhaps it's
> voluntary in the same way that you pay your taxes voluntarily...
>
I'm sorry Kevin, but your comment has no basis in truth. For a Christian
> On 3/26/2016 1:50 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>> On 3/26/2016 4:13 PM, kmiller wrote:
>>> On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>>>> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>>>>
>>>>> HUnter
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>
>>>> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Churches care about people, using other people's money...
>> Voluntary contributions...
>
> if tithing is a part of what you believe and if you also believe that,
> if you don't believe, you are damned to hell forever and ever and ever
> with no chance of parole then it's not voluntary. Or, perhaps it's
> voluntary in the same way that you pay your taxes voluntarily...
>
ALL giving is voluntary, and has nothing to do with your salvation.
>>>
>>> Businesses care about people, until they've taken all the people's
>>> money...
>>>
>>> Conservatives care about people, unless they have no money...
>>
>>
>
Bruce
Mar 26, 2016, 8:20:59 PM3/26/16
to
On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>
>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>
>> HUnter
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
If liberals cared about people, they'd be capitalists.
>>
>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>
>> HUnter
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
--
Bruce
"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from it's
government." -- Thomas Paine
nothermark
Mar 26, 2016, 8:46:22 PM3/26/16
to
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:21:01 -0700, Bruce <bruce...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>>
>>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>>
>>> HUnter
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>
>If liberals cared about people, they'd be capitalists.
Many are. Probably about as many as Conservatives. ;-)
wrote:
>On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
>>>
>>> Fact is liberals care about people,
>>>
>>> HUnter
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
>
>If liberals cared about people, they'd be capitalists.
Frank Howell
Mar 26, 2016, 8:52:17 PM3/26/16
to
groups that attempt to make everyone else without their consent, give
their money and time to your cause.
--
Frank Howell
Max
Mar 26, 2016, 9:51:49 PM3/26/16
to
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 8:25:37 PM UTC-6, George Anthony wrote:
> Max <gmd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 6:50:04 PM UTC-6, debbie wrote:
> >> On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
> >>>>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> >>>>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
> >>>
> >>> the mighty o is not even close to kasich
> >>>
> >> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
> >> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
> >
> > The Donald.
> >
>
> Nope. Obama wins hands down. What do you think that nose in the air pose he
> always strikes is?
Your perception.
> Max <gmd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 6:50:04 PM UTC-6, debbie wrote:
> >> On 3/20/2016 8:09 PM, nothermark wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:24:03 -0400, debbie <deb...@area51outreach.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/20/2016 9:19 AM, nothermark wrote:
> >>>>> Watching him on Meet the Press. The one thing that is clear is that
> >>>>> he has an ego bigger than the country. ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>> You mean much like the guy who is president now:)
> >>>
> >>> the mighty o is not even close to kasich
> >>>
> >> Matter of opinion. I am not a Kasich an, but I have never seen anyone
> >> more arrogant or egotistical than the one in office now.
> >
> > The Donald.
> >
>
> Nope. Obama wins hands down. What do you think that nose in the air pose he
> always strikes is?
Max
Mar 26, 2016, 9:58:31 PM3/26/16
to
On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 2:50:15 PM UTC-6, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> On 3/26/2016 4:13 PM, kmiller wrote:
> > On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> >> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Fact is liberals care about people,
> >>>
> >>> HUnter
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>>
> >> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
> >>
> >
> > Churches care about people, using other people's money...
> Voluntary contributions...
Coercion wears many costumes.
> On 3/26/2016 4:13 PM, kmiller wrote:
> > On 3/26/2016 12:10 PM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> >> On 3/25/2016 1:39 PM, Hunter Hampton wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Fact is liberals care about people,
> >>>
> >>> HUnter
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>>
> >> Liberals care about people, using other peoples money.
> >>
> >
> > Churches care about people, using other people's money...
> Voluntary contributions...
>
> Owen McKenzie
>
George Anthony
Mar 26, 2016, 10:12:29 PM3/26/16
to
happens to be correct.
Dusty
Mar 26, 2016, 11:29:42 PM3/26/16
to
are so few others.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages