info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
None
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Jeremy Bentham
Sep 2, 2016, 3:09:51 PM9/2/16
to
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 23:48:46 -0700 (PDT), randolph....@gmail.com wrote:
>On Tuesday, February 20, 1996 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Brandon Toshiro Sugiyama wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: 20 FEB 1996 23:55:26 GMT
>> From: 7176...@compuserve.com
>> Newgroups: soc.culture.asian.american
>> Subject: Rumor of racist statement by Tommy Hilfiger: True or False?
>>
>>
>> A classmate of my daughter did a report for school on the fashion designer
>> Tommy Hilfiger. Supposedly, he's quoted as saying that if he knew 'Chinks'
>> and 'Niggers' would wear his clothing he never would have go designed
>> it.
>>
>> Our family's started our own little boycott till we can determine whether
>> these statements attributed to Mr. Hilfiger were actually made or not.
>>
>> Can anyone either confirm or deny that Mr. Hilfiger made such a statement?
>>
>> Ken Ong
>> Queens, New York
>
>Gosh no, say it isn't so! a Social Justice Warrior that leaps into action wreaking as much havoc as he or she can before a simple look at facts? This is the core essential modus operandi of social justice warriors everywhere. The job of the pro-black and social justice warriors is to create divisiveness everywhere they go. "Critical theory" didn't get it's name from bringing people together. They need the divisiveness and criticism of everything, so people can hate each other based upon their differences, and call that "multiculturalism".
Truth about the khazar hilfiger "background":
A big mouth of the adl, aka the originator of 20th century kiddie fiddling and murdering the goyim / goyemm = "only white jewish zionists are human being - so kill the goyim from unborn to elderly"
Judith Levine, "Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children From Sex"
Race mixing for thee, but not for me: alon ziv
Racism Against Gentiles Is Preached In The Talmud
The Talmud preaches that members of the Jewish race are superior to all other races. It says that the Jews rightfully own all the wealth of the Gentiles and should dominate them.
the Shulchan Aruch Even Ha’ezer section 37 is entitled “All the Laws of Betrothing a Little Girl”.
First of all, the couple must be married. There must be a legally binding, publicly committed, long term relationship between the man and the girl. Offering her candy and driving away with her is not allowed.
Second of all, her father must consent to the union and participate in the betrothal ceremony.
Thirdly, a man is not allowed to have sex with his wife without her consent, as is mentioned in the Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim section 240:3.
Considering this, how frequent are sexual relations between adult Orthodox Jewish men and little girls, with the blessings of the rabbis? Not very. I know of no Jewish bride in modern times who was under 17. In ancient times, my impression is that typically brides were 12 while the grooms were 18. In fact, the Talmud Tractate Kiddushin 41a states “It is prohibited for a father to betroth his daughter in marriage until she matures and declares that she wishes to marry the groom.” Tosafos however does qualify that by saying that in a situation of extreme poverty and economic uncertainty, as was the case for Jews in medieval France, a man may marry off his small daughter if he is afraid that later he will not have the financial means to do so and she will therefore remain a lifelong spinster.
This past week in New York City we saw yet more examples of the Jewish media?s misguided protectionism of Jews:
A congregant of a Hasidic Chabad Center, Claud Neufeld, was rearrested for child molestation. Neufeld was first arrested last October for sexually abusing an 8-year old boy inside the Chabad
Lubavitch Center on Staten Island between December 1, 2009 and December 1, 2010. Yet he was allowed by Chabad?s rabbinic authorities to continue to visit the Chabad Center and associate with its
children. He was rearrested last week for molesting a different boy inside the Center 10 times between January 14, 2011 and September 21, 2012.If a Catholic priest had molested an altar boy and
been arrested in New York last week, it would have been international news. In fact, The New York Times this week dramatizes a 13-year old case in which the Archbishop of Newark, NJ failed to
act promptly concerning charges of child molestation against one of his priests. This stimulated 11 pages of Yahoo! internet coverage of this ?vital? issue. However, the relatively small Staten
Island Advanceand the ?Failed Messiah? website are, to date, the only media reporting Neufeld?s arrest.
One of my supporters, who lives on Staten Island, decided to see if, adequately alerted, the NYC primarily Jewish media would pick up the story. He talked to the news desks of the following
NYC media, emphasizing the significance of yet another Jewish pedophile arrest:The New York Times, New York Post, New York Daily News, WABC Ch. 7, WNBC Ch. 4, WCBS Ch. 2, Associated Press, XPIX
11 PV, FOX 5, and Ch. 9, NYC. To his knowledge, after nearly a week, there has been no mention in NYC media of it.
Last Friday the long-awaited trial of Jewish pedophile Rabbi Yosef Kolko began. The trial was soon over when Kolko admitted to pedophilia after several other victims came forward. He may
face 15 years in prison. Here is an account of Kolko?s misdeeds from The Asbury Park Press:
In a tight-knit community of people accustomed to handling problems among themselves, one young boy bucked the trend.He accused a Yeshiva teacher and camp counselor of molesting him, and
when a religious council of Orthodox Jews failed to take action against the man, the boy and his family went to the Ocean County Prosecutor?s Office for help.
Because they skirted religious protocols, the boy and his family were ostracized by their community. Some in the community even embarked on a campaign to get the boy and his father to
drop the criminal charges.
And, a flier was circulated in Lakewood saying the boy?s father made a ?mockery? of the Torah and committed a ?terrible deed? by going to the secular authorities.
But the family stood its ground. Now, six years after the alleged abuse occurred, the man accused of molesting the boy is set to go on trial in a case that likely is to be closely
watched by Lakewood?s Orthodox Jewish community.
Talmud Encourages Pedophilia
The phenomenon of sexual molestation of Jewish children is one perpetrated primarily by authority figures in Orthodox Judaism. This includes Hasidic rabbis of the largest Jewish organization in
the world, Chabad. Such indulgence comes from many encouragements of pedophilia in the Talmud, highest religious authority of modern Judaism.
Understandably then, we do not see rabbinic authorities rushing to launch investigations as to the cause of this scourge or encouraging the police and secular legal authorities to take action.
The credibility of the Talmud, wellspring of modern Judaism, is on the line. Instead, there exists a persistent tendency among Jewish authorities to dawdle, send the offender to Israel or not
respond to complaints of Jewish parents that their children are being molested.
This has recently become glaringly apparent in Melbourne, Australia, where sex offenders David Kramer and David Cyprys were allowed to continue to teach and associate with the youth of Chabad?s
Yeshivah College (see Pedophilia ‘Rampant’ in Orthodox Judaism), even after complaints from parents that their children were being sexually molested. Yeshivah College is an independent, single-
sex, Orthodox Jewish day school for boys. One parent testified in court that the director of Yeshivah College, Rabbi Yitzchak David Groner told him that, even though his 8-year old son had been
sexually molested by Cyprys, he should not worry since children under 8 who had been sexually violated are not harmed. The father alleged that the rabbi told him he was informed by psychologists
that sex at such an early age does not emotionally damage the child. If the father’s testimony is true, it means thatGroner is actually referencing the authority of the Talmud in Sanhedrin 69b.
It says: ?All agree that the [sexual] connection of a boy aged 9 years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than 8 years is not.?
In the Soncino edition of the Talmud, the footnote to Sanh. 76a explains: ?Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.? Sanh. 69b says that if a woman allows herself to be
penetrated by her minor son, she is fit to marry a priest. This is because a minor is not considered a ?man? by the Talmud in the fullest sense. Thus, according to the Talmud, sex with a minor
is of no moral or legal importance to the Jew (Sanh. 52b). A woman might, in fact, have sexual relations with a young boy without questions of morality even being brought up. ?A small boy who
has intercourse with a grown-up woman makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood? (Kethoboth 11b). The footnote to this passage says: ?Although the intercourse of a small boy is
not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless, the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.?
In my article, ?Pedophilia: The Talmud’s Dirty Secret,?as well my book, ?Israel: Our Duty…Our Dilemma,? (available atTruthtellers.org) I fully document the Talmud’s frequent and whole-hearted
encouragement of sex with 3-year old girls. The Talmud says of baby girls that ?Scripture speaks of them as ‘fit for cohabitation’? (Yebamoth 60b). These many passages agree with Rabbi Groner
that underage sex between a rabbi and a child is of no great moral, physical, medical or spiritual consequence. ?When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for when
the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger in the eye? (Keth. 116). The footnote to this passage says that as ?tears come to the eye again and again so
does virginity come back to the little girl under three years?. (See end of article for scans of these passages.)
Of course, any credible psychologist would insist that sex between an adult man and an 8-year-old boy or girl has a lasting and extremely traumatizing effect, both physically and emotionally.
That is why it is legally characterized as abuse. If Rabbi Groner did in fact base a further three years of inaction in this case upon the Talmud?s authority, it powerfully confirms that, just
beneath the surface of the pedophilia scourge among Orthodox authorities, there exists secret encouragement and tolerance of sex with minors. That is why those in Orthodox Judaism most familiar
with the Talmud, the rabbis, Yeshiva teachers and other authority figures ? not the common laity ? are most guilty of pedophilia.
Dean of Yeshiva Univ. Says: ?Don?t Report Pedophilia?
New York?s Yeshiva University is the most prestigious ?Ivy League? center of Orthodox Jewish education in the world. Yet, because the epidemic of pedophilia in Orthodox Judaism is spreading so
widely and rapidly, particularly threatening Talmudic-oriented leadership and institutions of learning, one of Yeshiva?s top deans, international Talmud expert, Hershel Schachter, in February
recommended that Jews no longer report incidences of pedophilia to civil authorities. The Forward says Schachter?…cautioned against reporting abuse to the authorities without first seeking
advice from a Torah scholar, because, he said, police and social service workers often ‘don?t handle the situation properly.’? Schachter also says that children can’t be depended upon to tell
the truth. He wants boards of rabbis/psychologists to now field all Jewish complaints of child molestation, only going to authorities as the last recourse. Schachter’s recommendation is
particularly ominous, since, as the Forward quotes one rabbi, ?Hundreds of rabbis hang on [Schachter’s] every word and interpret his every utterance as binding Jewish law…? Contrary to hopes of
reformers, the already close-knit Orthodox community, especially with Schachter?s encouragement, is not opening itself to investigation?especially investigation into the unmentionable Talmudic
basis for Jewish pedophilia.
Again, if a Catholic archbishop or dean of a prestigious Catholic university, such as Notre Dame or Georgetown Univ., issued an edict that pedophilia by priests not be reported to police, they
would be immediately fired?not to mention derided in world media for such blatant self-protection of the Catholic Church.
Schachter?s recommendation, however, although posted in the well-known Jewish Forward, drew no attention, much less criticism, from big media. There, Jewish pedophiles, unlike Catholic ones, are
a virtually protected species. The public has not been educated to expect Orthodox, ?Torah-believing? Jews to be capable of pedophilia. Instead, especially for tens of millions of Christian
evangelicals, even Jewish pedophiles are above being ?cursed? through criticism. They remain untouchable
http://truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret_reprint.html "Big bad Bob" home truth.
Why does he call himself that?
Well, he is a kiddie fiddler, a khazar - typically eastern european, no origin or positive culture, did not even exist until 700 years ago. The West has been over-run. That is why we are dying a painful death.
More of his own vile false "religion" of yahweh the devil:
http://www.come-and-hear.com/kethuboth/kethuboth_11.html
https://groups.google.com/forum/?_escaped_fragment_=topic/soc.culture.russian/oROTntLAK88#!topic/soc.culture.russian/oROTntLAK88
Home truths about a convicted kiddie fiddler:
>From "Awake My Glory"
"Hitler was not only sent by Heaven, but was sent as a kindness from
Heaven . . . Because assimilation and intermarriage are worse than
death . . . and the German Jews and others ignored the Torah-teachers
and refused to desist from their mad race into assimilation, the Nazis
were sent to prevent them and rescue them before they were swallowed up
by the nations"
https://theuglytruth.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/jewish-pedo.jpg
"Intimate relations with an animal is better than with a goy" rabbi
fricker Sept 1996.
What is a goy? also known as goyeem / goyism / the rule of goyism
states that "kill them from unborn to elderly", "killing goyim brings
you closer to g-d". Their "god" aka yahweh the devil.
>On Tuesday, February 20, 1996 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Brandon Toshiro Sugiyama wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: 20 FEB 1996 23:55:26 GMT
>> From: 7176...@compuserve.com
>> Newgroups: soc.culture.asian.american
>> Subject: Rumor of racist statement by Tommy Hilfiger: True or False?
>>
>>
>> A classmate of my daughter did a report for school on the fashion designer
>> Tommy Hilfiger. Supposedly, he's quoted as saying that if he knew 'Chinks'
>> and 'Niggers' would wear his clothing he never would have go designed
>> it.
>>
>> Our family's started our own little boycott till we can determine whether
>> these statements attributed to Mr. Hilfiger were actually made or not.
>>
>> Can anyone either confirm or deny that Mr. Hilfiger made such a statement?
>>
>> Ken Ong
>> Queens, New York
>
>Gosh no, say it isn't so! a Social Justice Warrior that leaps into action wreaking as much havoc as he or she can before a simple look at facts? This is the core essential modus operandi of social justice warriors everywhere. The job of the pro-black and social justice warriors is to create divisiveness everywhere they go. "Critical theory" didn't get it's name from bringing people together. They need the divisiveness and criticism of everything, so people can hate each other based upon their differences, and call that "multiculturalism".
Truth about the khazar hilfiger "background":
A big mouth of the adl, aka the originator of 20th century kiddie fiddling and murdering the goyim / goyemm = "only white jewish zionists are human being - so kill the goyim from unborn to elderly"
Judith Levine, "Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children From Sex"
Race mixing for thee, but not for me: alon ziv
Racism Against Gentiles Is Preached In The Talmud
The Talmud preaches that members of the Jewish race are superior to all other races. It says that the Jews rightfully own all the wealth of the Gentiles and should dominate them.
the Shulchan Aruch Even Ha’ezer section 37 is entitled “All the Laws of Betrothing a Little Girl”.
First of all, the couple must be married. There must be a legally binding, publicly committed, long term relationship between the man and the girl. Offering her candy and driving away with her is not allowed.
Second of all, her father must consent to the union and participate in the betrothal ceremony.
Thirdly, a man is not allowed to have sex with his wife without her consent, as is mentioned in the Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim section 240:3.
Considering this, how frequent are sexual relations between adult Orthodox Jewish men and little girls, with the blessings of the rabbis? Not very. I know of no Jewish bride in modern times who was under 17. In ancient times, my impression is that typically brides were 12 while the grooms were 18. In fact, the Talmud Tractate Kiddushin 41a states “It is prohibited for a father to betroth his daughter in marriage until she matures and declares that she wishes to marry the groom.” Tosafos however does qualify that by saying that in a situation of extreme poverty and economic uncertainty, as was the case for Jews in medieval France, a man may marry off his small daughter if he is afraid that later he will not have the financial means to do so and she will therefore remain a lifelong spinster.
This past week in New York City we saw yet more examples of the Jewish media?s misguided protectionism of Jews:
A congregant of a Hasidic Chabad Center, Claud Neufeld, was rearrested for child molestation. Neufeld was first arrested last October for sexually abusing an 8-year old boy inside the Chabad
Lubavitch Center on Staten Island between December 1, 2009 and December 1, 2010. Yet he was allowed by Chabad?s rabbinic authorities to continue to visit the Chabad Center and associate with its
children. He was rearrested last week for molesting a different boy inside the Center 10 times between January 14, 2011 and September 21, 2012.If a Catholic priest had molested an altar boy and
been arrested in New York last week, it would have been international news. In fact, The New York Times this week dramatizes a 13-year old case in which the Archbishop of Newark, NJ failed to
act promptly concerning charges of child molestation against one of his priests. This stimulated 11 pages of Yahoo! internet coverage of this ?vital? issue. However, the relatively small Staten
Island Advanceand the ?Failed Messiah? website are, to date, the only media reporting Neufeld?s arrest.
One of my supporters, who lives on Staten Island, decided to see if, adequately alerted, the NYC primarily Jewish media would pick up the story. He talked to the news desks of the following
NYC media, emphasizing the significance of yet another Jewish pedophile arrest:The New York Times, New York Post, New York Daily News, WABC Ch. 7, WNBC Ch. 4, WCBS Ch. 2, Associated Press, XPIX
11 PV, FOX 5, and Ch. 9, NYC. To his knowledge, after nearly a week, there has been no mention in NYC media of it.
Last Friday the long-awaited trial of Jewish pedophile Rabbi Yosef Kolko began. The trial was soon over when Kolko admitted to pedophilia after several other victims came forward. He may
face 15 years in prison. Here is an account of Kolko?s misdeeds from The Asbury Park Press:
In a tight-knit community of people accustomed to handling problems among themselves, one young boy bucked the trend.He accused a Yeshiva teacher and camp counselor of molesting him, and
when a religious council of Orthodox Jews failed to take action against the man, the boy and his family went to the Ocean County Prosecutor?s Office for help.
Because they skirted religious protocols, the boy and his family were ostracized by their community. Some in the community even embarked on a campaign to get the boy and his father to
drop the criminal charges.
And, a flier was circulated in Lakewood saying the boy?s father made a ?mockery? of the Torah and committed a ?terrible deed? by going to the secular authorities.
But the family stood its ground. Now, six years after the alleged abuse occurred, the man accused of molesting the boy is set to go on trial in a case that likely is to be closely
watched by Lakewood?s Orthodox Jewish community.
Talmud Encourages Pedophilia
The phenomenon of sexual molestation of Jewish children is one perpetrated primarily by authority figures in Orthodox Judaism. This includes Hasidic rabbis of the largest Jewish organization in
the world, Chabad. Such indulgence comes from many encouragements of pedophilia in the Talmud, highest religious authority of modern Judaism.
Understandably then, we do not see rabbinic authorities rushing to launch investigations as to the cause of this scourge or encouraging the police and secular legal authorities to take action.
The credibility of the Talmud, wellspring of modern Judaism, is on the line. Instead, there exists a persistent tendency among Jewish authorities to dawdle, send the offender to Israel or not
respond to complaints of Jewish parents that their children are being molested.
This has recently become glaringly apparent in Melbourne, Australia, where sex offenders David Kramer and David Cyprys were allowed to continue to teach and associate with the youth of Chabad?s
Yeshivah College (see Pedophilia ‘Rampant’ in Orthodox Judaism), even after complaints from parents that their children were being sexually molested. Yeshivah College is an independent, single-
sex, Orthodox Jewish day school for boys. One parent testified in court that the director of Yeshivah College, Rabbi Yitzchak David Groner told him that, even though his 8-year old son had been
sexually molested by Cyprys, he should not worry since children under 8 who had been sexually violated are not harmed. The father alleged that the rabbi told him he was informed by psychologists
that sex at such an early age does not emotionally damage the child. If the father’s testimony is true, it means thatGroner is actually referencing the authority of the Talmud in Sanhedrin 69b.
It says: ?All agree that the [sexual] connection of a boy aged 9 years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than 8 years is not.?
In the Soncino edition of the Talmud, the footnote to Sanh. 76a explains: ?Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.? Sanh. 69b says that if a woman allows herself to be
penetrated by her minor son, she is fit to marry a priest. This is because a minor is not considered a ?man? by the Talmud in the fullest sense. Thus, according to the Talmud, sex with a minor
is of no moral or legal importance to the Jew (Sanh. 52b). A woman might, in fact, have sexual relations with a young boy without questions of morality even being brought up. ?A small boy who
has intercourse with a grown-up woman makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood? (Kethoboth 11b). The footnote to this passage says: ?Although the intercourse of a small boy is
not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless, the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.?
In my article, ?Pedophilia: The Talmud’s Dirty Secret,?as well my book, ?Israel: Our Duty…Our Dilemma,? (available atTruthtellers.org) I fully document the Talmud’s frequent and whole-hearted
encouragement of sex with 3-year old girls. The Talmud says of baby girls that ?Scripture speaks of them as ‘fit for cohabitation’? (Yebamoth 60b). These many passages agree with Rabbi Groner
that underage sex between a rabbi and a child is of no great moral, physical, medical or spiritual consequence. ?When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for when
the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger in the eye? (Keth. 116). The footnote to this passage says that as ?tears come to the eye again and again so
does virginity come back to the little girl under three years?. (See end of article for scans of these passages.)
Of course, any credible psychologist would insist that sex between an adult man and an 8-year-old boy or girl has a lasting and extremely traumatizing effect, both physically and emotionally.
That is why it is legally characterized as abuse. If Rabbi Groner did in fact base a further three years of inaction in this case upon the Talmud?s authority, it powerfully confirms that, just
beneath the surface of the pedophilia scourge among Orthodox authorities, there exists secret encouragement and tolerance of sex with minors. That is why those in Orthodox Judaism most familiar
with the Talmud, the rabbis, Yeshiva teachers and other authority figures ? not the common laity ? are most guilty of pedophilia.
Dean of Yeshiva Univ. Says: ?Don?t Report Pedophilia?
New York?s Yeshiva University is the most prestigious ?Ivy League? center of Orthodox Jewish education in the world. Yet, because the epidemic of pedophilia in Orthodox Judaism is spreading so
widely and rapidly, particularly threatening Talmudic-oriented leadership and institutions of learning, one of Yeshiva?s top deans, international Talmud expert, Hershel Schachter, in February
recommended that Jews no longer report incidences of pedophilia to civil authorities. The Forward says Schachter?…cautioned against reporting abuse to the authorities without first seeking
advice from a Torah scholar, because, he said, police and social service workers often ‘don?t handle the situation properly.’? Schachter also says that children can’t be depended upon to tell
the truth. He wants boards of rabbis/psychologists to now field all Jewish complaints of child molestation, only going to authorities as the last recourse. Schachter’s recommendation is
particularly ominous, since, as the Forward quotes one rabbi, ?Hundreds of rabbis hang on [Schachter’s] every word and interpret his every utterance as binding Jewish law…? Contrary to hopes of
reformers, the already close-knit Orthodox community, especially with Schachter?s encouragement, is not opening itself to investigation?especially investigation into the unmentionable Talmudic
basis for Jewish pedophilia.
Again, if a Catholic archbishop or dean of a prestigious Catholic university, such as Notre Dame or Georgetown Univ., issued an edict that pedophilia by priests not be reported to police, they
would be immediately fired?not to mention derided in world media for such blatant self-protection of the Catholic Church.
Schachter?s recommendation, however, although posted in the well-known Jewish Forward, drew no attention, much less criticism, from big media. There, Jewish pedophiles, unlike Catholic ones, are
a virtually protected species. The public has not been educated to expect Orthodox, ?Torah-believing? Jews to be capable of pedophilia. Instead, especially for tens of millions of Christian
evangelicals, even Jewish pedophiles are above being ?cursed? through criticism. They remain untouchable
http://truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret_reprint.html "Big bad Bob" home truth.
Why does he call himself that?
Well, he is a kiddie fiddler, a khazar - typically eastern european, no origin or positive culture, did not even exist until 700 years ago. The West has been over-run. That is why we are dying a painful death.
More of his own vile false "religion" of yahweh the devil:
http://www.come-and-hear.com/kethuboth/kethuboth_11.html
https://groups.google.com/forum/?_escaped_fragment_=topic/soc.culture.russian/oROTntLAK88#!topic/soc.culture.russian/oROTntLAK88
Home truths about a convicted kiddie fiddler:
>From "Awake My Glory"
"Hitler was not only sent by Heaven, but was sent as a kindness from
Heaven . . . Because assimilation and intermarriage are worse than
death . . . and the German Jews and others ignored the Torah-teachers
and refused to desist from their mad race into assimilation, the Nazis
were sent to prevent them and rescue them before they were swallowed up
by the nations"
https://theuglytruth.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/jewish-pedo.jpg
"Intimate relations with an animal is better than with a goy" rabbi
fricker Sept 1996.
What is a goy? also known as goyeem / goyism / the rule of goyism
states that "kill them from unborn to elderly", "killing goyim brings
you closer to g-d". Their "god" aka yahweh the devil.
Anonymous
Sep 3, 2016, 3:25:29 AM9/3/16
to
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 23:48:46 -0700 (PDT), randolph....@gmail.com wrote:
>On Tuesday, February 20, 1996 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Brandon Toshiro Sugiyama wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: 20 FEB 1996 23:55:26 GMT
>> From: 7176...@compuserve.com
>> Newgroups: soc.culture.asian.american
>> Subject: Rumor of racist statement by Tommy Hilfiger: True or False?
>>
>>
>> A classmate of my daughter did a report for school on the fashion designer
>> Tommy Hilfiger. Supposedly, he's quoted as saying that if he knew 'Chinks'
>> and 'Niggers' would wear his clothing he never would have go designed
>> it.
>>
>> Our family's started our own little boycott till we can determine whether
>> these statements attributed to Mr. Hilfiger were actually made or not.
>>
>> Can anyone either confirm or deny that Mr. Hilfiger made such a statement?
>>
>> Ken Ong
>> Queens, New York
>
>Gosh no, say it isn't so! a Social Justice Warrior that leaps into action wreaking as much havoc as he or she can before a simple look at facts? This is the core essential modus operandi of social justice warriors everywhere. The job of the pro-black and social justice warriors is to create divisiveness everywhere they go. "Critical theory" didn't get it's name from bringing people together. They need the divisiveness and criticism of everything, so people can hate each other based upon their differences, and call that "multiculturalism".
Your and the racist designer single" culture" facts:
>On Tuesday, February 20, 1996 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Brandon Toshiro Sugiyama wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: 20 FEB 1996 23:55:26 GMT
>> From: 7176...@compuserve.com
>> Newgroups: soc.culture.asian.american
>> Subject: Rumor of racist statement by Tommy Hilfiger: True or False?
>>
>>
>> A classmate of my daughter did a report for school on the fashion designer
>> Tommy Hilfiger. Supposedly, he's quoted as saying that if he knew 'Chinks'
>> and 'Niggers' would wear his clothing he never would have go designed
>> it.
>>
>> Our family's started our own little boycott till we can determine whether
>> these statements attributed to Mr. Hilfiger were actually made or not.
>>
>> Can anyone either confirm or deny that Mr. Hilfiger made such a statement?
>>
>> Ken Ong
>> Queens, New York
>
>Gosh no, say it isn't so! a Social Justice Warrior that leaps into action wreaking as much havoc as he or she can before a simple look at facts? This is the core essential modus operandi of social justice warriors everywhere. The job of the pro-black and social justice warriors is to create divisiveness everywhere they go. "Critical theory" didn't get it's name from bringing people together. They need the divisiveness and criticism of everything, so people can hate each other based upon their differences, and call that "multiculturalism".
0 new messages