On Apr 30, 3:56 pm, dsi1 <
dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
> On 4/30/2012 10:04 AM, Slogoin wrote:
>
>
>
> > Not since Tiananmen Square in 89 when I was studying Chinese have
> > I been more impressed by the Chinese people. Chen is AWESOME!
>
> > Sorry for the OT but, man, this is brilliant!
>
> > Now bach to scales... :-^|)
>
> I've always admired the Chinese. Americans, for the most part, have
> always underestimated the Chinese. No doubt we'll be in for an attitude
> adjustment soon. The Chinese were the first wave of immigrants to come
> to Hawaii. It was all men who came here and they found Hawaiian women to
> be acceptable mates to start a family in the new land. It was a case of
> the lowest of the low coming together. Something about the combination
> of the two clicked and today the Hawaiian/Chinese population is one of
> the richest socioeconomic groups, financially and culturally, in this
> state.
>
> My guess is that Obama does not underestimate the Chinese. No doubt he
> had a lot of them as classmates at Punahou.
1500 years ago Chinese Buddhist monks discovered America.......
I first heard about the Chinese Buddhist discovery of America from a
gentleman scholar, Francis W. Paar of the Oriental Department of the
New York Public Library. I went to see him in 1976 while researching a
history of Buddhism in America. When I finally found my way to Dr.
Paar's office, he peered at me through his bifocals: "You've heard of
Fusang, of course?"
Of course I hadn't. But I wasn't about to let Dr. Paar know that. I
mumbled that I'd heard something about Fusang but would appreciate any
light he could shed on the subject. The librarian disappeared into the
multilingual stacks of the Oriental collection and within minutes
returned bearing a thick leather-bound volume published in 1885 by
Edward P.Vining, An Inglorious Columbus: Evidence that Hui Shan and a
Party of Buddhist Monks from Afghanistan Discovered America in the
Fifth Century A.D. In eight hundred-odd pages Vining recounted the
scholarly controversy that had begun in 1761 when M. Joseph De Guignes
published Recherches sur les Navigations des Chinois du Cote de l'
Amerique. De Guignes's book included the translation of a report found
in the Chinese imperial archives that depicts a voyage to Fusang by
Hui Shan, a Chinese Buddhist monk. De Guignes identified Fusang as
North America, in general, and Mexico, in particular. He claimed that
the Chinese had therefore "discovered" America nearly one thousand
years before Columbus.
On the trail of Hui Shan, I soon discovered that compared to later
writers, Vining could be considered almost conservative. In Pale Ink
(1972), for example, Henrietta Mertz suggested that Point Hueneme in
California had received its name because Hui Shan landed there. She
noted further that the Huichol Indians, who so resemble the Chinese
that the local people refer to them as "Chinois," perform an ancient
dance carrying bowls called sakaimona, a close fit to another of
Buddha's names, Shakyamuni. It was not much of a leap to her next
hypothesis. According to Mertz, the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl "was
kindly, abhorred war, was adverse to cruelty, maintained the most
exemplary manners, taught men to cultivate the soil, weave, reduce
metals from their ores, and was all that could be considered supreme
in a man," and in her view, this description perfectly fit that of a
cultivated Chinese monk such as Hui Shan. Further, she maintained that
Hui Shan was probably light-skinned, like Quetzalcoatl, since upper-
class Chinese carefully shielded themselves from the sun. Finally,
both Hui Shan and Quetzalcoatl appeared and disappeared quite suddenly
after teaching people to "forsake rude customs."
http://www.tricycle.com/ancestors/sailing-fusang