Fascinating interview with Riley, the author:
http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/2011/0922/Who-was-John-Lennon-Interview-with-biographer-Tim-Riley
One interesting quote:
Will Paul McCartney ever tell his story? Do you think he will write a
memoir?
I think he’s going to take it all with him. [Paul] is a giant puzzle
because he really doesn’t care too much about scholarship and history.
It doesn’t matter to him the way that it matters to a critic. Because
he keeps telling stories that people have demonstrated to him
repeatedly are not true. But they’re such great stories that you can
tell that he kind of believes they are true. For him it is a kind of
form of vivid truth. So he just doesn’t really have a critical vantage
on his own life the way we very much wish he did.
Translation: "if it has negative hearsay about Yoko, I'll scour it top
to bottom and quote it liberally in RMB".
Maybe you could do your own research and write a nice book about
Yoko.  Then you can counteract the negative books .
How can you have new information about a guy who has been
analyzed to death for the past 30 years who only lived to be
age 40? There is nothing new unless some new music is
discovered in the vaults, which is highly unlikely.
Huh? He repeats himself so much in every interview that there
is nothing else interesting to hear. He's so accessible.
If it hadn't been for John and George, there wouldn't be any
mystery.
> I think he’s going to take it all with him.
See above.
[Paul] is a giant puzzle
You've got to be kidding.
> because he really doesn’t care too much about scholarship and history.
> It doesn’t matter to him the way that it matters to a critic.
Huh? He's an open book.
 Because
> he keeps telling stories that people have demonstrated to him
> repeatedly are not true.
What stories? He and Lennon agreed on everything except for
one song, and who wrote what in the Playboy interview.
Has he changed his stories since then?
 But they’re such great stories that you can
> tell that he kind of believes they are true. For him it is a kind of
> form of vivid truth. So he just doesn’t really have a critical vantage
> on his own life the way we very much wish he did.
First it's John and Yoko, and now you're accusing him of
the same thing?
Not sure if I will ever read this book, although the first review on
Amazon makes it sound wonderful.
I feel a bit burned out from reading Beatles and Lennon books for the
last three decades.  How much more can be said, or discovered, or
portrayed in a different light from books previously published?
And yet, I always find something new or different to say about The
Beatles and John Lennon in my own writings.
Looking forward to someone on RMB reading Riley's new book, and
posting review or comments about it.
Marc
There's always room for a new book. The real shocker here is that the
title isn't some John Lennon song. There will eventually be 250 Beatle
books, each with the title of one of the tunes. Is there one called
"Ticket to Ride"? Yes, there is. "Eight Days a Week"? Yes, three of
them! So I take it back. There can be an infinite number of Beatle
books. Then there are the solo tunes, like "Dear Boy". Ok, that's
about Keith Moon for some reason.
but anyway, there should always be more Beatle books than one can read.
History and archeology fascinate me, even if the subject is centuries
old.  People still read and write about Kennedy, Lincoln, the
Pharoahs, etc.
There can always be a new spin, new documents found, etc.
I'm not accusing Paul . . . .this is someone else's quote.
 As far as the aspects of his personal life goes, that's something
only somebody like yourself would be interested in....gossip.
He's kept so busy over the years just writing and recording
music that he couldn't even have much of a private life. But,
you'll keep digging and find something to...psst about. I
couldn't even get half way through "Many years from now".
It was boring. Unlike many here, I love some of his solo
music.....but don't care to hear him talk that much. Same
old thing. Harrison's "I me mine" was even more interesting,
but not by much.
I ignore him.  I don't waste my time with him.
Fortunately when people are having sex, they focus on the same
areas.
A reasonable idea. It probably drives him wild that the object  of his
obsession ignores him.
If he  did n't   follow your posts around, good Lord  , he wouldn't
have a real purpose in life.   LOL
That's rich, coming from Gay's lapdog.