Wow. The polls these nazis conduct must be highly reliable:
"The Center for Security Policy (CSP) is a Washington, D.C.-based national security think tank that has been widely accused of engaging in conspiracy theorizing by a range of individuals, media outlets and organizations. Its activities are focused on exposing and researching perceived jihadist threats to the United States. The Center has been described as "not very highly respected" by BBC News and "disreputable" by Salon. It has faced strong criticism from people across the political spectrum, but has also had its reports cited by political figures such as Donald Trump and Michele Bachmann.[1][2][3]
On March 16, 2016, Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz announced he would appoint Frank Gaffney, founder of the Center for Security Policy, to be his National Security Adviser. Cruz announced his foreign policy team would also include three other employees of Gaffney's think tank: Fred Fleitz, Clare Lopez, and Jim Hanson.[4]
The Southern Poverty Law Center designated the CSP as a hate group in 2016."
One of the CSP's "Occasional Papers" accused Huma Abedin, then Hillary Clinton's aide, of being an undercover spy for the Muslim Brotherhood.[17] On June 13, 2012 Republican members of Congress Michele Bachmann, Trent Franks, Louie Gohmert, Thomas Rooney and Lynn Westmoreland, sent a letter to the State Department Inspector General including accusations against Abedin cited to the CSP. The letter and the CSP's accusation were widely denounced as a smear, and achieved "near-universal condemnation," including from several prominent Republicans such as John McCain, John Boehner, Scott Brown, and Marco Rubio.[3][20][22] In a separate report, the group declared that Susan Rice, Richard Haass, and Dennis Ross, were being secretly controlled by a covert "Iran lobby."[17]
The University of Southern California's Annenberg Center for Communication has described the organization as "a far-right think tank whose president, Frank Gaffney, was banned from the CPAC [Conservative Political Action Conference] ... because its organizers believed him to be a 'crazy bigot.'"[23] The Center for Democratic Values at Queens College, City University of New York has said the Center is among the "key players in the Sharīʿah cottage industry," what it describes as a "conspiracy theory" that claims the existence of "secretive power elite groups that conspire to replace sovereign nation-states in order to eventually rule the world."[24]
Gaffney's leadership of the organization has also prompted criticism of the group in the context of specific accusations made by Gaffney, including that the logo of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency "appears ominously to reflect a morphing of the Islamic crescent and star with the Obama campaign logo" and is part of a "worrying pattern of official U.S. submission to Islam."[9]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Security_Policy
Maybe they should vote for Ted Cruz.
It's called freedom of choice. It isn't readily apparent to me why this concerns you since you have stated here that you would spit on Muslim women. Do you want them to assimilate with you so you can more easily spit on them?
What it says: "Most (64%) say there is not too much support (30%) or no support at all (34%) for extremism among Muslim Americans. About one-in-five (21%) see either a great deal (6%) or a fair amount (15%) of support for extremism in the Muslim American community."
64% of them say the OPPOSITE but you decided to go with the small minority who could be completely deluded. Take a look at people who support Sarah Palin. They have no concept whatsoever of the real world. Additionally, "support extremism", in any case, could mean a wide range of things. As I say elsewhere here the poll is very vague and would be much more informative if the responders were presented with a definition of what the poll means by "extremism". "Extremism" could mean women wearing hijab.
From your link directly above:
"About eight-in-ten American Muslims (81%) say that suicide bombing and other forms of violence against civilians are never justified in order to defend Islam from its enemies. Just 8% say these tactics are often or sometimes justified. There has been virtually no change in these opinions since 2007."
Never justified even as a defensive measure. I suggest that people review that PEW polling.
http://www.people-press.org/2011/08/30/section-6-terrorism-concerns-about-extremism-foreign-policy/
It's somewhat slanted (for example, the question about suicide bombing: Justified? Often 1% Sometimes 7% Rarely 5%, doesn't specify whether against the tank of a foreign invader or the Boston Marathon. That's exceedingly vague and not intended to elicit a meaningful answer.)