BillB wrote:
> On 13/02/2016 12:06 AM, Dutch wrote:
>
>> You ought to stop calling me a racist. It's untrue and uncalled for and
>> I'm getting a little sick of it.
>
> Don't be offended. Your definition of racist and mine are two very
> different things. You think of a racist as someone who has a swastika
> tattooed on his forehead and says nigger a lot, right? That's not what
> I'm talking about. I already said my definition only puts you below the
> 50th percentile of human beings. That's really not so bad, but you do
> exhibit a strong racial bias. At least, my working theory is that it is
> racially motivated at it's core. It could be just plain old religious
> bigotry, but I'm giving you credit for being a little more complex than
> that.
What a load of patronizing hogwash.
> Seriously, Dutch, what other logical conclusion is there? You paint
> yourself as a champion of women's rights, but when a *white* Christian
> guy shoots up an abortion clinic and yells out in court that he's a
> "warrior for the babies," you try to defend him by saying he's not a
> Christian terrorist.
I don't recall the exact exchange but I believe this was another one of
your whataboutery posts where you attempt to deflect criticism away from
some Islamic terror attack or another. There have been so many I can't
recall which one it was. I wouldn't defend this guy's actions, ever, but
abortion is not mentioned in a biblical context and anti-abortion
activists are not all Christians. They are Christians, Jews, Muslims,
atheists, etc.
> When the topic of the thread is the millions of rapes and sexual
> assaults committed by white Christian men in North America and Western
> Europe, you horn into the conversation,
How do you know they're Christian?
try to minimize the serious of
> the *white* misogyny, and desperately try to change the subject to how
> bad Muslims (brown people) are on the other side of the world. Why??
You're just repeating the same lame sophistry I already dismissed in the
original thread. Piling on more shit doesn't make it stink less. I
described both phenomena honestly and accurately by their relative
impact on women. You had no answer for that response then and you still
don't.
>
> When a lower (but *white*) life form like furkin is chided for his 10
> year exploitation of impoverished Third World women for his own sexual
> gratification, you repeatedly jump in to align with him against his
> detractors. I can't see you doing that if he was a Muslim abuser.
There's a lot you can't see due to your blinding neo-progressiveness.
Yes it's a strange thing, but you're a classic example.
>
> You constantly attack Muslim males for their treatment of women,
No, sigh.... I attack Islam for Sharia and the notion that women are
second rate citizens that are to stay in the house, cook, and breed and
suffer corporal punishment for getting out of line. Western Christianity
was not a whole lot different a few generations ago..
day
> after day, post after post, yet you couldn't produce ONE POST from the
> last DECADE where you denounced white males for their mistreatment of
> women, which you are literally SURROUNDED by. Does that make any sense?
I condemn ALL MEN who mistreat women, but Islam which in most Islamic
countries is unreformed, preaches the violent subjugation of woman as a
fundamental article of faith.
>
> What other conclusion do you expect us to make? You wear your bias on
> your sleeve.
It's in your regressive mind.
>
> Just because I don't subscribe to your
>> particular brand of neo-progressive political correctness that does not
>> entitle you to be such an asshole. I thought you had higher standards.
>
> Aren't you trying to enforce your "neo-progressive" politically correct
> feminist views on Muslims? Doesn't that make you an asshole?
My views are decidedly not neo-progressive or politically correct. If
they were I would be like you, any time I sensed any criticism of Islam
I would feign offense, play the race card and engage in some form of
whataboutery. And I would not let up until the critics were shouted down.
My view, if you're listening, is that every person regardless of gender
or race of origin of birth is born with the right to determine his or
her own future. No fascist religion, political system or ideology has
the right to undermine that right.
My worry talking to you about this is that you are so invested in your
position that you couldn't back down even if you wanted to. In order to
save face you are compelled to paint me as a racist, even though you
know its a lie. It's the lawyer in you.