Liberal fags like TMT are shitting their diapers full because Ann Romney told them to get fucked.

[Laugh..Laugh..Laugh!]

You can always tell an abusive liberal pussy. They always
attack and curse the stronger women they fear.

[Kicking Ass and Takin' Names]

When asked why her husband won't release his tax returns -- as every
other presidential candidate has done for years -- Ann Romney snarls
and snips and pisses and moans about "you people."

She says we have no business poking around in her tax returns, her
offshore bank accounts, and her "blind trusts."

If Ann Romney were to apply for a minimum wage job, she'd have to
provide:
-- credit report
-- driving record
-- arrest record
-- and she'd have to piss in a bottle.

But she's applying to be FLOTUS so all she has to do is ride around on
her high horse and shit on "you people."

Memo to Ann Romney: Kiss you peoples' ass.

**************

SAVE AMERICA!!

Spay or neuter
your Republican!!

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 17, 6:20 am, Kicking Ass and Takin' Names

<PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:32:43 +0200, "Laugh..Laugh..Laugh!"
>

LOL...you got that right.

Did you see her latest interview...just freaking laughable how she
tries to avoid the "Release the tax returns Stupid" issue.

And note how the conservatives are ranting and bitching...foaming at
the mouth...as they confront the tax return issue that WILL NOT GO
AWAY.

The majority of Americans...which is the majority of voters...now say
that Romney MUST release his tax returns or they will be voting for
Obama by default.

Flip Flop is SO SCREWED!!


Laugh..laugh..laugh..

TMT

[Hawke]

The sense of entitlement that comes off these people is disgusting. They
see themselves as so above everyone else that they don't have to do what
"regular" candidates do. They are Romneys, after all, and they're
special. They don't have to play by the rules everyone else does. They
think they get to make the rules up as they go. That's what happens when
you get to thinking you're better than everyone else. Too bad for them
that they aren't special after all and if they don't come up with ten
years of tax returns like everyone else then they are going to be very
sorry.

Hawke

[Laugh..Laugh..Laugh!]

In article <k0m937$j6h$1...@speranza.aioe.org>

Envy noted.

Their sense of entitlement is different than yours.

You're a simple parasite with dependencies, whereas they worked
for and earned their money.

Laugh..laugh..laugh..

> Hawke

[Laugh..Laugh..Laugh!]

In article <3890bfc8-bc63-49ed-8309-
01b0f7...@x16g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>

Ann Romney can buy you libs and your gay teleprompter porch
monkey 250 million times over.

Laugh..laugh..laugh..


> TMT

[Gray Guest]

Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in news:k0m937$j6h$1
@speranza.aioe.org:

You should really go see someone about that.

--
Refusenik #1

[Gunner]

So where are Obamas records?

Hummm?

Gunner

One bleeding-heart type asked me in a recent interview if I did not
agree that "violence begets violence." I told him that it is my
earnest endeavor to see that it does. I would like very much to ensure
- and in some cases I have - that any man who offers violence to his
fellow citizen begets a whole lot more in return than he can enjoy.

- Jeff Cooper

[Gunner]

Maybe he should go see a Kennedy or something?

<VBG>

[Hawke]

Ha, ha, ha, old Ann Romney really worked hard to get her half of that
250 million didn't she? From what I can tell she was nothing but a
housewife with five kids. She wasn't a taker. No, She EARNED that money,
right? Didn't she? Being married to a successful man means you earned it
too right? Give us a break, huh. She did not earn a dime of that
fortune. She just married a rich man and now she thinks she deserves to
be the first lady. Oh, and we really know it is YOU that envies the
Romney's. Don't try to pretend you don't. But why accuse the rest of us
of envy when you know you are? If you say you don't envy them that just
means you are a liar too.

She sure has settled down to believing she's entitled to be first lady
just because of the money her HUSBAND made. She doesn't think ordinary
folk like you deserve to know about their business. In your case she's
probably right. Guys like you don't deserve to know what the Romney's
are pulling off with their tax avoidance schemes. The rest of us do.

Hawke

[Hawke]

You really need to understand that unlike you and other right wingers
what I just said is exactly what the majority of Americans think. Most
Americans want to see the Romney's tax returns. So it's you that is out
of step with the rest of us. Maybe you should find a therapist and ask
how come you think the opposite of most of your fellow citizens.

Hawke

[Scout]

"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:k0rgo2$tkh$2...@speranza.aioe.org...

Please cite your source that confirms that what you say is always exactly

what the majority of Americans think.

Then cite your source that a majority of Americans want or need to see his
tax returns.

[dca...@krl.org]

On Aug 19, 3:59 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:

>
> Ha, ha, ha, old Ann Romney really worked hard to get her half of that
> 250 million didn't she? From what I can tell she was nothing but a
> housewife with five kids. She wasn't a taker. No, She EARNED that money,
> right? Didn't she? Being married to a successful man means you earned it
> too right? Give us a break, huh. She did not earn a dime of that
> fortune. She just married a rich man and now she thinks she deserves to
> be the first lady. Oh, and we really know it is YOU that envies the
> Romney's. Don't try to pretend you don't. But why accuse the rest of us
> of envy when you know you are? If you say you don't envy them that just
> means you are a liar too.
>
> She sure has settled down to believing she's entitled to be first lady
> just because of the money her HUSBAND made. She doesn't think ordinary
> folk like you deserve to know about their business. In your case she's
> probably right. Guys like you don't deserve to know what the Romney's
> are pulling off with their tax avoidance schemes. The rest of us do.
>
> Hawke

Said by a man who never was married. And full of lies too. Romney
got married in 1969. He graduated from college in 1971. He gave his
inheritance to charity. Got a MBA and JJD in 1975 six years after
getting married. And went into management consulting in 1977.

So you are saying that Ann Romney was so smart that she knew Mitt was
going to be rich before he graduated from college and eight years
before he started working as a management consultant. Get real.

At least if you are going to make up lies, do not make ones that are
so easily be disproved.


Dan

[Gunner Asch]

I think the Chick-fil-A thing would have taught the Left that normal
people really dont think like they do. But..sigh..no...they are still
delusional.

Shrug

Gunner

--
"I was eating breakfast with my 13-year-old granddaughter
and I asked her, "What day is the 20th of February?"

She said "It's President's Day!"
(She is a smart kid.)
I asked "What does President's Day mean?"
I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln .... etc.
She replied, "President's Day is when President Obama steps out
of the White House, and if he sees his shadow we have
one more year of unemployment."
You know, it hurts when hot coffee spurts out your nose..."

[Gunner Asch]

" . . . President Obama used his weekly address this weekend to
support an earmark ban as well. He also issued a statement Monday
afternoon praising McConnell’s “decision to join me and members of both
parties who support cracking down on wasteful earmark spending.”

Join President Obama in fighting earmarks! He has fought them ever
since, well, never. This is a guy who sought millions and millions in
earmarks when he was a Senator — including, famously, “a request for $1
million in federal funding in 2006 for a new pavilion at the University
of Chicago Hospitals, where his wife, Michelle Obama, was a vice
president at the time.”

Oddly enough, “Mrs. Obama’s compensation at the University of Chicago
Hospital, where she is a vice president for community affairs, jumped
from $121,910 in 2004, just before her husband was elected to the
Senate, to $316,962 in 2005, just after he took office.” Almost as if
the administrators had an inkling that having her there might help them
cash in!

It didn’t work, by the way, despite Barry’s best efforts. The earmark
didn’t go through, and her salary was promptly reduced back to $273,618.
And that, I suppose, must be when he suddenly decided he hated earmarks?
If my wife can’t cash in, then screw everything.

This story somehow doesn’t make it into the L.A. Times article. Which
then goes on to quote Obama as follows:

“I look forward to working with Democrats and Republicans to not
only end earmark spending, but to find other ways to bring down our
deficits for our children,” he said.

I have an idea for how to bring down our deficits, Mr. President. Stop
spending money like it’s going out of style. Stop passing stimulus
packages costing hundreds of billions of dollars that aren’t needed.
Stop passing huge socialist reforms that cost a mint.

None of which is mentioned in the article either.

Oh, and just one last thing: senior White House advisor David Axelrod
said on Sunday morning that Obama probably has no choice but to sign a
slew of earmarks into law. Because, you know, “one of the problems is
that these things come embedded in bills that have to be signed.” “Have”
to be signed, he said.

That didn’t make it in the article either! Wow."

[Oglethorpe]

"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message

news:k0rgj3$tkh$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

As hard as Michelle worked to get half of Obama's millions, libtard.

[Oglethorpe]

"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message

news:k0rgo2$tkh$2...@speranza.aioe.org...

Most Americans are't libtard dipshits like you.

[Gray Guest]

Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in news:k0rgo2$tkh$2
@speranza.aioe.org:

besides the deluded cadre who would that be?

--
Refusenik #1

[Laugh..Laugh..Laugh!]

In article <k0rgo2$tkh$2...@speranza.aioe.org>

No they don't. The only ones asking for them are political
activists and Obama's media lap dogs.

Most of you libtards are TurboTax filers and too fucking stupid
to correctly read them anyway.

[Michael A. Terrell]

Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> I think the Chick-fil-A thing would have taught the Left that normal
> people really dont think like they do. But..sigh..no...they are still
> delusional.

I went there for breakfast, then for lunch. Everyone I talked to
while I was in line said that they were sick of people trying to tell
them how to think, and what they thought of 'Political Correctness' so
they were there to support free speech. Not one person said they were
there to protest in favor of the left.

[pyotr filipivich]

Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com> on Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:37:04 -0700
typed in misc.survivalism the following:

>
>>>
>>> You really need to understand that unlike you and other right wingers what
>>> I just said is exactly what the majority of Americans think. Most
>>> Americans want to see the Romney's tax returns.
>>
>>Please cite your source that confirms that what you say is always exactly
>>what the majority of Americans think.
>>
>>Then cite your source that a majority of Americans want or need to see his
>>tax returns.
>>
>>
>I think the Chick-fil-A thing would have taught the Left that normal
>people really dont think like they do. But..sigh..no...they are still
>delusional.

The incident confirmed what they already believed: the rest of the
country is populated by ignorant hateful bigots who refuse to
acknowledge their moral and intellectual superiors.

Same goes for the GOP's "Bedwetter Caucus".

>Shrug

Le Shrug. Just keeping the shoulder muscles loosened up.
--
pyotr filipivich
Most journalists these days couldn't investigate a missing chocolate cake
at a pre-school without a Democrat office holder telling them what to look for,
where, and why it is Geroge Bush's fault.

[Gunner]

The Left has become so pumped full of the imaginary importance of
whatever their current complaint is..that its rather funny to watch
them. Whats sad is the meatheads who for years, have bent over
backwards to cater to them. School administrators, politicians, the
media....

That of course will be coming to a sudden and very unexpected (to
them) halt in a very short time Hopefully those whinning ninnies will
simply go home with their tails between their legs and learn to get
over it. Worst case..is they are killed and bulldozed into thousands
of mass graves because they are simply selfish, stupid and have zero
ability to learn much of anything besides how to whimper to get what
they want. And since thats not going to be happening much
longer...they are going to have a very...very...very rough time when
the reality check is cashed.

[Gray Guest]

"Laugh..Laugh..Laugh!" <obama-t...@barackobama.com> wrote in
news:3d6d38532222c6b8...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:

We know little Timmy Geithner couldn't.

--
Refusenik #1

[Michael A. Terrell]

Gunner wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 02:27:56 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"

> ?mike.t...@earthlink.net? wrote:
>
> ?
> ?Gunner Asch wrote:
> ??
> ?? I think the Chick-fil-A thing would have taught the Left that normal
> ?? people really dont think like they do. But..sigh..no...they are still
> ?? delusional.
> ?
> ?
> ? I went there for breakfast, then for lunch. Everyone I talked to
> ?while I was in line said that they were sick of people trying to tell
> ?them how to think, and what they thought of 'Political Correctness' so
> ?they were there to support free speech. Not one person said they were
> ?there to protest in favor of the left.

>
> The Left has become so pumped full of the imaginary importance of
> whatever their current complaint is..that its rather funny to watch
> them. Whats sad is the meatheads who for years, have bent over
> backwards to cater to them. School administrators, politicians, the
> media....
>
> That of course will be coming to a sudden and very unexpected (to
> them) halt in a very short time Hopefully those whinning ninnies will
> simply go home with their tails between their legs and learn to get
> over it. Worst case..is they are killed and bulldozed into thousands
> of mass graves because they are simply selfish, stupid and have zero
> ability to learn much of anything besides how to whimper to get what
> they want. And since thats not going to be happening much
> longer...they are going to have a very...very...very rough time when
> the reality check is cashed.

MSM (Media's Screaming Morons) is a big part of the problem, by
telling them what they want to hear instead of the truth.

[max headroom]

Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in news:k0rgj3$tkh$1...@speranza.aioe.org:

> ... Guys like you don't deserve to know what the Romney's are pulling off with their tax avoidance

> schemes. The rest of us do.

Tax avoidance is not illegal. Hire a competent tax attorney and you can do it, too.

[pyotr filipivich]

"max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> on Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:53:44

-0700 typed in misc.survivalism the following:

That would require him to a) have enough left over from his
stipend to pay for a competent tax attorney b) him being able to
recognize a competent tax attorney. Maybe he can get one of Obama's
classmates or students. Does Joe Biden handle tax matters?

[Hawke]

Nope. What I said is what I said. Ann Romney got rich by marrying a rich
man not by earning anything herself. That is a fact. It's hard to figure
how you didn't understand that.

> At least if you are going to make up lies, do not make ones that are
> so easily be disproved.

You claiming that I made up any lies is a lie. There are no lies in my
post. You have not proven anything I said is wrong or is a lie. So your
accusation is a lie.

Hawke

[dca...@krl.org]

On Aug 20, 1:21 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:

> Nope. What I said is what I said. Ann Romney got rich by marrying a rich
> man not by earning anything herself. That is a fact. It's hard to figure
> how you didn't understand that.
>

>

> You claiming that I made up any lies is a lie. There are no lies in my
> post. You have not proven anything I said is wrong or is a lie. So your
> accusation is a lie.
>
> Hawke

Your lie is saying that Ann Romney married a rich man. At the time
she married Mitt, he was not a rich man. So your statement that she
married a rich man is false. If you were able to think clearly, you
would have said that Ann Romney married a man who became rich some
years after the marriage. It is your lack of clarity in your thinking
that leads to a lot of your misconceptions.

Do try to think.


Dan

[Gunner]

Thats impossible for a bird brain that comes here not for any aspect
of metalworking, but simply to spew the obvious and vast mental
illness issues that the Parakeet displays with every post.

I suggest you simply killfile the little scabies covered coot and not
bother with him...as he is simply here for political purposes. When
his Obamassiah loses in November..he will promptly disappear back into
the ooze from which he came. Dont waste your time with him, unless
you enjoy pinning his tailfeathers back and nailing his crusty feet to
the feeder. Which may be fun for you..and if so..feel free to keep
hammering the nails in. Need more nails..Ill donate a keg or two. You
do a very satisfactory job of it btw.

But the parakeet is here on RCM not for anything dealing with
metalworking..but for an evident need to be abused and treated like an
utter buffoon...which..sadly....he obviously is.

I often wonder if he is posting from the rec room at the Home. Maybe
thats what they give him when he cleans his room and leaves the little
boys alone.

[Tom Gardner]

On 8/17/2012 4:20 PM, Hawke wrote:

>
> The sense of entitlement that comes off these people is disgusting. They
> see themselves as so above everyone else that they don't have to do what
> "regular" candidates do.
>

> Hawke

"Regular" candidates release their school records. What is Obammy
afraid of???

he Obama records which have not been released include; Passport
records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental
College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard
Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago
scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois
State Senate records/schedules (said to be lost), Medical records,
Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents,
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the
long-form Certificate of Live Birth.

[Tom Gardner]

I thought he had some big inheritance and never worked a day in his
life. Has he ever wrote about a job? Like ALL leftists, he's had
everything handed to him and bitches about those that have more.

[Gunner]

But the obvious question is...why is he Here?

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 20, 12:21 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:

> Hawke- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

What is the difference between Ann Romney and a whore?

The whore is paid less for more effort.

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 20, 4:06 pm, Gunner <Gunner Asch> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:11:23 -0700 (PDT), "dcas...@krl.org"

>       - Jeff Cooper- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Translation: Hawke has kicked Gummer in the ass many times.

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

Wrong...Mitt was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.

She married him for his money.

Asked for and got to see his tax returns before the wedding.

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

> everything handed to him and bitches about those that have more.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

LOL...oh Tommy...not all of us has a company given to us by our
parents to run into the ground.

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

And your point is Tommy?

What's more important...being President or his tax returns?

If Romney wants to be President then he has to release his tax
returns.

And tough shit if he doesn't.

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 20, 8:52 pm, Gunner <Gunner Asch> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:26:16 -0400, Tom Gardner <Mars@Tacks> wrote:
> >On 8/20/2012 5:06 PM, Gunner wrote:

>       - Jeff Cooper- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Why are you?

Don't you have creditors that you owe money to?

How about paying those back taxes?

TMT

[JerryD(upstateNY)]

Hawke wrote ... Guys like you don't deserve to know what

the Romney's are pulling off with their tax avoidance
schemes. The rest of us do.<<<<<<<<<

You "deserve to know" what Romney is doing with HIS money
but don't give a shit about what obama is doing with YOUR money.
That's just plain STUPID !!!!



--
JerryD(upstateNY)

[JerryD(upstateNY)]

Gunner Asch typed in misc.survivalism the following:

Most Americans want to see the Romney's tax returns.<<<<

Not MOST Americans, just democrats "want to

see the Romney's tax returns".

And the only reason they want to see Romney's tax
returns is because the DNC told them they wanted to see them .
The average person has someone do his/her tax return
because they don't understand enough about it.
If they don't understand their own tax return, how in the
hell do you think they will understand anything on
Romney's 20-30 page return ?
Like I said, you only want to see it because
someone told you that you do.
By the way, that's called brainwashing and of course
you don't know you are being brainwashed or
you wouldn't allow it.
--
JerryD(upstateNY)

[Gunner]

Thats the parakeet. Dumb as a square thread on a round bolt.

[Gunner]

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 02:33:55 -0400, "JerryD\(upstateNY\)"
<jer...@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

>Gunner Asch typed in misc.survivalism the following:
>Most Americans want to see the Romney's tax returns.<<<<

Odd...can you repost the message that said I did, and include the
header information? We will have to take care of that particular
forger most rapidly.

Gunner

>
>Not MOST Americans, just democrats "want to
>see the Romney's tax returns".
>And the only reason they want to see Romney's tax
>returns is because the DNC told them they wanted to see them .
>The average person has someone do his/her tax return
>because they don't understand enough about it.
>If they don't understand their own tax return, how in the
>hell do you think they will understand anything on
>Romney's 20-30 page return ?
>Like I said, you only want to see it because
>someone told you that you do.
>By the way, that's called brainwashing and of course
>you don't know you are being brainwashed or
> you wouldn't allow it.

[Laugh..Laugh..Laugh!]

In article <d8a70748-42aa-47fc-bf3f-
d0d50f...@z9g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>

Apparently that joke of a democrat pretending to be president
now thinks it's important.

Romney will make Obama a deal.

He'll match whatever tax returns Obama releases along with his
college transcripts.

No transcripts, no deal.

> If Romney wants to be President then he has to release his tax
> returns.

No he doesn't.

> And tough shit if he doesn't.

That's right. Tough shit for you and the other progressive
retards.

laugh..laugh..laugh!

> TMT

[RD Sandman]

Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:d8a70748-42aa-47fc...@z9g2000yqf.googlegroups.com:

Free clue, TMT. Romney doesn't give a shit what you think about him
releasing or not his tax returns....you won't vote for him anyway.



--

5 second fuses last about 3 seconds...


Sleep well, tonight.....

RD (The Sandman)

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

On Aug 17, 6:20 am, Kicking Ass and Takin' Names
<PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:32:43 +0200, "Laugh..Laugh..Laugh!"
>
> <obama-the-lo...@barackobama.com> wrote:
> >You can always tell an abusive liberal pussy.  They always
> >attack and curse the stronger women they fear.
>
> When asked why her husband won't release his tax returns -- as every
> other presidential candidate has done for years -- Ann Romney snarls
> and snips and pisses and moans about "you people."
>
> She says we have no business poking around in her tax returns, her
> offshore bank accounts, and her "blind trusts."
>
> If Ann Romney were to apply for a minimum wage job, she'd have to
> provide:
> -- credit report
> -- driving record
> -- arrest record
> -- and she'd have to piss in a bottle.
>
> But she's applying to be FLOTUS so all she has to do is ride around on
> her high horse and shit on "you people."
>
> Memo to Ann Romney:  Kiss you peoples' ass.
>
> **************
>
> SAVE AMERICA!!
>
> Spay or neuter
> your Republican!!

I suppose you think that since the Mooche staged a phoney photo-op in
Target she's "one of you". Doesn't EVERYBODY that shops in Target wear
$200 t-shirts and $600 tennis shoes? I'm willing o bet that the
clothes Ann Romney wears she buys WITH HER OWN MONEY.

[Michael A. Terrell]

"Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E" wrote:
>
> I suppose you think that since the Mooche staged a phoney photo-op in
> Target she's "one of you". Doesn't EVERYBODY that shops in Target wear
> $200 t-shirts and $600 tennis shoes? I'm willing o bet that the
> clothes Ann Romney wears she buys WITH HER OWN MONEY.

Obama thinks she should be paid to be first lady:

<http://now.msn.com/president-obama-suggests-first-lady-should-get-salary>

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

On Aug 21, 1:50 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

He prolly thinks the Mooche's fat, smelly, baggy assed mammy should be
paid for simply taking up space in our Whitehouse on the taxpayer's
dime.

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 21, 12:30 pm, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey

> clothes Ann Romney wears she buys WITH HER OWN MONEY.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Hmm..I didn't know that "Tax Cheat" Mitt was letting "You People" Anny
work on the side?

Do you think she pays taxes on those Morman tricks she is turning?

Does she do a horse sex show on the weekends?

Laugh..laugh..laugh..

TMT

[Gunner]

Trying to work up a little nest egg for after January 20th?

Gunner

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 21, 1:50 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

Actually not a bad idea.

Hillary was a worker too.

Ever notice how the Republican First Wives are always the ones to lay
around, do nothing but watch tv and leech off the Country while
bitching about not getting enough.

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 21, 12:20 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
wrote:

> RD (The Sandman)- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Laugh..laugh..laugh...seems like that is your automatic response to
anyone who is winning the argument.

And The Truth is no honest American voter will vote for "Tax Cheat"
Mitt as long as he keeps his tainted tax returns secret.

Being President or releasing those damning tax returns..which will it
be Romney?

TMT

[Michael A. Terrell]

Gunner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:50:40 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E" wrote:
> >>
> >> I suppose you think that since the Mooche staged a phoney photo-op in
> >> Target she's "one of you". Doesn't EVERYBODY that shops in Target wear
> >> $200 t-shirts and $600 tennis shoes? I'm willing o bet that the
> >> clothes Ann Romney wears she buys WITH HER OWN MONEY.
> >
> >
> > Obama thinks she should be paid to be first lady:
> >
> ><http://now.msn.com/president-obama-suggests-first-lady-should-get-salary>
>
> Trying to work up a little nest egg for after January 20th?

They are both over paid, him by at least $500,000 a year. He should
be paying at least $100,000 a year rent to sleep in the Whitehouse, and
at least a $12,000,000 non refundable security deposit.

[Gunner]

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:49:04 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"

Not a bad idea. That way it will keep him and his cronies from
stealing everything in sight and vandalizing the Whitehouse like the
Clinton bunch did...to the tune of millions of dollars in stolen
property and busted computers and other valuables.

So the People should send in monitors on January 1st to make sure they
exit in an orderly fashion.

Ill volunteer, as long as I get to protect the Whitehouse from
vandalism and whatnot.

Got just the tools to do that too.

And Im sure I can talk a bunch of retired Spec Ops guys into
volunteering their time as well. And bring their own ammo too.

<VBG>


Gunner, testing out a new ASP baton

[F. George McDuffee]

OP lost

<snip>

> Doesn't EVERYBODY that shops in Target wear
> $200 t-shirts and $600 tennis shoes?

<snip>

Actually they might -- Target is an "up-scale" Walmart for
Yuppies pretending to be on an austerity budget.

The local real working class and those who used to be middle
class now shop at the day old bread outlet, Dollar General,
Family Dollar, Derailed Commodities, Dollar Tree and other
actual discount outlets. The parking lots of these stores
are filled with clapped out pickups and rust buckets with
nary a Lexus or BMW in sight, and no the drivers don't keep
a Cadillac at their summer home, although they frequently do
have a big dog in the bed or the back seat...


--
Unka' George

"Gold is the money of kings,
silver is the money of gentlemen,
barter is the money of peasants,
but debt is the money of slaves"

-Norm Franz, "Money and Wealth in the New Millenium"

[Michael A. Terrell]

Gunner wrote:

>
> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> >
> > They are both over paid, him by at least $500,000 a year. He should
> >be paying at least $100,000 a year rent to sleep in the Whitehouse, and
> >at least a $12,000,000 non refundable security deposit.
>
> Not a bad idea. That way it will keep him and his cronies from
> stealing everything in sight and vandalizing the Whitehouse like the
> Clinton bunch did...to the tune of millions of dollars in stolen
> property and busted computers and other valuables.
>
> So the People should send in monitors on January 1st to make sure they
> exit in an orderly fashion.
>
> Ill volunteer, as long as I get to protect the Whitehouse from
> vandalism and whatnot.

They should leave the Whitehouse same way they came into the world.
Naked, penniless, hungry and crying for something to suck on. They've
been tit feed for too long.

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 21, 6:58 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> been tit feed for too long.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

LOL...do you think that George Bush would know which tit he fed at?

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 21, 6:55 pm, F. George McDuffee <gmcduf...@mcduffee-

I didn't know that they sold dog?

Is it the other white meat?

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 21, 5:49 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> at least a $12,000,000 non refundable security deposit.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

LOL...just knowing that Barack and Michelle are doing in the Lincoln
Bedroom must just be killing you conservatives.

TMT

[The Big Black Boot]

In article <4892c4c8-eea9-45c1-8dc6-
ce3606...@x16g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>

Your boy Obama likes it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE3cpsdMg3Q&feature=player_embedd
ed

> TMT

[The Big Black Boot]

In article <e0a7a9b1-01c9-4ebb-abe4-
6073bc...@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>

would laugh and point fingers at you twits?

George Bush still owns you after being gone four years.

> TMT

[RD Sandman]

Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:b33a826b-986d-4e46...@o3g2000yqp.googlegroups.com:

> On Aug 21, 12:20 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> innews:d8a70748-42aa-47fc

> -bf3f-d0d...@z9g2000yqf.googlegroups.com:

That ain't you.

> And The Truth is no honest American voter will vote for "Tax Cheat"
> Mitt as long as he keeps his tainted tax returns secret.

Then your side should have no problems in November.

> Being President or releasing those damning tax returns..which will it
> be Romney?

He probably won't do either.

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 22, 11:57 am, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
wrote:

> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:b33a826b-986d-4e46...@o3g2000yqp.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 21, 12:20 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
> > wrote:
> >> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote
> >> innews:d8a70748-42aa-47fc

> > -bf3f-d0d50f312...@z9g2000yqf.googlegroups.com:

I am on record with saying that Obama will be reelected.

And you?

Meanwhile have you noticed that God has targeted the Rape Party with a
hurricane?

She doesn't like Republicans either.

TMT

[RD Sandman]

Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:7b8c1351-15cf-4954...@w15g2000yql.googlegroups.com:

> On Aug 22, 11:57 am, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> innews:b33a826b-986d-4e46

> -b361-a8d...@o3g2000yqp.googlegroups.com:

Probably.

> And you?

I hope you are smart enough to figure that out, but I doubt it.

[Hawke]

On 8/20/2012 12:11 PM, dca...@krl.org wrote:
> On Aug 20, 1:21 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
>
>> Nope. What I said is what I said. Ann Romney got rich by marrying a rich
>> man not by earning anything herself. That is a fact. It's hard to figure
>> how you didn't understand that.
>>
>
>>
>> You claiming that I made up any lies is a lie. There are no lies in my
>> post. You have not proven anything I said is wrong or is a lie. So your
>> accusation is a lie.
>>
>> Hawke
>
> Your lie is saying that Ann Romney married a rich man. At the time
> she married Mitt, he was not a rich man. So your statement that she
> married a rich man is false. If you were able to think clearly, you
> would have said that Ann Romney married a man who became rich some
> years after the marriage. It is your lack of clarity in your thinking
> that leads to a lot of your misconceptions.
>
> Do try to think.
>
>
> Dan
>


You come across as a real dumb shit when you try to play silly word
games. Ann Romney is married to a rich man, is she not? So she married a
rich man. There is nothing in my statement "she married a rich man" that
says anything about when he became a rich man. All I said is that she
married a rich man. She did. The day she got married the man she married
was not rich, although that is debatable too. But that is not the point.
She did marry a rich man. Whether she married him when he was poor or
whether she married him after he was rich she still married a rich man.
Arguing about a point like this is why you show yourself as a silly man.
No serious person would argue about something as trivial as this.


The fact that you have to sink to such low levels to try to prove a
point only shows how desperate you are. Just ask people you know if Ann
Romney married a rich man and see what they say. I'll guarantee the
majority of them will say yes because she is married to a rich man.
That's all! Arguing about how and when he became rich is irrelevant
unless you are desperate to find something to argue about.

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/20/2012 5:26 PM, Tom Gardner wrote:
> On 8/20/2012 5:06 PM, Gunner wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:11:23 -0700 (PDT), "dca...@krl.org"

>> <dca...@krl.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 20, 1:21 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nope. What I said is what I said. Ann Romney got rich by marrying a
>>>> rich
>>>> man not by earning anything herself. That is a fact. It's hard to
>>>> figure
>>>> how you didn't understand that.
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You claiming that I made up any lies is a lie. There are no lies in my
>>>> post. You have not proven anything I said is wrong or is a lie. So your
>>>> accusation is a lie.
>>>>
>>>> Hawke
>>>
>>> Your lie is saying that Ann Romney married a rich man. At the time
>>> she married Mitt, he was not a rich man. So your statement that she
>>> married a rich man is false. If you were able to think clearly, you
>>> would have said that Ann Romney married a man who became rich some
>>> years after the marriage. It is your lack of clarity in your thinking
>>> that leads to a lot of your misconceptions.
>>>
>>> Do try to think.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dan
>>

>> Thats impossible for a bird brain that comes here not for any aspect
>> of metalworking, but simply to spew the obvious and vast mental
>> illness issues that the Parakeet displays with every post.
>>
>> I suggest you simply killfile the little scabies covered coot and not
>> bother with him...as he is simply here for political purposes. When
>> his Obamassiah loses in November..he will promptly disappear back into
>> the ooze from which he came. Dont waste your time with him, unless
>> you enjoy pinning his tailfeathers back and nailing his crusty feet to
>> the feeder. Which may be fun for you..and if so..feel free to keep
>> hammering the nails in. Need more nails..Ill donate a keg or two. You
>> do a very satisfactory job of it btw.
>>
>> But the parakeet is here on RCM not for anything dealing with
>> metalworking..but for an evident need to be abused and treated like an
>> utter buffoon...which..sadly....he obviously is.
>>
>> I often wonder if he is posting from the rec room at the Home. Maybe
>> thats what they give him when he cleans his room and leaves the little
>> boys alone.
>>
>> Gunner
>
>
> I thought he had some big inheritance and never worked a day in his
> life. Has he ever wrote about a job? Like ALL leftists, he's had
> everything handed to him and bitches about those that have more.
>


No Tom, nobody ever died and handed me a business like what happened to
you. I never got a break like that. I guess you forgot that was a break
in life. Guys like you never remember the things that went your way only
the things that you can bitch and whine about.


Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/20/2012 6:52 PM, Gunner wrote:

>>> But the parakeet is here on RCM not for anything dealing with
>>> metalworking..but for an evident need to be abused and treated like an
>>> utter buffoon...which..sadly....he obviously is.
>>>
>>> I often wonder if he is posting from the rec room at the Home. Maybe
>>> thats what they give him when he cleans his room and leaves the little
>>> boys alone.
>>>
>>> Gunner
>>
>>
>> I thought he had some big inheritance and never worked a day in his
>> life. Has he ever wrote about a job? Like ALL leftists, he's had
>> everything handed to him and bitches about those that have more.
>
>

> But the obvious question is...why is he Here?

You ought to know by now. I'm here to set straight all the lies and
ignorance that is spread around here by the right wing crowd. Since you
have no real work to do go back to your dirty, little, shop and pretend
that you did something right in your life. It's the one thing you are
good at. Making things up.

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/20/2012 9:14 AM, pyotr filipivich wrote:
> "max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> on Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:53:44
> -0700 typed in misc.survivalism the following:
>> Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in news:k0rgj3$tkh$1...@speranza.aioe.org:
>>
>>> ... Guys like you don't deserve to know what the Romney's are pulling off with their tax avoidance
>>> schemes. The rest of us do.
>>
>> Tax avoidance is not illegal. Hire a competent tax attorney and you can do it, too.
>
> That would require him to a) have enough left over from his
> stipend to pay for a competent tax attorney b) him being able to
> recognize a competent tax attorney. Maybe he can get one of Obama's
> classmates or students. Does Joe Biden handle tax matters?


You say that as if you are so much superior to him. Are you? Tell us,
have you hired a high priced tax attorney to help you avoid paying your
taxes? H&R Block doesn't count, BTW.


Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/20/2012 11:25 PM, JerryD(upstateNY) wrote:
> Hawke wrote ... Guys like you don't deserve to know what the Romney's

> are pulling off with their tax avoidance schemes. The rest of us
> do.<<<<<<<<<
>

> You "deserve to know" what Romney is doing with HIS money but don't give
> a shit about what obama is doing with YOUR money.
> That's just plain STUPID !!!!



I know how Obama is spending our money. He's doing it a lot better than
Bush did and this time it's all on the budget.

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/19/2012 9:02 PM, Oglethorpe wrote:
> "Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
> news:k0rgj3$tkh$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/17/2012 8:09 PM, Laugh..Laugh..Laugh! wrote:
>>> In article <k0m937$j6h$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
>>> Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:

>>>>> LOL...you got that right.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you see her latest interview...just freaking laughable how she
>>>>> tries to avoid the "Release the tax returns Stupid" issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> And note how the conservatives are ranting and bitching...foaming at
>>>>> the mouth...as they confront the tax return issue that WILL NOT GO
>>>>> AWAY.
>>>>>
>>>>> The majority of Americans...which is the majority of voters...now say
>>>>> that Romney MUST release his tax returns or they will be voting for
>>>>> Obama by default.
>>>>>
>>>>> Flip Flop is SO SCREWED!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Laugh..laugh..laugh..
>>>>>
>>>>> TMT

>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The sense of entitlement that comes off these people
>>>

>>> Envy noted.
>>>
>>> Their sense of entitlement is different than yours.
>>>
>>> You're a simple parasite with dependencies, whereas they worked
>>> for and earned their money.
>>>
>>> Laugh..laugh..laugh..
>>
>>
>>
>> Ha, ha, ha, old Ann Romney really worked hard to get her half of that 250
>> million didn't she?
>
> As hard as Michelle worked to get half of Obama's millions, libtard.



That's the point, stupid! The wives of rich men didn't earn the money.
All they did was to be a wife, but in some cases they get the life of a
king just because of who they married. Now we know that Michelle is an
attorney and was on the way to making a lot of money all by herself. All
Ann Romney did was raise a family. I'd say Michelle did more and unlike
Ann, Michelle doesn't come across as if she deserves what she got. She
comes across as grateful. Do the Romney's seem grateful? I don't see it.
I see entitlement.

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/19/2012 1:53 PM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message

> news:k0rgo2$tkh$2...@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/18/2012 6:56 AM, Gray Guest wrote:
>>> Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in news:k0m937$j6h$1
>>> @speranza.aioe.org:

>>>> The sense of entitlement that comes off these people is disgusting.
>>>> They

>>>> see themselves as so above everyone else that they don't have to do
>>>> what

>>>> "regular" candidates do. They are Romneys, after all, and they're
>>>> special. They don't have to play by the rules everyone else does. They
>>>> think they get to make the rules up as they go. That's what happens
>>>> when
>>>> you get to thinking you're better than everyone else. Too bad for them
>>>> that they aren't special after all and if they don't come up with ten
>>>> years of tax returns like everyone else then they are going to be very
>>>> sorry.
>>>>
>>>> Hawke
>>>>
>>>
>>> You should really go see someone about that.
>>>
>>
>>
>> You really need to understand that unlike you and other right wingers
>> what I just said is exactly what the majority of Americans think. Most
>> Americans want to see the Romney's tax returns.
>
> Please cite your source that confirms that what you say is always
> exactly what the majority of Americans think.
>
> Then cite your source that a majority of Americans want or need to see
> his tax returns.


Shit, man, all you have to do is watch the news. They have had this
story on TV for weeks now. All during this time they have had many polls
on what the public thinks about Romney's taxes and the majority of
people say he should show his returns like all the other candidates have
done. If you question it then Google it and you'll find any number of
polls that say just that.


Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/20/2012 2:37 AM, Gunner wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 02:27:56 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Gunner Asch wrote:
>>>
>>> I think the Chick-fil-A thing would have taught the Left that normal
>>> people really dont think like they do. But..sigh..no...they are still
>>> delusional.
>>
>>
>> I went there for breakfast, then for lunch. Everyone I talked to
>> while I was in line said that they were sick of people trying to tell
>> them how to think, and what they thought of 'Political Correctness' so
>> they were there to support free speech. Not one person said they were
>> there to protest in favor of the left.
>
>
> The Left has become so pumped full of the imaginary importance of
> whatever their current complaint is..that its rather funny to watch
> them. Whats sad is the meatheads who for years, have bent over
> backwards to cater to them. School administrators, politicians, the
> media....
>
> That of course will be coming to a sudden and very unexpected (to
> them) halt in a very short time Hopefully those whinning ninnies will
> simply go home with their tails between their legs and learn to get
> over it. Worst case..is they are killed and bulldozed into thousands
> of mass graves because they are simply selfish, stupid and have zero
> ability to learn much of anything besides how to whimper to get what
> they want. And since thats not going to be happening much
> longer...they are going to have a very...very...very rough time when
> the reality check is cashed.
>
> Gunner


You'll be dead long before anything like that every happens. It's just a
perverse fantasy of yours anyway. We all know you're just a lying con
man that owes more than he's worth. That's why no one but jerkoffs
listen to anything you say.

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/19/2012 7:32 PM, Gray Guest wrote:

>>>
>>> You should really go see someone about that.
>>>
>>
>>
>> You really need to understand that unlike you and other right wingers
>> what I just said is exactly what the majority of Americans think. Most

>> Americans want to see the Romney's tax returns. So it's you that is out
>> of step with the rest of us. Maybe you should find a therapist and ask
>> how come you think the opposite of most of your fellow citizens.
>>
>> Hawke
>>
>
> besides the deluded cadre who would that be?
>



That group would be the majority of Americans. 54% of them say they want
to see more of Romney's returns. Don't believe it? Here's a poll that
says it's true.

> http://www.kvia.com/news/elections/Poll-Americans-want-to-see-Romney-s-tax-returns/-/390782/15607818/-/kv1bck/-/index.html

Okay, there you are. Most Americans want to see Romney's taxes. So what
do you say now that you know you are in the minority? You are the
deluded cadre? I think so.

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/19/2012 9:03 PM, Oglethorpe wrote:
>>>
>>> You should really go see someone about that.
>>>
>>
>>
>> You really need to understand that unlike you and other right wingers what
>> I just said is exactly what the majority of Americans think.
>

> Most Americans are't libtard dipshits like you.


What are they ignorant, right wing, nutjobs like you?

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/20/2012 8:26 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> On Aug 20, 7:18 pm, Tom Gardner <Mars@Tacks> wrote:
>> On 8/17/2012 4:20 PM, Hawke wrote:
>>
>>
>>

>>> The sense of entitlement that comes off these people is disgusting. They
>>> see themselves as so above everyone else that they don't have to do what
>>> "regular" candidates do.
>>

>>> Hawke
>>
>> "Regular" candidates release their school records. What is Obammy
>> afraid of???
>>
>> he Obama records which have not been released include; Passport
>> records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental
>> College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard
>> Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago
>> scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois
>> State Senate records/schedules (said to be lost), Medical records,
>> Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents,
>> Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the
>> long-form Certificate of Live Birth.
>
> And your point is Tommy?
>
> What's more important...being President or his tax returns?
>
> If Romney wants to be President then he has to release his tax
> returns.
>
> And tough shit if he doesn't.
>

> TMT


That's what is so funny about this. Romney fucked himself. He made this
into a big deal all by himself. If he had just put out his taxes during
the primaries this would not be a problem. But his refusing to do it now
is making everyone want to see it. It was a stupid political move on his
part. He doesn't know what he's doing and that is why he's never going
to be president. Obama is going to beat him easily.

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/21/2012 10:20 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
> Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in

> news:d8a70748-42aa-47fc...@z9g2000yqf.googlegroups.com:

> Free clue, TMT. Romney doesn't give a shit what you think about him
> releasing or not his tax returns....you won't vote for him anyway.

But he's going to be very sorry when a good chunk of Americans choose
not to vote for him because of his secrecy and because they won't think
they can trust a man who is hiding things from the public. He screwed
himself. He's the only person who is getting hurt on this issue. Those
of us who oppose him are loving this. He makes it worse for himself
every day.

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/22/2012 9:57 AM, RD Sandman wrote:

>>>> What's more important...being President or his tax returns?
>>>
>>>> If Romney wants to be President then he has to release his tax
>>>> returns.
>>>
>>>> And tough shit if he doesn't.
>>>
>>> Free clue, TMT. Romney doesn't give a shit what you think about him
>>> releasing or not his tax returns....you won't vote for him anyway.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> 5 second fuses last about 3 seconds...
>>>
>>> Sleep well, tonight.....
>>>
>>> RD (The Sandman)- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Laugh..laugh..laugh...seems like that is your automatic response to
>> anyone who is winning the argument.
>
> That ain't you.
>
>> And The Truth is no honest American voter will vote for "Tax Cheat"
>> Mitt as long as he keeps his tainted tax returns secret.
>
> Then your side should have no problems in November.
>
>> Being President or releasing those damning tax returns..which will it
>> be Romney?
>
> He probably won't do either.

Yep, but don't you think he should have known that if he was hiding
things that he couldn't afford to have come out he shouldn't even have
bothered to run?

Hawke

[Hawke]

On 8/22/2012 2:08 PM, RD Sandman wrote:
>
>>>>> 5 second fuses last about 3 seconds...
>>>
>>>>> Sleep well, tonight.....
>>>
>>>>> RD (The Sandman)- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>>> Laugh..laugh..laugh...seems like that is your automatic response to
>>>> anyone who is winning the argument.
>>>
>>> That ain't you.
>>>
>>>> And The Truth is no honest American voter will vote for "Tax Cheat"
>>>> Mitt as long as he keeps his tainted tax returns secret.
>>>
>>> Then your side should have no problems in November.
>>>
>>>> Being President or releasing those damning tax returns..which will
>>>> it be Romney?
>>>
>>> He probably won't do either.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> 5 second fuses last about 3 seconds...
>>>
>>> Sleep well, tonight.....
>>>
>>> RD (The Sandman)- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> I am on record with saying that Obama will be reelected.
>
> Probably.
>
>> And you?
>
> I hope you are smart enough to figure that out, but I doubt it.

It doesn't take much of a prophet to know that you don't want any
Democrat in the White House.

Hawke

[dca...@krl.org]

On Aug 22, 7:55 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:

> The fact that you have to sink to such low levels to try to prove a
> point only shows how desperate you are. Just ask people you know if Ann
> Romney married a rich man and see what they say. I'll guarantee the
> majority of them will say yes because she is married to a rich man.
> That's all! Arguing about how and when he became rich is irrelevant
> unless you are desperate to find something to argue about.
>
> Hawke

I can not help it if your command of the English language is poor.

It is irrelevant if many other people share your opinion that she
married a rich man. It just shows that you associate with others that
do not think clearly.

Dan

[dca...@krl.org]

On Aug 22, 8:01 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:


> You ought to know by now. I'm here to set straight all the lies and
> ignorance that is spread around here by the right wing crowd. Since you
> have no real work to do go back to your dirty, little, shop and pretend
> that you did something right in your life. It's the one thing you are
> good at. Making things up.
>
> Hawke

I consider you as being here to provide levity. Since you have no
job, go back and watch some more TV.

Dan

[dca...@krl.org]

On Aug 22, 8:07 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:

> I know how Obama is spending our money. He's doing it a lot better than
> Bush did and this time it's all on the budget.
>
> Hawke

You really are lost, aren't you. There is no budget. Congress is
suppose to pass one, but have not done that.

Dan

[Laugh..Laugh..Laugh!]

In article <7b8c1351-15cf-4954-9306-
1e393c...@w15g2000yql.googlegroups.com>

Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 22, 11:57 am, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> > Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:b33a826b-986d-4e46

> -b361-a8d...@o3g2000yqp.googlegroups.com:

being obtuse.

Laugh..laugh..laugh!

> TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

> Hawke- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

I agree...conservatives always seem to screw themselves.

The Akin debacle is just the latest one.

And yes...Obama will be reelected.

And then we will have another four years of conservatives foaming at
the mouth.

I can't wait.

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

> Hawke- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Rich people think rules don't apply to them.

TMT

[Gunner]

On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:46:48 -0700 (PDT), "dca...@krl.org"
<dca...@krl.org> wrote:

>On Aug 22, 8:07 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
>

>> I know how Obama is spending our money. He's doing it a lot better than
>> Bush did and this time it's all on the budget.
>>
>> Hawke
>

>Can't you keep anything straight? There is no budget. Congress is
>suppose to create a budget, but have not done that.
>
> Dan

Not since 2009.


One bleeding-heart type asked me in a recent interview if I did not
agree that "violence begets violence." I told him that it is my
earnest endeavor to see that it does. I would like very much to ensure
- and in some cases I have - that any man who offers violence to his
fellow citizen begets a whole lot more in return than he can enjoy.

- Jeff Cooper

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Aug 22, 7:30 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
> On 8/21/2012 10:20 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> > Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in

> Hawke- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Romney losing the election may be the best senario for Romney.

Releasing his tax returns likely is worse for him...jail time?

TMT

[Hawke]

That's true, but don't you wonder how Romney could have thought that he
could run for president and not have to provide his tax return when
everybody else has been doing that since his father began the custom?

Hawke

[Hawke]

They're always foaming at the mouth, and dragging their knuckles. But
that's neither here nor there. When Obama wins again he will be able to
continue with his programs, which are already working. That will mean
the country will get itself turned around since the republicans nearly
destroyed it. So when Obama brings real prosperity back to the middle
class just think what that will do for the next Democrat who runs after
him? That will guarantee we won't see a republican president for many
years to come. Won't that be great!


Hawke

[Too_Many_Tools]

I have thought about that too. I suspect it is the "Rich people think
rules don't apply to them." rule...the entitlement that comes with
money in the hands of the wrong people. If you review Romney's past,
it is full of indicators that he feels he is entitled to anything he
wants. That type of person is the last type you want as President. The
man hasn't had a real job in his life...everything he has, has been
given to him.

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

LOL..I think you are right.

The Republican Party is in sharp decline...note the lack of qualified
candidates...which guarantees Democratic control for years to come.

TMT

[Hawke]

On 8/22/2012 2:38 AM, The Big Black Boot wrote:
> In article <e0a7a9b1-01c9-4ebb-abe4-
> 6073bc...@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
> Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 21, 6:58 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Gunner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>>>
>>>>> They are both over paid, him by at least $500,000 a year. He shou
>> ld
>>>>> be paying at least $100,000 a year rent to sleep in the Whitehouse, an
>> d
>>>>> at least a $12,000,000 non refundable security deposit.
>>>
>>>> Not a bad idea. That way it will keep him and his cronies from
>>>> stealing everything in sight and vandalizing the Whitehouse like the
>>>> Clinton bunch did...to the tune of millions of dollars in stolen
>>>> property and busted computers and other valuables.
>>>
>>>> So the People should send in monitors on January 1st to make sure they
>>>> exit in an orderly fashion.
>>>
>>>> Ill volunteer, as long as I get to protect the Whitehouse from
>>>> vandalism and whatnot.
>>>
>>> They should leave the Whitehouse same way they came into the world
>> .
>>> Naked, penniless, hungry and crying for something to suck on. They've
>>> been tit feed for too long.- Hide quoted text -

>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>

>> LOL...do you think that George Bush
>
> would laugh and point fingers at you twits?
>
> George Bush still owns you after being gone four years.


The country is still hurting four years after landfall of hurricane
Bush/Cheney. Too bad for you but for the rest of time Bush is always
going to be remembered as the worst president we ever had and as the
president that nearly destroyed the country's economy. That's his
legacy. Yours is that you thought he would be a good president and you
helped him wreck the country by voting him into office twice. Bush was
dumb that is for sure. But you were worse for not knowing that.

Hawke

[Hawke]

Pretty much the guy has had a life without ever having to endure any
hardship. In my experience that makes a weak man. Since Mitt has been on
easy street his whole life how can anyone know what he would do if he
was really under pressure? You'd have to be crazy to put someone like
that in the White House. The problem is the same cretins that put Bush
in twice would happily do the same and put Romney it. Then when he blows
it they would blame the Democrats.

Hawke

[Hawke]

The republican party has allowed the most extreme element of it to take
over leadership of the party. This has led the party to move to the
right so far that it is now an extremist party. My 88 year old father,
who has been a staunch republican his whole life, recently said he did
not consider himself a republican any more, and that says it all. Anyone
who is not extreme has left the party. The result is the party has
marginalized itself. They will have to suffer a string of humiliating
defeats for new leadership to take back the party from the extremists. I
hope that takes a very long time.

Hawke

[RD Sandman]

Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in news:k13tt5$78e$8
@speranza.aioe.org:

Doesn't take much of anything for folks to understand that you are biased
and speaking out on subjects you know little about.

[RD Sandman]

Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in news:k13tj9$78e$5
@speranza.aioe.org:

That's fine and how politics should work. You piss off the folks, you
lose the election. However, none of folks in here whining would have
voted for him in the first place so here he has lost nothing.

[RD Sandman]

Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in news:k13tp1$78e$7
@speranza.aioe.org:

If that were the case, possibly. The case could also be he simply feels
his tax returns other than the two he released are really none of your
business and your side only wants them to dig for any possible cannon
fodder. If they don't find anything they will still waste time
generating some kind of controversy rather than face their own ineptitude
in office.

[RD Sandman]

Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in news:k15nmb$9ef$1
@speranza.aioe.org:

He has provided two of them. That's the same as McCain did and it wasn't
a problem then. The difference is that when Obama faced McCain, McCain
was stuck running on Bush's record. This time Obama is stuck running on
his own record so he wants to change the subject.

[George Plimpton]

On 8/23/2012 10:31 AM, Hawwwke-Ptooey blew Too_Much_A_Fool:
> On 8/23/2012 10:15 AM, Too_Much_A_Fool blew Hawwwke-Ptooey:
>> On Aug 23, 12:07 pm, Hawwwke-Ptooey blew Too_Much_A_Fool:
>>> On 8/22/2012 9:18 PM, Too_Much_A_Fool blew Hawwwke-Ptooey:
>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 7:27 pm, Hawwwke-Ptooey blew Too_Much_A_Fool:
>>>>> On 8/20/2012 8:26 PM, Too_Much_A_Fool blew Hawwwke-Ptooey:

>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 20, 7:18 pm, Tom Gardner <Mars@Tacks> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/17/2012 4:20 PM, Hawke wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> The sense of entitlement that comes off these people is
>>>>>>>> disgusting. They
>>>>>>>> see themselves as so above everyone else that they don't have to
>>>>>>>> do what
>>>>>>>> "regular" candidates do.
>>>
>>>>>>>> Hawke
>>>
>>>>>>> "Regular" candidates release their school records. What is Obammy
>>>>>>> afraid of???
>>>
>>>>>>> he Obama records which have not been released include; Passport
>>>>>>> records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records,
>>>>>>> Occidental
>>>>>>> College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis,
>>>>>>> Harvard
>>>>>>> Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of
>>>>>>> Chicago
>>>>>>> scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois
>>>>>>> State Senate records/schedules (said to be lost), Medical records,
>>>>>>> Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents,
>>>>>>> Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the
>>>>>>> long-form Certificate of Live Birth.
>>>
>>>>>> And your point is Tommy?
>>>
>>>>>> What's more important...being President or his tax returns?
>>>

>>>>>> If Romney wants [bullshit snipped]
>
> The republican party has allowed the [bullshit snipped]

Why don't you two prancing queers go get a room somewhere? Take your
slurpfest offline.

[Hawke]

On 8/21/2012 4:44 PM, Gunner wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:49:04 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Gunner wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:50:40 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
>>> <mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I suppose you think that since the Mooche staged a phoney photo-op in
>>>>> Target she's "one of you". Doesn't EVERYBODY that shops in Target wear
>>>>> $200 t-shirts and $600 tennis shoes? I'm willing o bet that the
>>>>> clothes Ann Romney wears she buys WITH HER OWN MONEY.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Obama thinks she should be paid to be first lady:
>>>>
>>>> <http://now.msn.com/president-obama-suggests-first-lady-should-get-salary>
>>>
>>> Trying to work up a little nest egg for after January 20th?

>>
>>
>> They are both over paid, him by at least $500,000 a year. He should
>> be paying at least $100,000 a year rent to sleep in the Whitehouse, and
>> at least a $12,000,000 non refundable security deposit.
>
>
> Not a bad idea. That way it will keep him and his cronies from
> stealing everything in sight and vandalizing the Whitehouse like the
> Clinton bunch did...to the tune of millions of dollars in stolen
> property and busted computers and other valuables.
>
> So the People should send in monitors on January 1st to make sure they
> exit in an orderly fashion.
>
> Ill volunteer, as long as I get to protect the Whitehouse from
> vandalism and whatnot.
>

> Got just the tools to do that too.
>
> And Im sure I can talk a bunch of retired Spec Ops guys into
> volunteering their time as well. And bring their own ammo too.
>
> <VBG>
>
>
> Gunner, testing out a new ASP baton


Yeah, and you can have all your close buddies from SEAL TEAM SIX come
along too. I'm sure since you are so tight with them all you need to do
is place one call and they'll all be there to back you up. Ha, ha.

A teenage girl with a year of karate could take that baton and ram it up
your ass. You would be of absolutely no use for protecting anything.
What you are good at is telling stories. Fictional stories.


Hawke

[Hawke]

Shut up hypocrite Dan. You are not employed either. So you can go back
to reading right wing rags now. You're never funny either, ever. But
that's because you have no sense of humor. Typical of right wing old men.

Hawke.