On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:19:19 -0800 (PST), bookburn
<
daka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:08:00 AM UTC-9, Ed Huntress wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 22:15:24 -0800 (PST), bookburn
> > <
daka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 7:04:22 PM UTC-9, Ed Huntress wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 19:41:37 -0800 (PST), bookburn
> > >> <
daka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:28:37 PM UTC-9, Red Prepper
wrote:
> > >> >> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 17:35:43 -0700, Steve from Colorado
> > >> >> <
S...@cocks.net> wrote:
> > >> >> > Those negrophiles in HBO have "colorized" Fahrenheit 451.
Is
> > >> >> nothing
> > >> >> > sacred?
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2018/02/27/hbo-blackwashes-fahrenh=
> eit-
> > >> >> 451/
> > >> >> > --
> > >> >> > One man's diversity is another man's failing schools,
graffiti
> > >> >> filled
> > >> >> > neighborhood and falling property values.
> > >> >
> > >> >> How does that saying go? Oh yeah...
> > >> >> Reading be for whitey.
> > >> >
> > >> >In the Old South black slaves had the saying, "Books make the
flesh w=
> eak."
> > >>
> > >> Thirteen years ago, you attributed that phrase to "Elizabethan
> > >> peasantry."
> > >>
> > >>
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare/PEI=
> Ub_3jIhI/USc1PdxUgAsJ
> > >>
> > >> I guess that the black slaves were talking about Shakespeare.
d8-)
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Ed Huntress
> > >
> > >It's a survival story how that Shakespeare news group has
flourished, th=
> en disappeared. A few real scholars weighed in on talking points
they publ=
> ished on, and I feel I got an education just reading how they went
about it=
> . Seems that in England they have a tradition of using newspaper
columns t=
> o confront each other with wit and manners. Evidently was a time
when Darwi=
> n's "Bulldog," Huxley, took on all comers defending Darwin against
those wh=
> o labeled him "descended from a monkey," etc..
> > >
> > >Good that someone with your experience and angle of vision tries
to tell=
> us how things really are; all lies of course.
> >
> > Well, "how things really are," in this case, is that you plucked
out
> > some old comment you imagined and re-tooled it to impugn "Old
South
> > black slaves."
> Willful misunderstanding on your part, because first, in the news
group pos=
> t, I was asking the question, whether commoners in the 16th century
were in=
> clined by church teachings not to identify too much with modern
inventions =
> like writing and emulating fashions of the day; what we might call
"anti-in=
> tellectualism"; so that's why they refrained from writing their
names and m=
> arked an "X" instead. The evidence is that some who knew how to
write some=
> times preferred to make their mark instead, and it was witnessed by
another=
> , too.
> > I was curious about that expression and wondered where it came
from,
> > so I Googled it. Guess what came up? Only one thing: an old Usenet
> > post by a guy named "bookburn." <g>
> I notice many of us have more than one user name we identify with,
like my =
> handle could be Don, by me, or bookburn. Something mysterious
about who we=
> are that gets played with? Suggest you consider using other names
for the=
> news group, to frustrate badgers.
> > --
> > Ed Cuntrdess
Well let's see. He already has more names than you Don. He answers to
Ed, Huntress, Ed Huntress, Ed Cuntdress, Ed Cuntinadress, Cunt, Cunt
in a dress, Cunt in a Red Dress, Lying Cunt, Trolling Cunt, Trolling
for gay sex Cuntinadress, etc.
Any mention of gay sex is usually enough for him to come prancing in
his cunt dress. And even if it's not mentioned, he will sashay in and
start to talk about it himself. Isn't that true you stank nasty
crotch rotten cunt in a dress?