On 2016-06-10, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DL...@DecadentLinuxUser.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:29:21 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
><alway...@message.header> Gave us:
>
>>JW <no...@dev.null> wrote:
>>
>>> "Jim Wilkins" <
murat...@gmail.com> wrote in Message id:
[ ... ]
>>> I don't think that one has a remote display, though. JD would like to
>>> have the display on the handlebars, but does not want to extend the
>>> wire on the bike to get there.
>>
>>After reading... Apparently what they do is place a resistor/shunt on
>>the current path, and they measure the voltage drop across that shunt.
>>So it's not like routing the power all the way up to the handlebars and
>>back.
>>
>>Obviously measuring current would be very useful. The mentioned product
>>looks good as long as current doesn't go over 100 A.
>
> The fact that you are oblivious as to this BASIC electronic principle
> proves you should not be in this group.
"This group" happens to be two newsgroups. It is cross-posted.
The newsgroups header is:
======================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.crafts.metalworking,sci.electronics.design
======================================================================
> BASICS is the group you should be in, and you barely qualify for that
> one.
He started out discussing this in rec.crafts.metalworking and I
don't know whether *he* added sci.electronics.design to the newsgroups
list, or whether someone else added it, expecting it to be a better
place to get the needed information. If the latter, he may not even
have noticed the addition of your newsgroup, just as *you* did not
notice rec.crafts.metalworking was part of the cross-posting.
You could add the basics newsgroup to the Newsgroups header, and
result in even more vituperation -- especially from those who do not
notice the other newsgroups.
And -- you could add a "Followup-To: " to the headers, which
would make only the replies to your articles go to the named
newsgroup(s), and other replies would still be cross-posted as before,
so it is a loosing battle.
Yes, a good shunt down at the motor/battery interface to measure
current, and two more leads for the voltage across the motor should
allow display of everything he wants. (Actually, three leads would
suffice, if done right) But if routed up to the handlebars, while light
gauge wire would do nicely to carry the voltage signals up to the meter
on the handlebars, I would advise fuses in all wires, in case they get
pinched together. (I don't know whether anything is grounded to the
frame, but a pinch which cuts through the insulation could get exciting
if the wires run along the frame near his thighs.
Enjoy,
DoN.
--
Remove oil spill source from e-mail
Email: <
BPdnic...@d-and-d.com> | (KV4PH) Voice (all times):
(703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. |
http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---