This One INSANE Text Message May Have Just Fatally Wounded The Mueller Investigation | Daily Wire

[raykeller]

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/24643/one-insane-text-message-may-have-just-fatally-ben-shapiro

On Wenesday, CNN published text messages between the former second-in-command in FBI counterintelligence, Peter Strzok, and his mistress and co-worker Lisa Page. Strzok was involved in the Hillary Clinton email investigation, instrumental in helping to launch the investigation into supposed collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, and staffed on the Trump-Russia investigation itself. He was fired by special investigator Robert Mueller after these texts were uncovered.

Now, one of those texts may wound the special investigation beyond repair.

That text is dated August 15, 2016. Strzok texted Page, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe’s] office that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40…”

This looks an awful lot like motivation for launching an investigation into Trump in order to sink Trump as a hedge against Trump’s victory. The FBI’s investigation into Russian governmental interference in the election began in July 2016, just weeks before Strzok’s text message. And that means that there is now more of a smoking gun of FBI corruption against Trump than there is of Trump colluding with Russia.

How can Mueller come back from that? He’s fired Strzok and Page, but if the investigation was initially a political hit job, how can it now turn into something good and decent, particularly in the absence of a smoking gun regarding collusion? It’s not just that this is fruit of the poisonous tree — there’s no fruit to show, just the poisonous tree. And as Victor Davis Hanson has written, the Mueller team is filled top-to-bottom with political activists who have a specific anti-Trump agenda.

[Siri Cruise]

On 12/13/2017 1:10 PM, raykeller wrote:
> **
> [bullshit]

No, ray-ray. The investigation is going to keep going, unhindered.

[max headroom]

In news:hmBYB.8$yr...@fx13.iad, Siri Cruise <chink.blow@yahöo.com> typed:

Hey, check it out -- now Rudy's forging posts!

How low can he go?

[DoD]

"max headroom" <maximus...@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:p0voa0$70e$1...@dont-email.me...

Sissy rudy has been forging for as long as I have been here...


--
Antikristi i masoni
Komunisti ovi, oni
Sire sotonske fraze
Da nas poraze
E, moj narode, e, moj narode
...
Generacije junaka
I pobjednicka vojska jaka
Jos se brine i gine
Zbog Domovine

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71KWtHZ75tL._SL1000_.jpg

[Scout]

"Siri Cruise" <chink.blow@yahöo.com> wrote in message
news:hmBYB.8$yr...@fx13.iad...

Yea, but the chances they would ever get a conviction no matter what they
uncovered now is utterly zero.

But then, that's right, they aren't going to find anything. Over a year of
investigation and they have exactly NOTHING.

Not like the case with Hillary where they established all kinds of proof she
was guilty, but it's ok because she never admitted that she intended to
violate the law six ways from Sunday.

[Clave]

On 12/15/2017 2:42 PM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Siri Cruise" <chink.blow@yahöo.com> wrote in message
> news:hmBYB.8$yr...@fx13.iad...
>> On 12/13/2017 1:10 PM, raykeller wrote:
>>> **
>>> [bullshit]
>>
>> No, ray-ray.  The investigation is going to keep going, unhindered.
>
> Yea, but the chances they would ever get a conviction no matter what
> they uncovered now is utterly zero.

Wrong.

> But then, that's right, they aren't going to find anything. Over a year
> of investigation and they have exactly NOTHING.

False. Mueller has warehouse-loads of evidence, and is finding more.

> Not like the case with Hillary where they established all kinds of proof
> she was guilty,

Bullshit.

[Siri Cruise]

In article <b6_YB.1023$oY6...@fx26.iad>,

Clave <ChrisSh...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:

> > Not like the case with Hillary where they established all kinds of proof
> > she was guilty,
>
> Bullshit.

Irrelevant to Mueller. Sessions is free to start a separate investigation of
Clinton. That's up to Sessions, not Mueller.

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
I'm saving up to buy the Donald a blue stone This post / \
from Metebelis 3. All praise the Great Don! insults Islam. Mohammed

[Clave]

On 12/15/2017 8:08 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:

> On 12/15/2017 4:51 PM, Clave wrote:
>> On 12/15/2017 2:42 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Siri Cruise" <chink.blow@yahöo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hmBYB.8$yr...@fx13.iad...
>>>> On 12/13/2017 1:10 PM, raykeller wrote:
>>>>> **
>>>>> [bullshit]
>>>>
>>>> No, ray-ray. The investigation is going to keep going, unhindered.
>>>
>>> Yea, but the chances they would ever get a conviction no matter what
>>> they uncovered now is utterly zero.
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>>> But then, that's right, they aren't going to find anything. Over a
>>> year of investigation and they have exactly NOTHING.
>>
>> False. Mueller has warehouse-loads of evidence, and is finding more.
>>

>>> Not like the case with Hillary where they established all kinds of
>>> proof she was guilty,
>>
>> Bullshit.
>
> Irrelevant to Mueller.

Not irrelevant to scooter's whine, idiot.

> Sessions is free to start a separate investigation of Clinton.

Which he won't do - guaranteed. Nor will whomever the Cheetoh appoints
after Sessions resigns or is fired. There will be no DOJ/FBI
investigation of Hillary Clinton no matter who heads the agencies - you
can bet on that.

[busta rhymes]

On 12/15/2017 9:26 PM, Clave wrote:
> here will be no DOJ/FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton no matter who
> heads the agencies - you can bet on that.

You moronic bi-valved faggot - you need to go back to babbling
incoherently in alt.fan.art-bell.

You always do your best nuttery there.

[busta rhymes]

On 12/15/2017 5:51 PM, Clave wrote:
> Mueller has warehouse-loads of evidence, and is finding more.

How long have you personally been on his team, Clammie Queer?

You fucking NUTBAR!

[Scout]

"Clave" <ChrisSh...@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message
news:b6_YB.1023$oY6...@fx26.iad...

> On 12/15/2017 2:42 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Siri Cruise" <chink.blow@yahöo.com> wrote in message
>> news:hmBYB.8$yr...@fx13.iad...
>>> On 12/13/2017 1:10 PM, raykeller wrote:
>>>> **
>>>> [bullshit]
>>>
>>> No, ray-ray. The investigation is going to keep going, unhindered.
>>
>> Yea, but the chances they would ever get a conviction no matter what they
>> uncovered now is utterly zero.
>
> Wrong.
>
>> But then, that's right, they aren't going to find anything. Over a year
>> of investigation and they have exactly NOTHING.
>
> False. Mueller has warehouse-loads of evidence, and is finding more.

Sure, He's got tons of evidence and NONE of it show Trump or his campaign
committed any crime.

>
>> Not like the case with Hillary where they established all kinds of proof
>> she was guilty,
>
> Bullshit.

Well that's what the director of the FBI said, and I sort of believe him
when he told us about all the classified information that was found to have
gone through her unsecured server in a total violation of federal law and
the handling of classified materials.

[Clave]

On 12/22/2017 8:13 PM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Clave" <ChrisSh...@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message
> news:b6_YB.1023$oY6...@fx26.iad...
>> On 12/15/2017 2:42 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Siri Cruise" <chink.blow@yahöo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hmBYB.8$yr...@fx13.iad...
>>>> On 12/13/2017 1:10 PM, raykeller wrote:
>>>>> **
>>>>> [bullshit]
>>>>
>>>> No, ray-ray.  The investigation is going to keep going, unhindered.
>>>
>>> Yea, but the chances they would ever get a conviction no matter what
>>> they uncovered now is utterly zero.
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>>> But then, that's right, they aren't going to find anything. Over a
>>> year of investigation and they have exactly NOTHING.
>>
>> False.  Mueller has warehouse-loads of evidence, and is finding more.
>
> Sure,  He's got tons of evidence and NONE of it show Trump or his
> campaign committed any crime.

You have no way of knowing that. It's what you wish to believe, for
purely ideological reasons, but you don't know it, and in fact, it's
almost certainly false.

>>> Not like the case with Hillary where they established all kinds of
>>> proof she was guilty,
>>
>> Bullshit.
>
> Well that's what the director of the FBI said,

No, he didn't.