Re: What loon sanctuary cities stand to lose if feds have their way

[Mary W. Moffat]

On 4/24/2017 10:56 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 06:57:06 -0700, "Mary W. Moffat"
> <little.cloud@heaven> wrote:
>
>> On 4/23/2017 10:50 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 09:26:40 -0700, "Mary W. Moffat"
>>> <little.cloud@heaven> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/22/2017 9:13 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 07:05:57 +0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
>>>>> <leroys...@usurper.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Legal precedent makes clear the federal government cannot broadly use
>>>>>> federal funds to coerce local jurisdictions into certain actions.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand...NEW precident [sic] can be made.
>>>>
>>>> *Precedent*, you dumb drooling fuck, is made by the courts. I thought
>>>> you didn't like courts making law?
>>>
>>> Really? Odd...where is that stated?
>>>
>>> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/precedent
>>
>> People who resort to dictionary definitions are admitting defeat.
>>
>> *Legal* precedent is made by the courts. The president cannot withhold
>> funds other than in a manner already prescribed by law.
>
>
> Yet that law can be changed to reflect the new norm.

By Congress, dumb broke loser renter schmuck, not by the president.