ZERO DAY!!!!!!

[raykeller]

ZERO DAY!!!!!!
1/19/2017 | By Laz A. Mataz

It is 0 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes, 57 seconds until the stuttering fruity
enemy-agent Muslim-excusing prancing pusillanimous embarrassing
perpetually-aggrieved lawless defiling vote-faking unctuous careless
warmongering hypocritical sniveling whining overreaching disreputable
sulking treacherous squandering odious disgusting backstabbing
election-corrupting robbery-inclined formulaic plundering indolent callous
violence-agitating motherless-punk puerile intruding sickening wicked sullen
wretched venal psychopathic grifting peculiar furious (and fast)
gratuitously-opining lame-duck faithless charlatan spying-for-enemies
shallow fake irrational mumbling imbecile dejected slothful acrimonious
demanding trivial putz juvenile delinquent odiferous malicious reptilian
detestable conniving Marxism-loving bastard peevish America-surrendering sly
villainous undignified shameful touchy unwelcome exhausting abominable
indecisive moronical stomach-turning depressed meddling corrupt predatory
impoverishing personal-history-concealing dangerous resentful apathetic
egotistical absurd unaccomplished poisonous black-supremacist arsehole
repressive putrescent vindictive fallacious contemptible simpering
megalomaniacal subversive spoiling sputtering vicious disruptive perjurious
taxing predictable nauseating awful combative blasphemous injurious horrid
inane silly ridiculous impotent race-baiting pussified evidence-faking
crazed inconsequential unconcerned trash-talking cynical arrogant vacuous
sanctimonious foul exploitive mercurial mocking Christophobic easily-fooled
nefarious appalling atrocious uncaring disobliging vile Republican-enabled
colluding wimpy internecine prevaricating raging hoplophobia-consumed
deceptive irresponsible aimless choleric belligerent disorderly repellent
childish insolent Israel-hating felonious disloyal illegitimate jejune
panic-encouraging contentious creepy effete deleterious sophism-embracing
cheating sinful self-important slimy chaos-creating lying afflicted covert
insurrectionist robotic repulsive terrible pugnacious confused secretive
vomitous pitiful worthless calculating Machiavellian brazenly-hypocritical
ill-mannered Shadow-Government-creating insecure conspiring imperious
ineffectual antagonistic globalist unscrupulous preening Republic-despoiling
maniacal obstructive disdainful Godless reprehensible opportunistic trifling
poseur loutish abnormal economy-sacking venomous disgraceful insincere
degenerate disingenuous grabbastic ruinous prideful petty
fake-news-promulgating underhanded furtive dishonest obnoxious horrifying
menacing swindling catastrophic double-crossing bellicose pretentious
fraudulent heinous ideological high-handed autocratic pouting twisted
spiteful blundering reality-inverting perverse foolish Imperialist bragging
obstructing shyster transsexual-favoring unintelligible sacrilegious
insidious monstrous vengeful tricky overconfident idiotic oily pathetic
sucker self-aggrandizing covetous ghastly artificial
falsely-accusing-of-racism querulous rueful haughty condescending
cryptocracy-creating malign sinister boasting glib snake-like revolting
self-centered bankrupting unrepentant small-minded defensive slithering
gullible goldbricker immoral constantly-golfing demagogic falsehood-spewing
complaining anti-Semitic plagiarizing truculent surreptitious unoriginal
despicable Che-idolizing deliberate ghoulish betraying demonic cocky
nihilistic deflecting unbalanced riot-fomenting destructive Islamic ruthless
despotic tragedy-celebrating unhelpful depraved malevolent deranged
homicidal miscreant pompous Caucasian-hating mean nasty malefactor scheming
presumptuous accusatory tradition-breaking unstable loathsome catty
homosexual dark-and-moody Allah-worshiping insurgent unsavory unpleasant
naive failing uncooperative self-seeking annexing ignominious turbulent
criminal-coddling imitating fetid baneful patronizing oligarchist
assassination-encouraging surly disastrous baleful conspiracy-creating
troublemaking disagreeable misleading smug rude specious ominous sneaky
anti-American scourge erratic chaotic derisive immodest freakish hostile
dainty sissified malfeasant thin-skinned pointless simpleminded toxic amoral
oppressive Internet-killing grotesque diabolical tragic sociopathic
incomprehensible unpredictable perilous hateful guilty disrespectful
renegade racist Mohammad-loving traitorous evil supercilious crooked devious
angry cloddish incompetent treasonous Supreme-Court-destroying manipulating
threatening collaborating egocentric middle-finger-waving heartless
breacher-of-trust screwy braggadocios socialist perfidious slandering
propaganda-spreading slippery outlandish petulant conceited poltroon deviant
violence-provoking execrable Constitution-ignoring malignant provocational
falsifying ignoble queer narcissist noxious scornful Saboteur-In-Chief
illegal duplicitous effluent-like hideous malefic dreadful Satanic communist
gay crack-smoking pernicious Kenyan crypto-Muslim mendacious dictator
usurping scamming Choom-smoking so-called-President "Stompy-Foot" Obama, who
is now a confirmed supporter of Islamic terrorists, is SPURNED, REPUDIATED,
FORSAKEN, RENOUNCED, JOBLESS, REMOVED, REJECTED, UNEMPLOYED, DISCARDED,
DESPISED, SHUNNED, EJECTED, UNWANTED, REBUFFED, EVICTED, REMOVED, SCORNED,
and leaves office.

[dca...@krl.org]

On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 2:59:12 PM UTC-5, raykeller wrote:
> ZERO DAY!!!!!!


WHERE IS THE METALWORKING CONTENT?

Dan

[edhun...@gmail.com]

It's between his ears.

--
Ed Huntress

[Bruce Snow]

In article <o5r5nb$mjf$1...@dont-email.me>
"raykeller"
<whiney_will
_have_his_nose_in_my_ass_in_3_2_1@leftards_are_loosers.com>
wrote:

We will all (Except for liberals) be very happy to see that
lying nigger hit the road.

[Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas]

"Bruce Snow" <bs...@aim.com> wrote in
news:69c0f7e6a867427c...@dizum.com:

Amen brother.

--
"...And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not
warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of
resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to
the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a
century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time,
with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."--
Thomas Jefferson, Nov. 13, 1787

[edhun...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 10:29:28 PM UTC-5, Bruce Snow wrote:
> In article <o5r5nb$mjf$1...@dont-email.me>
> "raykeller"
> <whiney_will
> _have_his_nose_in_my_ass_in_3_2_1@leftards_are_loosers.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > ZERO DAY!!!!!!
> > 1/19/2017 | By Laz A. Mataz
> >

<snip>

> > FORSAKEN, RENOUNCED, JOBLESS, REMOVED, REJECTED, UNEMPLOYED, DISCARDED,
> > DESPISED, SHUNNED, EJECTED, UNWANTED, REBUFFED, EVICTED, REMOVED, SCORNED,
> > and leaves office.
>
> We will all (Except for liberals) be very happy to see that
> lying nigger hit the road.

Today's FOX News poll has Obama's job approval at 57% versus 39% disapproval, and Trump's favorably rating at 42% versus 55% unfavorable.

It looks like Trump and the country are in for a rough ride. Most of the "we" don't think very much of him and think pretty highly of Obama -- except for the racist pigs, of course. Maybe you're just counting the ones there in the sty with you.

--
Ed Huntress

[PaxPerPoten]

Soo? you voted for Hillary?

>
>


--
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard
the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all
ages who mean to govern well, but *They mean to govern*. They promise to
be good masters, *but they mean to be masters*. Daniel Webster

[PaxPerPoten]

That Black Pariah will be sucking up tax payer dollars for 40 or more
years. He will also be a solid thorn into anything the next Presidents
and houses of congress try to do. His Daddy George Soros will insure the
SOB is covered by the Media..Nonstop!

[Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas]

"Bruce Snow" <bs...@aim.com> wrote in
news:69c0f7e6a867427c...@dizum.com:

I'd rather see the road hit him.

[Terry Coombs]

So , anybody that didn't support the Head Muslim In Charge is a racist ?
Fuck you , Ed . Just another "not my president" snowflake that can't stand
reality . Run , don't walk , to your safe place and do a little coloring .
--
Snag

[edhun...@gmail.com]

Nope, you're just misreading to satisfy your own prejudices -- and lack of logic.

MOST of the "we" leaves a large percentage of people who didn't like Obama. Except for the racist pigs, like Snow, almost ALL of whom don't like Obama. He'll get agreement from all of the people in his sty.

You have a tendency to jump to conclusions and to spin words, Terry.

--
Ed Huntress

[dca...@krl.org]

On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 8:34:16 PM UTC-5, edhun...@gmail.com wrote:

>
> It's between his ears.
>
> --
> Ed Huntress

I am not sure there is anything between his ears.

Dan

[edhun...@gmail.com]

He may have left it out for recycling. It's now a soup can filled with sausage and kidney beans.

--
Ed Huntress

[prairiesky]

On 01/19/2017 11:59 AM, raykeller wrote:
> ZERO DAY!!!!!!

You pretty much nailed it. Look at the attendance.

<http://slingstone.zenfs.com/offnetwork/5e9e7a4c18493363b27a142dfa6ed411>

<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2pUXNaXUAAGfz9.jpg>

[Just Wondering]

Photo, crowds at Trump inauguration.
http://i.tmgrup.com.tr/dailysabah/gallery/world/trumps-big-day-scenes-from-the-inauguration/13_d.jpeg

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

Shouldn't you be out burning something in protest?

[chuckle]

[edhun...@gmail.com]

I don't know. How long do you stay lit?

--
Ed Huntress

[Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas]

Just Wondering <fmh...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:k6GgA.31196$QP6....@fx15.iad:

I was there. Plenty of people were there, too.

Anyone that says otherwise is a lying pig.

[First-Post]

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:00:38 -0000 (UTC), Ministry of Vengeance and
Vendettas <nuke_them_...@sulaco.com> wrote:

>Just Wondering <fmh...@comcast.net> wrote in
>news:k6GgA.31196$QP6....@fx15.iad:
>
>> On 1/21/2017 2:02 AM, prairiesky wrote:
>>> On 01/19/2017 11:59 AM, raykeller wrote:
>>>> ZERO DAY!!!!!!
>>>
>>> You pretty much nailed it. Look at the attendance.
>>>
>>> <http://slingstone.zenfs.com/offnetwork/5e9e7a4c18493363b27a142dfa6ed411
>>> >
>>>
>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2pUXNaXUAAGfz9.jpg>
>> >
>> Photo, crowds at Trump inauguration.
>> http://i.tmgrup.com.tr/dailysabah/gallery/world/trumps-big-day-scenes-fro
>> m-the-inauguration/13_d.jpeg
>>
>
>I was there. Plenty of people were there, too.

As can be seen:
https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle/status/822515358041079808

[prairiesky]

A nice low-angle shot from the full end.

But this is the shot that tells the story.
<http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/00DE/production/_93722200_comparisonsocial.jpg>

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
news:o60dj0$1n5g$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

That Trump supporters have a job they needed to go to?

[First-Post]

Actually the pics showing a sparse crowd were taken after the
inauguration when the crowd had already began to thin out.

This is a photo of the crowd at it's peak.
http://i66.tinypic.com/20q04yx.jpg

But the liberal media and websites keep trying to spin it even with
such photos.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/21/14347298/trump-inauguration-crowd-size

[raykeller]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
news:o60dj0$1n5g$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

It shure does---the story of your dishonesty --- very obvious different time
of day

[edhun...@gmail.com]

What the hell are you talking about? The first is a low-angle shot from Trump's end. The point was that looking at it from Trump's end, you don't see how thin the crowd really was. The photo just below his statement that it was "packed," taken from the other end, shows the actual crowd density -- and it was low.

--
Ed Huntress

[Martin Eastburn]

Early in the day shot. on the BBCI.co.uk It had to get to the UK for
the newspaper.
Martin

[edhun...@gmail.com]

Those are Reuters photos. Where do you see the times the photos were taken? Reuters quoted the times for the transit counts, but I didn't see anything on the time for the photos, and if the BBC had reported it, I don't see it on the page.

The real issue here is that the narcissistic trashmouth we just elected is all wound up about the subject, like a teenager who just heard that his girlfriend is telling her friends that he has a little dick.

--
Ed Huntress

[prairiesky]

On 01/21/2017 04:22 PM, First-Post wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:03:42 -0500, "Scout"
> <me4...@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> wrote:
>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>> news:o60dj0$1n5g$1...@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> On 01/21/2017 01:49 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>> On 1/21/2017 2:02 AM, prairiesky wrote:
>>>>> On 01/19/2017 11:59 AM, raykeller wrote:
>>>>>> ZERO DAY!!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> You pretty much nailed it. Look at the attendance.
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://slingstone.zenfs.com/offnetwork/5e9e7a4c18493363b27a142dfa6ed411>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2pUXNaXUAAGfz9.jpg>
>>>> >
>>>> Photo, crowds at Trump inauguration.
>>>> http://i.tmgrup.com.tr/dailysabah/gallery/world/trumps-big-day-scenes-from-the-inauguration/13_d.jpeg
>>>
>>> A nice low-angle shot from the full end.
>>>
>>> But this is the shot that tells the story.
>>> <http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/00DE/production/_93722200_comparisonsocial.jpg>
>>
>> That Trump supporters have a job they needed to go to?
>>
> Actually the pics showing a sparse crowd were taken after the
> inauguration when the crowd had already began to thin out.

Actually, both pics were taken shortly before noon.

<http://www.sfgate.com/news/politics/article/Questions-surround-crowd-size-at-Trump-10871739.php#photo-12228866>

There are plenty of pics in the slideshow, and low-angle ones from the
Capitol end, such as #3, make the Mall appear full for 2017. Pics #1 and
#2, taken from the top of the Washington Monument, show otherwise.

[raykeller]

"raykeller"
<whiney_will_have_his_nose_in_my_ass_in_3_2_1@leftards_are_loosers.com>
wrote in message news:o60uvg$1ci$1...@dont-email.me...

prairiesky is a liar

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/

[prairiesky]

Nope, same time. First time I saw side-by-side pics, it was described as
shortly before noon. Page cited below says 45 minutes before each oath
of office.

Give it up, loser, the world has seen the photos. Your new tactic is
"alternative facts".

> prairiesky is a liar
>
> http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/

Page doesn't work. Try the link below.

<https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/20/us/politics/trump-inauguration-crowd.html?_r=0>

The footage on this page was captured 45 minutes before each oath of
office. Attendees were still entering the National Mall up until Mr.
Trump’s speech.

The analysis by Keith Still, a professor at Manchester Metropolitan
University in England, estimates that the crowd on the National Mall on
Friday was about one-third the size of Mr. Obama’s.

[Scout]

"raykeller"
<whiney_will_have_his_nose_in_my_ass_in_3_2_1@leftards_are_loosers.com>
wrote in message news:o63lmf$akk$1...@dont-email.me...

Darn look at that, every 'block' down the mall is totally packed....

unlike the photo that was asserted to be taken near the moment Trump was
being sworn into office.

[edhun...@gmail.com]

Don't be stupid. At that low angle, you can't tell.

The only photos that mean anything are the ones taken from up high, either aerial photos or shots from the top of the Washington Monument. And they show big gaps in Trump's attendance.

--
Ed Huntress

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

news:o63uvt$n2k$2...@gioia.aioe.org...

Works just dandy for me, and shows every "block" down the mall filled to
capacity.

Compare this photo from the link above.

http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h281/NC_Tigah/Politics/Inaug-real_zps9mvinknw.jpeg

With this one

> <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/20/us/politics/trump-inauguration-crowd.html?_r=0>

Then compare that with this one which is a closeup of the very back of the
crowd.

https://www.sott.net/image/s18/372364/full/Trump_inauguration_2.jpg

Clearly someone is lying and looks like it's the NY Times, or it's sources.
Clearly the photo in the NY Times was taken either well before, or well
after the event.

But go ahead, try to assert that yet 2 more links mysteriously work on
everyone's computer but yours.

[First-Post]

When he puts his mouse over any of them his finger just spasms up and
simply won't click it. Damndest thing. ROFL

[prairiesky]

On 01/22/2017 08:32 PM, Scout wrote:
>
> Compare this photo from the link above.
>
> http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h281/NC_Tigah/Politics/Inaug-real_zps9mvinknw.jpeg

With the next photo in the photobucket series,
file renamed Inaug-Fake_zpsimin59tn.jpeg
to see that they were posted to photobucket by a dork.

> Clearly someone is lying and looks like it's the NY Times, or it's

Look! Trump is able to generate YUGE crowds.

<https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/22/us/politics/womens-march-trump-crowd-estimates.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=2>

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

news:o644fr$str$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

> On 01/22/2017 08:32 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>> Compare this photo from the link above.
>>
>> http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h281/NC_Tigah/Politics/Inaug-real_zps9mvinknw.jpeg
>
> With the next photo in the photobucket series,
> file renamed Inaug-Fake_zpsimin59tn.jpeg
> to see that they were posted to photobucket by a dork.

And when you can't contest the truth, you lash out.

We accept your defeat.

[edhun...@gmail.com]

"Scout," you tedious and pedantic twit, YOUR OWN SOURCE for that photo said this:

"Obviously, it's possible to quibble over the total numbers, and when you look at the crowd at Obama's 2009 inauguration, it certainly looks like more people came to see Obama take the oath of office. Nevertheless, Trump still drew between 700 and 900 thousand people."

https://www.sott.net/article/340388-MSM-caught-faking-inauguration-crowd-size-as-CNNs-president-warns-Trump-his-network-will-deliberately-discredit-him

After all of the photo spin you and that source have posted (and that photo you linked to was taken with a HUGE telephoto from the Capitol, foreshortening everything in the photo -- just look at where the building in the background is located, relative to the Washington Monument and the Capitol itself), it finally concludes that, yes, Trump's crowd was half or less the size of Obama's crowd.

So look at the endless string of crap you've posted about this trivial, juvenile point, which finally was conceded in your own link. As I said earlier, Trump and his supporters on this point are acting like a teenager whose girlfriend is telling everyone in school that he has a little dick.

And you're arguing that he really has a big dick. What a pedantic ass.

--
Ed Huntress

[dca...@krl.org]

On Saturday, January 21, 2017 at 4:02:23 AM UTC-5, prairiesky wrote:

Welcome to RCM. What sort of metalworking do you do?

I am kind of addicted to going to the local scrap yard , finding something that inspires me to make something. Often I find nothing, but sometimes I find something that takes only a little work to have something useful.

Dan

[Jim Wilkins]

<dca...@krl.org> wrote in message
news:3acf3ddf-3ce5-48fb...@googlegroups.com...

Dontcha know that "good" people don't get their hands dirty.

[prairiesky]

I dug the remains of an ornate woodburning stove out of the ground and
made it into my secure vault-like mailbox. Some steel plate came from a
dumpster, then cutting torching and arcing welding gave me the metal
structure. Faced up the sides and back with native basalt.

[dca...@krl.org]

On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 2:36:59 PM UTC-5, prairiesky wrote:

> I dug the remains of an ornate woodburning stove out of the ground and
> made it into my secure vault-like mailbox. Some steel plate came from a
> dumpster, then cutting torching and arcing welding gave me the metal
> structure. Faced up the sides and back with native basalt.

Sounds nice. If it is a ornate wood burning stove, I would expect it was cast iron. If it is cast iron, what did you use for arc welding electrodes?

I knew someone in Washington State that embedded a mail box in the front half of a junk car. The mail box was not real obvious so it looked like a car coming out of a thicket of blackberries.

Dan

[prairiesky]

Here's the info you wanted.

<http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>

See, the disturbing picture of Trump's peak crowd was "taken at
11:49:43, minutes before Donald Trump took the oath of office."

And the timelapse is "7 hours of footage on the mall, from the beginning
of the morning through Donald Trump’s inauguration."

[Just Wondering]

Here's a photo that beyond dispute is during the inauguration.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
It shows crowds standing where your photo shows empty spaces.
Draw your own conclusion.

On a side note, it also shows where Melania Trump was in relation to
Slick Willie. It supports that footage of him supposedly ogling her as
Hiliary scowled.

[prairiesky]

On 01/23/2017 06:23 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
> On 1/23/2017 6:41 PM, prairiesky wrote:
>> On 01/21/2017 04:41 PM, raykeller wrote:
>>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>> ZERO DAY!!!!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You pretty much nailed it. Look at the attendance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://slingstone.zenfs.com/offnetwork/5e9e7a4c18493363b27a142dfa6ed411>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2pUXNaXUAAGfz9.jpg>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Photo, crowds at Trump inauguration.
>>>>> http://i.tmgrup.com.tr/dailysabah/gallery/world/trumps-big-day-scenes-from-the-inauguration/13_d.jpeg
>>>>>
>> A nice low-angle shot from the full end.
>>>>
>>>> But this is the shot that tells the story.
>>>> <http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/00DE/production/_93722200_comparisonsocial.jpg>
>>>>
>>> It shure does---the story of your dishonesty --- very obvious
>>> different time of day
>>
>> Here's the info you wanted.
>>
>> <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>
>>
>> See, the disturbing picture of Trump's peak crowd was "taken at
>> 11:49:43, minutes before Donald Trump took the oath of office."
>>
>> And the timelapse is "7 hours of footage on the mall, from the beginning
>> of the morning through Donald Trump’s inauguration."
> >
> Here's a photo that beyond dispute is during the inauguration.
> http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/

That page wants FireFox 46 and newer. I use 38.

> It shows crowds standing where your photo shows empty spaces.
> Draw your own conclusion.

If it's like another stitched-together panorama that I saw, it's
stitched together - "photoshopped" - and the gaping holes at the far end
disappear into the vanishing point.

> On a side note, it also shows where Melania Trump was in relation to
> Slick Willie. It supports that footage of him supposedly ogling her as
> Hiliary scowled.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2eNFLLUcAAAiSV.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2eNFLJVEAAC2G2.jpg

[prairiesky]

On 01/23/2017 04:51 PM, dca...@krl.org wrote:
> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 2:36:59 PM UTC-5, prairiesky wrote:
>
>> I dug the remains of an ornate woodburning stove out of the ground
>> and made it into my secure vault-like mailbox. Some steel plate
>> came from a dumpster, then cutting torching and arcing welding gave
>> me the metal structure. Faced up the sides and back with native
>> basalt.
>
> Sounds nice. If it is a ornate wood burning stove, I would expect it
> was cast iron.

and...

> If it is cast iron, what did you use for arc welding electrodes?

Some stuff that's been waiting in a can for 25 years.

[Martin Eastburn]

I'm using Firefox 50 and loaded it fine.

Fantastic to zoom out and then pan around and see the massive crowd.
Thanks to CNN for the Gigapixel page.

Martin

[Martin Eastburn]

I'm into Plasma CNC,

Turning Metal rods and non-round items,

working on an engine (not fast) and

currently working on a Bronze stick - 1/2" x 4" x 48". Have a foot

cut off to dovetail slot into it. (been a while).

I'm selling the CNC and even found a buyer for most in my shop by happen
chance.

Getting into more and more wood - carving and such as I slow down.
I'm 69 now coming on to 70.

Martin

[prairiesky]

On 01/23/2017 07:56 PM, Martin Eastburn wrote:
> I'm using Firefox 50 and loaded it fine.

I'm using ESR releases. Got up to 38.8.0, the last of the thirty-eights,
then the next update was a miserable slug 45.something. I went back to 38.

> Fantastic to zoom out and then pan around and see the massive crowd.
> Thanks to CNN for the Gigapixel page.

That page is the first of its kind that hasn't worked for me.

"Your browser do not support HTML5 WebGL technology or your browser just
crashed with 3D display."

Might be my FX5500 video card? My non-SSE2 Athlon XP processor?

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

news:o66hp7$12gv$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

> On 01/23/2017 06:23 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>> On 1/23/2017 6:41 PM, prairiesky wrote:
>>> On 01/21/2017 04:41 PM, raykeller wrote:
>>>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ZERO DAY!!!!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You pretty much nailed it. Look at the attendance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://slingstone.zenfs.com/offnetwork/5e9e7a4c18493363b27a142dfa6ed411>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2pUXNaXUAAGfz9.jpg>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Photo, crowds at Trump inauguration.
>>>>>> http://i.tmgrup.com.tr/dailysabah/gallery/world/trumps-big-day-scenes-from-the-inauguration/13_d.jpeg
>>>>>>
>>> A nice low-angle shot from the full end.
>>>>>
>>>>> But this is the shot that tells the story.
>>>>> <http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/00DE/production/_93722200_comparisonsocial.jpg>
>>>>>
>>>> It shure does---the story of your dishonesty --- very obvious
>>>> different time of day
>>>
>>> Here's the info you wanted.
>>>
>>> <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>
>>>
>>> See, the disturbing picture of Trump's peak crowd was "taken at
>>> 11:49:43, minutes before Donald Trump took the oath of office."
>>>
>>> And the timelapse is "7 hours of footage on the mall, from the beginning
>>> of the morning through Donald Trump’s inauguration."
>> >
>> Here's a photo that beyond dispute is during the inauguration.
>> http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
>
> That page wants FireFox 46 and newer. I use 38.

Irrelevant you've already seen the photos that prove a far larger crowd than
your source asserts.

Same mislabeled image showing up throughout the liberal media, but oddly
when Trump took the podium, the mall was packed.

All I can say is people sure managed to get into position really quick if
the picture you point to was really taken at a the time they say.

Here's another photo....still doesn't show the massive empty spaces your
'source' asserts.

https://kauilapele.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/trump_inauguration_crowd_from_cnn_gp_41.jpg

And another

http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Donald-Trump-2017-Inauguration-crowd.jpg

Odd how I can keep finding picture after picture from multiple locations
showing a crowd far larger than shown in your SOLITARY PHOTO.

No one really knows when that photo was taken. All we have is an assertion
of when it was taken. Yet, in the photos I present, they regularly show
Trump at the podium and the crowd is far greater that your picture would
assert.

So why don't you explain why all these pictures do NOT show what yours does?

[raykeller]

"Scout" <me4...@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> wrote in message
news:o66ubi$sks$1...@dont-email.me...

prairiesky has proven itself to be a lying commiecunt

[prairiesky]

On 01/23/2017 11:06 PM, Scout wrote:

>>>> Here's the info you wanted.


<http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>

>>>> See, the disturbing picture of Trump's peak crowd was "taken
>>>> at 11:49:43, minutes before Donald Trump took the oath of
>>>> office."
>>>>
>>>> And the timelapse is "7 hours of footage on the mall, from the
>>>> beginning of the morning through Donald Trump’s
>>>> inauguration."
>>>>
>>> Here's a photo that beyond dispute is during the inauguration.
>>> http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
>>>
>>>
>> That page wants FireFox 46 and newer. I use 38.
>
> Irrelevant you've already seen the photos that prove a far larger
> crowd than your source asserts.

It isn't irrelevant, idiot.

> So why don't you explain why all these pictures do NOT show what
> yours does?

Ed did that, why don't you pay attention? I explained why too. Re-read
the threads about this. A drawing class would have taught you about
foreshortening, perspective, vanishing points, ... etc. and etc.

[Just Wondering]

http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/obama-melania.jpg
http://cdn.evilbeetgossip.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/christina_aguilera_hillary_clinton-500x431.jpg

[Terry Coombs]

Nice evasion . I TIG CI with either strips of CI cut from an old
woodburning stove door or with Invar 42 (thanks Dan!) or braze with brass .
I haven't used any but understand there are a couple of nickel based
electrodes that work well .
So tell us , did you preheat ? Cool slowly after welding or peen the welds
as they cooled ? Weld it cold and pray ?
--
Snag

[prairiesky]

On 01/24/2017 07:45 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:

> Nice evasion . I TIG CI with either strips of CI cut from an old
> woodburning stove door or with Invar 42 (thanks Dan!) or braze with
> brass . I haven't used any but understand there are a couple of
> nickel based electrodes that work well . So tell us , did you preheat
> ? Cool slowly after welding or peen the welds as they cooled ? Weld
> it cold and pray ?

So funny! I don't recall much of what I did and didn't do, but I was
pretty sure that if I casually blew Dan off, he wouldn't be punky
enough to escalate this into a macho-dude challenge.

Hey, Coombs! My anvil is bigger than yours. You're a punk.

[Terry Coombs]

Nothing macho about it . You showed up here a couple of weeks ago posting
political drivel . I just wondered if you actually have any metalworking
skills . Apparently not . And I don't own an anvil - yet . But I do have an
aluminum foundry ...
--
Snag

[prairiesky]

On 01/24/2017 08:11 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
> prairiesky wrote:
>> On 01/24/2017 07:45 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
>>
>>> Nice evasion . I TIG CI with either strips of CI cut from an old
>>> woodburning stove door

You do that? WOW!

>>> or with Invar 42 (thanks Dan!) or braze with
>>> brass . I haven't used any but understand there are a couple of
>>> nickel based electrodes that work well .

Incredible!

>>> So tell us ,

And here we go!! After we learn just how bitchen' you are, can I measure
up??

>>> did you preheat
>>> ? Cool slowly after welding or peen the welds as they cooled ? Weld
>>> it cold and pray ?

Oh, NO! The hard-hitting questions!

>> So funny! I don't recall much of what I did and didn't do, but I was
>> pretty sure that if I casually blew Dan off, he wouldn't be punky
>> enough to escalate this into a macho-dude challenge.
>>
>> Hey, Coombs! My anvil is bigger than yours. You're a punk.
>
> Nothing macho about it . You showed up here a couple of weeks ago posting
> political drivel . I just wondered if you actually have any metalworking
> skills .

No, Dan wanted to check my credentials, and Dan dropped it when I cut
off the opening he was looking for. I figured maybe just a 1-in-5 chance
now that some punk would come strutting forward with a corny "So tell
us..." challenge.

Apparently not . And I don't own an anvil - yet . But I do have an
> aluminum foundry ...

Your a cliche. Simpsons characters are modelled after guys like you.

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

news:o6733m$1qci$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

> On 01/23/2017 11:06 PM, Scout wrote:
>
>>>>> Here's the info you wanted.
>
>
> <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>
>
>>>>> See, the disturbing picture of Trump's peak crowd was "taken
>>>>> at 11:49:43, minutes before Donald Trump took the oath of
>>>>> office."
>>>>>
>>>>> And the timelapse is "7 hours of footage on the mall, from the
>>>>> beginning of the morning through Donald Trump’s
>>>>> inauguration."
>>>>>
>>>> Here's a photo that beyond dispute is during the inauguration.
>>>> http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That page wants FireFox 46 and newer. I use 38.
>>
>> Irrelevant you've already seen the photos that prove a far larger
>> crowd than your source asserts.
>
> It isn't irrelevant, idiot.

I see, so unless you can view a particular link with your obsolete browser,
then the rest of the evidence presented doesn't count?

>
>> So why don't you explain why all these pictures do NOT show what
>> yours does?
>
> Ed did that, why don't you pay attention? I explained why too. Re-read the
> threads about this. A drawing class would have taught you about
> foreshortening, perspective, vanishing points, ... etc. and etc.

Nope, because even from these perspectives the last mat would, according to
your pictures be clearly seen to be EMPTY.
Yet it's clearly NOT empty. It's not even close to being empty.

Even the next mat up, which your photo shows as all but empty with a crowd
towards the NE corner, also shows as full.

Sorry, but clearly there were far more people that the other photo
indicates.

Further I take it as conclusive that they prove exactly what I said, since
you take great pains to delete the references to such pictures which refute
what you're claiming.


https://www.sott.net/image/s18/372364/full/Trump_inauguration_2.jpg

https://kauilapele.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/trump_inauguration_crowd_from_cnn_gp_41.jpg

http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Donald-Trump-2017-Inauguration-crowd.jpg

Now despite foreshortening, perspective, etc...what if very easy to
establish and which is NOT dependent on seeing the ground are heads. We see
ALL the heads. It's quite easy to compare the number of heads in blocks in
the foreground against those in the background. Of the 4 blocks at the very
back, we see at 1 with at least 75% capacity, 2 with at least 50% capacity
and one that has maybe 10% capacity.

Yet, in your photo 3 of these are all but empty and only one as a small mob
to the NE corner.

These photos clearly refute what yours indicate and either these people
managed to get into place really really quickly....or something about your
photo is inaccurate. IMO, the time was misstated.

But go ahead, explain to us exactly why we can see all those people in
blocks that YOUR photo would assert were empty.

[prairiesky]

On 01/24/2017 10:50 PM, Scout wrote:
> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>
>> <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>

>>
> But go ahead, explain to us exactly why we can see all those people in
> blocks that YOUR photo would assert were empty.

The Answer! uncovered by them smart guys over at the electronics group,
<http://i.imgur.com/erug2ZR.jpg>

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

news:o69ith$ie2$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

I accept by this that you have no rational explanation why the photo you
constantly reference clearly shows a crowd far smaller than the multitude of
shots, views and sources that show a much larger crowd.

[prairiesky]

On 01/24/2017 11:37 PM, Scout wrote:
> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
> news:o69ith$ie2$1...@gioia.aioe.org...
>> On 01/24/2017 10:50 PM, Scout wrote:
>>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> But go ahead, explain to us exactly why we can see all those people in
>>> blocks that YOUR photo would assert were empty.

The camera 500 feet above the ground at the sparsely populated Monument
end can see how empty the back half of the mall is. The camera low to
the ground at the crowded Capitol end cannot.
A mystery for you to figure out.

Here's more info, even the name of the photographer who took the picture
you don't like.
<https://widerimage.reuters.com/story/crowd-controversy-the-making-of-an-inauguration-day-photo>

>> The Answer! uncovered by them smart guys over at the electronics group,
>> <http://i.imgur.com/erug2ZR.jpg>
>

> I accept by this that ... the photo you

> constantly reference clearly shows a crowd far smaller

Yes, it's pretty clear.

IMAGE TAKEN AT 11:49 A.M. ET FROM LIVE POOL CAMERA
<http://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/newshour/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/comparison-withtime-1024x576.jpg>

[Terry Coombs]

prairiesky wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 08:11 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
>> prairiesky wrote:
>>> On 01/24/2017 07:45 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice evasion . I TIG CI with either strips of CI cut from an old
>>>> woodburning stove door
>
> You do that? WOW!

Yes I do , and it's obvious that you're awed by me .

>
>>>> or with Invar 42 (thanks Dan!) or braze with
>>>> brass . I haven't used any but understand there are a couple of
>>>> nickel based electrodes that work well .
>
> Incredible!

Yes , it is !

>
>>>> So tell us ,
>
> And here we go!! After we learn just how bitchen' you are, can I
> measure up??

I'm not really that bitchin' , but there are some here that are . You'll
never measure up to even me though .

>
>>>> did you preheat
>>>> ? Cool slowly after welding or peen the welds as they cooled ? Weld
>>>> it cold and pray ?
>
> Oh, NO! The hard-hitting questions!

Not at all - to anyone that knows anything about welding cast iron . Which
you obviously don't .

>
>>> So funny! I don't recall much of what I did and didn't do, but I was
>>> pretty sure that if I casually blew Dan off, he wouldn't be punky
>>> enough to escalate this into a macho-dude challenge.
>>>
>>> Hey, Coombs! My anvil is bigger than yours. You're a punk.
>>
>> Nothing macho about it . You showed up here a couple of weeks ago
>> posting political drivel . I just wondered if you actually have any
>> metalworking skills .
>
> No, Dan wanted to check my credentials, and Dan dropped it when I cut
> off the opening he was looking for. I figured maybe just a 1-in-5
> chance now that some punk would come strutting forward with a corny
> "So tell us..." challenge.
>
> Apparently not . And I don't own an anvil - yet . But I do have an
>> aluminum foundry ...
>
> Your a cliche. Simpsons characters are modelled after guys like you.

Originally , yes . But they had to dummy them down so those of you with a
5th grade mentality could understand them .
Your evasive responses have shown that you're just another troll . I'm
done with you , now go clean your room like mommy told you to before she
cuts off the power to the basement .
--
Snag

[dca...@krl.org]

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 12:59:06 AM UTC-5, prairiesky wrote:

> No, Dan wanted to check my credentials, and Dan dropped it when I cut
> off the opening he was looking for. I figured maybe just a 1-in-5 chance
> now that some punk would come strutting forward with a corny "So tell
> us..." challenge.
>

I dropped it because I figured anyone with any knowledge would recognize that you really did not do what you said you did. And who cares about the people that are ignorant about metalworking.

Dan

[Larry Jaques]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:11:01 -0600, "Terry Coombs" <snag...@msn.com>
wrote:

Plonk him and forget him, Snag. That vegetable is a waste of CO2.

--
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the
government fears the people, there is liberty."
Attributed to Thomas Jefferson, but Massah Ed, he doan tink it so.

[edhun...@gmail.com]

A spurious quote, most likely an "edited" version of a quote from John Basil Barnhill, 1914, in a debate about socialism: "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty."

There is no record that Jefferson ever said anything like it.

Since you have a proclivity to post spurious quotes, Larry, keep this URL handy if someone tells you something is from Jefferson. If it's from a rightard site, chances are it isn't:

https://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/spurious-quotations

--
Ed Huntress

[prairiesky]

On 01/25/2017 06:40 AM, dca...@krl.org wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 12:59:06 AM UTC-5, prairiesky
> wrote:
>
>> No, Dan wanted to check my credentials, and Dan dropped it when I
>> cut off the opening he was looking for. I figured maybe just a
>> 1-in-5 chance now that some punk would come strutting forward with
>> a corny "So tell us..." challenge.
>>
>
>
> I dropped it because I figured anyone with any knowledge would
> recognize that you really did not do what you said you did.

You dropped it because you saw a possible risk to your ego looming.
Coombs is just too stupid to look that far ahead. Whatever anyone thinks
they recognize now makes no difference, because I built the mailbox
anyway. You can see it on Google Maps, Street View. Check it out!

[rangerssuck]

Incredible that you guys are still litigating this. More incredible that Trump is.

[dca...@krl.org]

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 2:24:37 PM UTC-5, prairiesky wrote:

> >
> > I dropped it because I figured anyone with any knowledge would
> > recognize that you really did not do what you said you did.
>
> You dropped it because you saw a possible risk to your ego looming.
> Coombs is just too stupid to look that far ahead. Whatever anyone thinks
> they recognize now makes no difference, because I built the mailbox
> anyway. You can see it on Google Maps, Street View. Check it out!

Another idiot that believes he knows peoples motivation by reading what they post on the internet. I try my bet to park my ego before logging in.

Your suggestion to use Google Maps to see the mail box might be good, but only if you provide a location. No one is going to search the world looking for your mail box.

Dan

[goodsoldi...@invalid.junk]

He claims to have made a mail box? Good Lord, you can paint "MAIL" on
a gallon can and hang it on a fence post and call it a "mail box".

This is an accomplishment to brag about? "Oooooh! You can see my
mailbox on the internet!"


--
Cheers,

Schweik

[prairiesky]

On 01/25/2017 05:05 PM, dca...@krl.org wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 2:24:37 PM UTC-5, prairiesky wrote:
>
>>> I dropped it because I figured anyone with any knowledge would
>>> recognize that you really did not do what you said you did.
>>
>> You dropped it because you saw a possible risk to your ego looming.
>> Coombs is just too stupid to look that far ahead. Whatever anyone thinks
>> they recognize now makes no difference, because I built the mailbox
>> anyway. You can see it on Google Maps, Street View. Check it out!
>
> Another idiot that believes he knows peoples motivation by reading what they post on the internet. I try my bet to park my ego before logging in.

The Trump-bashing motivated you to begin, and what you "figured" above
is not what motivated you to quit. You made it up.

> Your suggestion to use Google Maps to see the mail box might be good, but only if you provide a location. No one is going to search the world looking for your mail box.

Located a quarter mile from my house. The metal was assembled outside my
garage. The stone work meant hauling rocks, bags of cement and 5-gallon
buckets of water down to the blvd. I'm still thinking about adding
flying buttresses to the back of it.

[prairiesky]

I know! Let's move on.
---------
Any metal in that pen?

<http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/01/why-doesnt-donald-trump-have-his-own-desk-at-mar-a-lago.html>

I don't think so. Zoomed in on that fat cap, way in, and it's exactly
the same as this Sharpie® Series No. 30000 that I have here.

[Just Wondering]

Now THAT's funny.

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

news:o69ras$v3s$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

> On 01/24/2017 11:37 PM, Scout wrote:
>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>> news:o69ith$ie2$1...@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> On 01/24/2017 10:50 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> But go ahead, explain to us exactly why we can see all those people in
>>>> blocks that YOUR photo would assert were empty.
>
> The camera 500 feet above the ground at the sparsely populated Monument
> end can see how empty the back half of the mall is. The camera low to the
> ground at the crowded Capitol end cannot.
> A mystery for you to figure out.

Yet both cameras see the heads of people, and it's quite easy to make a
count that what your ONE photo claims to show at the time of all these other
photos is not factual. Either the picture was faked, or the time it occurred
was.

But hey, clearly you're not interesting in the facts.

[prairiesky]

Terry Coombs isn't looking quite so stupid any more.

---------------------------------------------
On 01/25/2017 05:36 PM, goodsoldi...@invalid.junkwrote:

[Martin Eastburn]

What is funny - the Obama ones are on their LEFT side - Notice the split
on the capital building. The ones on the right are republicans..

So I suppose if the Republicans were on both sides then Trump has more
there since the ones on the 'white' side are added to the ones on the
other side that are covered up by Obama's people.


I don't think there are that many 'sheets' active in the country.
The last 'sheet' formation of them was in Connecticut in the 70's or
80'. The clan was dying out due to heavy FED pressure on them in the
south.

Martin

[prairiesky]

On 01/25/2017 09:57 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>
>>>>>>
>>>>> But go ahead, explain to us exactly why we can see all those people in
>>>>> blocks that YOUR photo would assert were empty.
>>
>> The camera 500 feet above the ground at the sparsely populated
>> Monument end can see how empty the back half of the mall is. The
>> camera low to the ground at the crowded Capitol end cannot.
>> A mystery for you to figure out.
>
> Yet both cameras see the heads of people, and it's quite easy to make a
> count that what your ONE photo claims to show at the time of all these
> other photos is not factual. Either the picture was faked, or the time
> it occurred was.
>
> But hey, clearly you're not interesting in the facts.

Look close, see if you can find the Cobra helicopter in this picture!

<https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/20/National-Politics/Images/_NK19706.JPG?uuid=KFq45t8lEeaJAmEP5IZ5HA>



(Hmmm, the crowd looks a little thin back there, doesn't it?)

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

news:o6euqg$10qv$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

Yes, it does, and then when we look at this picture of the same view.

http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Donald-Trump-2017-Inauguration-crowd.jpg

We suddenly see the crowd has grown massively.

Hmm.. Seems the crowd was a LOT larger during the inauguration than your
picture claimed it was. After all, I sort of doubt that all those people
either left very early, or arrived very late.

So clearly what I said about the differences between what your picture(s)
show, and what mine do during the actual inauguration, is utterly true.
There was a much larger crowd than the liberal media wants to report, or you
wish to admit to.

[raykeller]

"Scout" <me4...@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> wrote in message
news:o6f1fj$3ki$1...@dont-email.me...

His pictures are probably frome a leftard demonstration on a different day

[prairiesky]

On 01/27/2017 12:49 AM, Scout wrote:
> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>>

>> Look close, see if you can find the Cobra helicopter in this picture!
>>
>> <https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/20/National-Politics/Images/_NK19706.JPG?uuid=KFq45t8lEeaJAmEP5IZ5HA>
>>
>>
>> (Hmmm, the crowd looks a little thin back there, doesn't it?)
>
> Yes, it does, and then when we look at this picture of the same view.

It isn't the same view. The fences are 10 feet tall, and the horseman's
hat has moved from below a fence to above. The camera is even lower to
the ground than in the picture above.

> http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Donald-Trump-2017-Inauguration-crowd.jpg
>
> We suddenly see the crowd has grown massively.

Grown less than you'd like, with a lower camera angle leaving more empty
space hidden.
The shot from 500 ft. overhead shows the white blocks back there, at
11:49:43, minutes before Donald Trump took the oath of office, are
virtually empty.
<http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>

[Mr. B1ack]

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:50:53 -0700, "raykeller"
<whiney_will_have_his_nose_in_my_ass_in_3_2_1@leftards_are_loosers.com>
wrote:

Yep.

Maybe not even the same day.

If the crowd wasn't overwhelming at Trumps
inaugural it was because of three factors :

1) Forecast of bad weather.

2) Leftist terrorist threats.

3) "Deplorables" too broke from Obamanomics
to afford the trip to DC (welfare-staters have
no jobs so they can go anywhere, esp if lefties
provide free busses).

[edhun...@gmail.com]

Jan. 20, 2017: 48 deg. F Cloudy. Sprinkles at swearing in ceremony; light rain at start of parade. S winds around 5 mph.

Jan. 20, 2009: 28 deg. F Filtered sun through the thin cirrus clouds. Breezy with northwest winds around 15 mph, gusting 20-25 mph. Wind chill values in the mid teens.

(NWS archives)

>
> 2) Leftist terrorist threats.

Pfffft....

>
> 3) "Deplorables" too broke from Obamanomics
> to afford the trip to DC (welfare-staters have
> no jobs so they can go anywhere, esp if lefties
> provide free busses).

"The highest federal aid recipients are: Mississippi (45.3%), Louisiana (44%), Tennessee (41%), South Dakota (40.8%), Missouri (39.4%), Montana (39%), and Georgia (37.9%). All of these except for Missouri is a red state, controlled by Republicans.

(data from The Tax Foundation, 2012)

You live in a fantasy world, B1ack.

--
Ed Huntress

[Larry Jaques]

Democrats invented the KKK. Democrats accuse us of being racist.
And they pull stupid crap like photoshopping that image.

Just <sigh>

[prairiesky]

On 01/21/2017 07:45 PM, edhun...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Those are Reuters photos. Where do you see the times the photos were
> taken? Reuters quoted the times for the transit counts, but I didn't
> see anything on the time for the photos, and if the BBC had reported
> it, I don't see it on the page.

11:49 AM
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/

12:01 PM
https://widerimage.reuters.com/story/crowd-controversy-the-making-of-an-inauguration-day-photo

[edhun...@gmail.com]

Well, the time-lapse cinches it. Trump is full of shit; Spicer is full of shit; and "Scout" (gag....) is full of shit.

And no one is surprised. But the knuckle-draggers don't care.

--
Ed Huntress

[prairiesky]

And Kellyanne Conway is full of shit.

And "Trump's own chief strategist, Steve Bannon, was registered to vote
in both Florida and New York City until Wednesday, local election
officials told NBC News."

<http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/president-donald-trump-says-he-will-ask-major-investigation-allegations-n711956?cid=sm_tw_nbcnews>

[edhun...@gmail.com]

Right. I wonder if Bannon really sleeps in a cardboard box on 34th Street? He looks like it.

--
Ed Huntress

[Scout]

"raykeller"
<whiney_will_have_his_nose_in_my_ass_in_3_2_1@leftards_are_loosers.com>
wrote in message news:o6g16s$mbj$1...@dont-email.me...

I expect his pictures including the one the media is going ape over, were
taken either much earlier in the day or much later in the day. As shown by
the picture I posted from the same view as the one he posted, the crowd is
clearly larger in mind than in his. Further if you compare his against the
other view the media feel in love with, you will see marked similarities.
Leading me to believe both views date from about the same time, and show the
crowd at some time well removed from the actual inauguration.

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

news:o6g4rr$15a4$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

> On 01/27/2017 12:49 AM, Scout wrote:
>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> Look close, see if you can find the Cobra helicopter in this picture!
>>>
>>> <https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/20/National-Politics/Images/_NK19706.JPG?uuid=KFq45t8lEeaJAmEP5IZ5HA>
>>>
>>>
>>> (Hmmm, the crowd looks a little thin back there, doesn't it?)
>>
>> Yes, it does, and then when we look at this picture of the same view.
>
> It isn't the same view. The fences are 10 feet tall, and the horseman's
> hat has moved from below a fence to above. The camera is even lower to the
> ground than in the picture above.

True, there is a slight difference in the specific positioning of the
camera, but they are close enough be considered the same at that distance.

What is clear, is that one (mine) shows a crowd FAR more extensive than the
other (yours). Heads are clearly visible in both shots and as such simply
doing a 'headcount' within an area quickly shows that one crowd is much
larger than the other.



>> http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Donald-Trump-2017-Inauguration-crowd.jpg

Indeed, when we look at this view against the other view you posted, we find
marked similarities in the size and positioning of the crowd. As such they
clearly were taken near the same time, and NOT at the time of the
inauguration when when the crowd would be at it's peak, otherwise why would
my picture show a massively larger crowd?

>> We suddenly see the crowd has grown massively.
>
> Grown less than you'd like, with a lower camera angle leaving more empty
> space hidden.

Assuming that the shift would hide the empty space, what wouldn't be hidden
are heads. Since you're shooting down on the crowd, most people's heads
would be clearly visible in both shots. As such you can readily count the
heads in an area, and by picking an area with NO heads as shown in your
view....we find a large number of heads in mine. If anything, lowering the
camera angle would REDUCE the number of heads visible. Yet despite that my
view still shows lots of heads where your view shows NONE.

In short, there are people in my picture which weren't there in yours.

Now, do you really think that a lot of people are going to:
A) leave prior to the inauguration
B) arrive after the inauguration

Finally, do you really think that a tractor trailer carrying a helicopter is
going to pull through the prime viewing area during the middle of the
inauguration?

Sorry, but it seems clear that both the published shot in the media and the
one you posted were taken either well before or well after the inauguration.

> The shot from 500 ft. overhead shows the white blocks back there, at
> 11:49:43, minutes before Donald Trump took the oath of office, are
> virtually empty.
> <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>

So you're claiming all those people showed up.....either after the
inauguration took place....or they left before they got to see the
inauguration they came all that way to see?

I don't think so.

Simple answer....the time stamp is a lie....and all whole thing is fake
news.

[Flakey Foont]

On 1/27/2017 1:08 PM, edhun...@gmail.com wrote:
> You live in a fantasy world, B1ack.
>
> -- Ed Huntress

You are an exterminable lying TRAITOR, ed.

Your day will come.

[Flakey Foont]

On 1/27/2017 11:51 AM, prairiesky wrote:
> It isn't the same view. The fences are 10 feet tall, and the horseman's
> hat has moved

CLUEBAT - NO ONE FUCKING CARES!

[Flakey Foont]

On 1/27/2017 1:02 AM, prairiesky wrote:
> Look close, see if you can find the Cobra helicopter in this picture!

Look closer, see if you have a brain, even a tiny one!

[prairiesky]

On 01/28/2017 01:31 PM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
> news:o6g4rr$15a4$1...@gioia.aioe.org...
>> On 01/27/2017 12:49 AM, Scout wrote:
>>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> Look close, see if you can find the Cobra helicopter in this picture!
>>>>
>>>> <https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/20/National-Politics/Images/_NK19706.JPG?uuid=KFq45t8lEeaJAmEP5IZ5HA>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (Hmmm, the crowd looks a little thin back there, doesn't it?)
>>>
>>> Yes, it does, and then when we look at this picture of the same view.
>>
>> It isn't the same view. The fences are 10 feet tall, and the
>> horseman's hat has moved from below a fence to above. The camera is
>> even lower to the ground than in the picture above.
>
> True, there is a slight difference in the specific positioning of the
> camera, but they are close enough be considered the same at that distance.

The same at what distance? These shots are looking through telescopes.
Look at the picture with the helicopter in it.
<https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/20/National-Politics/Images/_NK19706.JPG?uuid=KFq45t8lEeaJAmEP5IZ5HA>
The Washington Monument ia a mile away, and the base of it looks yuge!
And behind that, we see the Lincoln Memorial TWO MILES away! And...
yuge! All that distance is compressed by the lens. There's no way to
judge the depth of the empty white space back there from distorted
pictures like this.

> Sorry, but it seems clear that both the published shot in the media and
> the one you posted were taken either well before or well after the
> inauguration.

Camera angle doesn't matter here, the tiered seating lets us see everyone.
<http://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AAm7gHw.img>
Was the shot taken well before, or well after the parade?

[edhun...@gmail.com]

You and the other 13-year-old girls are welcome any time.

--
Ed Huntress

[Just Wondering]

On 1/28/2017 5:00 PM, prairiesky wrote:
> On 01/28/2017 01:31 PM, Scout wrote:
>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>> news:o6g4rr$15a4$1...@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> On 01/27/2017 12:49 AM, Scout wrote:
>>>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>> Look close, see if you can find the Cobra helicopter in this picture!
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/20/National-Politics/Images/_NK19706.JPG?uuid=KFq45t8lEeaJAmEP5IZ5HA>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (Hmmm, the crowd looks a little thin back there, doesn't it?)
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it does, and then when we look at this picture of the same view.
>>>
>>> It isn't the same view. The fences are 10 feet tall, and the
>>> horseman's hat has moved from below a fence to above. The camera is
>>> even lower to the ground than in the picture above.
>>
>> True, there is a slight difference in the specific positioning of the
>> camera, but they are close enough be considered the same at that
>> distance.
>
> The same at what distance? These shots are looking through telescopes.
> Look at the picture with the helicopter in it.
> <https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/20/National-Politics/Images/_NK19706.JPG?uuid=KFq45t8lEeaJAmEP5IZ5HA>
>
> The Washington Monument ia a mile away, and the base of it looks yuge!
> And behind that, we see the Lincoln Memorial TWO MILES away! And...
> yuge! All that distance is compressed by the lens. There's no way to
> judge the depth of the empty white space back there from distorted
> pictures like this.
>

Use this picture:
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
Rotate it to show the horse statute with the crowds beyond.
Zoom in so the horse statute is about the same size as the one in the
Washington Post picture.

See those large vertical posts? They make good reference points. If
you count from the background toward the foreground with the most
distant post as post 1, the Washington Post photo shows nearly empty
areas between posts 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 3 and 4. The CNN photo
clearly shows large crowds in each of those areas. The only area that's
nearly empty of people in both photos is the area beyond post 1.

Now zoom in on the crowds in the foreground, just beyond the statute.
In the CNN photo all eyes are on the grandstand. In the WP photo people
are milling about much more. If it was taken during the actual event,
all eyes would be front, and they're not.

Here's a goodie. See that green helicopter and white semi tractor in
the WP photo? They are not in the CNN photo. Look up and to the left
of the helicopter in the WP photo, just to the right of that white
storage shed with the green fence around it. See that white sedan? See
the empty areas in its vicinity? In the CNN photo there's no car there,
only big crowds that clearly are not in the WP photo. That's proof
positive both photos were not taken at the same time.

Now rotate the CNN photo to the grandstand. Trump is speechifying,
which proves the time of the photo without needing a timestamp. Taking
all the details together, it's clear that the WP photo was not taken
during the actual ceremony.

[edhun...@gmail.com]

Bullshit. Do the trig on the line of sight. Then look at the time-lapse. There is no question that the 2009 inaugural was more than twice as large.

[Scout]

"prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message

news:o6jbae$1s6h$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

> On 01/28/2017 01:31 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>> news:o6g4rr$15a4$1...@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> On 01/27/2017 12:49 AM, Scout wrote:
>>>> "prairiesky" <outgoin...@mozilla.com> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>> Look close, see if you can find the Cobra helicopter in this picture!
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/20/National-Politics/Images/_NK19706.JPG?uuid=KFq45t8lEeaJAmEP5IZ5HA>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (Hmmm, the crowd looks a little thin back there, doesn't it?)
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it does, and then when we look at this picture of the same view.
>>>
>>> It isn't the same view. The fences are 10 feet tall, and the
>>> horseman's hat has moved from below a fence to above. The camera is
>>> even lower to the ground than in the picture above.
>>
>> True, there is a slight difference in the specific positioning of the
>> camera, but they are close enough be considered the same at that
>> distance.
>
> The same at what distance? These shots are looking through telescopes.
> Look at the picture with the helicopter in it.
> <https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/20/National-Politics/Images/_NK19706.JPG?uuid=KFq45t8lEeaJAmEP5IZ5HA>

Yep, and I note that despite being able to see the same place in both, there
is no helicopter sticking above the crowd. Nor do I think they would be
transporting a helicopter through the middle of the main viewing area thus
blocking the view of the people there during the inauguration. As such, the
very fact it is present would seem to clearly suggest the photo was taken

well before or well after the inauguration.

> The Washington Monument ia a mile away, and the base of it looks yuge!

0.6 miles

> And behind that, we see the Lincoln Memorial TWO MILES away!

1.6 miles

> And... yuge! All that distance is compressed by the lens. There's no way
> to judge the depth of the empty white space back there from distorted
> pictures like this.

Except we don't need to judge the empty space, we can simply count heads
within a specific area.

That is unless you think a view down on a group of people is going to
significantly change the number of heads we can see.

Where your pictures shows NO people standing....mine shows lots of people.

You can't explain that away.

>
>> Sorry, but it seems clear that both the published shot in the media and
>> the one you posted were taken either well before or well after the
>> inauguration.
>
> Camera angle doesn't matter here, the tiered seating lets us see everyone.
> <http://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AAm7gHw.img>
> Was the shot taken well before, or well after the parade?

Then by your own admission, if we see more heads in my photos that appear in
yours....then the crowd was larger than you and the news sources assert.

More heads, mean more people, more people means larger crowd.

Point, Set, and Match.

[Scout]

"Just Wondering" <fmh...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gckjA.36894$nV4....@fx33.iad...

Yep, but he's going to complain that his out of date browser can't handle
that, and that those of us who aren't stuck in the past, can verify what
this link shows with pictures taken at nearly the same time.

Whereas, his photos all rely upon a asserted time they were taken.

Yet, the time indicated does NOT match with the facts and reasonable
observations that indicate their time stamp is falsified.

Nope, Trump is right, the media is lying about the crowd size and even a
basic fact check proves that beyond a reasonable doubt.

Now whether Trump's crowd was larger, smaller or nearly the same as Obama's
would need further examination and a head count made of all viewing areas.
I've not see where any media source as even attempted such a step.

[edhun...@gmail.com]

It's 1.21 miles from the Ulysses S. Grant Memorial (the horse/rider statue) to the Washington Monument. Use the distance-measuring tool in Google Maps.

>
> > And behind that, we see the Lincoln Memorial TWO MILES away!
>
> 1.6 miles

It is 2.00 miles from the Grant statue to the Lincoln Memorial.


--
Ed Huntress

[prairiesky]

On 01/29/2017 03:20 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>
> Here's a goodie. See that green helicopter and white semi tractor in
> the WP photo? They are not in the CNN photo. Look up and to the left
> of the helicopter in the WP photo, just to the right of that white
> storage shed with the green fence around it. See that white sedan? See
> the empty areas in its vicinity? In the CNN photo there's no car there,
> only big crowds that clearly are not in the WP photo. That's proof
> positive both photos were not taken at the same time.

Nobody claimed that WP photo was taken at any particular time.

Here are the "particular time" photos

[prairiesky]

On 01/29/2017 07:23 AM, Scout wrote:
>
> Yep, and I note that despite being able to see the same place in both,
> there is no helicopter sticking above the crowd. Nor do I think they
> would be transporting a helicopter through the middle of the main
> viewing area thus blocking the view of the people there during the
> inauguration. As such, the very fact it is present would seem to clearly
> suggest the photo was taken well before or well after the inauguration.

Obviously! Aren't you trying to sow confusion now by mixing up precisely
timed photos

11:49 AM
<http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/comparison-president-trump-and-barack-obamas-inauguration-crowds/>

12:01 PM
<https://widerimage.reuters.com/story/crowd-controversy-the-making-of-an-inauguration-day-photo>

with other front-of-the-crowd unknown-time photos?

[Meecey Spiteball]

On 1/29/2017 10:59 AM, prairiesky wrote:
> Aren't you trying to sow confusion now by mixing up precisely timed photos

Froth over Trump's Tweets, you gutless invertebrate shitbag!

[Flakey Foont]

On 1/29/2017 10:43 AM, prairiesky wrote:
> Here are the "particular time" photos

NO

ONE

FUCKING

CARES!