Fox News Co-Owner Funds Ground Zero Mosque
Aratzio
http://snipurl.com/10rbo0 <Yahoo News>
: Indeed, as none other than Rupert Murdoch's New York Post reported
: last May, the Kingdom Foundation, al-Waleed's personal charity, has
: donated a total of $305,000 to Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow, a
: leadership and networking project sponsored jointly by two of Rauf's
: organizations, the American Society for Muslim Advancement and the
: Cordoba Initiative. Al-Waleed owns a 7 percent, $2.3 billion stake in
: News Corporation. Likewise, News Corporation owns a 9 percent, $70
: million stake — purchased in February — in Rotana, Al-Waleed's Saudi
: media conglomerate. Put another way: Rupert Murdoch and Fox News are
: in business, to the tune of billions of dollars, with one of the
: "Terror Mosque Imam's" principal patrons.
So, now we know who is funding Imam Rauf's disrespectful Mosque, Fox
News.
Aratzio
Gary L. Burnore <gbur...@databasix.com> got double secret probation
for writing:
>On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:41:13 -0700, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>So, now we know who is funding Imam Rauf's disrespectful Mosque[SLAP]
>
>No more disrepectful than building an entire church and setting up a
>school with it so childeren can be easily molested like the catholics
>do, right?
I guess I left the sarcasm tag out. "Disrespectful" is the Faux News
whine about the "Not Mosque Not At Ground Zero".
Personally, most of these people who are claiming their fee fees are
hurt by the Cordoba House are just fuckwits. The families of victims
and the residents that went through 9/11 have the right to feel those
things, but the pissant demagogue's like Gingrich need to just shut
the fuck up and let the people involved work this out between them.
They've been using it for prayer since they bought the building. Now
all of a sudden those prayers will cause irreparable harm to the
delicate psyches of wingnuts all across the country.
They also avoided the 6 months of public hearings by the Manhattan
Community Board and didn't start their cynical collective freakout
until the final decision by the board.
(My spell checker thinks Gingrich should be spelled gibberish)
John R. Carroll
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:80o276p80vrc2h1i3...@4ax.com...
>
> http://snipurl.com/10rbo0 <Yahoo News>
>
> : Indeed, as none other than Rupert Murdoch's New York Post reported
> : last May, the Kingdom Foundation, al-Waleed's personal charity, has
> : donated a total of $305,000 to Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow, a
> : leadership and networking project sponsored jointly by two of Rauf's
> : organizations, the American Society for Muslim Advancement and the
> : Cordoba Initiative. Al-Waleed owns a 7 percent, $2.3 billion stake in
> : News Corporation. Likewise, News Corporation owns a 9 percent, $70
> : media conglomerate. Put another way: Rupert Murdoch and Fox News are
> : in business, to the tune of billions of dollars, with one of the
> : "Terror Mosque Imam's" principal patrons.
>
> So, now we know who is funding Imam Rauf's disrespectful Mosque, Fox
> News.
>
shareholder in Murdoch's News Corp. and it's subsidiaries.
Altogether, they hold over three billion dollars in News Corp. equity
according to 10K Wizard.
On that basis it can fairly be said that Glenn Beck, Bill O'Lielly and Laura
Ingram all work for the House of Saud.
--
John R. Carroll
Hachiroku ハチロク
Not exactly what it says, but it suits your purposes.
As usual, you put your keen mind to a task and come to the wrong
conclusion.
Aratzio
Hachiroku ???? <anon...@not-for-mail.invalid> got double secret
probation for writing:
>On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:41:13 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>
>> http://snipurl.com/10rbo0 <Yahoo News>
>>
>> : Indeed, as none other than Rupert Murdoch's New York Post reported
>> : last May, the Kingdom Foundation, al-Waleed's personal charity, has
>> : donated a total of $305,000 to Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow, a
>> : leadership and networking project sponsored jointly by two of Rauf's
>> : organizations, the American Society for Muslim Advancement and the
>> : Cordoba Initiative. Al-Waleed owns a 7 percent, $2.3 billion stake in
>> : News Corporation. Likewise, News Corporation owns a 9 percent, $70
>> : million stake ? purchased in February ? in Rotana, Al-Waleed's Saudi
>> : media conglomerate. Put another way: Rupert Murdoch and Fox News are
>> : in business, to the tune of billions of dollars, with one of the
>> : "Terror Mosque Imam's" principal patrons.
>>
>> So, now we know who is funding Imam Rauf's disrespectful Mosque, Fox
>> News.
>
>
>Not exactly what it says, but it suits your purposes.
>
>As usual, you put your keen mind to a task and come to the wrong
>conclusion.
BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAA
Wingnut fuckwit whines about guilt by association. The exact thing
with which they are smearing Imam Rauf.
I'd tell you to go read the article but your attention span and
reading ability are not even close to the requirements of that task.
Yes, he is that stupid.
Hachiroku ハチロク
You keep saying that like you have to prove it to someone.
Whatsa matter? Getting your virtual ass kicked on a regular basis getting
to you?
Aratzio
Point of order: cowardice by wingnut with regard to facts at hand.
>>
>> I'd tell you to go read the article but your attention span and
>> reading ability are not even close to the requirements of that task.
Point of order: Wingnut fails to dispute statement, thus entering
statement as agreed to fact.
>>
>> Yes, he is that stupid.
>
>You keep saying that like you have to prove it to someone.
No, I keep saying that like I can't actually believe you can get out
of bed and not hurt your face when you hit the floor.
>
>Whatsa matter? Getting your virtual ass kicked on a regular basis getting
>to you?
>
BWAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAA
Since he can't actually address the point about wingnut hypocrisy, he
just flails away with Ad Hominem.
Really, you see avoiding the point as kicking someone's ass? Or are
you implying that a complete fucking coward that ran away every single
time was kicking my ass. Not to point out the latter would insure the
validation of the point as to your attention span and reading ability.
Feel free to step up to the plate, cupcake. Give it your best shot.
Unless you feel that Ad Hominem is your best shot?
Hachiroku ハチロク
What's to refute? A shareholder in Fox News donates to the Mosque, and
your addled brain reports that as Fox News legitimizing the mosque. Not
quite the same thing, except to a nutcase that can't see the forest for
the trees.
Like I said, You put your great mind to the task, and still can't get 2+2
to equal 4.
However, the deflection to my alleged stupidity was just camoflage to the
fact you didn't quite understand what you read and reported here.
Yes, indeed. Getting you ass kicked by someone you call stupid must be
fairly humiliating, isn't it?
Aratzio
alt.autos.toyota, Hachiroku ???? <anon...@not-for-mail.invalid> got
Even after I pointed it out, again, you still coundn't grasp the
point. See below.
>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd tell you to go read the article but your attention span and
>>>> reading ability are not even close to the requirements of that task.
>>
>> Point of order: Wingnut fails to dispute statement, thus entering
>> statement as agreed to fact.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, he is that stupid.
>>>
>>>You keep saying that like you have to prove it to someone.
>>
>> No, I keep saying that like I can't actually believe you can get out
>> of bed and not hurt your face when you hit the floor.
Point of order: No denial, entered into facts.
>>
>>>
>>>Whatsa matter? Getting your virtual ass kicked on a regular basis getting
>>>to you?
>>>
>>
>> BWAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAA
>> Since he can't actually address the point about wingnut hypocrisy, he
>> just flails away with Ad Hominem.
>>
>> Really, you see avoiding the point as kicking someone's ass? Or are
>> you implying that a complete fucking coward that ran away every single
>> time was kicking my ass. Not to point out the latter would insure the
>> validation of the point as to your attention span and reading ability.
>>
>> Feel free to step up to the plate, cupcake. Give it your best shot.
>> Unless you feel that Ad Hominem is your best shot?
>
>What's to refute? A shareholder in Fox News donates to the Mosque, and
>your addled brain reports that as Fox News legitimizing the mosque. Not
>quite the same thing, except to a nutcase that can't see the forest for
>the trees.
And even after the point is explained to him, he does not get the
point.
That is an amazing way to prove my other point about your short
attention span and lack of any discernable reading ability.
>
>Like I said, You put your great mind to the task, and still can't get 2+2
>to equal 4.
So, if you failed in your reading therefore your math failure based
upon your reading failure is my fault?
>
>However, the deflection to my alleged stupidity was just camoflage to the
>fact you didn't quite understand what you read and reported here.
" Wingnut fuckwit whines about guilt by association. The exact thing
with which they are smearing Imam Rauf."
"Since he can't actually address the point about wingnut hypocrisy,
he just flails away with Ad Hominem."
I do so love when they leave the evidence of their own complete
failure intact on the page. It does save me the extra 15-20 seconds to
copy it from a different message.
So, what point do you feel was missed? It appears the "guilt by
association" is fully addressed..
Oh, it is the part that you ran away from, the hypocrisy of the right
whining about "guilt by association" while using "guilt by
association" to smear the Imam.
Guess, you just showed me, didn't you? Now snip-n-run like a good
little coward.
>
>Yes, indeed. Getting you ass kicked by someone you call stupid must be
>fairly humiliating, isn't it?
Wow, another of my fine lines you needed to steal. I should be
honored, but stupid people like you should at least make sure you
credit the author.
Hachiroku ハチロク
>>
>>Yes, indeed. Getting you ass kicked by someone you call stupid must be
>>fairly humiliating, isn't it?
>
> Wow, another of my fine lines you needed to steal.
How did I steal this? You haven't had an original thought since Herbert
Hoover was President.
Oh. You weren't alive then? Your brain still isn't.
Aratzio
Hrmm, after claiming he was kicking ass he ran away from facts. Funny
how that works. Guess he didn't have an Ad Hominem to refute those
facts,
>>
>> That is an amazing way to prove my other point about your short
>> attention span and lack of any discernable reading ability.
>>
>> >
>> >Like I said, You put your great mind to the task, and still can't get 2+2
>> >to equal 4.
>>
>> So, if you failed in your reading therefore your math failure based
>> upon your reading failure is my fault?
Must have been or he would have addressed that.
>>
>> >
>> >However, the deflection to my alleged stupidity was just camoflage to the
>> >fact you didn't quite understand what you read and reported here.
>>
>> " Wingnut fuckwit whines about guilt by association. The exact thing
>> with which they are smearing Imam Rauf."
>>
>> "Since he can't actually address the point about wingnut hypocrisy,
>> he just flails away with Ad Hominem."
>>
>> I do so love when they leave the evidence of their own complete
>> failure intact on the page. It does save me the extra 15-20 seconds to
>> copy it from a different message.
>>
>> So, what point do you feel was missed? It appears the "guilt by
>> association" is fully addressed..
>>
>> Oh, it is the part that you ran away from, the hypocrisy of the right
>> whining about "guilt by association" while using "guilt by
>> association" to smear the Imam.
>>
>> Guess, you just showed me, didn't you? Now snip-n-run like a good
>> little coward.
And the winner of the prescient post of the hour is me!
After being presented with unassailable facts that prove he is a
complete stone cold fucking moron with the reading ability of a 1st
grader, he follows directions and runs away.
Yes, that is some ass kicking he has supplied. My question is, how
does he get his foot turned so the toe kicks his own ass? That is
pretty fuckin' freaky double jointedness.
>>
>> >
>> >Yes, indeed. Getting you ass kicked by someone you call stupid must be
>> >fairly humiliating, isn't it?
>>
>> Wow, another of my fine lines you needed to steal. I should be
>> honored, but stupid people like you should at least make sure you
>> credit the author.
>>
>
>How did I steal this? You haven't had an original thought since Herbert
>Hoover was President.
Well, yes folks, he is that stupid.
>
>Oh. You weren't alive then? Your brain still isn't.
I was wrong, he is that stupid and that lame.
Did I mention just how cowardly his snipping-n-running was? Seriously
after claiming he was kicking ass then running like that, woohee, that
is some serious cowardice.
Must have been the facts he had to snip.
Hachiroku ハチロク
>>> And even after the point is explained to him, he does not get the
>>> point.
>
> Hrmm, after claiming he was kicking ass he ran away from facts. Funny
> how that works. Guess he didn't have an Ad Hominem to refute those
> facts,
What "Facts"? That a shareholder is a representative for a company?
Let's put it this way: if you hold any shares in any company, they should
pay you off with a premium just so they aren't associated with "stupid".
>
>>>
>>> That is an amazing way to prove my other point about your short
>>> attention span and lack of any discernable reading ability.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >Like I said, You put your great mind to the task, and still can't get 2+2
>>> >to equal 4.
>>>
>>> So, if you failed in your reading therefore your math failure based
>>> upon your reading failure is my fault?
>
> Must have been or he would have addressed that.
Must have been? No, as usual, you were completely wrong. No need to
address it.
>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >However, the deflection to my alleged stupidity was just camoflage to the
>>> >fact you didn't quite understand what you read and reported here.
>>>
>>> " Wingnut fuckwit whines about guilt by association. The exact thing
>>> with which they are smearing Imam Rauf."
>>>
>>> "Since he can't actually address the point about wingnut hypocrisy,
>>> he just flails away with Ad Hominem."
>>>
>>> I do so love when they leave the evidence of their own complete
>>> failure intact on the page. It does save me the extra 15-20 seconds to
>>> copy it from a different message.
>>>
>>> So, what point do you feel was missed? It appears the "guilt by
>>> association" is fully addressed..
>>>
>>> Oh, it is the part that you ran away from, the hypocrisy of the right
>>> whining about "guilt by association" while using "guilt by
>>> association" to smear the Imam.
>>>
>>> Guess, you just showed me, didn't you? Now snip-n-run like a good
>>> little coward.
>
> And the winner of the prescient post of the hour is me!
Why repost your ignorant blather. We all read it and ignored it once, how
many times do we need to be 'treated' to it? Reading you moronic drivel
once is quite enough.
>
> After being presented with unassailable facts that prove he is a
> complete stone cold fucking moron with the reading ability of a 1st
> grader, he follows directions and runs away.
<YAWN> Sure. A shareholder is representative of the company. Only a
complete fool would think that.
>
> Yes, that is some ass kicking he has supplied. My question is, how
> does he get his foot turned so the toe kicks his own ass? That is
> pretty fuckin' freaky double jointedness.
>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >Yes, indeed. Getting you ass kicked by someone you call stupid must be
>>> >fairly humiliating, isn't it?
>>>
>>> Wow, another of my fine lines you needed to steal. I should be
>>> honored, but stupid people like you should at least make sure you
>>> credit the author.
>>>
>>
>>How did I steal this? You haven't had an original thought since Herbert
>>Hoover was President.
>
> Well, yes folks, he is that stupid.
>
>>
>>Oh. You weren't alive then? Your brain still isn't.
>
> I was wrong, he is that stupid and that lame.
>
> Did I mention just how cowardly his snipping-n-running was? Seriously
> after claiming he was kicking ass then running like that, woohee, that
> is some serious cowardice.
>
> Must have been the facts he had to snip.
Nah. Just more ignorant drool from Aratzio the Idiot.
No biggie. It was wrong the first time, what makes it correct on a reread?
Lookout
Uhh..who's ass do you think you kicked?
Aratzio
alt.autos.toyota, Hachiroku ???? <anon...@not-for-mail.invalid> got
double secret probation for writing:
>On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:08:39 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>> And even after the point is explained to him, he does not get the
>>>> point.
>>
>> Hrmm, after claiming he was kicking ass he ran away from facts. Funny
>> how that works. Guess he didn't have an Ad Hominem to refute those
>> facts,
>
>What "Facts"? That a shareholder is a representative for a company?
>Let's put it this way: if you hold any shares in any company, they should
>pay you off with a premium just so they aren't associated with "stupid".
And yet, even if I were to explain the point to him again, "guilt by
association" & "hypocrisy of the right" I am betting he sticks with
his talking point completely avoiding the facts, as usual.
It must be so nice to live in a cocoon insulated from reality as he
does.
So, why did you run away the first time?
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> That is an amazing way to prove my other point about your short
>>>> attention span and lack of any discernable reading ability.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >Like I said, You put your great mind to the task, and still can't get 2+2
>>>> >to equal 4.
>>>>
>>>> So, if you failed in your reading therefore your math failure based
>>>> upon your reading failure is my fault?
>>
>> Must have been or he would have addressed that.
>
>Must have been? No, as usual, you were completely wrong. No need to
>address it.
"Nuh Uh"
So, what do you think was the point of my sarcasm with regard to the
hypocrisy of the right and smear tactics based upon "guilt by
association"?
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >However, the deflection to my alleged stupidity was just camoflage to the
>>>> >fact you didn't quite understand what you read and reported here.
>>>>
>>>> " Wingnut fuckwit whines about guilt by association. The exact thing
>>>> with which they are smearing Imam Rauf."
>>>>
>>>> "Since he can't actually address the point about wingnut hypocrisy,
>>>> he just flails away with Ad Hominem."
>>>>
>>>> I do so love when they leave the evidence of their own complete
>>>> failure intact on the page. It does save me the extra 15-20 seconds to
>>>> copy it from a different message.
>>>>
>>>> So, what point do you feel was missed? It appears the "guilt by
>>>> association" is fully addressed..
>>>>
>>>> Oh, it is the part that you ran away from, the hypocrisy of the right
>>>> whining about "guilt by association" while using "guilt by
>>>> association" to smear the Imam.
>>>>
>>>> Guess, you just showed me, didn't you? Now snip-n-run like a good
>>>> little coward.
>>
>> And the winner of the prescient post of the hour is me!
>
>Why repost your ignorant blather. We all read it and ignored it once, how
>many times do we need to be 'treated' to it? Reading you moronic drivel
>once is quite enough.
Ah, so your reading has failed again. Most people it is just
pretending to be stupid so they can avoid the point. You, however, the
stupidity is actual fact.
So, do you imagine my point about the "guilt by association" smears of
Imam Rauf and the hilarious fact that the #2 investor in NewsCorp is a
donor to the same charities investing in the Mosque are not related?
That they in fact are two entirely different things? That the supposed
connections to terrorists and jihadists the right have been smearing
the Imam with are not as applicable to the Sheik & NewsCorp?
Or are you willing to admit the smears of Imam Rauf are disingenuous?
>
>>
>> After being presented with unassailable facts that prove he is a
>> complete stone cold fucking moron with the reading ability of a 1st
>> grader, he follows directions and runs away.
>
>
><YAWN> Sure. A shareholder is representative of the company. Only a
>complete fool would think that.
And he fails again:
" Wingnut fuckwit whines about guilt by association. The exact thing
with which they are smearing Imam Rauf."
Once he gets his stupidity locked in, there is no swaying him with
actual statements that show he is a moron that failed basic reading
comprehension.
>
>>
>> Yes, that is some ass kicking he has supplied. My question is, how
>> does he get his foot turned so the toe kicks his own ass? That is
>> pretty fuckin' freaky double jointedness.
Nuthin', eh, cupcake? No pithy rejoinder showing how smart and witty
you are?
(I do crack me up some times)
>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >Yes, indeed. Getting you ass kicked by someone you call stupid must be
>>>> >fairly humiliating, isn't it?
>>>>
>>>> Wow, another of my fine lines you needed to steal. I should be
>>>> honored, but stupid people like you should at least make sure you
>>>> credit the author.
>>>>
>>>
>>>How did I steal this? You haven't had an original thought since Herbert
>>>Hoover was President.
>>
>> Well, yes folks, he is that stupid.
>>
>>>
>>>Oh. You weren't alive then? Your brain still isn't.
>>
>> I was wrong, he is that stupid and that lame.
>>
>> Did I mention just how cowardly his snipping-n-running was? Seriously
>> after claiming he was kicking ass then running like that, woohee, that
>> is some serious cowardice.
>>
>> Must have been the facts he had to snip.
>
>Nah. Just more ignorant drool from Aratzio the Idiot.
>No biggie. It was wrong the first time, what makes it correct on a reread?
Poor Hachoo, his cowardice shown up and the fact I had predicted he
would be a coward forces him to address the points, with his usual
stupidity, that he ran away from the first time.
Gunner Asch
<anon...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:
>> Hrmm, after claiming he was kicking ass he ran away from facts. Funny
>> how that works. Guess he didn't have an Ad Hominem to refute those
>> facts,
>
>What "Facts"? That a shareholder is a representative for a company?
>Let's put it this way: if you hold any shares in any company, they should
>pay you off with a premium just so they aren't associated with "stupid".
Odd then isnt it, that since Pelosi has major stock in several petroleum
companies..that those companies are not Green Socialist Friends of the
Planet, eh wot?
Gunner
I am the Sword of my Family
and the Shield of my Nation.
If sent, I will crush everything you have built,
burn everything you love,
and kill every one of you.
(Hebrew quote)
Hachiroku ハチロク
I think you could probably include yours in the list.
Hachiroku ハチロク
>>What "Facts"? That a shareholder is a representative for a company?
>>Let's put it this way: if you hold any shares in any company, they should
>>pay you off with a premium just so they aren't associated with "stupid".
>
>
> Odd then isnt it, that since Pelosi has major stock in several petroleum
> companies..that those companies are not Green Socialist Friends of the
> Planet, eh wot?
Like I said.
Hachiroku ハチロク
>>Nah. Just more ignorant drool from Aratzio the Idiot.
>>No biggie. It was wrong the first time, what makes it correct on a reread?
>
> Poor Hachoo, his cowardice shown up and the fact I had predicted he
> would be a coward forces him to address the points
The only point needing dressing is the one on your head. Everthing else
coming from you is just more ignorant blather.
Gunner Asch
Indeed.
Which just shows the hypocrisy of the Left.
Lookout
<anon...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:
"you" think?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAH
Hachiroku ハチロク
Yes. That's the thing. I think.
For you, OTOH, it seems to be a foreign concept.
Lookout
<anon...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:
Who hasn't laughed at you in here? Hell..even assghost laughed at you.
Aratzio
Hachiroku ???? <anon...@not-for-mail.invalid> got double secret
probation for writing:
>On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:01:17 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
Poor snip-n-run coward.
You can't face the fact you were just stone cold stupid.
Hachiroku ハチロク
Hint: They're not laughing AT me.
ah
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:11:17 -0400, in the land of alt.impeach.bush,
> Gary L. Burnore <gbur...@databasix.com> got double secret probation
> for writing:
>
>>On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:41:13 -0700, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>So, now we know who is funding Imam Rauf's disrespectful Mosque[SLAP]
>>
>>No more disrepectful than building an entire church and setting up a
>>school with it so childeren can be easily molested like the catholics
>>do, right?
>
> I guess I left the sarcasm tag out. "Disrespectful" is the Faux News
> whine about the "Not Mosque Not At Ground Zero".
>
> Personally, most of these people who are claiming their fee fees are
> hurt by the Cordoba House are just fuckwits. The families of victims
> and the residents that went through 9/11 have the right to feel those
> things, but the pissant demagogue's like Gingrich need to just shut
> the fuck up and let the people involved work this out between them.
Amazing the old coot can actually still pull-out a fart.
>
> They've been using it for prayer since they bought the building. Now
> all of a sudden those prayers will cause irreparable harm to the
> delicate psyches of wingnuts all across the country.
But, but . . . the sacrilege!!1!
>
> They also avoided the 6 months of public hearings by the Manhattan
> Community Board and didn't start their cynical collective freakout
> until the final decision by the board.
>
> (My spell checker thinks Gingrich should be spelled gibberish)
It is correct.
--
a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h
ah
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:41:13 -0700, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>So, now we know who is funding Imam Rauf's disrespectful Mosque[SLAP]
>
> No more disrepectful than building an entire church and setting up a
> school with it so childeren can be easily molested like the catholics
> do, right?
'My God craps bigger than your god', eh?
ah
ROLF!
ah
Face it: you are sooo pwned.
Hachiroku ハチロク
And now the thread becomes a circle jerk.
cncmillgil
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:11:17 -0400, in the land of alt.impeach.bush,
> for writing:
>
> >On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:41:13 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com>
> >wrote:
>
> >>So, now we know who is funding Imam Rauf's disrespectful Mosque[SLAP]
>
> >No more disrepectful than building an entire church and setting up a
> >school with it so childeren can be easily molested like the catholics
> >do, right?
>
> whine about the "Not Mosque Not At Ground Zero".
>
> Personally, most of these people who are claiming their fee fees are
> hurt by the Cordoba House are just fuckwits. The families of victims
> and the residents that went through 9/11 have the right to feel those
> things, but the pissant demagogue's like Gingrich need to just shut
> the fuck up and let the people involved work this out between them.
>
> all of a sudden those prayers will cause irreparable harm to the
> delicate psyches of wingnuts all across the country.
>
> Community Board and didn't start their cynical collective freakout
> until the final decision by the board.
>
> (My spell checker thinks Gingrich should be spelled gibberish)
gibberish? = Polosi
Aratzio
<splif...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
The silence from the pussies is *deefning*.
Aratzio
Whines the coward that couldn't argue the point and then ran away.
Hachiroku ハチロク
Make that a jerk circle.
Aratzio
Was your lower lip puffing out when you wrote that?
ah
i.e., "Waaah!".
Hachiroku ハチロク
Do you ever actually say anything or, to be precise, anything useful?
ah
What would you have me say?
Would you like to know how to make your own glowsticks?
If you are interested, be aware, however, that there are a few patents on the
processes, namely 2,774,022 3,764,796 3,819,925 and 3,933,118 so you
should--how should I say it--perform the procedure(s) on an ad-hoc basis <s>
--
a "http://uk3-pn.mixstream.net/8026.m3u" h
ah
*crickets*
Hachiroku ハチロク
>> Do you ever actually say anything or, to be precise, anything useful?
>
> What would you have me say?
>
> Would you like to know how to make your own glowsticks?
>
> If you are interested, be aware, however, that there are a few patents on the
> processes, namely 2,774,022 3,764,796 3,819,925 and 3,933,118 so you
> should--how should I say it--perform the procedure(s) on an ad-hoc basis <s>
If I mix 'em up in the kithcen sink, I don't see a problem.
Did you obtain these patents? If so, this explains a lot:
Ingestion of white phosphorus may cause a medical condition known as
"Smoking Stool Syndrome".
ah
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:12:50 -0400, ah wrote:
>
>>> Do you ever actually say anything or, to be precise, anything useful?
>>
>> What would you have me say?
>>
>> Would you like to know how to make your own glowsticks?
>>
>> If you are interested, be aware, however, that there are a few patents on the
>> processes, namely 2,774,022 3,764,796 3,819,925 and 3,933,118 so you
>> should--how should I say it--perform the procedure(s) on an ad-hoc basis <s>
>
> If I mix 'em up in the kithcen sink, I don't see a problem.
>
> Did you obtain these patents? If so, this explains a lot:
Good lord, man. I haven't been allowed near the States since '57.
>
> Ingestion of white phosphorus may cause a medical condition known as
> "Smoking Stool Syndrome".
A budding scatological obsession is so quaint.
Hachiroku ハチロク
>>> If you are interested, be aware, however, that there are a few patents on the
>>> processes, namely 2,774,022 3,764,796 3,819,925 and 3,933,118 so you
>>> should--how should I say it--perform the procedure(s) on an ad-hoc basis <s>
>>
>> If I mix 'em up in the kithcen sink, I don't see a problem.
>>
>> Did you obtain these patents? If so, this explains a lot:
>
> Good lord, man. I haven't been allowed near the States since '57.
This could be a good thing.
>
>>
>> Ingestion of white phosphorus may cause a medical condition known as
>> "Smoking Stool Syndrome".
>
> A budding scatological obsession is so quaint.
I was just wondering if it was something you were suffering from.
ah
Oh, I'm not suffering :D
Hachiroku ハチロク
Um....ooooooooo-k! ;p