Mugshots

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 17, 2015, 12:40:52 PM7/17/15

to

Since anonymous posting pussies, like Jonathan Ball, and morons like slow eddy are obsessed with mugshots I thought I'd start a thread dedicated to mug shots. :>)

Here is Dr. Martin Luther King's mugshot:

http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnvar/20150115/169398

John Doe

unread,

Jul 17, 2015, 1:03:52 PM7/17/15

to

Google Groups spam/troll...

--
jon_banquer <jonbanquer yahoo.com> wrote in news:27c9b3e9-d747-4b30-a918-ac53e922f0f5 googlegroups.com:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 17, 2015, 1:09:01 PM7/17/15

to

On Friday, July 17, 2015 at 10:03:52 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "John Doe" failed:

amdx

unread,

Jul 18, 2015, 6:42:54 AM7/18/15

to

Are you comparing yourself to Dr. Martin Luther King?
Mikek

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 18, 2015, 10:31:36 AM7/18/15

to

Today's mugshot is Rosa Parks:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/670xX/photos/rparksmug1.jpg

Ed Huntress

unread,

Jul 18, 2015, 10:44:08 AM7/18/15

to

Bonkers sees no difference between resisting segregation and beating
his wife. He's one seriously disturbed head case.

BTW, that wasn't the first time he was arrested for domestic abuse.
This case, from 1994 (Banquer v. Steidley), is about as sad and
pathetic as one can get:

https://casetext.com/case/banquer-v-steidley-no-cv-97-0404728-s-nov

--
Ed Huntress

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 18, 2015, 11:03:35 AM7/18/15

to

On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 7:44:08 AM UTC-7, slow eddy lied:

<slow eddy lies slipped>

Nothing to respond to.

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 18, 2015, 11:09:45 AM7/18/15

to

Are you stupid?

Is there any chance your son ended up failing as you posted because you suck as a father?

amdx

unread,

Jul 18, 2015, 11:44:51 AM7/18/15

to

Ya, I probably should not have put computers together in front of him.
He got the idea he could do it, built himself a game machine and got
heavy into playing video games. I think that is where he went wrong.
To many video games.
Other than that, no, I don't suck as a father. There are many well
raised young people that don't finish college. He may still decide
to return to college, he just turned 21 years old.
We could talk about how your father failed. Do you want to?
Seems that could be long topic.
Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

amdx

unread,

Jul 18, 2015, 11:45:50 AM7/18/15

to

On 7/18/2015 9:31 AM, jon_banquer wrote:
> Today's mugshot is Rosa Parks:
>
> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/670xX/photos/rparksmug1.jpg
>

Are you comparing yourself to Rosa Parks?

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 18, 2015, 11:55:57 AM7/18/15

to

On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 8:45:50 AM UTC-7, amdx wrote:

> Are you comparing yourself to Rosa Parks?
> Mikek

Are you stuck on stupid?

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 18, 2015, 12:07:40 PM7/18/15

to

Easy to blame computers/games rather than yourself. Computers/games are an effect. They aren't the cause.

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:38:25 AM7/21/15

to

Whoa. According to Banquer his 'rents paid for stuff, the valuable
portion of which appears to have turned invisible. Banquer's
girlfriend, after claiming domestic violence, has him arrested, tells
him to get his stuff out of her house, and leaves it outside by
arrangement. He largely doesn't take the stuff despite showing up with
an unnecessary court order and a posse of lawyer, police and a too
small truck. So HE puts much of the stuff BACK inside her place.
Girlfriend's lawyer rightfully points out balnce of stuff to a
bankruptcy trustee, said stuff (judge's word LOL) being obviously and
at least partly admittedly withheld from Banquer's creditors.
Invisible receipts for invisible stuff, which was at best exaggerated
and likely never really existed. Banquer and trustee agree that
balance of stuff isn't worth getting out of hock, where it remains,
subject to warehouse lien. Banquer blames girlfriend for loss of
income from his profitable but non existent business venture! that
can't function without the invisible stuff that was so valuable and
crucial he couldn't bother to pick it up. Shockingly, judge doesn't
find Banquer credible. Is that about it?

Quite the read and fucking mess and undoubtedly not the only such
antics in Banquer's life. Aside: who hides a water heater and lawn
furniture from a bankruptcy? Jesus Banquer, you probably screwed those
creditors out of a huge sum but you couldn't let them have your damned
lawn chairs?

I can see where this is heading...

None of Banquer's ex girlfriend, the judge, the bankruptcy trustee,
both lawyers lawyer, the warehouse owner and of course me, have a
Linkedin group. :)

Rudy Canoza

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:39:53 AM7/21/15

to

bonkers is seriously fucked up. No sane person disputes it.

Rudy Canoza

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:43:13 AM7/21/15

to

On 7/18/2015 7:44 AM, Ed Huntress wrote:

Typical bonkers shitbaggery:

When he was forced to move from the Orange residence he moved many
items of personal property into the basement and garage of the
defendant's home. For example he moved a water heater, a
refrigerator/freezer, and a power washer. He also stored on her
property a used Jaguar automobile on which he practiced auto body
restoration skills that he was in the process of learning.
Significantly, although each of these items was acquired by the
plaintiff prior to filing the petition in bankruptcy, none of these
items of personal property is listed in any of the schedules to the
plaintiff's Chapter 7 filing, schedules to which he swore to the
truth on September 20, 1993.

jonny bonkers is a sleazy fuck. Everyone knows this.

Martin Eastbourne

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:45:44 AM7/21/15

to

LOL! God damn, I love this stuff.

rangerssuck

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 11:55:04 AM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 1:38:25 AM UTC-4, Captain Obvious wrote:

> I can see where this is heading...
>
> None of Banquer's ex girlfriend, the judge, the bankruptcy trustee,
> both lawyers lawyer, the warehouse owner and of course me, have a
> Linkedin group. :)

+25!

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:35:07 PM7/21/15

to

Today's mugshot is Steve McQueen:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/celebrity/hollywood/steve-mcqueen

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:36:06 PM7/21/15

to

On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 10:38:25 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:36:53 PM7/21/15

to

On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 10:43:13 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball lied:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:37:24 PM7/21/15

to

-25!

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:37:53 PM7/21/15

to

On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 10:45:44 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball lied:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 1:38:29 PM7/21/15

to

On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 10:39:53 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball lied:

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 5:05:27 PM7/21/15

to

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 10:38:25 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

Here's your chance to set the record straight, Banquer. It seems clear
you were guilty of bankruptcy fraud. If you disagree, feel free to
explain what you think the judge got wrong. If you don't care to
elablorate, then I think it's very fair to accept the judge's opion.
She seems to have seen right through you. How'd the domestic violence
thing turn out? How much did the creditors lose on your forclosure and
bankruptcy?

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 5:06:27 PM7/21/15

to

Hey Banquer, what's McQueen's stance on bankruptcy fraud and domestic
violence and parents having to bail out their adult kids?

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 5:13:26 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 2:05:27 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 5:14:10 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 2:06:27 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 7:22:18 PM7/21/15

to

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:13:24 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 2:05:27 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

How come you aren't flapping your gums like usual, Banquer?

#1 collection of selected hilarity from your court case, where you
idiotically tried to place the blame for your own failures on some
poor female.

According to 'da judge:

.... the plaintiff claims that he spent over $23,000 acquiring tools
that he intended to use for an auto body repair business that he
believes would have generated substantial income for him....

...The plaintiff's father testified he and the plaintiff's mother gave
the plaintiff $29,000 over a period of one year...

(at this point your "business" reached maximum profitability, and you
should have franchised)

... the plaintiff has failed to prove that he has been injured. The
plaintiff's credibility suffers as a result of his outlandish claim
that the deprivation of some auto repair manuals and tools has
disrupted his ability to file income tax returns, earn a living, and
get back on his feet over a period of six years now

A lack of credibility? Banquer? Noooooo! It must be some other asshat
named Banquer, right Banquer? No income tax for six years? No doubt
it's a lot more years by now. Yet another thing you and Wieber have in
common.

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 7:24:46 PM7/21/15

to

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:14:07 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 2:06:27 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

Cat got your tongue Banquer?

#2 collection of selected hilarity from your court case, where you
idiotically tried to place the blame for your own failure on some poor

female.

According to 'da judge:

The plaintiff Jonathan Banquer...

... had previously lived at a residence that he owned in Orange,
Connecticut, which had been foreclosed. His unhappy financial
situation had also caused him to file a petition in bankruptcy earlier
that year, on August 5, 1993...

... he moved many items of personal property into the basement and
garage of the defendant's home...

... Significantly, although each of these items was acquired by the

plaintiff prior to filing the petition in bankruptcy, none of these
items of personal property is listed in any of the schedules to the
plaintiff's Chapter 7 filing, schedules to which he swore to the truth
on September 20, 1993.

So you withheld assets from your creditors. Very similar to what
Wieber does. How many of your detractors here have accused you of
being dishonest? We all figured you out a long time ago.

amdx

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 7:36:47 PM7/21/15

to

Is this the best you got?
My son is fine.
Mikek

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 7:44:00 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 4:22:18 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 7:45:24 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 4:36:47 PM UTC-7, amdx wrote:

> Is this the best you got?
> My son is fine.
> Mikek

I seriously doubt your son is fine based on what you have posted.

I'm sorry you can't deal with the fact that you have failed as a father and why.

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 7:47:12 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 4:24:46 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied and failed:

amdx

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 7:54:48 PM7/21/15

to

On 7/21/2015 4:14 PM, jon_banquer wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 2:06:27 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:
>
>

No I think you are failing.
Are you posting mugshots to make yourself feel better about yours?
Is this an attempt to compare yourself to these people?
Get over it man!
Mikek

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:06:47 PM7/21/15

to

What really bothers you is that I know what you are. You're someone who makes excuse after excuse instead of getting the help you and your son need.

It doesn't surprise me in the least why you can't figure out why I post mugshots.

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:08:31 PM7/21/15

to

These kinds of mugshots?

http://thumbs.mugshots.com/gallery/images/2/3d/34/Jonathan-Banquer_mugshot.400x800.jpg

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:22:13 PM7/21/15

to

I see that as usual you have a strange idea of how to generate
sympathy for yourself. I wonder how that's going to work out.

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:26:10 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 5:22:13 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:27:16 PM7/21/15

to

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:47:09 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 4:24:46 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied and failed:

Who is this poster and how was he able to almost totally disable
Banquer's keyboard?

#3 collection of selected hilarity from your court case, where you

idiotically tried to place the blame for your own failure on some poor
female.

According to 'da judge:

The plaintiff Jonathan Banquer ...

....On January 20, 1994, the plaintiff was arrested at the home of the
defendant on her complaint of domestic violence. As part of the
disposition of that case, the plaintiff was placed under a court order
obligating him to vacate the premises. The order allowed the plaintiff
to retrieve his personal items provided he had no contact with Ms.
Steidley and provided he be accompanied by a police officer at the
time of the retrieval. The plaintiff took no steps at that time to
deal with the removal of the tools stored at the home of the
defendant.

On April 13, 1994, the court order was modified at the request of the
plaintiff's attorney to specify that the plaintiff be allowed to
retrieve his social security card, his birth certificate, and his
motorcycle1 from the defendant's residence. In fact, it appears that
such a modification of the order was largely unnecessary because the
plaintiff already had an order allowing him to retrieve his belongings
and the defendant was content and even eager to have the plaintiff
remove all of his items from her premises...

LOL You paid (OK, hopefully your parents paid) a lawyer to get a
redundant court order you didn't need, to force the ex to relinquish
stuff she couldn't wait to get rid of. What a drama queen!

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:31:03 PM7/21/15

to

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:43:58 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 4:22:18 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

Banquer is once again at a loss for words!

#4 collection of selected hilarity from your court case, where you
idiotically tried to place the blame for your own failure on some poor

female.

According to 'da judge:

... The plaintiff Jonathan Banquer ...

...Nor can the court credit the evidence offered by the plaintiff as
to the value of the goods lost. The court does not believe that all of
the money given to the plaintiff by his parents was given to him
between August and November of 1993 nor that all of that money went to
buy CT Page 13671 tools. That the plaintiff testified that the value
of the tools was twice what he paid, that he paid for them all in cash
(when there is evidence that he was using a credit card for many other
purchases during the same time), that he offered no names of the
vendors nor lists or photos of the types of tools, all of these
factors make the plaintiff's testimony not credible as to the value of
the lost items. In the absence of credible evidence of the value of
the lost items, the court would be left to speculate or guess as to
their value, a process that is not allowed....

You thought you could hornswoggle the judge into agreeing that your
crap was worth twice what you paid in cash, and without any list,
receipts, photos or details. Where the hell did you find a lawyer
willing to go along with any of this bullshit? I hope he insisted on
being paid in advance.

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:32:52 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 5:31:03 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:40:52 PM7/21/15

to

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:07:36 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Wieber vs Banquer. Can we have O'Reilly vs Hannity next?

Ed Huntress

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:45:54 PM7/21/15

to

What's funny is that Gunner doesn't know that it was Bonkers' mugshot,
linked to in a post a couple of days ago, that Bonkers is trying to
scour from everyone's memory by posting mugshots of people who
actually had character. <g>

--
Ed Huntress

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:46:14 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 5:40:52 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:48:37 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 5:45:54 PM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:

<The usual slow eddy bullshit and lies snipped>

Nothing to respond to.

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:49:18 PM7/21/15

to

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:32:48 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 5:31:03 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

Mute Banquer must respond!

#5 collection of selected hilarity from your court case, where you

idiotically tried to place the blame for your own failure on some poor
female.

According to 'da judge:

... The plaintiff Jonathan Banquer ...

...The plaintiff's credibility suffers as a result of his outlandish

claim that the deprivation of some auto repair manuals and tools has
disrupted his ability to file income tax returns, earn a living, and

get back on his feet over a period of six years now...

Tell the truth, are you trying to beat Wieber's record for number of
years of no hope/ pretending to be successfull?

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 21, 2015, 8:50:48 PM7/21/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 5:49:18 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 22, 2015, 9:25:15 AM7/22/15

to

It's tough for either to find something fair to criticize about the
other because they're such similar losers.
No doubt the transcript of Banquer's courst case has some hilarious
moments. His strategy on the mugshot thing is nuts, a fact he's
powerless to recognize or accept. But if he had a glimmer of fair
mindedness, the mugshots would at least be more along these lines
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZJ_VLW1lmK0/Ti1ccUynoiI/AAAAAAAAC7Y/OqFsbSfxIYs/s1600/nick_nolte_mug_shot_dui.jpg
http://i1.cdnds.net/11/42/618_showbiz_mugshot_macaulay_culkin.jpg
http://cerebraljetsam.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/gary-busey.jpg

I have to marvel at Banquer's talent for attracting and motivating
merciless detractors. It must be dozens over the years. Have you seen
this one? https://twitter.com/jonbanquer_ Brutal, and right on the
money.

Rudy Canoza

unread,

Jul 22, 2015, 10:16:46 AM7/22/15

to

God damn - that's some serious dementia at work.

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 22, 2015, 11:37:29 AM7/22/15

to

Today's mugshot is Bill Gates:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/celebrity/business/bill-gates

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 22, 2015, 12:58:06 PM7/22/15

to

Today's Banquer fan site:

http://bp1.blogger.com/_yph3maSB7kw/SCiLwvAl_tI/AAAAAAAAAAM/p01wgkdhH1g/S660/broomboy2.jpg

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 22, 2015, 2:49:43 PM7/22/15

to

On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 9:58:06 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

Ed Huntress

unread,

Jul 22, 2015, 2:50:20 PM7/22/15

to

On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:25:41 -0700, Captain Obvious

He's like a magnet. <g>

--
Ed Huntress

mog...@hotmail.com

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 9:20:36 AM7/23/15

to

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:49:18 PM UTC-4, Captain Obvious wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:32:48 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
> <jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 5:31:03 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:
>
> Mute Banquer must respond!

Respond to what? jon doesn't have to respond to NOT being convicted in a court of law.

What part of "NOT" don't you understand? Ignorant people like you have to first understand the law. Anyone or any group can pressure a federal or state investigator to bring charges and take a particular person to jail while trying to trump up charges and an eventual conviction.

But is the person ever found guilty or not. I don't care how many people dislike the person, try to focus here. Cut out the typical half-brained assumptions.

Was jon convicted in a court of law? If you can finally think for yourself, you'll see that jon was NOT convicted in a court of law. Get over it. You lose.

==================================================
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 10:57:29 AM7/23/15

to

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:20:34 -0700 (PDT), mog...@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:49:18 PM UTC-4, Captain Obvious wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:32:48 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>> <jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 5:31:03 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:
>>
>> Mute Banquer must respond!
>
>Respond to what? jon doesn't have to respond to NOT being convicted in a court of law.
>

You misunderstood my point, which was that Banquer cannot stop himself
from responding, despite refusing to make any meaningful comment on
the accusations.

Here are the facts. Banquer has attracted dozens of detractors over
many years. It happens like this: Banquer says something inane. People
ridicule him. Banquer escalates, almost always falsely accusing his
opponent of lying and worse. He gets personal, his opponents get
personal.

In the case at hand, Banquer pretends that his mugshot is meaningless.
It is not. He has been arrested twice for domestic violence. Ah, but
innocent until convicted, right? We don't know if he was convicted,
but consider the accusations Banquer makes about others, and then read
this judge's decision and comments.
https://casetext.com/case/banquer-v-steidley-no-cv-97-0404728-s-nov
There's no question, he's a lowlife hypocrite, and he's getting what
he deserves. He can change his attitude any time and find his online
life more pleasant. But he won't, because he thrives on
unpleasantness. He claims he's only "telling the truth." Bullshit, the
truth is in that judge's comments, and Banquer has no defense against
it.

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 11:58:04 AM7/23/15

to

On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 7:57:29 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 12:03:11 PM7/23/15

to

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 7:57:29 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

True to form, Banquer has no defense but to accuse someone of lying,
perhaps because he does so much of it so poorly. I notice you haven't
accused the judge of lying, Banquer. LOL Afraid she'll find out and
take you on with more than ridicule?

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 12:07:02 PM7/23/15

to

On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 9:03:11 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 12:08:18 PM7/23/15

to

Today's mugshot is George Carlin:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/celebrity/hollywood/george-carlin

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 12:16:10 PM7/23/15

to

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:06:59 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 9:03:11 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

Why do I have a feeling that your bankruptcy fraud etc is going to
haunt you for a long time? Because that's the inevitable result of
fighting dirty... you end up in the shit. Forseeable and preventable,
but nothing can stop the mighty Banquer from posting scathing replies
such as "liar" and "bump." Free and good advice, Banquer: stop making
enemies.

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 12:18:15 PM7/23/15

to

Today's Banquer fan site is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfSiHGcLqcg

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 12:20:21 PM7/23/15

to

On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 9:18:15 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 23, 2015, 12:22:37 PM7/23/15

to

On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 9:16:10 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied and failed:

brew...@aol.com

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 1:19:23 AM7/27/15

to

Jon's wife Constance Banquer spent a couple of years in a Florida
prison for ID Theft, Grand Theft and probably a few other charges.

http://www.dc.state.fl.us/InmateReleases/detail.asp?Bookmark=1&From=list&SessionID=406249443

It could be a skill she learned from Jon while they lived in CT. Where
Jon says he "Owned 100+ rental units"* at the time his income was
something like $16.00 an hour** as the "head of CADCAM systems" for a
company and a SolidWorks Instructor***.

If true pretty amazing by any standard so I asked Jon how exactly did
he manage to qualify for loans on 100+ rental units in CT all while he
was making $16.00 an hour with a wife and two kids to support but he
has yet to answer. If true (and legal) he should be teaching real
estate courses. So it seems just a little too fishy to be true
especially when Jon, his wife and kids left CT (in a hurry) ending up
penniless in Florida.

Unlike today back in those days banks were a bit reluctant to admit
publicly that they could be victimized by loan fraud. If there was
some equity or not too large a loss they were inclined to negotiate a
deal with the perpetrator under the threat of criminal prosecution.

So while Jon's wife was being housed and fed by the Great State of
Florida Jon moved ("in a hurry") only to end up penniless in Arizona.

--
Tom
http://tinyurl.com/5okkgz

*
[
I owned well over a hundred rental units
]- Jon Banquer - Dec 2007

**
[
As head of CADCAM systems for Precision Resource, tool and die
division in Shelton, CT I started at $16 an hour and ended up at $21
dollars an hour less than a year later and that was well over ten
years ago.
] - Jon Banquer- May 3, 2009

***
[
I own SolidWorks and use to teach it.
] - Jon Banquer - Aug 2, 2001

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 11:47:51 AM7/27/15

to

Today's mugshot is Bobby Unser:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/celebrity/sports/bobby-unser

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 11:55:56 AM7/27/15

to

Almost everything Tom Brewer has posted about CADCAM software for years has turned out to be bad advice/wrong:

Tom Brewer CADCAM Moron:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Tom Brewer CADCAM Moron:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Tom Brewer CADCAM Moron:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Tom Brewer CADCAM Moron:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Tom Brewer CADCAM Moron:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Tom Brewer CADCAM Moron:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 3:47:27 PM7/27/15

to

Today's Banquer fan site is https://twitter.com/Jon_Banquer

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 3:49:55 PM7/27/15

to

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:09:00 -0700, Captain Obvious
<cpt...@yippee.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 22:19:21 -0700 (PDT), brew...@aol.com wrote:
>
>>Jon's wife Constance Banquer spent a couple of years in a Florida
>>prison for ID Theft, Grand Theft and probably a few other charges.
>>
>>http://www.dc.state.fl.us/InmateReleases/detail.asp?Bookmark=1&From=list&SessionID=406249443
>>
>>It could be a skill she learned from Jon while they lived in CT. Where
>>Jon says he "Owned 100+ rental units"* at the time his income was
>>something like $16.00 an hour** as the "head of CADCAM systems" for a
>>company and a SolidWorks Instructor***.
>>
>>If true pretty amazing by any standard so I asked Jon how exactly did
>>he manage to qualify for loans on 100+ rental units in CT all while he
>>was making $16.00 an hour with a wife and two kids to support but he
>>has yet to answer. If true (and legal) he should be teaching real
>>estate courses. So it seems just a little too fishy to be true
>>especially when Jon, his wife and kids left CT (in a hurry) ending up
>>penniless in Florida.
>>
>>Unlike today back in those days banks were a bit reluctant to admit
>>publicly that they could be victimized by loan fraud. If there was
>>some equity or not too large a loss they were inclined to negotiate a
>>deal with the perpetrator under the threat of criminal prosecution.
>>
>>So while Jon's wife was being housed and fed by the Great State of
>>Florida Jon moved ("in a hurry") only to end up penniless in Arizona.

If Banquer said he owned 100 rental units, that translates to - drove
by 1 rental unit 100 times-

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 3:58:27 PM7/27/15

to

On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 12:49:55 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 3:59:08 PM7/27/15

to

On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 12:47:27 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

Rudy Canoza

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 4:06:10 PM7/27/15

to

Haw haw haw! That's fucking hilarious!

"I am an unemployed internet legend. I am banned from every CAD/CAM or
CNC forum in existence. I love to pretend I'm important."

And then, at a linked site:

"About me: I sweep floors for WalMart. If you drop a jar of pickles,
I'm the guy they call. I also change the cakes in the urinals and empty
the diaper pails."

Okay, serious question: which one do you more enjoy savaging, jonny
bonkers or Deputy Pinocchio? With the vast Cliff Notes archive on
Deputy Pinocchio, I imagine it's a little more work to rip bonkers a new
one, but that may also make it more satisfying.

Rudy Canoza

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 4:12:52 PM7/27/15

to

On 7/26/2015 10:19 PM, brew...@aol.com wrote:
> Jon's wife Constance Banquer spent a couple of years in a Florida
> prison for ID Theft, Grand Theft and probably a few other charges.
>
> http://www.dc.state.fl.us/InmateReleases/detail.asp?Bookmark=1&From=list&SessionID=406249443

Updated:
http://www.dc.state.fl.us/InmateReleases/detail.asp?Bookmark=1&From=list&SessionID=696741392

http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Florida/Indian-River-County-FL/Constance-L-Banquer.1845737.html

There are some really nice tattoo descriptions at both sites.

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 4:16:49 PM7/27/15

to

On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 1:06:10 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball using one of his hundreds of aliases failed again:

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 4:17:28 PM7/27/15

to

It's a tough call, but I have to give the nod to Wieber. He's
threatened to sue AND kill me. Which gives me carte blanche to be
merciless. Banquer is very helpless by comparison. All he threatens is
to "own me." He'd have his hands full owning a candy bar.

BTW, those two clowns have badly busted this former truism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_you%27re_a_dog

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 4:20:48 PM7/27/15

to

On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 1:17:28 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

Rudy Canoza

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 4:35:30 PM7/27/15

to

You're right - I failed to take gummer's never-ending string of death
threats into account. I forget when he first (emptily) threatened me
with death, but I have to think it was at least eight years ago.

> BTW, those two clowns have badly busted this former truism
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_you%27re_a_dog
>

That's a great cartoon. I have a temporary "subscription" to the New
Yorker, and I really enjoy it.

Ed Huntress

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 5:08:28 PM7/27/15

to

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:06:07 -0700, Rudy Canoza
<LaLaLa...@philhendrie.con> wrote:

Whoyakidding's Cliff Notes are classics, and beyond compare. However,
a few people have compiled some fun collections of Bonkerisms,
including this one:

>"Without a doubt SaladWorks is a complete piece of ****" - Jon Banquer
> - May 21, 2006

> "SolidWorks is consuming every available minute of my learning time
>right now." - Jon Banquer - Aug 12, 2007

> "I've been away from SolidWorks for almost ten years. The program has
>changed so much in ten years that I'm still way behind where I need to
>be." - Jon Banquer - Aug. 26, 2007

> ----------------------------------------
> "For the record I like SolidWorks" Jon Banquer April 10, 1998

> "I'd hate to be using SolidWorks" -Jon Banquer - Jan 15, 2005

> ----------------------------------------
> "OneCNC looks good." - Jon Banquer - Aug 31 2003

> "OneCNC has a good product" - Jon Banquer - May 11 2005

> "OneCNC is so bad that it can't be sold" - Jon Banquer - June 30,
>2007
> ----------------------------------------------
> "May I remind you that your an anonymous loser who is too chicken
>**** to post with his own name." - Jon Banquer - Dec 24 2006

> Franco Folini UPDATE -- July 8, 2007 -- "Jon didn't respect our
> agreement, posting comments under fake names."
> -------------------------------
> SolidWorks 2007 Bible "the content is just superb!" - Jon Banquer-
>Aug 8, 2007

> To the author SolidWorks 2007 Bible "I should knock down 200 or so
> pages this week. Which still won't get me to Multibodies! Just
>****ing ridiculous, Matt." - Jon Banquer - Aug 19-2007
> -----------------------------------
> "John Carroll is probably the best thing that has ever happened to
> U.S. Vero" - Jon Banquer- June 16, 2001

> "the type of scumbag that John Carroll is... which is why he can't
> sell jack ****" - Jon Banquer- Sept 13, 2012
> ------------------------------------
> "You never chain geometry in Gibbs or SmartCAM. It's not necessary."
> Jon Banquer - May 20, 2005

> >From the SmartCAM Manual "Create the elements in any order, and
> sequence them later, using modeling tools such as Chain."
> --------------------------------------
> "I would strongly suggest you buy The SolidWorks Bible. It will give
> you many insights into how SolidWorks works" - Jon Banquer - Aug 19,
> 2007

> "For all your talk about design intent it's amazing how few examples
> you actually give in the SolidWorks Bible on design intent. Why is
> that ****tard?" - Jon Banquer - July 14, 2007
> ----------------------------------------
> "The program is a buggy, overpriced under performing, POS that is a
> tribute to Bill Gibbs enormous ego" - Jon Banquer -
>
> "Love those GibbsCAM Machining Markers! Great idea" - Jon Banquer -
> ---------------------------------------------------
> "Need I remind you that it's you who is too much of a pussy to say a
> word to Bill Gibbs on how you really feel about his claims of no
> chaining." - Jon Banquer - July 15, 2007

> "Last time I saw Bill Gibbs at a trade show he almost pissed in his
> pants... I went out of my way to be polite and not disturb his
> presentation." - Jon Banquer - Aug 11, 2007
>=====================================
>LOL!
>I think some of those dates are from cross-posted replies, but who
>knows.

>Yes, this is pretty cheesy entertainment, but there's something
>satisfying about harpooning a complete phony -- like Jon the Phony
>Banquer.
>Which reminds me of a Banquer post that reminds me about just how
>flakey this guy is:
>===========================================
>[Jon Banquer replying to Ed Huntress]:
>Ed,
>The newsgroup badly needs someone who is as articulate as you are.
>Keep me on my toes and correct me where ever you think it's
>appropriate,as I respect what you have to say based on what you have
>already posted. I will certainly take the time to think about whatever
>correction, advice, etc. you post. - Jon Banquer - Jun 23, 2002
>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.machines.cnc/v9HpyewLf_I/t2qa5vNd-rQJ
>=============================================
>You bettcha, Jon!
>
>OMFG that was hilarious!
>
>===================================
>"Reading "whoyakidding" nail Gunner on a daily basis on all the lies
>Gunner has told over many years on Usenet is easily the highlight of
>this newsgroup for me." Jon Banquer, Jan 2, 2013
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/msg/18302126bc6be21d

>"This is yet another one of KiddingNoOne's many lies." Jon Banquer,
>Apr 3, 2013
>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.cad.solidworks/msg/7aa25a0cfef810a4

--
Ed Huntress

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 5:31:31 PM7/27/15

to

On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 2:08:28 PM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:

Rudy Canoza

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 6:17:41 PM7/27/15

to

Ha ha ha ha ha! He reminds me (in more ways than one) of Willy Loman.

"Chevrolet, Linda, is the greatest car ever built."

"That goddamn Chevrolet, they ought to prohibit the manufacture of that
car!"

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 27, 2015, 6:30:22 PM7/27/15

to

On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 3:17:41 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball using one of his hundreds of aliases failed:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 28, 2015, 10:19:51 PM7/28/15

to

Almost forgot :>)

Today's mugshot is Al Unser brother of Bobby Unser:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/celebrity/sports/al-unser

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 2:24:27 PM7/30/15

to

Today's mugshot is Jimmy Connors:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/celebrity/sports/jimmy-connors

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 7:05:41 PM7/30/15

to

Today's Banquer fan site is

http://www.cnczone.com/forums/news-announcements/137002-mastercam-software.html

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 7:15:13 PM7/30/15

to

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 4:05:41 PM UTC-7, Captain Obvious failed:

Ed Huntress

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 7:25:40 PM7/30/15

to

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:24:21 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

And here's today's shot of Bonkers' mug:

https://twitter.com/Jon_Banquer/status/177594952614805505/photo/1

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 7:33:21 PM7/30/15

to

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 4:25:40 PM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:

Ed Huntress

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 7:52:51 PM7/30/15

to

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 4:25:40 PM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:

Oh, we almost missed the Jonny Bonkers Quote of the Day:

> "May I remind you that your an anonymous loser who is too chicken
>**** to post with his own name." - Jon Banquer - Dec 24 2006

> Franco Folini UPDATE -- July 8, 2007 -- "Jon didn't respect our
> agreement, posting comments under fake names."

ba-dum-bum-CHING ...

--
Ed Huntress

Rudy Canoza

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 7:59:07 PM7/30/15

to

LOL! I have to assume that's a bogus Twitter page?

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 8:03:42 PM7/30/15

to

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 4:52:51 PM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 8:04:20 PM7/30/15

to

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 4:59:07 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball using one of his hundreds of aliases failed:

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 8:06:09 PM7/30/15

to

Banquer seems to be fine with PV posting anonymously as well. This
thing he's doing now of posting one word responses will not go well
for him. He's holding back day after day, and the pressure will have
to be released eventually. Ever mixed a bunch of old paint? I see
Banquer as a drum of it that will end up as a giant psychedelic splat.

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 8:09:54 PM7/30/15

to

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 5:06:09 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

Ed Huntress

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 9:25:29 PM7/30/15

to

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:06:52 -0700, Captain Obvious
<cpt...@yippee.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:52:45 -0400, Ed Huntress
><hunt...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>><jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 4:25:40 PM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:
>>
>>Oh, we almost missed the Jonny Bonkers Quote of the Day:
>>
>>> "May I remind you that your an anonymous loser who is too chicken
>>>**** to post with his own name." - Jon Banquer - Dec 24 2006
>>
>>> Franco Folini UPDATE -- July 8, 2007 -- "Jon didn't respect our
>>> agreement, posting comments under fake names."
>>
>>ba-dum-bum-CHING ...
>
>Banquer seems to be fine with PV posting anonymously as well.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend, sort of.

>This thing he's doing now of posting one word responses will not go well
>for him. He's holding back day after day, and the pressure will have
>to be released eventually. Ever mixed a bunch of old paint? I see
>Banquer as a drum of it that will end up as a giant psychedelic splat.

Bonkers is in his ostrich mode. If' he keeps clucking, maybe no one
will see what people are saying about him.

--
Ed Huntress

Ed Huntress

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 9:27:40 PM7/30/15

to

I guess it depends on what you mean by "bogus." <g>

It's one of the various monuments that Jon's vast array of Internet
buddies have left around cyberspace to signify just what they think of
him.

--
Ed Huntress

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 10:36:03 PM7/30/15

to

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 6:25:29 PM UTC-7, slow eddy lied:

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 10:36:32 PM7/30/15

to

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 6:27:40 PM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:

David R. Birch

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 11:08:29 PM7/30/15

to

On 7/30/2015 8:25 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:

> Bonkers is in his ostrich mode. If' he keeps clucking, maybe no one
> will see what people are saying about him.

More likely, while his head is in the sand, someone will approach from
the rear and drop their, and his, trousers. I wonder if he'd object?

David

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 30, 2015, 11:11:31 PM7/30/15

to

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 8:08:29 PM UTC-7, David R. Bitch failed:

Captain Obvious

unread,

Jul 31, 2015, 10:03:39 AM7/31/15

to

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:25:24 -0400, Ed Huntress

<hunt...@optonline.net> wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:06:52 -0700, Captain Obvious
><cpt...@yippee.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:52:45 -0400, Ed Huntress
>><hunt...@optonline.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>>><jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 4:25:40 PM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:
>>>
>>>Oh, we almost missed the Jonny Bonkers Quote of the Day:
>>>
>>>> "May I remind you that your an anonymous loser who is too chicken
>>>>**** to post with his own name." - Jon Banquer - Dec 24 2006
>>>
>>>> Franco Folini UPDATE -- July 8, 2007 -- "Jon didn't respect our
>>>> agreement, posting comments under fake names."
>>>
>>>ba-dum-bum-CHING ...
>>
>>Banquer seems to be fine with PV posting anonymously as well.
>
>The enemy of my enemy is my friend, sort of.

<sob> Why can't they be happy for me? :) Geez do they ever get pissed
when I describe the good life. I should write more along those lines,
I might be able to get them slobbering enough to short out their
keyboards.

>>This thing he's doing now of posting one word responses will not go well
>>for him. He's holding back day after day, and the pressure will have
>>to be released eventually. Ever mixed a bunch of old paint? I see
>>Banquer as a drum of it that will end up as a giant psychedelic splat.
>
>Bonkers is in his ostrich mode. If' he keeps clucking, maybe no one
>will see what people are saying about him.

LOL I think he's hoping the one word responses will be sufficiently
less antagonizing, thereby saving him from further embarrassing
revelations. Which while goofy is his best strategy so far. Problem
is, Banquer is like a drug addict. He won't be able to resist for
long. Based on his history I have no doubt he'll write himself into an
even more miserable life. He knows his clown car is headed off a
cliff, but he can't lift that giant shoe off the gas pedal.

jon_banquer

unread,

Jul 31, 2015, 10:19:19 AM7/31/15

to

On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 7:03:39 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied: