After Anne Frank exposed as a fraud, Jews go crazy digging through trash to save face.

[Bruce Denker]

JERUSALEM -- Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial says
researchers excavating the remains of one of the most notorious
Nazi death camps have uncovered a pendant that appears identical
to one belonging to Anne Frank.

Yad Vashem says Sunday it has ascertained the pendant belonged
to Karoline Cohn - a Jewish girl who perished at Sobibor and may
have known the famous diarist. Like Frank, Cohn was born in
Frankfurt in 1929. Researchers are trying to confirm whether
they were related.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/anne-frank-karoline-cohn-sobibor-
excavation/


The Anne Frank Diary Fraud

The Anne Frank Diary Fraud
By Charley Reese on January 12, 2010


Introduction – Rixon Stewart February 22, 2006

In today’s London Times Daniel Finkelstien reflects on David
Irving’s sentencing and asks: “The test that David Irving set
me: do I really believe in the power of truth?”

The answer to that is an emphatic no. If anything Finkelstien is
working in the opposite direction. This becomes apparent half-
way through the article when he writes: “With her own eyes, my
mother saw Anne Frank arrive in Belsen (she knew the family),
yet still Irving and people like him contend that Frank’s story
is fake.”

The Anne Frank story may not be an outright fake but as Brian
Harring reveals in the article below, it is an elaborate piece
of story telling. However, the fact that Finkelstien uses it to
condemn Irving says all there is to say about his detractors and
Finkelsteim’s belief in the “power of truth.”

So we should be wary when Finkelstien concludes: “no David
Irving should not be in jail. We can do better than that. I wish
I could tell you that the Irving trial is the only way in which
my belief in the power of truth is being tested.”

Here Finkelstiem’s apparent balance and restaint is being used
as a ruse to further beguile the reader into believing his
deceit. Just as the Anne Frank story was contrived, so
Finkelstiem’s article is little more than fiction and his
concern for the “truth” an attempt to bolster its credibility.

In fact the Times itself has become a Zionist propaganda
mouthpiece that often resorts to lies to make its point. Last
year it described Israel Shamir, a former Israeli paratrooper
now a writer and political activist as “a Swedish-domiciled anti-
Semite also known as Jöran Jermas”. Now, as revealed below, it
uses an proven fake to bolster the case against Historical
Revisionists.


The Anne Frank Diary Fraud
by Brian Harring – TBR News.org

When Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote Uncle Tom’s Cabin, she did so
prompted by the highest of motives. Yet she, herself, relates
the incident that when she first met Abraham Lincoln in 1863, he
commented “So you are the little woman who wrote the book that
made this great war!”


Few will deny that the printed word in this instance fanned the
flames of passion which brought about one of the bloodiest and
saddest wars of American history, with brother sometimes pitted
against brother, father against son. Perhaps if there had been
less appeal to the emotions the problems might have resolved
themselves through peaceful means. However, almost universally
read at the time, few people then recognized the potency of one
small book or the injustice done the South through its wide
acceptance as a fair picture of slavery in the South.


Propaganda, as a weapon of psychological warfare is in even
wider use today. Communists were masters of the art. Often they
used the direct approach; just as often they employed diversion
tactics to focus the eyes and ears of the world in directions
other than where the real conflict was being waged. For many
years, through propaganda alone, the dead threat of Hitler and
Nazism had been constantly held before the public in a diversion
maneuver to keep attention from being directed against the live
threat of Stalin, Khrushchev and Communism.


Such has been the effect, if not the deliberate intention of
many who have promoted its distribution, of a book of popular
appeal-The Diary Of Anne Frank. It has been sold to the public
as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl who died in a Nazi
concentration camp after two years of abuse and horror.


Many Americans have read the book or seen the movie version, and
have been deeply moved by the real life drama it claims to
present. But have we been misled in the belief that Anne Frank
actually wrote this diary? And if so. should an author be
permitted to produce a work of fiction and sell it to the world
as fact, particularly one of such tremendous emotional appeal?


The Swedish journal Frio Ord published two articles commenting
on The Diary of Anne Frank. A condensation of these articles
appeared in the April 15, 1959 issue of Economic Council Letter,
as follows:


“History has many examples of myths that live a longer and
richer life than truth. and may become more effective than truth.


The Western world has for some years hem made aware of a young
Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to he her
personally written story, “Anne Frank’s Diary.” Any informed
literary inspection of this book has shown it to have been
impossible as the work of a teenager.


A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms
this point of view, in that the well known American writer,
Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50.000 to be paid him by the
father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the
“Anne Frank Diary.”


Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, had promised to pay to prominent
Jewish author, Meyer Levin. not less than $50,000 because he had
used the literary creation of author Levin in toto, and
represented it to his publisher and the public as his late
daughter’s original work.


Inquiry of the County Clerk. New York County. as to the facts of
the case referred to in the Swedish press, brought a reply on
April 23, 1962, giving the name of a New York firm of lawyers as
“attorneys .far the respondent.” Reference was to ”The Dairy of
Anne Frank 2203-58.”


A letter to this firm brought a response on May 4, 1962 that
“Although we represent Mr. Levin in other matters, we had
nothing to do with the Anne Frank case.”


On May 7, 1962, came the following reply from a member of a firm
of New York lawyers to whom the original inquiry had been
forwarded:


“I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto
Frank and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin
$50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was
later set aside by the trial justice. Hon. Samuel C. Coleman. on
the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner
required by law. The action was subsequently settled between the
litigating parties, while an appeal from Judge Coleman’s
decision was pending.


I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so
far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman’s decision, is
concerned. Certain procedural matters were reported. both in 141
New York Supplement. Second Series 170. and in 5 Second Series
181. The correct file number in the New York County Clerk‘s
office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full
one which must include Judge Coleman’s decision. Unfortunately,
our file is in storage and 1 cannot locate a copy of that
decision as it appeared in the New York Law Journal early in the
year 1960.”


The Diary Of Anne Frank was first published in 1952 and
immediately became a bestseller. It has been republished in
paperback, 40 printings. It is impossible to estimate how many
people have been touched and aroused by the movie production.


Why has the trial involving the father of Anne Frank, bearing
directly on the authenticity of this book, never been
“officially reported”? In royalties alone, Otto Frank has
profited richly from the sale of this book, purporting to depict
the tragic life of his daughter. But is it fact, or is it
fiction? Is it truth or is it propaganda? Or is it a combination
of all of these? And to what degree does it wrongfully appeal to
the emotions through a misrepresentation as to its origin?


School publications for years have recommended this book for
young people, presenting it as the work of Anne Frank.
Advertising in advance of the movie showing has played up the
“factual” nature of the drama being presented. Do not writers of
such editorials and promoters of such advertising, “fan the
flames of hate” they rightly profess to deplore?


Many American Jews were shocked at the handling of the Eichmann
case, the distortions contained in the book Exodus and its movie
counterpart, but their protests have had little publicity
outside of their own organ, Issues, by the American Council for
Judaism. Others who have expressed the same convictions have
been charged with anti-Semitism. Yet it is to be noted that both
Otto Frank and his accuser Meyer Levin, were Jewish, so a
similar charge would hardly be applicable in pursuing this
subject to an honest conclusion..


File number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk’s office
should be opened to the public view and its content thoroughly
publicized. Misrepresentation, exaggeration, and falsification
has too often colored the judgment of good citizens. If Mr.
Frank used the work of Meyer Levin to present to the world what
we have been led to believe is the literary work of his
daughter, wholly or in part, then the truth should be exposed.


To label fiction as fact is never justified nor should it be
condoned.


Since actual period documentation does not exist in support of
the Holocaust myth, it has always been incumbent on its
supporters to create it.


Not only is the “Anne Frank” diary now considered to be a fake,
so also is “The Painted Bird” by Jerzy Kosinski. This book,
which is a mass of pornographic and sadistic imagery which, had
it not been taken so seriously by the Jewish community, would be
merely the pathetic manifestation of a self-serving and very
sick person.


This was duly exposed as a shabby, though much revered (by the
Jewish community) and quoted, fraud. When this was exposed,
Kosinski committed suicide. Later, in Kosinski’s footsteps we
find the next fiction entitled “Fragments, ” by a Swiss
Protestant named Bruno Dosseker who spent the war in Switzerland
as a young child. Dosseker posed as a very young Baltic Jewish
concentration camp inmate named Binjamin Wilkomerski. This work
consists of allegedly fragmented “memories” and is very
difficult to read


Dosseker became the poster boy for the Holocaust supporters and
was lionized by the international Jewish community, reaping
considerable profit and many in-house awards for his wonderful
and moving portrayal of German brutality and sexual sadism.


Another book, allegedly by a Hungarian doctor, concerning his
deportation from Budapest in 1944 and subsequent journey by
“Death Train” to Auschwitz is another fraud. There was never
such a doctor in Hungary during the period involved and the
alleged route of the train from Budapest to Auschwitz did not
exist.


These sort of pathetic refugees from the back wards seem to be
drawn to the Holocausters…and they to them. There are now
“Holocaust Survivors” as young as thirty which is an interesting
anomaly because the last concentration camp was closed in 1945.
Perhaps they consider the last frenzied spring sale at
Bloomingdale’s department store to be what they survived.


Next we can expect to see a book based on twenty-seven volumes
of secret diaries prepared on a modern word processor within the
current year by an alleged inhabitant of the Warsaw ghetto,
describing the Nazi slaughter of tens of millions of weeping
Jews by means that would shame a modern African state.


And, predictably, the publication of these howlers would be
greeted with joy on the part of the fund raisers and fanatics,
praised in the columns of the New York Times and scripted by
Steven Spielberg for a heart-wrenching and guaranteed Oscar-
winning film.


Hundreds of thousands of DVD copies will be donated to American
schools and the Jewish community will demand that subservient
executive and legislative bodies in America create a Day of
Atonement as a National Holiday to balance the terrible
Christian Christmas and the wickedly Satanic Halloween.


Conservationists must hate these books because so many otherwise
beautiful and useful trees are slaughtered for their preparation


Insofar as the Anne Frank diary is concerned, herewith is some
background on Anne Frank, her family and her alleged Diary.


The Franks were upper class German Jews, both coming from
wealthy families. Otto and his siblings lived on the exclusive
Meronstrasse in Frankfurt. Otto attended a private prep school,
and also attended the Lessing Gymnasium, the most expensive
school in Frankfurt.


Otto attended Heidelberg University. After graduation he left
for a long vacation in England.


In 1909, the 20 year old Otto went to New York City where he
stayed with his relatives, the Oppenheimers.


In 1925 Anne’s parents married and settled in Frankfurt,
Germany. Anne was born in 1929. The Frank’s family business
included banking, management of the springs at Bad Soden and the
manufacture of cough drops. Anne’s mother, the former Edith
Holländer, was the daughter of a manufacturer.


In 1934, Otto and his family moved to Amsterdam where he bought
a spice business, Opekta, which manufactures Pectin used in
making household jellies.


On May 1940, after the Germans occupied Amsterdam Otto remained
in that city while his mother and brother moved to Switzerland.
Otto remained in Amsterdam where his firm did business with the
German Wehrmacht. From 1939 to 1944, Otto sold Opeka, and
Pectin, to the German army. Pectin was a food preservative, and
a anti infectant balm for wounds and as a thickener for raising
blood volume in blood transfusions. Pectin was used as an
emulsifier for petroleum, gelatized gasoline for fire bombing.
By supplying the Wehrmacht, Otto Frank became, in the eyes of
the Dutch, a Nazi collaborator.


On July 6, 1942 Otto moved the Frank family into the so-called
‘Secret Annex’. The annex is a three story, mostly glass
townhouse that shares a garden park with fifty other apartments.


While he was allegedly in hiding, Otto Frank still managed his
business, going downstairs to his office at night and on
weekends. Anne and the others would go to Otto’s office and
listen to radio broadcasts from England.


The purported diary begins on June 12, 1942, and runs to
December 5,1942 . It consists of a book that is six by four by a
quarter inches. In addition to this first diary, Anne
supplemented it with personal letters. Otto said Anne heard
Gerrit Bolkestein in a broadcast say: ~ “Keep a diary, and he
would publish after the war”, and that’s why Anne’s father
claimed she rewrote her diaries second time in 1944.


In this second edition, the new writer changed, rearranged and
occasionally combined entries of various dates.


When Anne allegedly rewrote the diaries, she used a ball point
pen, which did not exist in 1945, and the book took on an
extremely high literary standard, and read more like a
professional documentary than a child’s diary. In Anne’s second
edition her writing style, and handwriting, suddenly matured.


The actual diary of Anne Frank contained only about 150 notes,
according to The New York Times, of October 2 ,1955.


In 1944, German authorities in occupied Holland determined that
Otto Frank had been swindling then via his extensive and very
lucrative Wehrmacht contracts. The German police then raided his
apartment attic, and the eight Jews were sent to Westerbork work
camp and forced to perform manual labor .Otto himself was sent
to Auschwitz.. Anne, her sister Margot, and her mother,
subsequently died of typhus in another camp.


In 1945, after being liberated from German custody, Otto
returned to Amsterdam, where he claimed he found Anne’s diary
cleverly hidden in the Annex’s rafters. However, another version
has a Dutch friend, Meip Geis finding Anne’s diary of fictional
events, which she then gave to Otto Frank.


Otto took what he claimed were Anne’s letters and notes, edited
them into a book, which he then gave to his secretary, Isa
Cauvern, to review. Isa Cauvern and her husband Albert Cauvern ,
a writer, authored the first diary.


Questions were raised by some publishers as to whether Isa and
Albert Cauvern, who assisted Otto in typing out the work used
the original diaries or whether they took it directly from Mr.
Frank’s personal transcription.


American author, Meyer Levin wrote the third and final edition


Meyer Levin was an author, and journalist, who lived for many
years in France, where he met Otto Frank around 1949.


Born in 1905, Meyer Levin was raised in the section of Chicago
notoriously known in the days of gangster warfare as the “Bloody
Nineteen Ward.” At the age of eighteen he worked as a reporter
for the Chicago Daily News and during the next four years became
an increasingly frequent contributor to the national literary
magazine, The Menorah Journal. In 1929 he published THE
REPORTER, which was the first of his sixteen novels.


In 1933 Levin became an assistant editor and film critic at the
newly-created Esquire Magazine where he remained until 1939.


Perhaps his best-known work is COMPULSION (1956), chronicling
the Leopold and Loeb case and hailed by critics as one of the
greatest books of the decade. The compelling work was the first
“documentary novel” or “non-fiction novel.”


After the enormous success of COMPULSION, Levin embarked on a
trilogy of novels dealing with the Holocaust. The first, EVA
(1959) was the story of a Jewish girl’s experiences throughout
the war and her adjustment to life after the concentration
camps. This was followed by THE FANATIC (1963), which told the
hypnotic story of a Jewish poet dealing with the moral questions
that arose from his ordeal at the hands of the Nazis. The last
in the triptych, THE STRONGHOLD (1965), is a thriller set in a
concentration camp during the last days of the war.


At the outset of World War II Levin made documentary films for
the US Office of War Information and later worked in France as a
civilian expert in the Psychological Warfare Division. He
eventually became a war correspondent for the Jewish Telegraphic
Agency, with the special mission of uncovering the fate of
Jewish concentration camp prisoners. Levin took his role very
seriously, sometimes entering concentration camps ahead of the
tanks of the liberating forces in order to compile lists of the
survivors.


After the war Levin went to Palestine and turned his attention
again to the motion picture camera. His film MY FATHER’S HOUSE
told the story of a child survivor searching for his family in
Palestine. He wrote this story as a novel as well and the book
was published in 1947.


Levin also joined the Hagana underground and helped smuggle Jews
from the interior of Poland to Palestine, then basically an Arab
country under the control of the British..


In 1951 Levin came upon a copy of the French edition of the Anne
Frank diary He made a number of attempts to have the work
published in English, and conceived it as a play and film. When
the diary finally found an American publisher, his play was
accepted for production but then suddenly barred, ostensibly for
being “unstageworthy,” and another writer’s version was
commissioned.


Levin fought for the rights to perform his version of the play,
claiming that the real reason the producers refused to stage his
work was because they thought it “too Jewish.” He saw the
suppression of the play as an extension of the Stalinist attack
on Jewish culture and, outraged that even Anne Frank could be
censored, he took the producers to court and began an agonizing,
prolonged struggle that dragged on for years.


Levin eventually won a jury award against the producers for
appropriation of ideas, but the bitterness of the trial made him
many enemies in the Jewish and literary communities.


Although Levin’s version of the play is still banned by the
owners of the dramatic rights, underground productions of the
work are frequently staged throughout the world.

Meyer Levin died in 1981


Levin rewrote the various post-war treatments of the Anne Frank
diary with an eye toward a Broadway production, but Otto decided
to cut him out, refusing to honor his contract or pay him for
his work. Meyer Levin sued Otto Frank for his writings, and the
New York Supreme court awarded Meyer Levin $50,000, for his
‘intellectual work’.


In 1980, Otto sued two Germans, Ernst Romer and Edgar Geiss, for
distributing literature denouncing the diary as a forgery. The
trial produced a study by official German handwriting experts
that determined everything in the diary was written by the same
person. The person that wrote the diaries had used a ballpoint
pen throughout. Unfortunately for Herr Frank, the ballpoint pen
was not available until 1951 whereas Anne was known to have died
of typhus in 1944.


Because of the lawsuit in a German court, the German state
forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA] forensically
examined the manuscript, which at that point in time consisted
of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound in a
fourth notebook, with special forensic equipment.


The results of tests, performed at the BKA laboratories, showed
that “significant” portions of the work, especially the fourth
volume, were written with a ballpoint pen. Since ballpoint pens
were not available before 1951, the BKA concluded those sections
must have been added subsequently.


In the end, BKA clearly determined that none of the diary
handwriting matched known examples of Anne’s handwriting. The
German magazine, Der Spiegel, published an account of this
report alleging that (a) some editing postdated 1951; (b) an
earlier expert had held that all the writing in the journal was
by the same hand; and thus (c) the entire diary was a postwar
fake.


The BKA information, at the urgent request of the Jewish
community, was redacted at the time but later inadvertently
released to researchers in the United States.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=4297
 

[Mr. B1ack]

Trump put the bust of CHURCHILL back on display, next
to MLKs. He did NOT add a bust of Hitler too.

So piss off fascist, you're not wanted.