info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
So is Clinton Foundation under investigation or not?
14 views
Skip to first unread message
raykeller
Aug 14, 2016, 10:41:36 PM8/14/16
to
http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/so-is-clinton-foundation-under-investigation-or-not/
So is Clinton Foundation under investigation or not?
Exclusive: Joseph Farah wonders if Obama will indict Hillary, stay in White
House
By Joseph Farah
First we were told the FBI was investigating the shockingly apparent
violations of ethics and the law involving Bill and Hillary Clinton's misuse
of her office and the Clinton Foundation they use as a personal tax-exempt
piggybank.
Then we were told by FBI Director James Comey his agency was not.
Now we're being told once again, by an "unnamed senior official" it is.
What are we to believe about this?
I have two guesses, based on the unscrupulous history of the Democratic
Party, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton:
a.. This is an administration leak designed to make Americans believe
there can actually be blind justice when it comes to the crimes of powerful
members of the Democratic Party. That's what the sham investigation by Comey
into Hillary's emails amounted to at the end of the day. She got off without
any charges for crimes that would have landed just about anyone else in
prison and disgrace. Probably this "investigation" will end the same way.
You won't hear any more about it until long after Election Day. This Justice
Department is misnamed. It should be called the Injustice Department.
a.. But there is another possibility, even more sinister, perhaps.
Suppose - just suppose now - that Obama is hedging his bets. What if he is
actually using this FBI and this Injustice Department to do a real
investigation intended to maintain his position as president? I have
previously speculated, and that's all it is I admit openly, pure informed
speculation, that Obama has not completely abandoned the idea of remaining
president past Jan. 20, 2017. The earlier speculation focused on what would
happen if Donald Trump won the election. You can read those two columns here
and here.
How would this latter plan work if Hillary won the election?
It's no secret that there's never been any love lost between the Obamas and
the Clintons. They were fierce competitors in 2008. It was she and her
campaign that first raised the eligibility question. It was Obama who played
the "race card" against the Clintons, in the words of Bill himself in that
campaign. She did him no favors as secretary of state - accomplishing
nothing but scandalous activity, officially and unofficially, in her brief
tenure in the job.
So what if - and it's a big "if" - Obama is holding something back? Suppose
he has actually authorized a probe of what she did as secretary of state to
benefit herself and the Clinton Foundation.
Is it possible he might use the findings - and, believe me, they are not
hard to find - to indict her between Election Day and Jan. 17, while he is
still president?
If she is indicted on serious charges, she will not be permitted to take the
oath of office. Neither will Tim Kaine be permitted to assume the office of
the president because he will not yet be vice president.
The whole thing will create a constitutional crisis. The next in line, House
Speaker Paul Ryan, will not be allowed to assume the presidency, either,
because there is a sitting president.
What might Obama do? He might declare a national emergency that permits him
to remain in power until another election is held. Or, he might even stay on
while and turn things over to the person he preferred to succeed him all
along - Vice President Joe Biden. Or, he might even try to stay in power for
another four years.
If this admittedly unlikely and far-fetched scenario occurs, it will
demonstrate that Obama has been planning it for quite some time. That's why
I'm telling you about the remote possibility now.
Had Hillary been indicted during the campaign, as she should have been, this
whole scenario would not have been possible. The Democrats would have been
forced to nominate another candidate - probably Bernie Sanders. Of course,
we know the Democratic Party establishment would not have allowed that under
any circumstances.
Think about it.
The polls show Obama, despite his breaches of the Constitution, despite his
flouting of the law, despite his inflammatory rhetoric on race, despite his
war on cops, despite his shocking foreign-policy failures, despite his
flailing economy hanging on a thread, despite his lies about Obamacare,
remains popular with a majority of the American public - especially the
low-information voter.
The Big Media love him. Only the alternative media challenge him.
The Republican Congress has never challenged him - not on anything. Would
you really expect it to begin in the heat of a "national emergency"?
The so-called "progressives," with the possible exception of the Bernie
Sanders crowd, would love it. And, in fact, the deal would probably honor
Bernie in some way to mollify them.
While the Constitution prohibits Obama from being elected to a third term,
it doesn't speak to a non-elected third term.
Trump says the election is rigged. Maybe he just doesn't even know how right
he is.
So is Clinton Foundation under investigation or not?
Exclusive: Joseph Farah wonders if Obama will indict Hillary, stay in White
House
By Joseph Farah
First we were told the FBI was investigating the shockingly apparent
violations of ethics and the law involving Bill and Hillary Clinton's misuse
of her office and the Clinton Foundation they use as a personal tax-exempt
piggybank.
Then we were told by FBI Director James Comey his agency was not.
Now we're being told once again, by an "unnamed senior official" it is.
What are we to believe about this?
I have two guesses, based on the unscrupulous history of the Democratic
Party, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton:
a.. This is an administration leak designed to make Americans believe
there can actually be blind justice when it comes to the crimes of powerful
members of the Democratic Party. That's what the sham investigation by Comey
into Hillary's emails amounted to at the end of the day. She got off without
any charges for crimes that would have landed just about anyone else in
prison and disgrace. Probably this "investigation" will end the same way.
You won't hear any more about it until long after Election Day. This Justice
Department is misnamed. It should be called the Injustice Department.
a.. But there is another possibility, even more sinister, perhaps.
Suppose - just suppose now - that Obama is hedging his bets. What if he is
actually using this FBI and this Injustice Department to do a real
investigation intended to maintain his position as president? I have
previously speculated, and that's all it is I admit openly, pure informed
speculation, that Obama has not completely abandoned the idea of remaining
president past Jan. 20, 2017. The earlier speculation focused on what would
happen if Donald Trump won the election. You can read those two columns here
and here.
How would this latter plan work if Hillary won the election?
It's no secret that there's never been any love lost between the Obamas and
the Clintons. They were fierce competitors in 2008. It was she and her
campaign that first raised the eligibility question. It was Obama who played
the "race card" against the Clintons, in the words of Bill himself in that
campaign. She did him no favors as secretary of state - accomplishing
nothing but scandalous activity, officially and unofficially, in her brief
tenure in the job.
So what if - and it's a big "if" - Obama is holding something back? Suppose
he has actually authorized a probe of what she did as secretary of state to
benefit herself and the Clinton Foundation.
Is it possible he might use the findings - and, believe me, they are not
hard to find - to indict her between Election Day and Jan. 17, while he is
still president?
If she is indicted on serious charges, she will not be permitted to take the
oath of office. Neither will Tim Kaine be permitted to assume the office of
the president because he will not yet be vice president.
The whole thing will create a constitutional crisis. The next in line, House
Speaker Paul Ryan, will not be allowed to assume the presidency, either,
because there is a sitting president.
What might Obama do? He might declare a national emergency that permits him
to remain in power until another election is held. Or, he might even stay on
while and turn things over to the person he preferred to succeed him all
along - Vice President Joe Biden. Or, he might even try to stay in power for
another four years.
If this admittedly unlikely and far-fetched scenario occurs, it will
demonstrate that Obama has been planning it for quite some time. That's why
I'm telling you about the remote possibility now.
Had Hillary been indicted during the campaign, as she should have been, this
whole scenario would not have been possible. The Democrats would have been
forced to nominate another candidate - probably Bernie Sanders. Of course,
we know the Democratic Party establishment would not have allowed that under
any circumstances.
Think about it.
The polls show Obama, despite his breaches of the Constitution, despite his
flouting of the law, despite his inflammatory rhetoric on race, despite his
war on cops, despite his shocking foreign-policy failures, despite his
flailing economy hanging on a thread, despite his lies about Obamacare,
remains popular with a majority of the American public - especially the
low-information voter.
The Big Media love him. Only the alternative media challenge him.
The Republican Congress has never challenged him - not on anything. Would
you really expect it to begin in the heat of a "national emergency"?
The so-called "progressives," with the possible exception of the Bernie
Sanders crowd, would love it. And, in fact, the deal would probably honor
Bernie in some way to mollify them.
While the Constitution prohibits Obama from being elected to a third term,
it doesn't speak to a non-elected third term.
Trump says the election is rigged. Maybe he just doesn't even know how right
he is.
mog...@hotmail.com
Aug 15, 2016, 8:24:39 AM8/15/16
to
On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 10:41:35 PM UTC-4, raykeller wrote:
> http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/so-is-clinton-foundation-under-investigation-or-not/
>
> So is Clinton Foundation under investigation or not?
> Exclusive: Joseph Farah wonders if Obama will indict Hillary, stay in White
> House
The government has studied "politically motivated" investigations under undemocratic rule and refuses to copy the practice. Sorry.
> http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/so-is-clinton-foundation-under-investigation-or-not/
>
> So is Clinton Foundation under investigation or not?
> Exclusive: Joseph Farah wonders if Obama will indict Hillary, stay in White
> House
Governor Swill
Aug 15, 2016, 12:35:23 PM8/15/16
to
On Sun, 14 Aug Winston_Smith wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Aug raykeller@looser_losers.com> wrote:
>>http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/so-is-clinton-foundation-under-investigation-or-not/
>>So is Clinton Foundation under investigation or not?
>On Sun, 14 Aug raykeller@looser_losers.com> wrote:
>>http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/so-is-clinton-foundation-under-investigation-or-not/
>>So is Clinton Foundation under investigation or not?
>>First we were told the FBI was investigating the shockingly apparent
>>violations of ethics and the law involving Bill and Hillary Clinton's misuse
>>of her office and the Clinton Foundation they use as a personal tax-exempt
>>piggybank.
>>Then we were told by FBI Director James Comey his agency was not.
>>Now we're being told once again, by an "unnamed senior official" it is.
>>What are we to believe about this?
>
>That there is a war going on between factions in the FBI.
>>violations of ethics and the law involving Bill and Hillary Clinton's misuse
>>of her office and the Clinton Foundation they use as a personal tax-exempt
>>piggybank.
>>Then we were told by FBI Director James Comey his agency was not.
>>Now we're being told once again, by an "unnamed senior official" it is.
>>What are we to believe about this?
>
Power struggle perhaps, but "war"?
Swill
--
#imwithher
You can lead a wingnut to knowledge but you can't make him
learn.
PaxPerPoten
Aug 15, 2016, 6:13:04 PM8/15/16
to
On 8/15/2016 11:35 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug Winston_Smith wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Aug raykeller@looser_losers.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/so-is-clinton-foundation-under-investigation-or-not/
>>> So is Clinton Foundation under investigation or not?
>>> First we were told the FBI was investigating the shockingly apparent
>>> violations of ethics and the law involving Bill and Hillary Clinton's misuse
>>> of her office and the Clinton Foundation they use as a personal tax-exempt
>>> piggybank.
>>> Then we were told by FBI Director James Comey his agency was not.
>>> Now we're being told once again, by an "unnamed senior official" it is.
>>> What are we to believe about this?
>>
>> That there is a war going on between factions in the FBI.
>
> Power struggle perhaps, but "war"?
It loks like a power struggle between Obama's orders to ignore Hillary's
> On Sun, 14 Aug Winston_Smith wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Aug raykeller@looser_losers.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/so-is-clinton-foundation-under-investigation-or-not/
>>> So is Clinton Foundation under investigation or not?
>>> First we were told the FBI was investigating the shockingly apparent
>>> violations of ethics and the law involving Bill and Hillary Clinton's misuse
>>> of her office and the Clinton Foundation they use as a personal tax-exempt
>>> piggybank.
>>> Then we were told by FBI Director James Comey his agency was not.
>>> Now we're being told once again, by an "unnamed senior official" it is.
>>> What are we to believe about this?
>>
>> That there is a war going on between factions in the FBI.
>
> Power struggle perhaps, but "war"?
activities and appointed insiders, that want to either do the right
thing/or Want to just cleanse America of the Klinton Corruption in favor
of the GOP Corruption.
>
> Swill
>
--
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard
the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all
ages who mean to govern well, but *They mean to govern*. They promise to
be good masters, *but they mean to be masters*. Daniel Webster
mog...@hotmail.com
Aug 16, 2016, 10:07:56 AM8/16/16
to
On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 9:42:35 AM UTC-4, Mr. B1ack wrote:
> But this sounds like a "politically DE-motivated" investigation,
> a deliberate effort NOT to investigate something because the
> existing political authorities don't WANT it investigated. Obama
> and the Dems do NOT want anything evil revealed about HRC
What's wrong? Can't the great Paul Ryan congress finally close the deal (the GOP has only had 24 years to make something stick).
> a deliberate effort NOT to investigate something because the
> existing political authorities don't WANT it investigated. Obama
> and the Dems do NOT want anything evil revealed about HRC
What's wrong? Can't the great Paul Ryan congress finally close the deal (the GOP has only had 24 years to make something stick).
0 new messages