opposed piston engines as opposed to horizontally opposed "boxer" engines.

[Blue Heeler]

Darryl

I mentioned the Napier Deltic earlier - here is pictures of one and a
animated graphic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yftg5Ip0YlA

Noddy.

It's been a while since I saw a Porsche engine pulled down, but I seem
to recall that they are accurately described as a 180 degree V engine.
They are no at "boxer"

[avag...@gmail.com]

recommend a sound video ?

[AMuzi]

meh.
The Ancients had previously achieved perfection:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4we1rcWFDmM

--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

[avag...@gmail.com]

that a bicycle man, welder/machinist/athlete would fawn over Crovairs...?

that said...

I wuz detained at http://goo.gl/Lr3uwu

for the northbound empty container 2 engine 1 miler...and you know their engines are tuned...sound enhanced AAA. Ex Chevy engineer ?

[Andre Jute]

Here we go again with the resident ignorant morons claiming knowledge they do not, and cannot possibly, have because it is held by a strictly limited class of persons.

On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 1:00:17 AM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:

> It's been a while since I saw a Porsche engine pulled down, but I seem
> to recall that they are accurately described as a 180 degree V engine.
> They are no at "boxer"

Crap. You're an ignoramus and a liar. The only Porsche "180 degree V engine" is the 12 cylinder in the 917, to correct your ignorance, and you have never in your life seen a Porsche 917 engine "pulled down", to call you on your lie.

Stop pretending about stuff you don't know shit about, sonny.

Andre Jute

[Frank Krygowski]

On 2/9/2015 9:11 AM, avag...@gmail.com wrote:

> that a bicycle man, welder/machinist/athlete would fawn over Crovairs...?

Andrew and I get it, Gene. You don't. Sorry.

--
- Frank Krygowski

[avag...@gmail.com]

NNNNNNNNNNNNNN

an exclusieve club fersure... McCORMICK EFFECT...plow on Dude.


my cousin came by with a new 356SC...we hit Cherry Hill in a fly of gravel as he said " handles just like a VW"

as for Jute ?

http://goo.gl/wQnJ4A

https://www.google.com/#q=is+a+porsche+917+engine+a+flat+12+or+a+vee+12

[avag...@gmail.com]

nnnnnnnnnnnn

searched in Music

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=locomotive+turbo+diesel

is Jute available if we search 'insensitive' ?

[avag...@gmail.com]

the diesel crew isn't up on sound recording.
figures.

[avag...@gmail.com]

nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-human-language-positive-20150209-story.html

[Zarniwoop]

3 crankshafts , 3 cylinder, 6 piston Diesel Engines

Another way to get the High compression to Ignite diesel Fuel
The turbo charger doesn't hurt Either .

[Blue Heeler]

Go fuck your boot Jute liar.


1/. I never claimed anything regarding a 917 engine - that, as usual is
your fantasy (or more correctly, your lie). Perhaps more technically it
is also a straw man argument - something you specialise in.

2/. You are an established liar, the last time I bothered calling you
on a lie (in relation to your fanciful claims regarding ownership of a
Laverda jota when it was obvious you had never been in the same
postcode as a real one)


So what now jute liar - will your mental illness drive you to repost
your fanciful "10 things i wish were true about me" post - that was
sceamingly funny, but sad at the same time as it revealed the extent to
which your narcissistic, sociopathic disorder casuses you to believe
your own fantastic lies.

[Andre Jute]

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:03:10 PM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:
> Andre Jute wrote:
>
> > Here we go again with the resident ignorant morons claiming knowledge
> > they do not, and cannot possibly, have because it is held by a
> > strictly limited class of persons.
> >
> > On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 1:00:17 AM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:
> >
> > > It's been a while since I saw a Porsche engine pulled down, but I
> > > seem to recall that they are accurately described as a 180 degree V
> > > engine. They are no at "boxer"
> >
> > Crap. You're an ignoramus and a liar. The only Porsche "180 degree V
> > engine" is the 12 cylinder in the 917, to correct your ignorance, and
> > you have never in your life seen a Porsche 917 engine "pulled down",
> > to call you on your lie.
> >
> > Stop pretending about stuff you don't know shit about, sonny.
> >
> > Andre Jute
>
>
>
> Go fuck your boot Jute liar.
>
>
> 1/. I never claimed anything regarding a 917 engine - that, as usual is
> your fantasy (or more correctly, your lie). Perhaps more technically it
> is also a straw man argument - something you specialise in.

Let's see what you said, sonny;

> > > It's been a while since I saw a Porsche engine pulled down, but I
> > > seem to recall that they are accurately described as a 180 degree V
> > > engine. They are no at "boxer"

Now, all the Porsche engines, except one, the 917, quite contrary to your claim are in fact boxer engines, or flat engines. The distinguishing mark of a boxer engine is that opposing cylinders are on different cranks of the crankshaft, whereas opposing cylinders of a flattened V engine are on the same crank; this has important consequences for the smoothness, size and weight of the engine. So you're either ignorant or lying in this regard.

That leaves only the Porsche 917 engine, which is the singe Porsche engine ever to be a flattened V engine. Clearly, to the gullible, this sentence of yours is designed to imply that you have seen one of those engines 'pulled down":

> > > It's been a while since I saw a Porsche engine pulled down, but I
> > > seem to recall that they are accurately described as a 180 degree V
> > > engine.

However, fewer than 60 chassis for 917 were built, and not all of those were built up into cars, and they were all racing cars in a formula that became obsolete almost 35 years ago. A provincial nobody like you never saw a 917 engine torn down.

This pretense of yours that you are some kind of a mechanical expert is of a piece with your earlier claim that you knew some anonymous person in the Australian outback with "a collection' of Laverda which he let a clown like you work on. Yeah, "a collection" of Laverda racers (in Australia already unlikely to vanishing point), and he let some yob off the street take a spanner to them. What sort of gullible morons do you take us for, sonny?

Andre Jute
When I stop smiling, somebody gets hurt. Funny thing, it is never me.

[Andre Jute]

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:03:10 PM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:

> 2/. You are an established liar,

Well, then you should prove I ever told a lie, sonny. You've been trying for two decades, since RAT, and all that has happened is that I proved you a liar, again and again, and publicly treat you with contempt, without a voice being raised in your defence because everyone except the congenital idiots who hate me more than you do can see that you're lying, and that I have your measure.

>the last time I bothered calling you
> on a lie (in relation to your fanciful claims regarding ownership of a
> Laverda jota when it was obvious you had never been in the same
> postcode as a real one)

Others can enjoy that entertaining thread here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/rec.bicycles.tech/laverda/rec.bicycles.tech/70MUhwdUrFk/4Wmxun0NWJYJ
They will notice that "Blue Heeler", aka the slimeball Peter Howard, still hasn't provided the various proofs I demanded of him. Readers may make up their own minds about who is a liar and who is a nobody trying to raise his profile by attacking his betters on the net.

> So what now jute liar - will your mental illness drive you to repost
> your fanciful "10 things i wish were true about me" post - that was
> sceamingly funny, but sad at the same time as it revealed the extent to
> which your narcissistic, sociopathic disorder casuses you to believe
> your own fantastic lies.

Give us a URL to this "10 things i wish were true about me" you claim I wrote so we can enjoy the joke too. Of course, the joke's likely to be on you again, "Blue Heeler". But then, as the great Lord Valve told us, it is the destiny of worthless little wankers like you that I should own them.

> which your narcissistic, sociopathic disorder

Yeah, it is quite understandable that a weed like you should hate everyone who isn't a weed. We feel for you, little Howie.

> your own fantastic lies.

Yup. That's my business: I'm a novelist. And, unlike you, I'm very good at it. Also unlike crudely unlettered morons like you, I never confuse fiction with autobiography.

Andre Jute
Charisma is

[avag...@gmail.com]

The links...using a slanted search offer circuitous information, may cause confusion amungst the ignorant.

https://www.google.com/#q=porsche+V+configuration+engines

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_engine
.......................

Well. As the resident 917 expert. Let me say . Let me say yawl confused.
AFAIK, Porsche sells flat engine configurations with pistons NOT sharing the same journal.

However, I read information claiming a 917 FLAT 12 is a FLAT 12 but uses a V engine crank. You figure that...

Odd, when liking at the GooImages I posted on 917 blocks, there seems to be a very flat V shape served up but ? Porsche sez FLAT. Its their block.

FIND a front section drawing of a 917 FLAT 12 block

I know what a Can Am car is inside and a 917....356. I went into a Porsche dealer down the road n bumped into a 'CanAm' type car in the showroom.

I'm not current with auto design. It was a V-10 Porsche looking like a CanAm car, a Group 7 unlimited sports car.....having 2 seats.

Porscheista said the V I saw is a 'pig' from the higher center of motor weight, Porsche's inexperience at designing around this standard inconvenience. The device looked unbalanced.

And so the actor's crash.

I'm not a Porsche owner. Costs are too much to bear. Local racer suggest I go for a turbo boxer. Maybe a 356SC...whhhiiirrwhiiirrr. A 1000 hp Audi Quattro ....?

But, there are Porsches and then there are Porsches made with other types of motors.

[Blue Heeler]

Andre Jute snivelled, whined and moaned:

> >
> > Go fuck your boot Jute liar.
> >
> >
> > 1/. I never claimed anything regarding a 917 engine - that, as
> > usual is your fantasy (or more correctly, your lie). Perhaps more
> > technically it is also a straw man argument - something you
> > specialise in.
>
> Let's see what you said, sonny;

Yes you snivelling, lying troll, let's see what I wrote.

>
> > > > It's been a while since I saw a Porsche engine pulled down, but
> > > > I seem to recall that they are accurately described as a 180
> > > > degree V engine. They are no at "boxer"
>
> Now, all the Porsche engines, except one, the 917, quite contrary to
> your claim are in fact boxer engines, or flat engines.

Jute liar, please show where there is any claim regarding any
particular mark of porsche engine. All typical "jutification" the
invention that takes th eplace of fact in your deranged and addled
brain.

> distinguishing mark of a boxer engine is that opposing cylinders are
> on different cranks of the crankshaft, whereas opposing cylinders of
> a flattened V engine are on the same crank; this has important
> consequences for the smoothness, size and weight of the engine. So
> you're either ignorant or lying in this regard.
>
> That leaves only the Porsche 917 engine, which is the singe Porsche
> engine ever to be a flattened V engine. Clearly, to the gullible,
> this sentence of yours is designed to imply that you have seen one of
> those engines 'pulled down":
> > > > It's been a while since I saw a Porsche engine pulled down,
> > > > but I seem to recall that they are accurately described as a
> > > > 180 degree V engine.
>

Read what I wrote jute liar, instead of trying to lose what was said in
your own stinking stream of fantasy bullshit.

> However, fewer than 60 chassis for 917 were built, and not all of
> those were built up into cars, and they were all racing cars in a
> formula that became obsolete almost 35 years ago. A provincial nobody
> like you never saw a 917 engine torn down.
>
> This pretense of yours that you are some kind of a mechanical expert
> is of a piece with your earlier claim that you knew some anonymous
> person in the Australian outback with "a collection' of Laverda which
> he let a clown like you work on. Yeah, "a collection" of Laverda
> racers (in Australia already unlikely to vanishing point), and he let
> some yob off the street take a spanner to them. What sort of gullible
> morons do you take us for, sonny?
>

The only person here who I "take" for anything jute is you - lying,
self aggrandising, attention whoring, cunt of a thing that you are.


And dear oh bloody dear Jute fruit - your lies become more florid as
time goes by don't they.


1/. nobody mentioend the outback

2/. nobody (except jute the liar) mentioned a collection, in fact, as I
said at the time, my friend owned exactly two Laverdas, a twin and a
triple. Of course that is exactly two more than you have ever owned
ridden or possibly even drooled over.

3/. you know absolutely nothing, and are far too stupid to enquire, as
to what mechanical skills I might possess - simply more straw man
grist, foor your own mill of lies and deception jute.

> Andre Jute
> When I stop smiling, somebody gets hurt. Funny thing, it is never me.

No brain, no pain is the only rational explanation jute, the lies you
tell would drive any normal person to a positive fit of mortification.

[Blue Heeler]

Andre Jute wrote:

> On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:03:10 PM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:
>
> > 2/. You are an established liar,
>
> Well, then you should prove I ever told a lie, sonny.

No need little one, it is obvious that near every time you place
fingers on a keyboard you are lying Jute.

> You've been
> trying for two decades, since RAT, and all that has happened is that
> I proved you a liar, again and again, and publicly treat you with
> contempt, without a voice being raised in your defence because
> everyone except the congenital idiots who hate me more than you do
> can see that you're lying, and that I have your measure.

Another Jute lie, based on your fantastic need to pretend to be some
sort of an internet "hard man", snivelling little lying coward that you
are. You know very well that I am not Peter Howard, yet you persist in
trying to peddle that line of bullshit.

(By the way Jute, that is another deliberate lie on your part)

>
> > the last time I bothered calling you
> > on a lie (in relation to your fanciful claims regarding ownership
> > of a Laverda jota when it was obvious you had never been in the same
> > postcode as a real one)
>
> Others can enjoy that entertaining thread here:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/rec.bicycles.tech/laverda/r
> ec.bicycles.tech/70MUhwdUrFk/4Wmxun0NWJYJ They will notice that "Blue
> Heeler", aka the slimeball Peter Howard, still hasn't provided the
> various proofs I demanded of him.

You get to demand nothing liar. Fool, trolling wannabe bully that you
are.

> Readers may make up their own minds
> about who is a liar and who is a nobody trying to raise his profile
> by attacking his betters on the net.

Jute, most rational people came to that conclusion about you years ago.
Your problem is that by definition, just about anything that currently
has, or once had, a pulse is better than you.

> > So what now jute liar - will your mental illness drive you to repost
> > your fanciful "10 things i wish were true about me" post - that was
> > sceamingly funny, but sad at the same time as it revealed the
> > extent to which your narcissistic, sociopathic disorder casuses you
> > to believe your own fantastic lies.
>
> Give us a URL to this "10 things i wish were true about me" you claim
> I wrote so we can enjoy the joke too. Of course, the joke's likely to
> be on you again, "Blue Heeler". But then, as the great Lord Valve
> told us, it is the destiny of worthless little wankers like you that
> I should own them.

No Jute you were put in usenet to be a metaphoric chalk outline.

I did in fact slightly mis-remember your ridiculous and absurd little
fantasy, but then that is simply an indication of how little you, or
your feelings, mean to me.


In fact, the post in question was titled:- "Twenty five random things
about me" of course it would have been more truthfully titled "25
things Jute wishes were true about himself"

URL is at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.bicycles.tech/FYn9rc6r_rA


As I said, the anguish you experienced at being shown for the liar you
are by someone who knows how to handle snivelling little trolls like
you resulted in you spewing the above adbsurd nonsense into the group,
driven by your narcissistic personality disorder combined with your
obvious soiciopathic tendancies.


However, it wasn't even original as you first posted the same nonsense
on 23 Aug 2012 - url below

http://www.kboards.com/index.php?topic=3048.900

>
> > which your narcissistic, sociopathic disorder
>
> Yeah, it is quite understandable that a weed like you should hate
> everyone who isn't a weed. We feel for you, little Howie.

You know that I am not Peter Howard, that is the second time in 24
hours you have told that lie Jute.


I don't "hate' you jute, that would require far more effort than I
would ever put into something as insignificant as you.

I am amused by you jute, nothing more. And here I am with time on my
hands and you are stupid enough to want a second round. It will finish
just as badly for your ego as the first time. The funny thing is you
are smart enough to know that, but your mental illness will drive you
on regardless.

>
> > your own fantastic lies.
>
> Yup. That's my business: I'm a novelist.

No, you are the author of formulaic, derivative crap.

Now that is your trade, and you make a living at it and I certainly do
not hold it against you, but there is nothing special about the dreck
you write Jute.

A colleague of mine had success some years back writing for Mills and
Boon, the editors encouraged her to continue but she found that the
time required interfered too greatly with her profession.

Still, she remains glad to this day that if she ever wants to leave her
profession, like you she will have a trade to fall back on.

> And, unlike you, I'm very
> good at it.

You are a competent, if somewhat dreary tradesman wordsmith Jute,
nothing more. And the best part is that you know that to be true.

> Also unlike crudely unlettered morons like you, I never
> confuse fiction with autobiography.

Well actually jute old fruit that is exactly what you did in your "25
things I wish were true about me" fantasy - an imagined life you wish
you had led.

>

[John B. Slocomb]

On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:54:03 +0000, Phil W Lee <ph...@lee-family.me.uk>
wrote:

>Zarniwoop <fiet...@gmail.com> considered Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:40:12

>Or the sleeve valvegear, which means you don't need valve cutouts in
>the piston crowns like poppet valves do.

But I've overhauled a number of diesel engines that did not have
cutouts in the piston heads. see http://tinyurl.com/lldyk46
for one example.

And the other guy's point seems to be that high compression to ignite
fuel is somehow a problem.... funny, it wasn't back in 1897 3when Dr.
Diesel successfully tested the first working diesel cycle engine :-)
--
Cheers,

John B.

[Andre Jute]

On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 1:00:17 AM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:
>

> It's been a while since I saw a Porsche engine pulled down, but I seem
> to recall that they are accurately described as a 180 degree V engine.
> They are no at "boxer"

This is an outright lie. Everyone who isn't a mechanical idiot knows that Porsche engines meet all the qualifications for being "boxer" engines. There is only one Porsche flat engine *ever* which was a flattened V, the 917, and the chances that a provincial peasant like Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard ever saw one "torn down" is less than nil.

The rest of this thread is full of the smoke Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard tries to blow over this gross error.

Where's your apology for this gross error, Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard?

Or, if it is a deliberate lie, where is your retraction?

This isn't the first time this provincial pissant peasant has tried to pose here as someone who knows something about mechanics.

Andre Jute
Now let us praise famous men (Ecclesiastes): Jobst would have enjoyed putting down this ignorant moron Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard

[Andre Jute]

Good heavens, now this little failed writer, Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard pretends he's a literary critic.

Listen Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard, I can understand that someone whose scribblings nobody wants to publish can be bitter about me being published by the most prestigious literary publishers everywhere, and the newspapers of record loving me ("Wild but exciting" -- New York Times), and my books commissioned before I take the cover off my keyboard, and visiting professorships, and all those women, and whatever else wriggles your wee dickie, but it doesn't get you anywhere. You don't look bigger or any prettier, you don't get to be more talented, by denigrating me; you just look like what you are, worthless, small, envious, nasty. The sooner you grasp that you're a nobody without any talent (a receding possibility of different talents -- perhaps net bullying? though you aren't much good at that either) and learn to live with it, the sooner you'll be happy. In any event, you can't be me; it requires brains, principles, a resolute character, huge amounts of backbreaking work, and the ability to attract and hold the best associates; you don't have any of those; so, however much you'd like to crawl up my arse, it's never going to happen.

Andre Jute

Well, if Mills & Boon is as high as you aspire, even in another of your anonymous "friends" supposed to give you credibility, what are you doing with me? I don't grub around at that end of the market. Are you quite sure you understand that there are different layers of literature, Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard?

> Still, she remains glad to this day that if she ever wants to leave her
> profession, like you she will have a trade to fall back on.
>
> > And, unlike you, I'm very
> > good at it.
>
>
> You are a competent, if somewhat dreary tradesman wordsmith Jute,
> nothing more. And the best part is that you know that to be true.

If you want to be a writer, Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard, it helps to have a feeling for the language. Instead of the clumsy, indeed, clumpingly dull and meaningless "tradesman", try "journeyman" as precise in meaning and more elegant too.

"And the best part is" just drips spite. It gives away so much more about you than it says about me.

You see what I mean when I say above that you'll never cut it. Instead of abusing me on the net, which wins you noting except further humiliation guaranteed further to undermine your already fragile self-esteem, you should have spent your time reading my handbooks for other writers. Maybe you could have caught a tip; many others did, and were published. Now it's probably too late.

> > Also unlike crudely unlettered morons like you, I never
> > confuse fiction with autobiography.
>
> Well actually jute old fruit that is exactly what you did in your "25
> things I wish were true about me" fantasy - an imagined life you wish
> you had led.
>

There are 25 headline facts in that piece for you to disprove, enough to keep you busy for another twenty years of stalking me with no gain. That piece was designed to frustrate netstalkers just like you. Go for your life, sonny: you clearly have nothing better to do with it.

[avag...@gmail.com]

Go in peace

https://www.google.com/search?site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1067&bih=513&q=reed+valve+2+stroke+engine&oq=reed+valve&gs_l=img.1.5.0l10.4044.6278.0.16162.10.7.0.3.3.0.177.859.0j7.7.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.61.img..0.10.889.qpvyVKJqmhM

https://www.google.com/search?q=internal+combustion+engine+valve+systems&sa=X&biw=1067&bih=513&site=imghp&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ei=hpnbVO3BDISaNsW1hOgP&ved=0CB8QsAQ

[Andre Jute]

What do these irrelevant references have to do with boxer engines, Daniels? Why are you wasting everyone's time? -- Andre Jute

[AMuzi]

You actually click Gene's gurgle links?

[avag...@gmail.com]

You actually click Gene's gurgle links?

.......................


intelligent conversation isnot Jute's strong point

[avag...@gmail.com]

Morning at Wal recording grackle morse. Coold with fierce sun warming, birds in just now leafing Waltree. Super birds

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Titusville,+FL/@28.5553279,-80.8438608,296m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x88e74cd2b8345827:0xa32c05cae813a18e

Now over here on the pole working with the Brewer's Flock where we have 2-3 conversant birds.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Titusville,+FL/@28.6240025,-80.7949076,74m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x88e74cd2b8345827:0xa32c05cae813a18e

The SpaceX launch is tentative with high winds at 25000 feet.
Frequently RBT, and other dialog, is like watching a old Godzilla film.

I usually assume comments as per AJ are rational intended humorous...Cave 6

[avag...@gmail.com]

On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 4:14:52 PM UTC-5, avag...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 4:01:01 PM UTC-5, avag...@gmail.com wrote:
> > You actually click Gene's gurgle links?
> >
> > .......................
> >

LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL^

intelligent conversation isnot Jute's strong point
Morning at Wal recording grackle morse. Coold with fierce sun warming, birds in just now leafing Waltree. Super birds

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Titusville,+FL/@28.5553279,-80.8438608,296m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x88e74cd2b8345827:0xa32c05cae813a18e

Now over here on the pole working with the Brewer's Flock where we have 2-3 conversant birds.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Titusville,+FL/@28.6240025,-80.7949076,74m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x88e74cd2b8345827:0xa32c05cae813a18e

The SpaceX launch is tentative with high winds at 25000 feet.
Frequently RBT, and other dialog, is like watching a old Godzilla film.>
I usually assume comments as per AJ are rational intended humorous...Cave 6

xxx

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Titusville,+FL/@28.624946,-80.792179,3a,75y,90h,90t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sEbgF9dzd-naR8JPHNQl9ug!2e0!4m2!3m1!1s0x88e74cd2b8345827:0xa32c05cae813a18e!6m1!1e1

launch pad is off across water at bottom right pic right of palm abt 14+ miles off.

when SpaceX launches the path carries cross the photo's top then straight out over the ATL

There is a 'low' white building visible disappearing into twilight at 6PM

uh I've watched maybe 12+ shuttle launches, several lesser. Lived for a year + at

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Live+Oak+Ct,+Cape+Canaveral,+FL+32920/@28.3981289,-80.5973099,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x88e0a6525aa13b5b:0x7ad80d26652ac992

Intention was working within the NASA intelligence sphere towards an energy device siphoning energy from atmospheric microvoltage but the local mob poisoned my yard and blasted me with continuous noise, supported by local gestapo, aborting the project. OC wanted something line $3-4000 month.

[Andre Jute]

Just once. I learned my lesson. What a waste of time.

Andre Jute

[avag...@gmail.com]

we see you need to talk abt Jute where there are 2 other posters interested in valves not Jute.

The launch was excellent. and our predictions were 100%. The weather fantastic, the birds wonderful.

The noise on NASA's public broadcast included several what sounds like personal whorish attacks on me recorded here. The ground folk at NASA are often sex workers.

I am releaved.

In my film script we could do a young girl with a large football player's dick in her mouth with the countdown backed by these comments verbaitum.

[Blue Heeler]

Andre Jute wrote:


Typical lying troll behaviour from you Jute liar - snip the bit that
causes you problems.


Your entire tirade is based on your *own* lying fantasy.


What a stupid fuckwit you are Jute!

[Blue Heeler]

Andre Jute wrote:

> Good heavens, now this little failed writer, Anonymous Blue
> Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard pretends he's a literary critic.

so jute liar, as your sociopathic behaviour becomes more florid i have
to be not less than three people.....


What a fool you are Jute.

> Well, if Mills & Boon is as high as you aspire, even in another of
> your anonymous "friends" supposed to give you credibility, what are
> you doing with me? I don't grub around at that end of the market. Are
> you quite sure you understand that there are different layers of
> literature, Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard?

Yes of course I am aware that there are numerous layers of Literature
Jute liar - you of course are at the very bottom of it, a mere
tradesman forever looking upwards at his betters who manage to make
writing a profession and who's works constitute art to your mere finger
painting.

>
>
> If you want to be a writer, Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter
> Howard, it helps to have a feeling for the language. Instead of the
> clumsy, indeed, clumpingly dull and meaningless "tradesman", try
> "journeyman" as precise in meaning and more elegant too.

I have no desire whatsoever to be a writer and have no knowledge or
interest as to the abilities of Mark Harriss or Peter Howard in that
area. My talents are in other directions, however to poke another hole
in the verbal constructs you seek to place between your fragile little
ego and the real world, my use of language in relation to your skills
as a writer is entirely accurate. A journeyman learns from his betters
and equals, and sometimes manages to surpass their skills. A mere
tradesman, such as yourself, learns enough to get by and if he works
diligently, makes a living, albeit at the bottom rung.


just like you.

>
> "And the best part is" just drips spite. It gives away so much more
> about you than it says about me.
>
> You see what I mean when I say above that you'll never cut it.
> Instead of abusing me on the net, which wins you noting except
> further humiliation guaranteed further to undermine your already
> fragile self-esteem, you should have spent your time reading my
> handbooks for other writers. Maybe you could have caught a tip; many
> others did, and were published. Now it's probably too late.

Actually jute, abusing you on the net is fun because I refuse to play
by your troll rules and all you do is humiliate yourself. Idiot that
you are, you are too stupid to do the smart thing and walk away when
over matched.

> >
>
> There are 25 headline facts in that piece for you to disprove, enough
> to keep you busy for another twenty years of stalking me with no
> gain. That piece was designed to frustrate netstalkers just like you.
> Go for your life, sonny: you clearly have nothing better to do with
> it.

No sonny Jim Jute the silly, untruthful, little troll, they are your
assertions and yours to prove - but of course they are unprovable as
they are a fantasy product of your narcissistic personality disorder
and their existence is confined to your addled brain. That is to say,
you are so mad you probably believe they are true.



I will await you next response (if any, who knows Jute, you might grow
a brain), but my time is limited and engaging with you Jute is kind of
like trying to play chess with a pigeon, you knock over the pieces,
shit on the board and then fly away and tell the rest of the flock that
you "won".


But who knows, you might continue to amuse me.

[Andre Jute]

This entire splurge of personal abuse by the mechanical ignoramus Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard is intended as smoke to cover up his ignorance about boxer engines, for which anyone else would have apologized by now. Oh, that Jobst were here to enjoy me putting down this clown.

Enjoy. Nothing further is required from me.

Andre Jute

"Wild but exciting" -- New York Times

[Andre Jute]

Where's your apology for your gross ignorance on boxer engines, Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard? Where's you apology for your lie that you saw a Porche 917 engine "torn down"? Or did they get lost in the same ether in which you claimed to be a Laverda "expert"? And BMW expert, and a Ducati expert, and... and... and... endlessly on.

On Friday, February 13, 2015 at 10:38:23 PM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:
> Andre Jute wrote:
>
> Typical lying troll behaviour from you Jute liar - snip the bit that
> causes you problems.

I reproduced your ignorance and lie in full, and do so again below. You snipped my entire post and then lied that I snipped yours. You're wanna netstalker scum, and everyone knows it now.

> Your entire tirade is based on your *own* lying fantasy.

Man, you flatter yourself. You, Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard, have zero achievement, zero profile, zero attraction to anyone, you contribute zero, you don't even have entertainment value. You're a waste of skin.

> What a stupid fuckwit you are Jute!

Even your abuse is second hand, twenty years out of date, a copy of what I invented for the Magnequest Scum.

So here's my previous post, which the ignorant clown Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard snipped in total -- while characteristically lying that I snipped his post:

******

Andre Jute
Author of DESIGNING AND BUILDING SPECIAL CARS
"Just about every automobile manufacturer short of Porsche could learn something useful from Jute's book. We always knew suspensions were important, but he infuses them with excitement and art." -- CAR

[Andre Jute]

Don't you just love the headline on Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard puts on his latest vomit of scatalogical abuse: "Jute the stupid troll runs up the surrender flag and runs away like the vile simpering little coward it is"

Here's a nice (!) little sample of the hysterical nobody Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard spiraling out of control:
> Indeed Jute, nothing was *ever* required from you - stupid, lying,
> trolling, attention-whoring, cunt of a thing that you are!

More from this wretched loser below but nothing more from me in this thread; I'm just reposting so that Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard's vicious spite stays on the record.

Andre Jute

>Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be >removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 21).

On Saturday, February 14, 2015 at 3:07:29 AM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:
> Andre Jute wrote:
>
> > This entire splurge of personal abuse by the mechanical ignoramus
> > Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard is intended as smoke
> > to cover up his ignorance about boxer engines, for which anyone else
> > would have apologized by now. Oh, that Jobst were here to enjoy me
> > putting down this clown.
> >
> > Enjoy. Nothing further is required from me.
>

> Indeed Jute, nothing was *ever* required from you - stupid, lying,
> trolling, attention-whoring, cunt of a thing that you are!
>
>
>
> Your "Nothing further is required from me" is merely your attempt to
> run up the surrender flag, tuck your tail between you legs and run
> away, hoping that nobody will notice what a vile little coward you are.
>
>
>
> And I am so difficult for you too try and handle that you have to try
> and salve your puny little ego by pretending that I am not one, but
> three people all ganging up on poor widdle jute.
>
>
> Get over it sonny and keep your fool fingers off the keyboard.
>
> >

[Andre Jute]

Here is Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard's wet dream, in the headline:
> The lying scumbag jute gets his face pushed into the mud wiith Blue Heeler's foot
> on the back of his stupid neck - Again!

You wanted to be famous, Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard, so be be grateful that I'm making you indelibly famous -- well, at least notorious -- as a wannabe netbully.

Nothing more from me in this post, made mainly to preserve Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard's spite for posterity.

Oh, by the way, below, at last, he admits he is ignorant about Porsche engines, which is what I've been saying all along, but repeats his lie that he's seen a Porsche 917 engine "torn down" which I've already dealt with adequately above. Not that at this distance from the original offense it matters that he admits it, as everyone knew from the beginning, and before, from the Laverda contretemps, that Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard is a a mechanical moron and a liar.

Andre Jute
Fair to a fault

>Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be
> removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 21).

On Saturday, February 14, 2015 at 3:18:53 AM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:

> Andre Jute wrote:
>
> > Where's your apology for your gross ignorance on boxer engines,
> > Anonymous Blue Heeler/Mark Harriss/Peter Howard? Where's you apology
> > for your lie that you saw a Porche 917 engine "torn down"? Or did
> > they get lost in the same ether in which you claimed to be a Laverda
> > "expert"? And BMW expert, and a Ducati expert, and... and... and...
> > endlessly on.
>
>

> Apologise to you? Snivelling little liar that you are Jute, you were
> even too fucking stupid to ask where I actually saw the *only* Porsche
> engine I have ever seen pulled down. My "mistake" was in assuming that
> the construction methods of that engine applied across the brand.
>
>
> On the other hand you should start apologising for your obvious and
> repeated lies about me.
>
> And your therapist should consider increasing the dose of whatever
> anti-psychotic you are supposed to be taking.
>
>
> Let's just put my original post back in glorious isolation Jute - see
> if you like it sonny.

>
>
>
> > > On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 1:00:17 AM UTC, Blue Heeler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It's been a while since I saw a Porsche engine pulled down, but I
> > > > seem to recall that they are accurately described as a 180 degree
> > > > V engine. They are no at "boxer"
> > >
>
>
>

> Now lying pond scum that you are Jute - where are the "facts" on which
> you based your lying fantasy?
>
>
> Don't hold back now sonny, anytime you are ready will be just fine......

>
> >
> > Andre Jute
> > Author of DESIGNING AND BUILDING SPECIAL CARS
> > "Just about every automobile manufacturer short of Porsche could
> > learn something useful from Jute's book. We always knew suspensions
> > were important, but he infuses them with excitement and art." -- CAR
>
>

> My opinion of your books has already been stated Jute. Assuming for one
> second the above endorsement actually exists in the real world - how
> much of your publisher's advertising budget did it absorb?