On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 19:45:55 +0100, "Benderthe.evilrobot"
<
Benderthe...@virginmedia.com> wrote:
> If you're not competing on the track - what's the advantage of loadsa gears?
Depends on the terrain. In Albany County, New York, you need a very
high gear for riding from Thatcher Park to New Salem, and a very low
gear for riding from New Salem to Thatcher Park.
But when I lived there, I got along with only ten gears: two
chainwheels and six cogs, one cog a whole bunch bigger than the other
five. A middle chainwheel would have made it easier to get onto the
big ring, I think; I often unship the chain shifting up and sometimes
can't get it back without dismounting. (Still riding Albany gears --
and I can no longer ride up Ninth Street, which took only reasonable
effort when I was fifteen years younger. Now Chestnut is getting to
be a chore.)
And then there's condition. The mechanic set up my first bike with
very low gears so my weak legs could get up hills. "So I'll be back
when I've built up some muscle?" "No, you'll tackle steeper hills."
Some folks are more tolerant of wide changes than others. I'll just
slow a bit if one gear makes me pedal too slowly and the next lower
makes me pedal too fast; other folks need both effort and cadence to
be perfect.
And, I suspect, some folks throw lots and lots of gears onto the bike
because they don't know which gears they will need. I did the same
with my bookcases: instead of trying to decide in advance how many
and which spacing, I put up "standards" which allowed me to put up
shelves at two-inch intervals. I still have one shelf left over,
which I keep in the closet in case it's wanted later -- but I don't
know where the corresponding brackets are.
--
Joy Beeson
joy beeson at comcast dot net