On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:02:40 -0700 (PDT),
cycl...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 5:16:39 PM UTC-7, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:51:59 -0700 (PDT),
avag...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >Has Lieb a mini vise grip ?
>>
>> No. I have many vices, few of which are considered "mini".
>> I vaguely recall that my right hand grip is about 85lbs (66kg) when I
>> measured it about 2 years ago in rehab. That's at the low end of the
>> scale, so I guess it could be called mini. I forgot what I measured
>> for the left hand, but it was less.
>> <
http://www.topendsports.com/testing/norms/handgrip.htm>
> Don't remind me of rehab.
I had to do rehab after the body mechanics installed 2 stents in the
plumbing to my heart. Under Medicare, I only had to pay 20% of the
inflated charges, so it seemed like a good idea. However, at 2-3
times per week, plus a few some night time lectures, plus some lost
working time, it became rather expensive. It was well worth the
effort as it accelerated my recovery. I'm not an athlete by any
stretch of the imagination and need inspiration (or coercion) to get
adequate exercise. After about 9 weeks of rehab, I was in much better
shape than I had been for years. After rehab, I immediately reverted
to a couch potato. Hopefully, you'll do better.
> I have to go to an orthopedic surgeon tuesday for a growing
> pain in my shoulder.
Bummer. I hope it goes well for you.
The problem with going to a surgeon for a diagnosis, is that the
diagnosis will always be something within his area of expertise. If
you went to a sports medicine doctor, the solution would be more or
different exercises. If you went to a chiropractor, it would be bone
cracking. If you went to a drug dealer, the answer would be pain
killers.
> Hopefully he can read MRI's better than me because I don't
> see anything suspicious on the pictures.
I believe that he can, because he has one advantage over your
abilities. He has seen a large number of similar MRI's and therefore
has a baseline to compare your images against what might be called
"normal". The MRI image settings are carefully standardized to always
use the same settings and exposures, so that such comparisons are
possible, which would not be the case if image enhancement were used.
However, that doesn't stop you from playing with image enhancement
software if you have a digital image (which you can get from the
radiology office).