On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 11:11:00 AM UTC-5, Dan S. MacAbre wrote:
> Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 10:10:48 AM UTC-5, viva padrepio wrote:
> >> On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 7:37:48 AM UTC-7, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 8:20:46 AM UTC-5, viva padrepio wrote:
> >>>> ...and wants the same for the U.S.
> >>>>
> >>>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWizLUmJug4
> >>>
> >>> You mean Hitler was right?
>
> There is no right or wrong. Hitler was a populist who took root in the
> chaos that was Germany in the late 20's.
"Opportunistic predator" perhaps?
It reminds of another populist running for office now.
>
> >> To a degree.
> >>
> >> Take for example a person's heritage. Some pride themselves of being a mixed race, while others maintain that a pure breed is the better way to go.
> >
> > Some pride themselves in being gay, while others do not.
>
> That's probably just some kind of reaction. No-one should take pride in
> just being what they are. They didn't earn it.
That's what I say too. Are Christians proud? Are atheists proud?
We know the atheists are in a minority but that doesn't make them wrong. A certain intellectual superiority is enough to be proud, doesn't it?
>
> > Who's to say who's right and who's wrong? That's right: God makes those judgments all the time.
>
> No-one's right, no-one wrong. You just are what you are, and you find
> your place within the masses.
I guess the people in the courtroom are all right except for the criminal. A child molester is wrong even he's a priest. We don't know if God would be proud of himself if he existed.
We know cyclists are proud, and drivers are not.