info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
John B.(Bullshitter)
14 views
Skip to first unread message
EdwardDolan
Jun 11, 2016, 7:29:02 AM6/11/16
to
This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter). He should know by now what to
expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup. Do not read any of the crap
that in any way relates to John B.(Bullshitter). I am posting nothing but
shit to counter his shit. He thinks he is saying something of course, but
all he is doing is posting sissified name calling. I think he must be a
transgender freak as he seems to object to a bit of profanity.
Usenet is now populated by the dregs of society. It wasn’t always this way.
I think what has happened is that the social websites have pretty much
replaced Usenet. A newsgroup like rec.bicycles.soc. is now on its last legs.
Its days are clearly numbered.
However, it is still possible to voice an opinion here, but one should do it
in the context of a message of substance and it should have something to do
with bicycles. If name calling ensues, at least it ensues logically. If you
use a newsgroup merely for personal insult it marks you as an imbecile.
There have always been lots of imbeciles on this particular newsgroup.
Sometimes I think anyone interested in bicycles must not be too smart.
Cycling may be a recreation for dummies!
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
Ed Dolan the Great – Minnesota
expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup. Do not read any of the crap
that in any way relates to John B.(Bullshitter). I am posting nothing but
shit to counter his shit. He thinks he is saying something of course, but
all he is doing is posting sissified name calling. I think he must be a
transgender freak as he seems to object to a bit of profanity.
Usenet is now populated by the dregs of society. It wasn’t always this way.
I think what has happened is that the social websites have pretty much
replaced Usenet. A newsgroup like rec.bicycles.soc. is now on its last legs.
Its days are clearly numbered.
However, it is still possible to voice an opinion here, but one should do it
in the context of a message of substance and it should have something to do
with bicycles. If name calling ensues, at least it ensues logically. If you
use a newsgroup merely for personal insult it marks you as an imbecile.
There have always been lots of imbeciles on this particular newsgroup.
Sometimes I think anyone interested in bicycles must not be too smart.
Cycling may be a recreation for dummies!
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
Ed Dolan the Great – Minnesota
John B.
Jun 11, 2016, 8:35:14 AM6/11/16
to
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter). He should know by now what to
>expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup. Do not read any of the crap
Of course I know what to expect from you :-) A spoiled little boy who
doesn't want anyone else to play in HIS sand box.
>that in any way relates to John B.(Bullshitter). I am posting nothing but
>shit to counter his shit. He thinks he is saying something of course, but
>all he is doing is posting sissified name calling. I think he must be a
>transgender freak as he seems to object to a bit of profanity.
Ah... you mean when you use filthy language and I tell you to your
face that you have a filthy mouth. Yes, certainly. I admit to that.
>Usenet is now populated by the dregs of society. It wasn’t always this way.
>I think what has happened is that the social websites have pretty much
>replaced Usenet. A newsgroup like rec.bicycles.soc. is now on its last legs.
>Its days are clearly numbered.
It certainly is, here you are right in the midst of the dregs.
Of course, rec.bicycles.soc is doomed. After all you are doing
everything you can to kill it.
>However, it is still possible to voice an opinion here, but one should do it
>in the context of a message of substance and it should have something to do
>with bicycles.
>If name calling ensues, at least it ensues logically. If you
>use a newsgroup merely for personal insult it marks you as an imbecile.
>There have always been lots of imbeciles on this particular newsgroup.
>Sometimes I think anyone interested in bicycles must not be too smart.
>Cycling may be a recreation for dummies!
"If name calling ensues". Terrible thing!
But, of course we have the comment that, "I think anyone interested in
but of course Dolan the Great said it so it must be all right.
>Mountain bikes have wheels.
By God! I believe that Dolan has discovered something! Amazingly he
has discovered that bicycles have two wheels.
(I wonder what he thinks the name "Bi Cycle" means?)
Friends, we are dealing with a proven genius.
>Trails are for walking.
And yet another gem of wisdom from the master's voice...... well
except for the Taimiami Trail is 275 miles of paved road, or The
Skechewaug Trail, up there in VT. or maybe The National Old Trails
Road, also known as the Ocean-to-Ocean Highway, which was established
in 1912,It was 3,096 miles long and stretched from Baltimore, Maryland
(some old maps indicate New York City was the actual eastern
terminus), to California. Much of the route follows the old National
Road and the Santa Fe Trail.
Anyone for a hike of 3,096 miles, or even a short 275 mile ramble?
After all Dolan says that trails are for walking. So off you go. Call
when you get back.
>Ed Dolan the Great – Minnesota
Great what?
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
>This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter). He should know by now what to
>expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup. Do not read any of the crap
doesn't want anyone else to play in HIS sand box.
>that in any way relates to John B.(Bullshitter). I am posting nothing but
>shit to counter his shit. He thinks he is saying something of course, but
>all he is doing is posting sissified name calling. I think he must be a
>transgender freak as he seems to object to a bit of profanity.
face that you have a filthy mouth. Yes, certainly. I admit to that.
>Usenet is now populated by the dregs of society. It wasn’t always this way.
>I think what has happened is that the social websites have pretty much
>replaced Usenet. A newsgroup like rec.bicycles.soc. is now on its last legs.
>Its days are clearly numbered.
Of course, rec.bicycles.soc is doomed. After all you are doing
everything you can to kill it.
>However, it is still possible to voice an opinion here, but one should do it
>in the context of a message of substance and it should have something to do
>with bicycles.
>If name calling ensues, at least it ensues logically. If you
>use a newsgroup merely for personal insult it marks you as an imbecile.
>There have always been lots of imbeciles on this particular newsgroup.
>Sometimes I think anyone interested in bicycles must not be too smart.
>Cycling may be a recreation for dummies!
But, of course we have the comment that, "I think anyone interested in
bicycles must not be too smart. Cycling may be a recreation for
dummies!"
Ah, but I wonder, does that little jewel qualify as name calling? Ah,
dummies!"
but of course Dolan the Great said it so it must be all right.
>Mountain bikes have wheels.
By God! I believe that Dolan has discovered something! Amazingly he
has discovered that bicycles have two wheels.
(I wonder what he thinks the name "Bi Cycle" means?)
Friends, we are dealing with a proven genius.
>Trails are for walking.
And yet another gem of wisdom from the master's voice...... well
except for the Taimiami Trail is 275 miles of paved road, or The
Skechewaug Trail, up there in VT. or maybe The National Old Trails
Road, also known as the Ocean-to-Ocean Highway, which was established
in 1912,It was 3,096 miles long and stretched from Baltimore, Maryland
(some old maps indicate New York City was the actual eastern
terminus), to California. Much of the route follows the old National
Road and the Santa Fe Trail.
Anyone for a hike of 3,096 miles, or even a short 275 mile ramble?
After all Dolan says that trails are for walking. So off you go. Call
when you get back.
>Ed Dolan the Great – Minnesota
--
cheers,
John B.
EdwardDolan
Jun 12, 2016, 4:31:52 AM6/12/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:l9vnlbdbe6p1hosf8...@4ax.com...
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter). He should know by now what to
>expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup. Do not read any of the crap
Of course I know what to expect from you :-) A spoiled little boy who
doesn't want anyone else to play in HIS sand box.
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>that in any way relates to John B.(Bullshitter). I am posting nothing but
>shit to counter his shit. He thinks he is saying something of course, but
>all he is doing is posting sissified name calling. I think he must be a
>transgender freak as he seems to object to a bit of profanity.
Ah... you mean when you use filthy language and I tell you to your
face that you have a filthy mouth. Yes, certainly. I admit to that.
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>Usenet is now populated by the dregs of society. It wasn’t always this way.
>I think what has happened is that the social websites have pretty much
>replaced Usenet. A newsgroup like rec.bicycles.soc. is now on its last
>legs.
>Its days are clearly numbered.
It certainly is, here you are right in the midst of the dregs.
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
Of course, rec.bicycles.soc is doomed. After all you are doing
everything you can to kill it.
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>However, it is still possible to voice an opinion here, but one should do
>it
>in the context of a message of substance and it should have something to do
>with bicycles.
>If name calling ensues, at least it ensues logically. If you
>use a newsgroup merely for personal insult it marks you as an imbecile.
>There have always been lots of imbeciles on this particular newsgroup.
>Sometimes I think anyone interested in bicycles must not be too smart.
>Cycling may be a recreation for dummies!
"If name calling ensues". Terrible thing!
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
But, of course we have the comment that, "I think anyone interested in
bicycles must not be too smart. Cycling may be a recreation for
dummies!"
Ah, but I wonder, does that little jewel qualify as name calling? Ah,
but of course Dolan the Great said it so it must be all right.
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>Mountain bikes have wheels.
By God! I believe that Dolan has discovered something! Amazingly he
has discovered that bicycles have two wheels.
(I wonder what he thinks the name "Bi Cycle" means?)
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
Friends, we are dealing with a proven genius.
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>Trails are for walking.
And yet another gem of wisdom from the master's voice...... well
except for the Taimiami Trail is 275 miles of paved road, or The
Skechewaug Trail, up there in VT. or maybe The National Old Trails
Road, also known as the Ocean-to-Ocean Highway, which was established
in 1912,It was 3,096 miles long and stretched from Baltimore, Maryland
(some old maps indicate New York City was the actual eastern
terminus), to California. Much of the route follows the old National
Road and the Santa Fe Trail.
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
Anyone for a hike of 3,096 miles, or even a short 275 mile ramble?
After all Dolan says that trails are for walking. So off you go. Call
when you get back.
Jesus Christ Almighty! If I were a jackass and an asshole like you, that is
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
news:l9vnlbdbe6p1hosf8...@4ax.com...
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter). He should know by now what to
>expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup. Do not read any of the crap
Of course I know what to expect from you :-) A spoiled little boy who
doesn't want anyone else to play in HIS sand box.
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>that in any way relates to John B.(Bullshitter). I am posting nothing but
>shit to counter his shit. He thinks he is saying something of course, but
>all he is doing is posting sissified name calling. I think he must be a
>transgender freak as he seems to object to a bit of profanity.
Ah... you mean when you use filthy language and I tell you to your
face that you have a filthy mouth. Yes, certainly. I admit to that.
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>Usenet is now populated by the dregs of society. It wasn’t always this way.
>I think what has happened is that the social websites have pretty much
>replaced Usenet. A newsgroup like rec.bicycles.soc. is now on its last
>legs.
>Its days are clearly numbered.
It certainly is, here you are right in the midst of the dregs.
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
Of course, rec.bicycles.soc is doomed. After all you are doing
everything you can to kill it.
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>However, it is still possible to voice an opinion here, but one should do
>it
>in the context of a message of substance and it should have something to do
>with bicycles.
>If name calling ensues, at least it ensues logically. If you
>use a newsgroup merely for personal insult it marks you as an imbecile.
>There have always been lots of imbeciles on this particular newsgroup.
>Sometimes I think anyone interested in bicycles must not be too smart.
>Cycling may be a recreation for dummies!
"If name calling ensues". Terrible thing!
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
But, of course we have the comment that, "I think anyone interested in
bicycles must not be too smart. Cycling may be a recreation for
dummies!"
Ah, but I wonder, does that little jewel qualify as name calling? Ah,
but of course Dolan the Great said it so it must be all right.
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>Mountain bikes have wheels.
By God! I believe that Dolan has discovered something! Amazingly he
has discovered that bicycles have two wheels.
(I wonder what he thinks the name "Bi Cycle" means?)
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
Friends, we are dealing with a proven genius.
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
>Trails are for walking.
And yet another gem of wisdom from the master's voice...... well
except for the Taimiami Trail is 275 miles of paved road, or The
Skechewaug Trail, up there in VT. or maybe The National Old Trails
Road, also known as the Ocean-to-Ocean Highway, which was established
in 1912,It was 3,096 miles long and stretched from Baltimore, Maryland
(some old maps indicate New York City was the actual eastern
terminus), to California. Much of the route follows the old National
Road and the Santa Fe Trail.
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
Anyone for a hike of 3,096 miles, or even a short 275 mile ramble?
After all Dolan says that trails are for walking. So off you go. Call
when you get back.
what I would have said too, but I would have said it better!
EdwardDolan
Jun 12, 2016, 4:47:29 AM6/12/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:l9vnlbdbe6p1hosf8...@4ax.com...
[...]
news:l9vnlbdbe6p1hosf8...@4ax.com...
Edward Dolan wrote:
> Trails are for walking.
>> And yet another gem of wisdom from the master's voice...... well
except for the Taimiami Trail is 275 miles of paved road, or The
Skechewaug Trail, up there in VT. or maybe The National Old Trails
Road, also known as the Ocean-to-Ocean Highway, which was established
in 1912,It was 3,096 miles long and stretched from Baltimore, Maryland
(some old maps indicate New York City was the actual eastern
terminus), to California. Much of the route follows the old National
Road and the Santa Fe Trail.
idiot John B.(Bullshitter) is, or do you think those are the kind of trails
that are being discussed here? He not only wants to deconstruct words, but
he also thinks he is being witty, not realizing that he is just being dumb
and stupid. It is why I will continue to treat him with nothing but
contempt.
>> Anyone for a hike of 3,096 miles, or even a short 275 mile ramble?
After all Dolan says that trails are for walking. So off you go. Call
when you get back.
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
John B.
Jun 12, 2016, 6:10:20 AM6/12/16
to
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 03:47:28 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:l9vnlbdbe6p1hosf8...@4ax.com...
>[...]
>
>Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>> Trails are for walking.
>
>>> And yet another gem of wisdom from the master's voice...... well
>except for the Taimiami Trail is 275 miles of paved road, or The
>Skechewaug Trail, up there in VT. or maybe The National Old Trails
>Road, also known as the Ocean-to-Ocean Highway, which was established
>in 1912,It was 3,096 miles long and stretched from Baltimore, Maryland
>(some old maps indicate New York City was the actual eastern
>terminus), to California. Much of the route follows the old National
>Road and the Santa Fe Trail.
>
>The above response should tell anyone still left on this newsgroup what an
>idiot John B.(Bullshitter) is, or do you think those are the kind of trails
>that are being discussed here? He not only wants to deconstruct words, but
>he also thinks he is being witty, not realizing that he is just being dumb
>and stupid. It is why I will continue to treat him with nothing but
>contempt.
Ah yes.... another gem of wisdom from the lips of the great Dolan, who
has been treating us to his theme song "Trails are for walking; What’s
the matter? Can’t walk?" for some years now. Has his little ditty ever
mentioned foot trails, walking trails or even snake tails? Nope, not a
single peep out of his pristine lips.
Strangely enough my spelling checker argues that "What's" and "can't"
are misspelled words. And, again strangely, my dictionary doesn't seem
to list either of the two words and my Thesaurus says "Queried string
not found in thesaurus!" when I query either word.
Ah well...
Now you must to understand that this "non specific" description, as it
might be termed, is not the sole province of Dolan. No, it common to
every con man and shyster that ever existed.
Why? Well, by using a word that can be interpreted in more than one
manner it gives the shyster an "out", or might term it an excuse.
If an honest man should say, "Hey There, what about the Taimiami
Trail? That is for automobiles" why the shyster can say, well, I
didn't mean that kind of trail. (begin to see why I mentioned snake
trails?)
The Great Dalon appears to be using a technique common to the "not so
great", as one might call them. One can only speculate on why he feels
the need to do so.
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:l9vnlbdbe6p1hosf8...@4ax.com...
>[...]
>
>Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>> Trails are for walking.
>
>>> And yet another gem of wisdom from the master's voice...... well
>except for the Taimiami Trail is 275 miles of paved road, or The
>Skechewaug Trail, up there in VT. or maybe The National Old Trails
>Road, also known as the Ocean-to-Ocean Highway, which was established
>in 1912,It was 3,096 miles long and stretched from Baltimore, Maryland
>(some old maps indicate New York City was the actual eastern
>terminus), to California. Much of the route follows the old National
>Road and the Santa Fe Trail.
>
>The above response should tell anyone still left on this newsgroup what an
>idiot John B.(Bullshitter) is, or do you think those are the kind of trails
>that are being discussed here? He not only wants to deconstruct words, but
>he also thinks he is being witty, not realizing that he is just being dumb
>and stupid. It is why I will continue to treat him with nothing but
>contempt.
has been treating us to his theme song "Trails are for walking; What’s
the matter? Can’t walk?" for some years now. Has his little ditty ever
mentioned foot trails, walking trails or even snake tails? Nope, not a
single peep out of his pristine lips.
Strangely enough my spelling checker argues that "What's" and "can't"
are misspelled words. And, again strangely, my dictionary doesn't seem
to list either of the two words and my Thesaurus says "Queried string
not found in thesaurus!" when I query either word.
Ah well...
Now you must to understand that this "non specific" description, as it
might be termed, is not the sole province of Dolan. No, it common to
every con man and shyster that ever existed.
Why? Well, by using a word that can be interpreted in more than one
manner it gives the shyster an "out", or might term it an excuse.
If an honest man should say, "Hey There, what about the Taimiami
Trail? That is for automobiles" why the shyster can say, well, I
didn't mean that kind of trail. (begin to see why I mentioned snake
trails?)
The Great Dalon appears to be using a technique common to the "not so
great", as one might call them. One can only speculate on why he feels
the need to do so.
--
cheers,
John B.
John B.
Jun 12, 2016, 6:16:48 AM6/12/16
to
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 03:31:47 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:l9vnlbdbe6p1hosf8...@4ax.com...
>
>On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
>wrote:
>
>>This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter). He should know by now what to
>>expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup. Do not read any of the crap
>
>Of course I know what to expect from you :-) A spoiled little boy who
>doesn't want anyone else to play in HIS sand box.
>
Hey there Dolan, I came across a post you made some years ago and
thought I'd just show the folks some of your more revealing prose
Posted on alt.firefighters some time ago, it reads in part:
"No one on these cycling groups give a good god damn about
firefighters. They are vastly over rated as a group. Anyone who would
risk their life to save property is a fool, but I have always thought
that all firefighters are fools. Hells Bells, I would not even risk my
life to save another life. I mean, just how stupid can you get?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota"
You can tell this guy is all heart.
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:l9vnlbdbe6p1hosf8...@4ax.com...
>
>On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
>wrote:
>
>>This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter). He should know by now what to
>>expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup. Do not read any of the crap
>
>Of course I know what to expect from you :-) A spoiled little boy who
>doesn't want anyone else to play in HIS sand box.
>
thought I'd just show the folks some of your more revealing prose
Posted on alt.firefighters some time ago, it reads in part:
"No one on these cycling groups give a good god damn about
firefighters. They are vastly over rated as a group. Anyone who would
risk their life to save property is a fool, but I have always thought
that all firefighters are fools. Hells Bells, I would not even risk my
life to save another life. I mean, just how stupid can you get?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota"
You can tell this guy is all heart.
--
cheers,
John B.
John B.
Jun 12, 2016, 6:21:56 AM6/12/16
to
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 17:16:46 +0700, John B. <slocom...@gmail.xyz>
wrote:
I really hate to answer my own posts but I thought someone might be
interested to read the response to the above post.
The guy that replied said, "Don't respond to him. He is just another
troll."
Which seemed to be the end of the thread.
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
interested to read the response to the above post.
The guy that replied said, "Don't respond to him. He is just another
troll."
Which seemed to be the end of the thread.
--
cheers,
John B.
news16
Jun 12, 2016, 7:47:53 AM6/12/16
to
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter).
Obviously he has won as you've now resorting to insults.
> This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter).
EdwardDolan
Jun 12, 2016, 10:30:51 PM6/12/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:ohdqlbpoec46t4f2k...@4ax.com...
>>This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter). He should know by now
what to
>>expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup.
>>> Hey there Dolan, I came across a post you made some years ago
and
thought I'd just show the folks some of your more revealing prose
>>> Posted on alt.firefighters some time ago, it reads in
part:
>>> "No one on these cycling groups give a good god damn
about
firefighters. They are vastly over rated as a group. Anyone who would
risk their life to save property is a fool, but I have always thought
that all firefighters are fools. Hells Bells, I would not even risk
my
life to save another life. I mean, just how stupid can you get?”
My God, my own brilliance amazes me at times. I have grown
more mellow in the ensuing years, but I stand behind everything I have ever
posted to Usenet. However I wish you would risk your life to save either some
property or some life, and then lose your life into the bargain. Nothing like
being a complete fool!
>>> You can tell this guy is all heart.
You can that Ed Dolan the Great is all brain. Hearts are for
fools like you.
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
EdwardDolan
Jun 12, 2016, 10:41:32 PM6/12/16
to
"John B." wrote in message news:5ndqlbp7qlrr3q3em...@4ax.com...
[...]
> I really hate to answer my own posts but I thought someone might
be
interested to read the response to the above post.
> The guy that replied said, "Don't respond to him. He is just
another
troll."
That is what all of Usenet rapidly became after the first few
flush years – a forum for trolls. Why? Because there were no moderators. That is
how fools like you came to dominate Usenet. All we are doing here is trolling
one another because you refuse to post content. You are too god damn stupid to
own up to yourself. The only difference between us is that I am a brilliant
troll and you are a goofy troll.
> Which seemed to be the end of the thread.
I am an expert at ending all threads.
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
EdwardDolan
Jun 12, 2016, 11:06:29 PM6/12/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:n7bqlbtthld40mqfn...@4ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 03:47:28 -0500, "EdwardDolan"
<edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:l9vnlbdbe6p1hosf8...@4ax.com...
>[...]
>
>Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>> Trails are for walking.
>
>>> And yet another gem of wisdom from the master's voice......
well
>except for the Taimiami Trail is 275 miles of paved road, or The
>Skechewaug Trail, up there in VT. or maybe The National Old
Trails
>Road, also known as the Ocean-to-Ocean Highway, which was
established
>in 1912,It was 3,096 miles long and stretched from Baltimore,
Maryland
>(some old maps indicate New York City was the actual eastern
>terminus), to California. Much of the route follows the old
National
>Road and the Santa Fe Trail.
>
>The above response should tell anyone still left on this newsgroup what
an
>idiot John B.(Bullshitter) is, or do you think those are the kind of
trails
>that are being discussed here? He not only wants to deconstruct words,
but
>he also thinks he is being witty, not realizing that he is just being
dumb
>and stupid. It is why I will continue to treat him with nothing but
>contempt.
>>>> Ah yes.... another gem of wisdom from the lips of the
great Dolan, who
has been treating us to his theme song "Trails are for walking;
What’s
the matter? Can’t walk?" for some years now. Has his little ditty
ever
mentioned foot trails, walking trails or even snake tails [trails]? Nope,
not a
single peep out of his pristine lips.
All messages are in some kind of context. The fact that you
can’t figure out the context just tells the world what a dummy you are.
>>>> Strangely enough my spelling checker argues that "What's"
and "can't"
are misspelled words. And, again strangely, my dictionary doesn't
seem
to list either of the two words and my Thesaurus says "Queried string
not found in thesaurus!" when I query either word.
You had best get a new dictionary. And a spell checker must be
used by someone with some education.
What’s the matter? is short for What is the matter? Can’t walk
is short for Can not walk? Ever hear of the apostrophe? I suggest you stick to
your low brow culture and not meddle with a genius like me.
>>>> Ah well...
>>>> Now you must to understand that this "non specific"
description, as it
might be termed, is not the sole province of Dolan. No, it common to
every con man and shyster that ever existed.
John B.(Bullshitter) still does not know what is meant by
“trail” in the context of these threads on this newsgroup? His ignorance it
truly unconquerable!
>>>> Why? Well, by using a word that can be interpreted in more
than one
manner it gives the shyster an "out", or might term it an excuse.
There was always only one interpretation of the word “trail”
in the context of this newsgroup. Your feeble attempt at obfuscation is pitiful.
Leave word play to the adults.
>>>> If an honest man should say, "Hey There, what about the
Taimiami
Trail? That is for automobiles" why the shyster can say, well, I
didn't mean that kind of trail. (begin to see why I mentioned snake
trails?)
Anyone who would confuse a highway for automobiles with a
recreational trail for hikers is too god damn stupid to be using words –
period!
>>>> The Great Dalon appears to be using a technique common to
the "not so
great", as one might call them. One can only speculate on why he
feels
the need to do so.
Pathetic!
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
EdwardDolan
Jun 12, 2016, 11:18:45 PM6/12/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:njji58$qkd$2...@dont-email.me...
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter).
>> Obviously he has won as you've [you’re] now resorting to
insults.
Au contraire, my good man. He has lost as he was bound to lose
since I use words as they were meant to be used – to clarify, not to obfuscate.
I am now resorting to insults because I do not like to waste words on a fool. If
he or you or anyone else wish to post content, I am ready to argue my positions,
but I will not bother to do that when all I am getting are personal attacks. The
only thing to do then is just post prepared insults. To spend time on a fool is
something that only another fool would do.
John B.
Jun 13, 2016, 12:28:25 AM6/13/16
to
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 21:41:32 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message news:5ndqlbp7qlrr3q3em...@4ax.com...
>[...]
>
>> I really hate to answer my own posts but I thought someone might be
>interested to read the response to the above post.
>
>> The guy that replied said, "Don't respond to him. He is just another
>troll."
>
>That is what all of Usenet rapidly became after the first few flush years – a forum for trolls. Why? Because there were no moderators. That is how fools like you came to dominate Usenet. All we are doing here is trolling one another because you refuse to post content. You are too god damn stupid to own up to yourself. The only difference between us is that I am a brilliant troll and you are a goofy troll.
Amazing! From the mouth of fools....
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message news:5ndqlbp7qlrr3q3em...@4ax.com...
>[...]
>
>> I really hate to answer my own posts but I thought someone might be
>interested to read the response to the above post.
>
>> The guy that replied said, "Don't respond to him. He is just another
>troll."
>
>That is what all of Usenet rapidly became after the first few flush years – a forum for trolls. Why? Because there were no moderators. That is how fools like you came to dominate Usenet. All we are doing here is trolling one another because you refuse to post content. You are too god damn stupid to own up to yourself. The only difference between us is that I am a brilliant troll and you are a goofy troll.
--
cheers,
John B.
John B.
Jun 13, 2016, 12:38:22 AM6/13/16
to
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:18:45 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>"news16" wrote in message news:njji58$qkd$2...@dont-email.me...
>
>On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>
>> This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter).
>
>>> Obviously he has won as you've [you’re] now resorting to insults.
>
>Au contraire, my good man. He has lost as he was bound to lose since I use words as they were meant to be used
Exactly as Humpty Dumpty said, ""When I use a word it means just what
I choose it to mean - neither more or less."
One can only marvel at such an expressive individual. I'm sure that
many will recall your famous words, "I have always thought that all
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
>"news16" wrote in message news:njji58$qkd$2...@dont-email.me...
>
>On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>
>> This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter).
>
>>> Obviously he has won as you've [you’re] now resorting to insults.
>
>Au contraire, my good man. He has lost as he was bound to lose since I use words as they were meant to be used
I choose it to mean - neither more or less."
One can only marvel at such an expressive individual. I'm sure that
many will recall your famous words, "I have always thought that all
firefighters are fools. Hells Bells, I would not even risk my life to
save another life. I mean, just how stupid can you get?”
A truly heroic person. Tell us, do you still sit on the wall?
save another life. I mean, just how stupid can you get?”
--
cheers,
John B.
John B.
Jun 13, 2016, 12:43:26 AM6/13/16
to
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 21:30:49 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
Oh My God, what a blinding exhibit of brilliance.
Would you believe it? A Bi Cycle has wheels. Will wonders never cease?
By Gorry, this Dolan is really smart.
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
Would you believe it? A Bi Cycle has wheels. Will wonders never cease?
By Gorry, this Dolan is really smart.
--
cheers,
John B.
John B.
Jun 13, 2016, 1:26:27 AM6/13/16
to
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:06:28 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
Certainly. But here you are singing Do Wacka Do Wacka Do", and if some
one questions that you say "Oh, you should have known what I meant".
>
>>>>> Strangely enough my spelling checker argues that "What's" and "can't"
>are misspelled words. And, again strangely, my dictionary doesn't seem
>to list either of the two words and my Thesaurus says "Queried string
>not found in thesaurus!" when I query either word.
>
>You had best get a new dictionary. And a spell checker must be used by someone with some education.
>
>What’s the matter? is short for What is the matter? Can’t walk is short for Can not walk? Ever hear of the apostrophe? I suggest you stick to your low brow culture and not meddle with a genius like me.
>
>>>>> Ah well...
>
>>>>>
>
"Bicycles have wheels"? Well of course they do.
"Wheels are for roads." Well perhaps, but for countless ages, as I
pointed out, people rolled them on trails...
My dictionary lists 26 meanings for the word "Trail", used as a noun.
Which would seem to give Dolan quite a bit of leeway when he says, Oh,
you don't understand, I didn't mean that".
As an aside, legal document are so complex partially they carefully
define every descriptive word used in the document. This is so
important that it is usually the second section of the document, right
after the first section that sets forth the purpose of the contract.
Which, of course, is done to prevent the sleazier section of the
population from doing exactly what Dolan is attempting - avoiding
responsibility by saying "Oh, I didn't mean that".
--
cheers,
John B.
one questions that you say "Oh, you should have known what I meant".
>
>>>>> Strangely enough my spelling checker argues that "What's" and "can't"
>are misspelled words. And, again strangely, my dictionary doesn't seem
>to list either of the two words and my Thesaurus says "Queried string
>not found in thesaurus!" when I query either word.
>
>You had best get a new dictionary. And a spell checker must be used by someone with some education.
>
>What’s the matter? is short for What is the matter? Can’t walk is short for Can not walk? Ever hear of the apostrophe? I suggest you stick to your low brow culture and not meddle with a genius like me.
>
>>>>> Ah well...
>
>>>>>
>
>John B.(Bullshitter) still does not know what is meant by “trail” in the context of these threads on this newsgroup? His ignorance it truly unconquerable!
In the context of this message?
"Bicycles have wheels"? Well of course they do.
"Wheels are for roads." Well perhaps, but for countless ages, as I
pointed out, people rolled them on trails...
My dictionary lists 26 meanings for the word "Trail", used as a noun.
Which would seem to give Dolan quite a bit of leeway when he says, Oh,
you don't understand, I didn't mean that".
As an aside, legal document are so complex partially they carefully
define every descriptive word used in the document. This is so
important that it is usually the second section of the document, right
after the first section that sets forth the purpose of the contract.
Which, of course, is done to prevent the sleazier section of the
population from doing exactly what Dolan is attempting - avoiding
responsibility by saying "Oh, I didn't mean that".
--
cheers,
John B.
news16
Jun 13, 2016, 1:39:10 AM6/13/16
to
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:18:45 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> "news16" wrote in message news:njji58$qkd$2...@dont-email.me...
>
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>
>> This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter).
>
>>> Obviously he has won as you've [you’re] now resorting to insults.
>
> Au contraire, my good man. He has lost as he was bound to lose since I
> use words as they were meant to be used – to clarify, not to obfuscate.
Most people call it drivel, but keep trying.
> "news16" wrote in message news:njji58$qkd$2...@dont-email.me...
>
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>
>> This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter).
>
>>> Obviously he has won as you've [you’re] now resorting to insults.
>
> Au contraire, my good man. He has lost as he was bound to lose since I
> use words as they were meant to be used – to clarify, not to obfuscate.
John B.
Jun 13, 2016, 6:57:20 AM6/13/16
to
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:39:10 -0000 (UTC), news16 <new...@woa.com.au>
wrote:
I find it interesting to find just how tenacious some people can be
defending what is essentially an untenable position.
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
defending what is essentially an untenable position.
--
cheers,
John B.
news16
Jun 13, 2016, 10:27:31 AM6/13/16
to
media. Inversely proportional.
John B.
Jun 13, 2016, 8:29:09 PM6/13/16
to
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:27:30 -0000 (UTC), news16 <new...@woa.com.au>
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:57:17 +0700, John B. wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:39:10 -0000 (UTC), news16 <new...@woa.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:18:45 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>>>
>>>> "news16" wrote in message news:njji58$qkd$2...@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter).
>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously he has won as you've [you?re] now resorting to insults.
>On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:57:17 +0700, John B. wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:39:10 -0000 (UTC), news16 <new...@woa.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:18:45 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>>>
>>>> "news16" wrote in message news:njji58$qkd$2...@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:29:09 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Au contraire, my good man. He has lost as he was bound to lose since I
>>>> use words as they were meant to be used ? to clarify, not to
>>>> Au contraire, my good man. He has lost as he was bound to lose since I
>>>> obfuscate.
>>>
>>>Most people call it drivel, but keep trying.
>>
>> I find it interesting to find just how tenacious some people can be
>> defending what is essentially an untenable position.
>
>The fact that I reply just shows the mount of trash on entertainment
>media. Inversely proportional.
I like that. Comparing Dolan with Oprah.... and Oprah wins :-)
>>>
>>>Most people call it drivel, but keep trying.
>>
>> I find it interesting to find just how tenacious some people can be
>> defending what is essentially an untenable position.
>
>The fact that I reply just shows the mount of trash on entertainment
>media. Inversely proportional.
--
cheers,
John B.
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 2:05:04 AM6/14/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:6beslbtjdrbcqnfnv...@4ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 21:30:49 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:ohdqlbpoec46t4f2k...@4ax.com...
>
>On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 03:31:47 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
>wrote:
>
>>>This message is NOT for John B.(Bullshitter). He should know by now what
>>>to
>>>expect from me. No, this is for the newsgroup.
>
>>>> Hey there Dolan, I came across a post you made some years ago and
>thought I'd just show the folks some of your more revealing prose
>
>>>> Posted on alt.firefighters some time ago, it reads in part:
>
>>>> "No one on these cycling groups give a good god damn about
>firefighters. They are vastly over rated as a group. Anyone who would
>risk their life to save property is a fool, but I have always thought
>that all firefighters are fools. Hells Bells, I would not even risk my
>life to save another life. I mean, just how stupid can you get?”
>
>My God, my own brilliance amazes me at times. I have grown more mellow in
>the ensuing years, but I stand behind everything I have ever posted to
>Usenet. However I wish you would risk your life to save either some
>property or some life, and then lose your life into the bargain. Nothing
>like being a complete fool!
>
>>>> You can tell this guy is all heart.
>
>like you.
>
>Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Oh My God, what a blinding exhibit of brilliance.
Would you believe it? A Bi Cycle has wheels. Will wonders never cease?
By Gorry, this Dolan is really smart.
>>>>> It is what wheels are for, you god damn fucking moron!
>
>Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Oh My God, what a blinding exhibit of brilliance.
Would you believe it? A Bi Cycle has wheels. Will wonders never cease?
By Gorry, this Dolan is really smart.
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 2:15:05 AM6/14/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:0geslbpi8uu3m5m2q...@4ax.com...
If you can’t figure out the context without being told what it is, then you
are too god damn fucking stupid for this newsgroup, and most likely, for any and
all newsgroups.
>
>>>>> Strangely enough my spelling checker argues that
"What's" and "can't"
>are misspelled words. And, again strangely, my dictionary doesn't
seem
>to list either of the two words and my Thesaurus says "Queried
string
>not found in thesaurus!" when I query either word.
>
>You had best get a new dictionary. And a spell checker must be used by
someone with some education.
>
>What’s the matter? is short for What is the matter? Can’t walk is short
for Can not walk? Ever hear of the apostrophe? I suggest you stick to your low
brow culture and not meddle with a genius like me.
>
>>>>> Ah well...
>
>>>>>
>
>John B.(Bullshitter) still does not know what is meant by “trail” in
the context of these threads on this newsgroup? His ignorance it truly
unconquerable!
>>>>> In the context of this message?
In the context of this newsgroup, you god damn fucking
moron!
The following shit has been deleted as it is too idiotic to
merit a response from someone so Great as Myself.
[...]
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 2:20:32 AM6/14/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:7sdslbp3ej7pg655h...@4ax.com...
meant by 'trails' though, isn't it?
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 2:23:49 AM6/14/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:njlgtu$8nc$9...@dont-email.me...
You shanky-assed, cattle-molesting, armpit-licking, shit-gobbling,
pimple-nibbling, butt-brained cockweasel!
pimple-nibbling, butt-brained cockweasel!
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 2:25:52 AM6/14/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:jr1tlbpnca9ri9phv...@4ax.com...
hemorrhoid-nibbling, cock-brained wankstain!
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 2:28:01 AM6/14/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:njmfsi$8nc$1...@dont-email.me...
You knuckleheaded, brother-raping, jock strap-smelling, tit-sucking,
boil-nibbling, cunt-brained cock jockey!
boil-nibbling, cunt-brained cock jockey!
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 2:33:24 AM6/14/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:nmjulbd92ksevphkd...@4ax.com...
You pussy-whipped, cattle-raping, crotch-slurping, ass-munching,
hemorrhoid-nibbling, cock-brained wankstain!
hemorrhoid-nibbling, cock-brained wankstain!
John B.
Jun 14, 2016, 3:42:54 AM6/14/16
to
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:15:06 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
Of course you deleted it.
You see, anything that depicts Edward as he actually is, in all his
naked glory, warts and all, must obviously, to nearly everyone, be a
filthy, nasty, damned, stinking, lie.
A lie? Of course Sir.
Anything that does not depict "the Great", in all his imagined glory,
must be a lie!
Another problem that "the Great" has is that in Ed's world words
aren't definite. They have, what one might call, "moveable meanings"
which allow Dolan to slide them around and claim and argue that they
mean "this" today... and "that" tomorrow.
"The Great" (as he describes himself) also imagines that he is a
unique and superior creature however Lewis Carroll described him way
back in November 1864, when he reported the conversation a little girl
had with an egg.
The Egg says, "When I use a word, he said, in rather a scornful tone,
'it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less."'
The little girl replies, "The question is, whether you can make words
mean so many different things."
Imagine that, a tiny little small girl revealed "The Great" as a
buffoon a hundred and fifty years ago.
The Great that was?
--
cheers,
John B.
You see, anything that depicts Edward as he actually is, in all his
naked glory, warts and all, must obviously, to nearly everyone, be a
filthy, nasty, damned, stinking, lie.
A lie? Of course Sir.
Anything that does not depict "the Great", in all his imagined glory,
must be a lie!
Another problem that "the Great" has is that in Ed's world words
aren't definite. They have, what one might call, "moveable meanings"
which allow Dolan to slide them around and claim and argue that they
mean "this" today... and "that" tomorrow.
"The Great" (as he describes himself) also imagines that he is a
unique and superior creature however Lewis Carroll described him way
back in November 1864, when he reported the conversation a little girl
had with an egg.
The Egg says, "When I use a word, he said, in rather a scornful tone,
'it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less."'
The little girl replies, "The question is, whether you can make words
mean so many different things."
Imagine that, a tiny little small girl revealed "The Great" as a
buffoon a hundred and fifty years ago.
The Great that was?
--
cheers,
John B.
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 4:19:15 AM6/14/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:gpavlb513a5e4gi53...@4ax.com...
> Of course you deleted it.
The following shit posted by John B.(Bullshit) is deleted because, of
course, it is just his usual bullshit.
[...]
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
John B.
Jun 14, 2016, 7:05:47 AM6/14/16
to
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 03:19:16 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:gpavlb513a5e4gi53...@4ax.com...
>
>> Of course you deleted it.
>
>Would that I could delete you - you god damn fucking moron!
>
>The following shit posted by John B.(Bullshit) is deleted because, of
>course, it is just his usual bullshit.
Ohooo... I just love it when you talk dirty.
And of course you must be correct, your rapid attempts for a quick
"cover up" is noted. To paraphrase the Great One, "What's the matter?
Can't stand the truth?"
What was it that President Truman said? Was it, "If you can't stand
the heat get out of the kitchen"?
>
>Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
>
>Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
>
>Ed Dolan the Great – Minnesota
>
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:gpavlb513a5e4gi53...@4ax.com...
>
>> Of course you deleted it.
>
>Would that I could delete you - you god damn fucking moron!
>
>The following shit posted by John B.(Bullshit) is deleted because, of
>course, it is just his usual bullshit.
And of course you must be correct, your rapid attempts for a quick
"cover up" is noted. To paraphrase the Great One, "What's the matter?
Can't stand the truth?"
What was it that President Truman said? Was it, "If you can't stand
the heat get out of the kitchen"?
>
>Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
>
>Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
>
>Ed Dolan the Great – Minnesota
>
cheers,
John B.
news16
Jun 14, 2016, 8:49:32 AM6/14/16
to
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:33:25 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> You pussy-whipped, cattle-raping, crotch-slurping, ass-munching,
> hemorrhoid-nibbling, cock-brained wankstain!
Why did you stop? you were obviously on a roll exposing your sad life.
> You pussy-whipped, cattle-raping, crotch-slurping, ass-munching,
> hemorrhoid-nibbling, cock-brained wankstain!
news16
Jun 14, 2016, 8:52:01 AM6/14/16
to
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:28:02 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> You knuckleheaded, brother-raping, jock strap-smelling, tit-sucking,
> boil-nibbling, cunt-brained cock jockey!
Not original.
> You knuckleheaded, brother-raping, jock strap-smelling, tit-sucking,
> boil-nibbling, cunt-brained cock jockey!
>
> Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
>
> Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
My great, great great grandpappy said said riding a bicycle would take me
> Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
>
> Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
around the world. the guy who decided to walk it is still going.
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 9:14:37 AM6/14/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:qnovlbp9vvl823c93...@4ax.com...
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 03:19:16 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:gpavlb513a5e4gi53...@4ax.com...
>
>> Of course you deleted it.
>
>Would that I could delete you - you god damn fucking moron!
>
>The following shit posted by John B.(Bullshit) is deleted because, of
>course, it is just his usual bullshit.
Decipher this:
You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting
naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted
fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 9:17:53 AM6/14/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:njougr$8nc$1...@dont-email.me...
I can see that you need something more to do too, just like John
B.(Bullshitter).
Decipher this:
You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting
naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted
fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.
B.(Bullshitter).
Decipher this:
You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting
naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted
fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.
EdwardDolan
Jun 14, 2016, 9:21:44 AM6/14/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:njoulg$8nc$1...@dont-email.me...
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:28:02 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> You knuckleheaded, brother-raping, jock strap-smelling, tit-sucking,
> boil-nibbling, cunt-brained cock jockey!
>> Not original.
It is more than original enough for the likes of an Asshole like you.
> Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
>
> Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
>> My great, great great grandpappy said said riding a bicycle would take me
around the world. the guy who decided to walk it is still going.
Ride your bike on roads and stay the hell off of trails.
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:28:02 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> You knuckleheaded, brother-raping, jock strap-smelling, tit-sucking,
> boil-nibbling, cunt-brained cock jockey!
>> Not original.
> Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
>
> Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
>> My great, great great grandpappy said said riding a bicycle would take me
around the world. the guy who decided to walk it is still going.
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
news16
Jun 14, 2016, 10:55:47 AM6/14/16
to
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:17:54 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> "news16" wrote in message news:njougr$8nc$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:33:25 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>
>> You pussy-whipped, cattle-raping, crotch-slurping, ass-munching,
>> hemorrhoid-nibbling, cock-brained wankstain!
>
>>> Why did you stop? you were obviously on a roll exposing your sad life.
>
> I can see that you need something more to do too,
Usual drivel.
> "news16" wrote in message news:njougr$8nc$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:33:25 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>
>> You pussy-whipped, cattle-raping, crotch-slurping, ass-munching,
>> hemorrhoid-nibbling, cock-brained wankstain!
>
>>> Why did you stop? you were obviously on a roll exposing your sad life.
>
> I can see that you need something more to do too,
news16
Jun 14, 2016, 10:57:00 AM6/14/16
to
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:21:45 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> "news16" wrote in message news:njoulg$8nc$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
>
> "news16" wrote in message news:njoulg$8nc$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
>
>>> My great, great great grandpappy said said riding a bicycle would take
>>> me
> around the world. the guy who decided to walk it is still going.
>
> Ride your bike on roads and stay the hell off of trails.
Lol, when he was riding, there were no roads. It was all trails.
>>> me
> around the world. the guy who decided to walk it is still going.
>
> Ride your bike on roads and stay the hell off of trails.
John B.
Jun 14, 2016, 10:10:57 PM6/14/16
to
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:14:38 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
But, tell us, does your mommy let you talk that way around the house?
Or can you only write it, furtively, on your computer?
"Mountain bikes have wheels"? Good Lord man. Haven't you figured it
out yet? "Bike" is a contraction of the word "bicycle" and "bi" is a
synonym for "two" and "cycles" is, again a synonym, for circle, or in
this case "wheel".
Thus a reasonably well educated person would immediately grasp the
fact that a "bike", or bicycle, has two wheels; and a unicycle has one
and (amazing as it may be) a tricycle has three.
But you've not tumbled to the fact in many years now. Tell us, have
you learned to tie your own shoes? Or is mommy still helping you?
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:qnovlbp9vvl823c93...@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 03:19:16 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
>wrote:
>
>>"John B." wrote in message
>>news:gpavlb513a5e4gi53...@4ax.com...
>>
>>> Of course you deleted it.
>>
>>Would that I could delete you - you god damn fucking moron!
>>
>>The following shit posted by John B.(Bullshit) is deleted because, of
>>course, it is just his usual bullshit.
>[...]
>
>Decipher this:
>
>You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
>You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
>foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
>crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
>cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting
>naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted
>fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.
Ohoooo Doodles! You are so masterful.
>"John B." wrote in message
>news:qnovlbp9vvl823c93...@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 03:19:16 -0500, "EdwardDolan" <edo...@iw.net>
>wrote:
>
>>"John B." wrote in message
>>news:gpavlb513a5e4gi53...@4ax.com...
>>
>>> Of course you deleted it.
>>
>>Would that I could delete you - you god damn fucking moron!
>>
>>The following shit posted by John B.(Bullshit) is deleted because, of
>>course, it is just his usual bullshit.
>[...]
>
>Decipher this:
>
>You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
>You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
>foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
>crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
>cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting
>naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted
>fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.
But, tell us, does your mommy let you talk that way around the house?
Or can you only write it, furtively, on your computer?
"Mountain bikes have wheels"? Good Lord man. Haven't you figured it
out yet? "Bike" is a contraction of the word "bicycle" and "bi" is a
synonym for "two" and "cycles" is, again a synonym, for circle, or in
this case "wheel".
Thus a reasonably well educated person would immediately grasp the
fact that a "bike", or bicycle, has two wheels; and a unicycle has one
and (amazing as it may be) a tricycle has three.
But you've not tumbled to the fact in many years now. Tell us, have
you learned to tie your own shoes? Or is mommy still helping you?
--
cheers,
John B.
EdwardDolan
Jun 15, 2016, 10:49:49 PM6/15/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:nhd1mbtsq2jof2r6o...@4ax.com...
[...]
>>The following shit posted by John B.(Bullshit) is deleted because, of
>>course, it is just his usual bullshit.
>[...]
>
>Decipher this:
>
>You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
>You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
>foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
>crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
>cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting
>naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted
>fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.
Ohoooo Doodles! You are so masterful.
But, tell us, does your mommy let you talk that way around the house?
Or can you only write it, furtively, on your computer?
puss-nibbling, fuck-headed assclown!
"Mountain bikes have wheels"? Good Lord man. Haven't you figured it
out yet? "Bike" is a contraction of the word "bicycle" and "bi" is a
synonym for "two" and "cycles" is, again a synonym, for circle, or in
this case "wheel".
You shanky-assed, cattle-molesting, armpit-licking, shit-gobbling,
pimple-nibbling, butt-brained cockweasel!
pimple-nibbling, butt-brained cockweasel!
Thus a reasonably well educated person would immediately grasp the
fact that a "bike", or bicycle, has two wheels; and a unicycle has one
and (amazing as it may be) a tricycle has three.
fact that a "bike", or bicycle, has two wheels; and a unicycle has one
and (amazing as it may be) a tricycle has three.
You knuckleheaded, brother-raping, jock strap-smelling, tit-sucking,
boil-nibbling, cunt-brained cock jockey!
boil-nibbling, cunt-brained cock jockey!
But you've not tumbled to the fact in many years now. Tell us, have
you learned to tie your own shoes? Or is mommy still helping you?
You pussy-whipped, brother-humping, shit-smelling, toe jam-sucking,
you learned to tie your own shoes? Or is mommy still helping you?
zit-nibbling, butt-brained cockweasel!
EdwardDolan
Jun 15, 2016, 10:52:04 PM6/15/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:njp5ti$8nc$2...@dont-email.me...
EdwardDolan
Jun 15, 2016, 11:01:30 PM6/15/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:njp5vr$8nc$2...@dont-email.me...
What, not even any carriage roads? Maybe your grandpappy was from West
Papua, where he might have known the grandpappy of John B.(Bullshitter).
Jeez, just a couple of aborigines who were too backward ever to know
anything about roads.
Papua, where he might have known the grandpappy of John B.(Bullshitter).
Jeez, just a couple of aborigines who were too backward ever to know
anything about roads.
news16
Jun 17, 2016, 3:35:53 AM6/17/16
to
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:49:50 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> "Mountain bikes have wheels"? Good Lord man. Haven't you figured it out
> yet? "Bike" is a contraction of the word "bicycle" and "bi" is a synonym
> for "two" and "cycles" is, again a synonym, for circle, or in this case
> "wheel".
You are aware that bicycles were at the forefront of the modern world.
> "Mountain bikes have wheels"? Good Lord man. Haven't you figured it out
> yet? "Bike" is a contraction of the word "bicycle" and "bi" is a synonym
> for "two" and "cycles" is, again a synonym, for circle, or in this case
> "wheel".
Their development lead to the great transport revolution.
news16
Jun 17, 2016, 3:36:36 AM6/17/16
to
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:52:05 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>>>> Usual drivel.
>
> Better drivel than drool from an Asshole like you.
>
Where, where. I'll die of shock.
>>>> Usual drivel.
>
> Better drivel than drool from an Asshole like you.
>
news16
Jun 17, 2016, 3:38:00 AM6/17/16
to
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:01:31 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
> "news16" wrote in message news:njp5vr$8nc$2...@dont-email.me...
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:21:45 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>
>> "news16" wrote in message news:njoulg$8nc$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>>>> My great, great great grandpappy said said riding a bicycle would
>>>> take me
>> around the world. the guy who decided to walk it is still going.
>>
>> Ride your bike on roads and stay the hell off of trails.
>
>>>>> Lol, when he was riding, there were no roads. It was all trails.
>
> What, not even any carriage roads?
Correct. Roads come after bicycle riders put out guides so car drivers
> "news16" wrote in message news:njp5vr$8nc$2...@dont-email.me...
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:21:45 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>
>> "news16" wrote in message news:njoulg$8nc$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>>>> My great, great great grandpappy said said riding a bicycle would
>>>> take me
>> around the world. the guy who decided to walk it is still going.
>>
>> Ride your bike on roads and stay the hell off of trails.
>
>>>>> Lol, when he was riding, there were no roads. It was all trails.
>
> What, not even any carriage roads?
would feel safe following the trails.
John B.
Jun 17, 2016, 4:00:03 AM6/17/16
to
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:38:00 -0000 (UTC), news16 <new...@woa.com.au>
wrote:
Actually, I believe that the Romans built roads, and they certainly
had two wheeled vehicles. They even built a race track, the "Circus
Maximus", in order to race them.
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
had two wheeled vehicles. They even built a race track, the "Circus
Maximus", in order to race them.
--
cheers,
John B.
news16
Jun 17, 2016, 11:02:19 AM6/17/16
to
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:59:57 +0700, John B. wrote:
>>>>>>> Lol, when he was riding, there were no roads. It was all trails.
>>>
>>> What, not even any carriage roads?
>>
>>Correct. Roads come after bicycle riders put out guides so car drivers
>>would feel safe following the trails.
>
> Actually, I believe that the Romans built roads, and they certainly had
> two wheeled vehicles. They even built a race track, the "Circus
> Maximus", in order to race them.
Not over here. YMMV.
>>>>>>> Lol, when he was riding, there were no roads. It was all trails.
>>>
>>> What, not even any carriage roads?
>>
>>Correct. Roads come after bicycle riders put out guides so car drivers
>>would feel safe following the trails.
>
> Actually, I believe that the Romans built roads, and they certainly had
> two wheeled vehicles. They even built a race track, the "Circus
> Maximus", in order to race them.
John B.
Jun 17, 2016, 8:18:09 PM6/17/16
to
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:02:18 -0000 (UTC), news16 <new...@woa.com.au>
wrote:
True :-)
And I doubt if those who were "over here" wandered through the woods
contemplating the "forest Primeval" either.
--
cheers,
John B.
wrote:
And I doubt if those who were "over here" wandered through the woods
contemplating the "forest Primeval" either.
--
cheers,
John B.
news16
Jun 17, 2016, 10:33:44 PM6/17/16
to
lot of them can best be described as "forbidden love" stories.
Anyway, the bicycle was a major factor in the migrant workfore. If you
didn't have one, you didn't get around to get the work. Not too many
people had the resource or income to buy or keep a horse.
John B.
Jun 17, 2016, 11:58:43 PM6/17/16
to
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 02:33:43 -0000 (UTC), news16 <new...@woa.com.au>
Something that the cyclists never seem to brag about is that one
bicycle, would likely eliminate the need for one horse. A horse will,
normally, produce between 15 and 35 pounds of manure a day. In 1890
New York had something like 100,000 horses. 100,000 X 35 = 3.5 million
pounds.
One could envision many different slogans based on that fact :-)
--
cheers,
John B.
bicycle, would likely eliminate the need for one horse. A horse will,
normally, produce between 15 and 35 pounds of manure a day. In 1890
New York had something like 100,000 horses. 100,000 X 35 = 3.5 million
pounds.
One could envision many different slogans based on that fact :-)
--
cheers,
John B.
EdwardDolan
Jun 18, 2016, 2:11:28 AM6/18/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:nk09a3$5tt$7...@dont-email.me...
The drool is from your every orifice, a characteristic of fucktards like
you.
Post content or get lost - you pussy-whipped, brother-humping,
you.
Post content or get lost - you pussy-whipped, brother-humping,
shit-smelling, toe jam-sucking, zit-nibbling, butt-brained cockweasel!
EdwardDolan
Jun 18, 2016, 2:17:41 AM6/18/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:nk09co$5tt$8...@dont-email.me...
There were carriage roads everywhere prior to the invention of the bicycle,
but thanks for proving what an idiot you are.
Now go fuck yourself and quit bothering the honorable members of this noble
newsgroup.
but thanks for proving what an idiot you are.
Now go fuck yourself and quit bothering the honorable members of this noble
newsgroup.
EdwardDolan
Jun 18, 2016, 2:25:21 AM6/18/16
to
"John B." wrote in message
news:uk49mb1i0rgk5u8j8...@4ax.com...
everywhere used by horse drawn carriages prior to the invention of the
bicycle. What the hell do you think Wells Fargo used in the early days of
the West? Trails or roads?
EdwardDolan
Jun 18, 2016, 3:12:55 AM6/18/16
to
"news16" wrote in message news:nk098o$5tt$6...@dont-email.me...
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:49:50 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>> "Mountain bikes have wheels"
horseless carriage. Once the automobile came full fledged on the scene, that
was the end of the bicycle as a practical means of transportation. It is
really the car that marked the beginning of the modern world, not the
bicycle. The bicycle became a toy, mostly for children, but later for adults
as well.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:49:50 -0500, EdwardDolan wrote:
>> "Mountain bikes have wheels"
> Good Lord man. Haven't you figured it out
> yet? "Bike" is a contraction of the word "bicycle" and "bi" is a synonym
> for "two" and "cycles" is, again a synonym, for circle, or in this case
> "wheel".
>>> You are aware that bicycles were at the forefront of the modern world.
Their development lead to the great transport revolution.
The bicycle enjoyed a brief interim of prominence between the horse and the
> yet? "Bike" is a contraction of the word "bicycle" and "bi" is a synonym
> for "two" and "cycles" is, again a synonym, for circle, or in this case
> "wheel".
>>> You are aware that bicycles were at the forefront of the modern world.
Their development lead to the great transport revolution.
horseless carriage. Once the automobile came full fledged on the scene, that
was the end of the bicycle as a practical means of transportation. It is
really the car that marked the beginning of the modern world, not the
bicycle. The bicycle became a toy, mostly for children, but later for adults
as well.
0 new messages