Doing that Anim8r Thing With the DEM Debate

[BTR1701]

Who schedules a debate on STAR WARS opening weekend? Debbie
Wasserman-Schultz is apparently trying to provide cover for Hillary
Clinton. It's almost as if the DNC is sheltering its hideously-flawed
predetermined nominee from public examination.


DNC put out a dancing stormtrooper video to get people hyped for the
debate.

https://twitter.com/TheDemocrats/status/678336220779429888?ref_src=twsrc%
5Etfw

America: Sorry, Debbie. I have to worm my dog.


One hour before stage time: Bernie's doing bar-dips while the CAPE FEAR
theme plays. Massive Howard Zinn tat on his back.


ABC is obviously going for the record-smallest debate audience ever.
Push away viewers with a pointless half hour of nattering talking heads.


Debate is being billed as a showdown between Hillary & Bernie. Sounds
like an argument over the early-bird special check at Denny's.


Lead-in to debate is the movie COCOON.


Llleeeettttt's get ready to rumbzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....


Hillary looks fetching in her Ann Taylor Loft "Shaved Chewbacca" sweater
frock.


Bernie Sanders: a 70-year-old man pushing 100-year-old ideas. Progress!


You can tell who is an uninformed voter because they're enthusiastic
about one of the candidates.


This group exudes the powerful confidence of three people in line at the
pharmacy.


Bernie Sanders's backwardness would almost be cute if not for the
unacknowledged violence in the system he espouses.


Bernie Sanders hacked into Hillary's computer files, officially making
him the final person left in the world to do so. He claims he didn't
actually hack into Clinton's voter file. He just socialized it.


George Stephanopoulos is surprised Republicans would tie Obama's
Secretary of State for four years to Obama.


Hillary suggests mean rhetoric is enough to radicalize people to become
psychopathic barbarians.


Martin O'Malley tries to gravy-train Hillary's applause.


Bernie is concerned about "Mooslims".


I bet all of Bernie Sanders ties have cream cheese stains on them.


Hillary's detailed plan to go after ISIS:

1. Go after ISIS.
2. Go after ISIS network.
3. Make us safe.


I hope Lincoln Chafee walks on stage holding up this photo like Sally
Field in NORMA RAE.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/88475764/Clinton.jpg


I dig O'Malley's "battle tempo" jazz hands.


Hillary: "Republicans don't want to do anything to increase incomes."
Um... yes they do. They're called jobs.


Bernie promises that anyone who creates jobs will hate him.


This is the greatest debate I've seen since 1988's Dukakis/ALF face-off.


Martin O'Malley makes me yearn for the animal charisma of Lincoln
Chaffee.


Hillz wants to establish a Math-hattan Project to invent magical
unicorns, er... I mean secure encryption back doors.


Hillary: "I don't understand all the tech, but..." If a Republican said
this, they would be ridiculed as out of touch and lost in the past.


And here comes gun control!


The question that neither Bernie nor Hillary can answer: How will giving
up my right to bear arms make my family safer?


O'Malley: "Combat assault weapons." <facepalm>


Sanders: "The American people do not need to own automatic weapons."
<second facepalm>


[Note: It has been 28 years since selective-fire weapons could be
legally manufactured for civilians and outside some very rarefied and
strictly controlled instances, they have been illegal for civilians to
own for decades. Every candidate on the debate stage is lying.]


O'Malley: We should never give up our freedoms for the promise of
security. (Except for freedoms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment.)


The panel is having trouble staying awake, as is the audience. Mission
accomplished DNC!


Bernie: "I am not saying that Martin O'Malley is a lizard, but I will
say he does not blink. See for yourself!"


Get ready, folks. We are almost at the "free college" part of the debate.


Bernie gets really excited when he lists all the new taxes he'll enact.


Hillary's got Kasich's lobster-claw hand thing going.


Oh, sweet mercy, finally a break.


And we're back. But Hillz seems to be lost back stage where she
retreated to drink her "relaxation juice".


<<SILVER ALERT>> Grandmother wearing burlap sack, last seen at
convention hall in New Hampshire. <<SILVER ALERT>>


"People keep telling me to watch THE WIRE. They're fucking with me,
right?" -- Martin O'Malley


"Maybe the back door is the wrong door."-- Hillary Clinton just now. And
there's an image that will haunt me for eternity.


Bernie now talking about how he and his wife started youth programs back
in the early Triassic.

[Note: That my-wife-is-smarter/better/prettier-than-me shtick that male
politician do is beyond tiresome.]


Crowd boos O'Malley for hinting at the fact that the other two
candidates are collectively 3000 years old.


Hillz advocates an ISIS no-fly zone but refuses to say what she'd do if
other countries violate it. Makes sense.


Three old white people will now lecture America about institutional
racism.


My favorite part of the Dem debate so far is all the diversity.


Now all the candidates are swapping heroin anecdotes. Good lord...


This is the latest Bernie Sanders has been awake since The Dead appeared
on a 1972 episode of MIDNIGHT SPECIAL.


Closing statements! Here we go!


Martin O'Malley is talking to the American people like a boyfriend
talking to a girlfriend who he cannot believe is breaking up with him.


Comrade Sanders just pledged to bring about "revolution". We now live in
an America where socialism has been given an air of legitimacy. ("There
is only one way to shorten and ease the convulsions of the old society
and the bloody birth pangs of the new: revolutionary terror." --Karl
Marx)


DNC: Thanks for not watching!!!

[FPP]

On 2015-12-20 05:23:41 +0000, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> said:

> Who schedules a debate on STAR WARS opening weekend? Debbie
> Wasserman-Schultz is apparently trying to provide cover for Hillary
> Clinton. It's almost as if the DNC is sheltering its hideously-flawed
> predetermined nominee from public examination.

Really? Is that what it's almost?

Thanks for the laugh...
--
When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm
beginning to believe it. -Clarence Darrow

[BTR1701]

In article <n55dqe$dq0$1...@dont-email.me>, FPP <fred...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 2015-12-20 05:23:41 +0000, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> said:
>
> > Who schedules a debate on STAR WARS opening weekend? Debbie
> > Wasserman-Schultz is apparently trying to provide cover for Hillary
> > Clinton. It's almost as if the DNC is sheltering its hideously-flawed
> > predetermined nominee from public examination.
>
> Really? Is that what it's almost?
>
> Thanks for the laugh...

Well, at least you made it obvious how thin-skinned progs are. You
humorless shits can't even laugh at yourselves-- you know, the way I did
with the conservative debate-- twice.

[Roger Blake]

On 2015-12-20, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> wrote:
> Well, at least you made it obvious how thin-skinned progs are. You
> humorless shits can't even laugh at yourselves-- you know, the way I did
> with the conservative debate-- twice.

Liberals are scum. At some point we'll probably have to round them
up and transport them to predetermined points around the country
where they can then be exterminated.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Blake (Posts from Google Groups killfiled due to excess spam.)

NSA sedition and treason -- http://www.DeathToNSAthugs.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Adam H. Kerman]

BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> wrote:

>Who schedules a debate on STAR WARS opening weekend? Debbie
>Wasserman-Schultz is apparently trying to provide cover for Hillary
>Clinton. It's almost as if the DNC is sheltering its hideously-flawed
>predetermined nominee from public examination.

Thanks for watching that so I didn't have to. I've watched one of these.
Gawd. I suppose I'll watch part of it on C-SPAN. Instead, I watched
Luther bring about dark justice to a London cannibal which, oddly enough,
has something in common with political debates.

I believe you're quoting Bernie there.

When Lincoln Chafee was still running, he certainly took some decent
positions. I don't admire him for dumping the Republican Party (or getting
dumped), which is in desperate need of moderates.

I still don't understand how O'Malley isn't tarnished with the Baltimore
police scandal. Uh, Baltimore cops were notorious for giving suspects
"rough rides" and "accidentally" forgetting to strap them onto benches
in the paddy wagons. Everybody knew it; it's been going on for decades.

I really can't believe the other two even acknowledge that O'Malley is alive;
what a joke of a candidate.

[BTR1701]

Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
> BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Who schedules a debate on STAR WARS opening weekend? Debbie
>> Wasserman-Schultz is apparently trying to provide cover for Hillary
>> Clinton. It's almost as if the DNC is sheltering its hideously-flawed
>> predetermined nominee from public examination.
>
> Thanks for watching that so I didn't have to. I've watched one of these.
> Gawd. I suppose I'll watch part of it on C-SPAN. Instead, I watched
> Luther bring about dark justice to a London cannibal which, oddly enough,
> has something in common with political debates.

But it wasn't even Luther that brought the justice. It was the red-headed
wilding girl from GAME OF THRONES that punched his ticket.

[FPP]

I just said "thanks for the laugh"... and your reply is that I'm "humorless".

Perhaps you do not understand what the word "laugh" means?

Man... talk about humorless.

[FPP]

On 2015-12-20 05:50:43 +0000, Roger Blake <rogb...@iname.invalid> said:

> On 2015-12-20, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> wrote:
>> Well, at least you made it obvious how thin-skinned progs are. You
>> humorless shits can't even laugh at yourselves-- you know, the way I did
>> with the conservative debate-- twice.
>
> Liberals are scum. At some point we'll probably have to round them
> up and transport them to predetermined points around the country
> where they can then be exterminated.

And here I was, thinking BTR was funny... when along comes this joker
who puts him to shame. Literally.

It's nice to know that, at this time of the year, that true
conservatives are just full of the holiday spirit.

Which, apparently, includes the extermination of fellow countrymen with
whom they have political disagreements.

Happy Holidays!
--
Never try and teach a pig to sing. You just waste your time, and you
annoy the pig.

[FPP]

I'm still trying to sort out whether Alice Morgan is really dead, or not.

Is this going to be a multi-part series? Because I didn't see anymore
episodes scheduled for any time soon?
--
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty... and the pig LIKES it.

[trotsky]

On 12/20/15 3:33 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 2015-12-20 05:30:37 +0000, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> said:
>
>> In article <n55dqe$dq0$1...@dont-email.me>, FPP <fred...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-12-20 05:23:41 +0000, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> said:
>>>
>>>> Who schedules a debate on STAR WARS opening weekend? Debbie
>>>> Wasserman-Schultz is apparently trying to provide cover for Hillary
>>>> Clinton. It's almost as if the DNC is sheltering its hideously-flawed
>>>> predetermined nominee from public examination.
>>>
>>> Really? Is that what it's almost?
>>>
>>> Thanks for the laugh...
>>
>> Well, at least you made it obvious how thin-skinned progs are. You
>> humorless shits can't even laugh at yourselves-- you know, the way I did
>> with the conservative debate-- twice.
>
> I just said "thanks for the laugh"... and your reply is that I'm
> "humorless".
>
> Perhaps you do not understand what the word "laugh" means?
>
> Man... talk about humorless.

Please. Thanny inhabits a world where "thanks for the humorless laugh"
makes sense to him. I guess what I'm trying to say, ostensibly, is he
puts the "moron" in "oxymoron".

[Rhino]

Maybe you need to dig out your copy of Prairie Fire, the manifesto that
talked about murdering 25 or 30 million Americans. Of course that wasn't
written by some obscure individual on Usenet: the authors were the
Weather Underground, among them William Ayers, good friend and mentor of
Barack H. Obama.

--
Rhino

[Rhino]

This "season" of Luther was filmed as a single two hour story but shown
here as two one hour episodes. Alice Morgan's status was deliberately
kept ambiguous so they can use her again if they want to do so in the
upcoming Luther theatrical movie.

--
Rhino

[Michael Black]

How common is the book? They self published it, while underground. I have
a copy, but then I collect such books.

Michael

[Nawskrad]

On 20/12/2015 12:23 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

> Bernie Sanders's backwardness would almost be cute if not for the
> unacknowledged violence in the system he espouses.

Are you on crack? Hillary is the one that's pro-imperialist (regime
change, rah rah go in and bust heads, etc.) -- Bernie (and O'Malley)
seem very skeptical of unilateral "interventionism" (aka warmongering,
aka violence).

> Bernie Sanders hacked into Hillary's computer files,

Ridiculous. A low level staffer in his campaign ran a search that,
because of a glitch caused by a DNC vendor screwing up, returned results
that it wasn't supposed to from a shared computer system. You make it
sound like Sanders personally snuck into a machine in Hillary's office
with malicious intent, which could not be further from the truth.

> Hillary: "Republicans don't want to do anything to increase incomes."
> Um... yes they do. They're called jobs.

Republicans (and neoliberal Democrats) talk about creating jobs, but all
they actually do is create the incentives for the so-called "job creator
class" to offshore jobs, to replace full-time work with benefits with
part-time work without benefits, and to jack up prices while depressing
wages and sending their giant profits offshore to tax havens.

> Hillz wants to establish a Math-hattan Project to invent magical
> unicorns, er... I mean secure encryption back doors.

The first thing you've said that I agree with.

> Hillary: "I don't understand all the tech, but..." If a Republican said
> this, they would be ridiculed as out of touch and lost in the past.

Most likely, only Sanders, among all of the candidates from both
parties, is not out of touch and lost in the past.

> The question that neither Bernie nor Hillary can answer: How will giving
> up my right to bear arms make my family safer?

That's simple enough. More guns tilts the advantage towards those who
initiate the use of force and thus have surprise. It's elementary game
theory, really.

> O'Malley: "Combat assault weapons." <facepalm>

What is wrong with that?

> Sanders: "The American people do not need to own automatic weapons."
> <second facepalm>

And what is wrong with that?

> [Note: It has been 28 years since selective-fire weapons could be
> legally manufactured for civilians and outside some very rarefied and
> strictly controlled instances, they have been illegal for civilians to
> own for decades. Every candidate on the debate stage is lying.]

I am pretty sure they said semiautomatic weapons. Of course, a lot of
the semiautomatic weapons are (deliberately) designed in such a way as
to be easily (if illegally) converted to full-auto, too.

> O'Malley: We should never give up our freedoms for the promise of
> security. (Except for freedoms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment.)

Europeans and Canadians seem pretty free without the need for an arsenal
sufficient to equip every man, woman, and child in the country with a gun.

> Bernie gets really excited when he lists all the new taxes he'll enact.

On the 0.1%, I believe he mentioned.

> Hillz advocates an ISIS no-fly zone but refuses to say what she'd do if
> other countries violate it. Makes sense.

And yet you say Sanders is the one most likely to embroil us in
violence. Hmm.

> Comrade Sanders just pledged to bring about "revolution". We now live in
> an America where socialism has been given an air of legitimacy.

And this frightens you? Remember, the result would be to make this place
more like, say, Sweden, not the USSR. Would you be hugely unhappy to be
in (an English-speaking) Sweden?

[anim8rfsk]

In article <alpine.LNX.2.02.1...@darkstar.example.org>,

AbeBooks has two copies, one $75, the other $334.

--
New sig pending

[Michael Black]

I paid about 3.95 for a copy about 1980, at a used bookstore. Though it
didn't look read, so maybe they had other distribution circles. It was
single copy, I've never seen another since.

I'm not sure of the exact date, it had to be late seventies or early
eighties. But in 1980, Bill and Bernadine turned themselves in.

Michael

[Barb May]

Rhino wrote:
> On 2015-12-20 4:37 AM, FPP wrote:
>> On 2015-12-20 05:50:43 +0000, Roger Blake <rogb...@iname.invalid>
>> said:
>>> On 2015-12-20, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> Well, at least you made it obvious how thin-skinned progs are. You
>>>> humorless shits can't even laugh at yourselves-- you know, the way
>>>> I did with the conservative debate-- twice.
>>>
>>> Liberals are scum. At some point we'll probably have to round them
>>> up and transport them to predetermined points around the country
>>> where they can then be exterminated.
>>
>> And here I was, thinking BTR was funny... when along comes this joker
>> who puts him to shame. Literally.
>>
>> It's nice to know that, at this time of the year, that true
>> conservatives are just full of the holiday spirit.
>>
>> Which, apparently, includes the extermination of fellow countrymen
>> with whom they have political disagreements.
>>
>> Happy Holidays!
>
> Maybe you need to dig out your copy of Prairie Fire, the manifesto
> that talked about murdering 25 or 30 million Americans.

Nope. Feel free to search the book for a quote justifying your
allegation, but you won't find it because you're repeating comments made
by a former FBI informant about what he claims he heard. Anyone who
knows anything at all about the activities of the FBI's COINTELPRO
during this period, would know better than to take anything said by the
FBI or one of their informants as fact.

> Of course
> that wasn't written by some obscure individual on Usenet: the authors
> were the Weather Underground, among them William Ayers, good friend
> and mentor of Barack H. Obama.

Nope. Not a mentor. Here's a source you won't dismiss:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2012/06/04/obama-ayers/
No one suggested that Ayers was a political adviser to candidate Obama.
The suggestion was that the two men were friends and that the friendship
might indicate that the two shared similar worldviews. ThatÕs the story
the NY Times and the rest of the media never fully investigated in 2008.

As you ought to know by now, Breitbart is prone to gross overstatement,
not understatement when it comes to the Left, so if they indicate Ayers
wasn't a mentor of Obama then he most certainly wasn't.

How many times does your information have to be proven wrong, before you
realize that your sources are shit and your worldview, based on
information from those sources, is completely inaccurate?

--
Barb

[FPP]

On 2015-12-20 14:34:50 +0000, Rhino

Shall I place it right next to YUR copy of "The Turner Diaries"?

You know the one I mean, right... I think it's in your frontrunners
nightstand, in the top drawer.

> The Turner Diaries depicts a violent revolution in the United States
> which leads to the overthrow of the federal government, nuclear war,
> and, ultimately, a race war
>
> All groups opposed by the author, such as Jews, gays, and non-whites,
> are exterminated. The book was described as "explicitly racist and
> anti-Semitic" by The New York Times and has been labeled a "bible of
> the racist right".

Merry Christmas! Enjoy the next 11 Months of Relevance, before
Hillary's FIRST term begins :-)
--
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who
are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." -Twain

[FPP]

On 2015-12-20 17:55:27 +0000, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com> said:

> How many times does your information have to be proven wrong, before you
> realize that your sources are shit and your worldview, based on
> information from those sources, is completely inaccurate?

I wonder about that, myself.

You would have thought it would have been 8 years, and two elections...
but that doesn't seem to have been enough.
--
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the
advice. -Cosby

[FPP]

On 2015-12-20 14:38:08 +0000, Rhino

I had the feeling that was it.

I don't know how you can present a two hour block, and sell it as
another "season".

Although I think they use the term "series" in the UK, as well.
--
Every day, computers are making people easier to use.

[Nawskrad]

Bernie's.

[Roger Blake]

On 2015-12-20, Rhino <no_offline_c...@example.com> wrote:
> Maybe you need to dig out your copy of Prairie Fire, the manifesto that
> talked about murdering 25 or 30 million Americans.

"Progressive" socialists have always been at the forefront of mass murder,
including of course such liberal darlings as Joey Stalin and Mao Zedong,
not to mention a certain leading figure involved in National *Socialism*
in Germany a few years back.

In the instant case of course the libs are so stoopid and humorles that
they did not realize that I was using a line from an old radio comedy show;
one that aired on the ultra-left-wing/liberal Pacifica Radio Network.

The stupidity of left-wingers is exceeded only by their arrogance and
duplicity.

[FPP]

On 2015-12-21 00:38:40 +0000, Roger Blake <rogb...@iname.invalid> said:

> On 2015-12-20, Rhino <no_offline_c...@example.com> wrote:
>> Maybe you need to dig out your copy of Prairie Fire, the manifesto that
>> talked about murdering 25 or 30 million Americans.
>
> "Progressive" socialists have always been at the forefront of mass murder,
> including of course such liberal darlings as Joey Stalin and Mao Zedong,
> not to mention a certain leading figure involved in National *Socialism*
> in Germany a few years back.
>
> In the instant case of course the libs are so stoopid and humorles that
> they did not realize that I was using a line from an old radio comedy show;
> one that aired on the ultra-left-wing/liberal Pacifica Radio Network.
>
> The stupidity of left-wingers is exceeded only by their arrogance and
> duplicity.

So, where do you put Donald J. Trump then?

His philosophy would seem to fit right in with those other figures you
mentioned.
--
Why are people with closed minds the first to open their mouths?

[Ubiquitous]

In article <n567u4$ti3$1...@speranza.aioe.org>, gms...@email.com wrote:

> Someone's sockpuppet wrote:
>> On 2015-12-20 05:30:37 +0000, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> said:

>>> Someone's sockpuppet wrote:
>>>> On 2015-12-20 05:23:41 +0000, BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> said:

>>>>> Who schedules a debate on STAR WARS opening weekend? Debbie
>>>>> Wasserman-Schultz is apparently trying to provide cover for Hillary
>>>>> Clinton. It's almost as if the DNC is sheltering its hideously-flawed
>>>>> predetermined nominee from public examination.
>>>>
>>>> Really? Is that what it's almost?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the laugh...
>>>
>>> Well, at least you made it obvious how thin-skinned progs are. You
>>> humorless shits can't even laugh at yourselves-- you know, the way I did
>>> with the conservative debate-- twice.
>>
>> I just said "thanks for the laugh"... and your reply is that I'm
>> "humorless".
>>
>> Perhaps you do not understand what the word "laugh" means?
>>
>> Man... talk about humorless.
>
>Please. Thanny inhabits a world where "thanks for the humorless laugh"
>makes sense to him. I guess what I'm trying to say, ostensibly, is he
>puts the "moron" in "oxymoron".

Oh, look! The sockpuppets are pretending to conversate again!
Funny how that happens whenever you-know-who loses a debate, is it not?

--
The old Soviet leaders had it right. Our destruction comes from within:
Moochers, parasites, and Obama.

[Ubiquitous]

In article <n571rm$v1g$2...@dont-email.me>, fred...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 2015-12-20 17:55:27 +0000, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com> said:

>> How many times does your information have to be proven wrong, before you
>> realize that your sources are shit and your worldview, based on
>> information from those sources, is completely inaccurate?
>
>I wonder about that, myself.
>
>You would have thought it would have been 8 years, and two elections...
>but that doesn't seem to have been enough.

[Ubiquitous]

atr...@mac.com wrote:

>Who schedules a debate on STAR WARS opening weekend? Debbie
>Wasserman-Schultz is apparently trying to provide cover for Hillary
>Clinton. It's almost as if the DNC is sheltering its hideously-flawed
>predetermined nominee from public examination.

"Almost as if"?

Was the Democrat debate held on a TV game show set to make the endless
promises of free stuff seem more natural?

To keep the TV audience awake during the Dem debate at St. Anselm
College, there should have been a split screen of Bill Clinton roaming
the campus.

>You can tell who is an uninformed voter because they're enthusiastic
>about one of the candidates.

The entire Democrat debate audience was brought to the hall in a Chevy
Volt. In one trip.

>Bernie Sanders hacked into Hillary's computer files, officially making
>him the final person left in the world to do so. He claims he didn't
>actually hack into Clinton's voter file. He just socialized it.

He could've saved time by just asking China what was in them.

>George Stephanopoulos is surprised Republicans would tie Obama's
>Secretary of State for four years to Obama.

I noticed they went to great lengths to avoid that elephant in the room.
Candy Crowley, realizing there are no Republicans to correct, left the
building.

>Hillary suggests mean rhetoric is enough to radicalize people to become
>psychopathic barbarians.

Oh, the irony!

>Hillary's detailed plan to go after ISIS:
>
> 1. Go after ISIS.
> 2. Go after ISIS network.
> 3. Make us safe.

This coming from one of the people responsible for creating ISIS...

Yep, once again, they tried to blame others for their failures.

>Hillary: "Republicans don't want to do anything to increase incomes."
>Um... yes they do. They're called jobs.
>
>Bernie promises that anyone who creates jobs will hate him.

+1

>Oh, sweet mercy, finally a break.
>
>And we're back. But Hillz seems to be lost back stage where she
>retreated to drink her "relaxation juice".
>
>
><<SILVER ALERT>> Grandmother wearing burlap sack, last seen at
>convention hall in New Hampshire. <<SILVER ALERT>>

Last known image of subject:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploads4/HillaryUrinal1109829948.jpg

I was kinda hoping she had another incapaciting stroke so they would cut
this "debate" short out of mercy.

This was not a debate. It was a "pre-corination show" for Hillary.

I decided to watch a rarely-shown ep of Charles in Charge at this time.

--
If you ever feel stupid, just rememeber:
People are actually going to vote for Hillary Clinton.

[Dimensional Traveler]

On 12/28/2015 2:00 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> Heirs to New Hampshire poet sue 'Big Bang Theory' producers
> NEW YORK (AP) - The heirs to a New Hampshire teacher who wrote a poem
> about a "soft kitty" say TV's "The Big Bang Theory" is violating their
> copyrights.
>
> Edith Newlin's daughters sued CBS and other media-related companies
> Monday over the copyright to a song the lawsuit says has repeatedly been
> used on the sitcom.
>
> According to the lawsuit, "The Big Bang Theory" used lyrics written by
> Newlin in the 1930s without buying the rights. The lyrics begin: "Soft
> kitty, warm kitty."
>
> "The Big Bang Theory" characters have periodically sung a lullaby
> involving that phrase.
>
> Messages seeking comment from CBS and other companies sued by Ellen
> Newlin Chase and Margaret Chase Perry were not immediately returned.
> Edith Newlin died in 2004.
>
> The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages from the show's producers and
> distributors.
>
Yea?

[A Friend]

In article <n5t2ji$p4a$2...@dont-email.me>, Dimensional Traveler

This is half of the story -- the half that makes the show's producers
look really bad. In fact, in 2007 the producers bought the rights to
the song from the publisher of a book of nursery-school doggerel. The
author's daughters feel cut out and are suing, even though their beef
appears to be with the publisher and not the show. See:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2015/12/28/lawsuit-claims-big-bang-
stole-soft-kitty-song/77989574/

The daughters claim never to have seen the show and not known anything
about the use of the lyrics until 2014. I expect that's an attempt to
show that their suit is timely, even though it isn't.

This will be settled for go-away money.

[Dimensional Traveler]

"Deep Pockets".