"Clinton Cash" the movie

[RichA]

http://www.breitbart.com/clinton-cash-movie/

[Barb May]

RichA wrote:
> http://www.breitbart

This crude hatchet job by a Right-wing guttersnipe makes the same
logical error over and over again by repeatedly claiming that if one
thing followed another then it's a case of cause-and-effect. The book's
author admitted he has no hard evidence supporting his allegations.

--
Barb

[RichA]

So, is everyone who is anti-Clinton a hatchet-wielder? No one has any legitimate arguments against her being president? Your answer will determine your political stripe.

[ZZyXX]

although to be fair he does make an excellent case that corporations are
evil, greedy "people"

[Dimensional Traveler]

Corporations are required by law to be greedy.

--
Running the rec.arts.TV Channels Watched Survey for Summer 2016

[NoBody]

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:36:12 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com>
wrote:

Perhaps you can provide specifics as to what was inaccurate instead of
just ranting?

[Barb May]

You're saying if I criticize one hatchet job on Clinton that means I
don't think any criticism of Clinton is valid. That's moronic.

--
Barb

[Ubiquitous]

NoB...@nowhere.com wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:36:12 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com>
>wrote:

>>This crude hatchet job by a Right-wing guttersnipe makes the same
>>logical error over and over again by repeatedly claiming that if one
>>thing followed another then it's a case of cause-and-effect. The book's
>>author admitted he has no hard evidence supporting his allegations.
>
>Perhaps you can provide specifics as to what was inaccurate instead of
>just ranting?

Of course he can't! All he can do is use ad hominems.

--
BREAKING NEWS
In other news, somehow Hillary still isn't in prison...

[FPP]

On 2016-07-29 16:18:32 +0000, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:

> NoB...@nowhere.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:36:12 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com>
>> wrote:
>
>>> This crude hatchet job by a Right-wing guttersnipe makes the same
>>> logical error over and over again by repeatedly claiming that if one
>>> thing followed another then it's a case of cause-and-effect. The book's
>>> author admitted he has no hard evidence supporting his allegations.
>>
>> Perhaps you can provide specifics as to what was inaccurate instead of
>> just ranting?
>
> Of course he can't! All he can do is use ad hominems.

Don't play the sockpuppet's game. All he wants to do is have you work
to prove what he already knows.
Just give him a link, and let him do his own work. He doesn't really
care anyway.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/05/05/clinton-cash-author-peter-schweizer-admits-hes/203528

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/clinton-cash-bill-hillary-scandal-book

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/clinton-cash-publisher-corrects-7-or-8-inaccurate-passages-117946

--


Q: How do you know when <NoB...@nowhere.com> is lying? A: Ubiquitous
<web...@polaris.net> fingers are moving.
<NoB...@nowhere.com> reveals himself to be a sockpuppet of sickpuppy
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=142705573800
http://fc00.deviantart.net/images3/i/2004/181/4/a/The_Lurking_Sock_Puppet.jpg

[Barb May]

FPP wrote:
> On 2016-07-29 16:18:32 +0000, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>
>> NoB...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:36:12 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> This crude hatchet job by a Right-wing guttersnipe makes the same
>>>> logical error over and over again by repeatedly claiming that if
>>>> one thing followed another then it's a case of cause-and-effect.
>>>> The book's author admitted he has no hard evidence supporting his
>>>> allegations.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you can provide specifics as to what was inaccurate instead
>>> of just ranting?
>>
>> Of course he can't! All he can do is use ad hominems.
>
> Don't play the sockpuppet's game. All he wants to do is have you work
> to prove what he already knows.
> Just give him a link, and let him do his own work. He doesn't really
> care anyway.
>
> http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/05/05/clinton-cash-author-peter-schweizer-admits-hes/203528
>
> https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/clinton-cash-bill-hillary-scandal-book
>
> http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/clinton-cash-publisher-corrects-7-or-8-inaccurate-passages-117946

Those two socks are in my killfile along with several others who have
tried to troll me.

About a week ago Rhino tried to play that same game by asking me to
prove something. This was my answer to him and every other a'hole who
thinks demanding proof is a one-way street and a good way to troll
someone:

"Learn how to use Google, because I'm not spoon-feeding anything else to
you. The proof is there for you to find all on your own. You have
repeatedly refused to provide proof of your own assertions when it was
demanded, so you have given up the right to ask others for proof, or to
be treated as if you were anything other than a troll who is just trying
to waste my time. Don't ever ask me for proof of anything because all
you'll ever get from me is more humiliation."


--
Barb

[Rhino]

H

Humiliation? Hardly! All I get from you is a belly laugh as you
arrogantly dismiss the proof I do provide as being from "the Right Wing
echo chamber" or "a right wing rag".



--
Rhino

[NoBody]

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 17:04:44 -0400, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2016-07-29 16:18:32 +0000, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>
>> NoB...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:36:12 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> This crude hatchet job by a Right-wing guttersnipe makes the same
>>>> logical error over and over again by repeatedly claiming that if one
>>>> thing followed another then it's a case of cause-and-effect. The book's
>>>> author admitted he has no hard evidence supporting his allegations.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you can provide specifics as to what was inaccurate instead of
>>> just ranting?
>>
>> Of course he can't! All he can do is use ad hominems.
>
>Don't play the sockpuppet's game. All he wants to do is have you work
>to prove what he already knows.
>Just give him a link, and let him do his own work. He doesn't really
>care anyway.
>
>http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/05/05/clinton-cash-author-peter-schweizer-admits-hes/203528
>
>https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/clinton-cash-bill-hillary-scandal-book
>
>http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/clinton-cash-publisher-corrects-7-or-8-inaccurate-passages-117946

You provide three left wing citations as your proof? Good grief...

[NoBody]

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:38:50 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com>

wrote:

>FPP wrote:
>> On 2016-07-29 16:18:32 +0000, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>
>>> NoB...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:36:12 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> This crude hatchet job by a Right-wing guttersnipe makes the same
>>>>> logical error over and over again by repeatedly claiming that if
>>>>> one thing followed another then it's a case of cause-and-effect.
>>>>> The book's author admitted he has no hard evidence supporting his
>>>>> allegations.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you can provide specifics as to what was inaccurate instead
>>>> of just ranting?
>>>
>>> Of course he can't! All he can do is use ad hominems.
>>
>> Don't play the sockpuppet's game. All he wants to do is have you work
>> to prove what he already knows.
>> Just give him a link, and let him do his own work. He doesn't really
>> care anyway.
>>
>> http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/05/05/clinton-cash-author-peter-schweizer-admits-hes/203528
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/clinton-cash-bill-hillary-scandal-book
>>
>> http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/clinton-cash-publisher-corrects-7-or-8-inaccurate-passages-117946
>
>Those two socks are in my killfile along with several others who have
>tried to troll me.
>

1st error: Your assumption above is incorrect.

>About a week ago Rhino tried to play that same game by asking me to
>prove something. This was my answer to him and every other a'hole who
>thinks demanding proof is a one-way street and a good way to troll
>someone:

2nd error: Anyone who makes a claim of fact should be able to back it
up with credible citations upon request.

>
>"Learn how to use Google, because I'm not spoon-feeding anything else to
>you. The proof is there for you to find all on your own. You have
>repeatedly refused to provide proof of your own assertions when it was
>demanded, so you have given up the right to ask others for proof, or to
>be treated as if you were anything other than a troll who is just trying
>to waste my time. Don't ever ask me for proof of anything because all
>you'll ever get from me is more humiliation."

3rd and final (for now) error: Believing that it is logical that
someone else do your homework for you.

[NoBody]

And you'll note that the "proof" provided above came from the "Left
Wing echo chamber" so has zero credibility.

[Ubiquitous]

NoB...@nowhere.com wrote:

Funny how "Barb May" accuses others of what he routine practices, is
it not?


--
Hillary will now receive classified briefings, which means China,
Russia, and every hacker will also receive classified briefings.

[Barb May]

Maybe you are too stupid to realize you should be humiliated.

You haven't provided any proof when it has been demanded, you liar. Most
of the time you claim not to know where you got your information, even
as you make ridiculous assertions. Every time I trace the source of your
lies the source is either Brietbart or Infowars. Now tell us why
anything from Brietbart and Infowars should be believed.

--
Barb

[FPP]

You are a joke... just like your hero, Trump.
Both of you are delusional, and both of you are losers. You, now...
him, in November.

But look on the bright side... you can cry about it for another four years.
--
Am I getting older... or is the Supermarket just playing *great* music?

[FPP]

Ad hominem attack noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
--
Originality is the fine art of remembering what you hear but forgetting
where you heard it. -LJ Peter

[NoBody]

Lack of useful information noted. Get back to us when you have
something to contribute.

[NoBody]

On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 08:42:39 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com>

Tell us why anything from mediamatters should be believed. Barb May
is the ultimate hypocrite.

[Ubiquitous]

FFPsky is so predictible, is he not?

[FPP]

--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley

[bruce2...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, 28 July 2016 12:58:20 UTC-4, Barb May wrote:

> RichA wrote:
> > http://www.breitbart
>
> This crude hatchet job by a Right-wing guttersnipe makes the same
> logical error over and over again by repeatedly claiming that if one
> thing followed another then it's a case of cause-and-effect.

I guess that's a "post hoc fallacy" claim (post hoc ergo propter hoc is latin for "after this, therefore because of this", which is a logical fallacy that states "since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X."

> The book's
> author admitted he has no hard evidence supporting his allegations

The "Clinton Cash" author (Peter Schweitzer) had to correct eight passages in his book. Sad.

[NoBody]

Lack of useful information noted. Get back to us when you something
to contribute.

[Adam H. Kerman]

Have you met "Barb May"?

[Ubiquitous]

[FPP]

Ad hominem blah, blah, blah...
--
On Donald Trump: "He's written a lot of books about business... they
all seem to end at Chapter 11." -HRC

[FPP]

On 2016-08-01 13:21:07 +0000, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:

> NoB...@nowhere.com wrote:
> FFPsky is so predictible, is he not?

Here... here is something else to laugh at, boys. Laugh all you
like... but the real joke here is YOUR candidate.
He's a boat anchor around the neck of every conservative and Republican
running for office today.

> John Harwood @JohnJHarwood
> longtime ally of Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager: "Manafort not
> challenging Trump anymore. Mailing it in. Staff suicidal."
>
> I exchanged messages this evening with a longtime ally of Trump
> campaign manager Paul Manafort, who I asked about who was calling the
> shots in the campaign. The response indicated that Manafort, a veteran
> of Republican politics brought in this spring for the transition from
> primaries to the general election, has lost control over his candidate.
>
> "Manafort not challenging (Trump) anymore," Manafort's ally wrote.
> "Mailing it in. Staff suicidal."

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/02/ally-of-trump-staffer-paul-manafort-the-staff-is-suicidal-hes-mailing-it-in.html

Ali

> Vitali @alivitali
> A Trump campaign source, in reax to this, tells me "it's all true" and
> "way worse than people realize."

http://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2016/08/02/donald-trumps-campaign-staff-rumored-to-be-suicidal-campaign-manager-mailing-it-in/

And

while your roaring at that, say a little prayer for Tea Party
conservative Republican Tim Huelskamp... 'cause he just had his balls
kicked up into his throat.

> Representative Tim Huelskamp, a member of the hard-line conservative
> Freedom Caucus, lost to a political newcomer on Tuesday in the
> Republican primary for his Kansas district.
>
> Mr. Huelskamp, who was elected to Congress in 2010 and quickly earned a
> reputation for frustrating Republican leaders, was defeated by Roger
> Marshall, an obstetrician from Great Bend, in the primary for the First
> Congressional District, which covers western Kansas and much of the
> state’s center.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/03/us/politics/tim-huelskamp-roger-marshall-kansas-primary.html?_r=0

To

add to your hilarity, check out what Republican conservative darling
Meg Whitman, former CEO of HP said today.

> Meg Whitman, a Hewlett Packard executive and Republican fund-raiser,
> said Tuesday that she would support Hillary Clinton for president and
> give a “substantial” contribution to her campaign in order to stop
> Donald J. Trump, whom she berated as a threat to American democracy.
>
> “I will vote for Hillary, I will talk to my Republican friends about
> helping her, and I will donate to her campaign and try to raise money
> for her,” Ms. Whitman said in a telephone interview.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/03/us/politics/meg-whitman-hillary-clinton.html

Not only is she voting for Hillary, she's going to raise money and
bring her friends on board. Suck it. Hard.
Keep laughin' boys... while you can.
--
The 2016 election isn't about Democrat vs Republican, or Right vs Left.
This election is about Normal vs Abnormal -Vox 7/30/2016

[NoBody]

Well that response was predictable too...

[Ubiquitous]

I hear he looks a lot like "trotsky".

[FPP]

On 2016-08-03 05:28:08 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:

> In article <nnqdu0$gjh$4...@news.albasani.net>, a...@chinet.com wrote:
>> NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:36:12 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>> RichA wrote:
>
>>>>> http://www.breitbart
>>>>
>>>> This crude hatchet job by a Right-wing guttersnipe makes the same
>>>> logical error over and over again by repeatedly claiming that if one
>>>> thing followed another then it's a case of cause-and-effect. The book's
>>>> author admitted he has no hard evidence supporting his allegations.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you can provide specifics as to what was inaccurate instead of
>>> just ranting?
>>
>> Have you met "Barb May"?
>
> I hear he looks a lot like "trotsky".

Ad hominem blah, blah, blah... etc. Get back to us blah, blah, blah... etc.

Insert ASCII art here:
--
"For too long, Reality TV star real-estate Moguls have been silenced by
the immigrant parents of slain US Soldiers.
"Trump says: "No more." - Eli Lake

[Ubiquitous]

QED

[FPP]

[trotsky]

On 8/3/16 5:03 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 2016-08-03 05:28:08 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>
>> In article <nnqdu0$gjh$4...@news.albasani.net>, a...@chinet.com wrote:
>>> NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:36:12 -0800, "Barb May" <bar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>> RichA wrote:
>>
>>>>>> http://www.breitbart
>>>>>
>>>>> This crude hatchet job by a Right-wing guttersnipe makes the same
>>>>> logical error over and over again by repeatedly claiming that if one
>>>>> thing followed another then it's a case of cause-and-effect. The
>>>>> book's
>>>>> author admitted he has no hard evidence supporting his allegations.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you can provide specifics as to what was inaccurate instead of
>>>> just ranting?
>>>
>>> Have you met "Barb May"?
>>
>> I hear he looks a lot like "trotsky".
>
> Ad hominem blah, blah, blah... etc. Get back to us blah, blah, blah...
> etc.
>
> Insert ASCII art here:

I like it when Pubie uses me as a brand name. It's weird though, if
Barb May is my sockpuppet how come she stopped responding to me a long
time ago when I told her she was an idiot for saying Obama is a
"disappointment"?