In article <o1a3lq$sf7$
2...@news.albasani.net>, Adam H. Kerman
<
a...@chinet.com> wrote:
> A Friend wrote:
> >Adam H. Kerman <
a...@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>A Friend wrote:
> >>>David Johnston <
Davidjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>On 11/20/2016 11:38 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> >>>>>On 11/20/2016 12:04 PM, David Johnston wrote:
>
> >>>>>>1. A Diva's Christmas: "Superdiva" Ebony Scrooge, an egotistical
> >>>>>>singer has lost the spirit of Christmas.
>
> >>>>>>2. Scrooged: A cynical TV executive is haunted by three spirits
> >>>>>>bearing lessons.
>
> >>>>>3. Ms Scrooge: Scrooge as a black female shopping store magnate.
>
> >>>>4. A Christmas Carol: The 1984 one with George C. Scott.
>
> >>>That one's very, very good, second only to the Alastair Sim version. . . .
>
> >>I like the British "classics illustrated" version from the 1930s. . . .
>
> >Is that the one with Sir Seymour Hicks? Yes, it's very good. . . .
>
> He'd played the character on stage for years. I haven't seen it in a
> long time, though.
>
> I also like Reginald Owen's lighter take on the character in the 1938
> American adaptation, despite the almost comical scenes with Mr. and
> Mrs. Lockhart as Mr. and Mrs. Cratchitt. Yes, one isn't supposed to like
> an adaptation that takes such liberties in tone with the original material.
I like it, but I think it was a loss to film history when Lionel
Barrymore had to give it a pass. With Barrymore as Scrooge, it might
have surpassed even the later Sim version. As it is, it does have the
three Lockharts in their only joint appearance on film. It's also got
that inadvertently funny scene where the Cratchits eat the plum
pudding. It's on fire, but the blue flames didn't register on b&w
film, so they poured a ton of salt on the pudding to make the flames
turn orange, and the Cratchit actors have to eat it that way. If you
watch carefully, you can see Tiny Tim's bug-eyed reaction to all that
salt just as he's panned out of frame.
> Of course, the Sims version adds a lot of stuff that Dickens never wrote,
> and I'm sorry, but it's unforgiveable that they overloaded the tragedy
> in Scrooge's back story given that they made Scrooge younger than his
> sister and his mother died in labor of his birth, so the first major
> abandonment in his life (forming his cynical and unempathetic personality)
> was during his own birth! I understood the character just fine from
> Sims' performance, thankyouverymuch.
I think it added an interesting layer onto Scrooge: He hates Fred
because his mother, Fan, died giving birth to him ... just as Scrooge's
own mother died in giving birth to Scrooge. Not only does Scrooge's
hatred for Fred mirror Pa Scrooge's hatred for Scrooge, but it also
indicates Scrooge's hatred for himself.
> Then there's Scrooge, the musical film adaptation. That one haunted me,
> as I saw it in theater as a yout'. It was partly the scene of Scrooge
> going to Hell (all those red sets), but for 45 years, I haven't been able
> to get several of those awful songs out of my head.
Oh, thank God. I was afraid I was the only one who thinks that film is
terrible. Saying you don't like SCROOGE is like taking a crap on THE
SOUND OF MUSIC. (I don't like that one, either, so I'm used to this.)