What Killed The Martians?

[The Starmaker]

Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...


What Killed The Martians on Mars?



I don't want to know about Monster Tsunamis Rocked Mars Oceans Billions of Years Ago

http://www.space.com/32917-mars-tsunamis-ancient-oceans.html
http://www.space.com/28742-ancient-mars-ocean-water-lost.html



I want to know about

What Killed The Martians on Mars?


doesn't anybody care?


Am I the only one??


Or are you waiting for NASA to tell you first to wonder and care?



wat a bunch of sheeps yous are.

[The Starmaker]

Sam Wormley wrote:

>
> On 5/19/16 1:54 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>

> Solar radiation (ionizing)
> Solar wind scouring away the martian atmosphere.
>

That's completely WRONG!


Solar radiation would not have enter The Martians atmosphere to kill them.


Try again, dummie.


Maybe they all drowned in the Mega Monster Tsunamis that Rocked Mars Oceans Billions of Years Ago...

[The Starmaker]

Sam Wormley wrote:

>
> On 5/19/16 3:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Solar radiation would not have enter The Martians atmosphere to kill them.
>

> Solar radiation UV, x-ray, and charged particles rain down on the
> surface of Mars as we speak with no magnetic field, nor thick
> atmospher to protect the surface.

WRONG AGAIN! 3 stikes and you're out!!

What happen to the martians thick atmosphere?? You could not have an ocean on Mars without a thick atmosphere?

[ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com]

In sci.physics The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>> On 5/19/16 3:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > Solar radiation would not have enter The Martians atmosphere to kill them.
>>
>> Solar radiation UV, x-ray, and charged particles rain down on the
>> surface of Mars as we speak with no magnetic field, nor thick
>> atmospher to protect the surface.
>
> WRONG AGAIN! 3 stikes and you're out!!
>
> What happen to the martians thick atmosphere?? You could not have an
> ocean on Mars without a thick atmosphere?

Europa has a thin atmosphere and oceans, idiot.


--
Jim Pennino

[Kevrob]

Don't confuse *mocker w/facts. That's not why he posts.
He's just trolling.

Kevin R

[The Starmaker]

"..and oceans, idiot."

[ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com]

Yes, a thin atmosphere and oceans.

The two are not mutually exclusive.


--
Jim Pennino

[The Starmaker]

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On 5/19/16 3:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> >> > Solar radiation would not have enter The Martians atmosphere to kill them.
> >> >>
> >> >> Solar radiation UV, x-ray, and charged particles rain down on the
> >> >> surface of Mars as we speak with no magnetic field, nor thick
> >> >> atmospher to protect the surface.
> >> >
> >> > WRONG AGAIN! 3 stikes and you're out!!
> >> >
> >> > What happen to the martians thick atmosphere?? You could not have an
> >> > ocean on Mars without a thick atmosphere?
> >>
> >> Europa has a thin atmosphere and oceans, idiot.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Pennino
> >
> >
> > "..and oceans, idiot."
>
> Yes, a thin atmosphere and oceans.
>

don't forget the rivers, and lakes that run into the ocean...and the waterfalls.

[ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com]

Don't forget to take your meds.


--
Jim Pennino

[The Starmaker]

I heard of the speling police, grammar police, you must be with
the...meds police.


Would you be interested in ocean front properties on Europa beach?? I'll
sell it you ...

[Zephirum]

On 19 May 2016 19:54, The Starmaker wrote:
> Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
>
>
> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>

Who says any ever evolved and if they did climate change was what
killed them.



--
Sailing against the wind.

[J. Clarke]

In article <dq7q6n...@mid.individual.net>, oldsailor62-
eur...@yahoo.com says...

>
> On 19 May 2016 19:54, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
> >
> >
> > What Killed The Martians on Mars?
> >
> Who says any ever evolved and if they did climate change was what
> killed them.

You're sure about that are you?

Perhaps the current climate of Mars is the result of the use of weapons
beyond our comprehension. Or perhaps they were perfectly happy with the
current climate and killed themselves with weapons beyond our
comprehension that had no effect on climate.

[Stephen Allcroft]

On Thursday, 19 May 2016 19:54:06 UTC+1, The Starmaker wrote:
> Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
>
>
> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>
>
>
> I don't want to know about Monster Tsunamis Rocked Mars Oceans Billions of Years Ago
>
> http://www.space.com/32917-mars-tsunamis-ancient-oceans.html
> http://www.space.com/28742-ancient-mars-ocean-water-lost.html
>
>
>
> I want to know about
>
> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>
>
> doesn't anybody care?
>

> h

> Am I the only one??
>
>
> Or are you waiting for NASA to tell you first to wonder and care?
>
>
>
> wat a bunch of sheeps yous are.

Captain Black killed the Martians, which is why the Mysterons Declared war (Captain Scarlet Annual 1967)

[T Guy]

I think the boat may have sailed on that one.

[T Guy]

Also depicted in the first episode, unless my memory fails me.

Is the Starmaker revealing that Earth won the war against the Mysterons and finished them off?

Or, not for the first time, that he is an idiot/ Or a troll?

To be fair, I do derive some amusement from his antics.

[The Starmaker]

Zephirum wrote:
>
> On 19 May 2016 19:54, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
> >
> >
> > What Killed The Martians on Mars?
> >
> Who says any ever evolved

I didn't bring up any theories of evolution...
they could have come from someplace else and left.

>and if they did climate change was what
> killed them.

another theory...


don't yous have any original ideas?


I guess "Who says" says it all.

[ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com]

Nope; the kook baiters.


--
Jim Pennino

[The Starmaker]

Sam Wormley wrote:

>
> On 5/20/16 11:40 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I didn't bring up any theories of evolution... they could have come
> > from someplace else and left.
>

> Not likely. The escape velocity is 5 km/s on Mars.
>
> --


For example...
if aliens from another planet
were to arrive on our moon..

they would find on the
surface of the moon this photo:
http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/AS16-117-18840.jpg

Would they ask "What happen to the moon people?" Obviously someone came and left..


The problems with yous people in the 'scientific comunity'..is that
your theories are...limited.

[William December Starr]

In article <MPG.31a890273...@news.eternal-september.org>,
"J. Clarke" <j.clark...@gmail.com> said:

> oldsailor...@yahoo.com says...

>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>>>
>> Who says any ever evolved and if they did climate change was what
>> killed them.
>
> You're sure about that are you?
>
> Perhaps the current climate of Mars is the result of the use of
> weapons beyond our comprehension. Or perhaps they were perfectly
> happy with the current climate and killed themselves with weapons
> beyond our comprehension that had no effect on climate.

Or maybe they're still there.

-- wds

[William December Starr]

In article <9af41aca-f80e-4d51...@googlegroups.com>,

Stephen Allcroft <stephen...@lycos.co.uk> said:

> Captain Black killed the Martians,

temporarily, I believe

> which is why the Mysterons Declared war (Captain Scarlet Annual 1967)

Not much war, really, just Teach Them a Lesson harassment, I think.
I always had the impression that if they'd wanted to the Mysterons
could have just turned the Earth off and still had time for breakfast.

-- wds

[Dimensional Traveler]

We do lose a LOT of probes headed that way.... :)

--
Privacy IS Security

[je suis charly]

In article <nho8sj$7hc$1...@dont-email.me>,

Have you ever consider that in War of the Worlds, we are the invaders and Mars
is the target? What if Mars bacteria is particular good nutrient?

--
Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments
of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from
coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true
of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.

[Thomas Heger]

Am 19.05.2016 20:54, schrieb The Starmaker:
> Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
>
>
> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>

Supposed the Mars was inhabited by Marsians, these people would have
developed civilisations.

So there have been the equivalent to our cultural structures on ancient
Mars, too, like tribes and states and so forth.

If Marsians had been as aggressive as we believe they were, they fought
wars upon their ancient oceans. For this they needed ships and to build
them, they needed wood.

So the Marsians cut down all their own forests, to build ships and all
the other forests, to prevent the enemy to do so.

Then all the forest were gone.

And then the sun was shining directly onto the ground and heated that
up. So the ground got bone-dry. Subsequently there was no more other
vegetation.

Then the atmosphere heated up and also the oceans. This made the water
evaporate and the atmosphere expand.

Then the atmosphere got blown away by the solar wind.


TH

[Zephirum]

On 20 May 2016 09:09, J. Clarke wrote:
> In article <dq7q6n...@mid.individual.net>, oldsailor62-
> eur...@yahoo.com says...
>>
>> On 19 May 2016 19:54, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
>>>
>>>
>>> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>>>
>> Who says any ever evolved and if they did climate change was what
>> killed them.
>
> You're sure about that are you?
>

No I put it forward as one theory.

[Zephirum]

As indeed your attitude says it all about you so goodbye

[Zephirum]

>> oldsailor...@yahoo.com says...
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>>>>
>>> Who says any ever evolved and if they did climate change was what
>>> killed them.
>>
>> You're sure about that are you?
>>
>> Perhaps the current climate of Mars is the result of the use of
>> weapons beyond our comprehension. Or perhaps they were perfectly
>> happy with the current climate and killed themselves with weapons
>> beyond our comprehension that had no effect on climate.
>

Or maybe your comprehension is not at all comprehensive?

[leif...@dimnakorr.com]

In rec.arts.sf.written William December Starr <wds...@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <MPG.31a890273...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>

>> Perhaps the current climate of Mars is the result of the use of
>> weapons beyond our comprehension. Or perhaps they were perfectly
>> happy with the current climate and killed themselves with weapons
>> beyond our comprehension that had no effect on climate.
>
> Or maybe they're still there.
>

Watching our affairs from the timeless worlds of space and slowly,
and surely, drawing their plans against us.

--
Leif Roar Moldskred

[J. Clarke]

In article <4OadnTZxvOc8gN3K...@giganews.com>,
leif...@dimnakorr.com says...

You've just hit it--they're areoforming Earth.

[The Starmaker]

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
>

> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>

> I don't want to know about Monster Tsunamis Rocked Mars Oceans Billions of Years Ago
>
> http://www.space.com/32917-mars-tsunamis-ancient-oceans.html
> http://www.space.com/28742-ancient-mars-ocean-water-lost.html
>
> I want to know about
>

> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>

> doesn't anybody care?

>
> Am I the only one??
>
> Or are you waiting for NASA to tell you first to wonder and care?
>
> wat a bunch of sheeps yous are.

I'll tell you what killed the martians...

they got consumed with politics and sex,
and that caused...friction..

which in turn caused atomic bombs.

[C. E. Gee]

On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 11:54:06 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
>
>
> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>
>

Goto http://www.perihelionsf.com/permalinks/gee001.htm

Then scroll down the article 'til the next story "Repulsive Progession" appears.

The story will explain in detail what happened to the Martians. And the story takes only three minutes to read!

[The Starmaker]

i don't read science fiction stories...i'll fall asleep after 2 minutes.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---

[Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy]

The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:57412B...@ix.netcom.com:

> C. E. Gee wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 11:54:06 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker
>> wrote:
>> > Let me ask the question first before the questions gets
>> > asked...
>> >
>> >
>> > What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Goto http://www.perihelionsf.com/permalinks/gee001.htm
>>
>> Then scroll down the article 'til the next story "Repulsive
>> Progession" appears.
>>
>> The story will explain in detail what happened to the Martians.
>> And the story takes only three minutes to read!
>
> i don't read science fiction stories...i'll fall asleep after 2
> minutes.
>

Plus, there's words and shit, and that's beyond your abilities.

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[Thomas Heger]

Am 20.05.2016 19:51, schrieb The Starmaker:

>
> For example...
> if aliens from another planet
> were to arrive on our moon..
>
> they would find on the
> surface of the moon this photo:
> http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/AS16-117-18840.jpg
>
> Would they ask "What happen to the moon people?" Obviously someone came and left..
>

Alien visitor of the Moon would not see anything on this picture, since
photographic emulsions of colour-photos in the 60th have been quickly
destroyed by uv-rays (which are abundant on the surface of the Moon).

TH

[The Starmaker]

It would only destroy the red channel...and get faded by the
sunlight..the blue channel would have details that can still be seen...

[Dan Tilque]

The Starmaker wrote:
> Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
>
>
> What Killed The Martians on Mars?

"I" said me
"With my bow and arrow, I killed the Martians."

(I also killed Cock Robin, Amelia Earhart, Sasquatch, and JFK. And I'm
working on Jimmy Hoffa.)

--
Dan Tilque

[The Starmaker]

futhermore...they would find a paper card inclosed in a cellophane
bag...what in moon could have caused?

[The Starmaker]

Isn't the correct...usage, ""Me" said I"?


'Me' is the body, and "I" is the conscience. So that would mean it is the body
that shot the arrow, not the "I".



"With my bow and arrow,..."

Here again, it is the "my" that is the body.


me, myself, ...and I.


You people don't even know Who you are or What you are....

[Dan Tilque]

The Starmaker wrote:
> Dan Tilque wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>> "I" said me
>> "With my bow and arrow, I killed the Martians."
>>
>

> Isn't the correct...usage, ""Me" said I"?

<sigh> Literary references are always lost on you. Always.

--
Dan Tilque

[The Starmaker]

I was refering to physics, not science fiction which has it's literary
references inaccurate to the real world.


It's me that killed the martians, not I.


Get the facts straight..

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Dan Tilque wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:

> > > Let me ask the question first before the questions gets asked...
> > >
> > >

> > > What Killed The Martians on Mars?
> >
> > "I" said me
> > "With my bow and arrow, I killed the Martians."
> >

> > (I also killed Cock Robin, Amelia Earhart, Sasquatch, and JFK. And I'm
> > working on Jimmy Hoffa.)
> >
> > --
> > Dan Tilque
>

> Isn't the correct...usage, ""Me" said I"?
>

[Dan Tilque]

The Starmaker wrote:
> Dan Tilque wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Dan Tilque wrote:
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>>>> "I" said me
>>>> "With my bow and arrow, I killed the Martians."
>>>>
>>> Isn't the correct...usage, ""Me" said I"?
>> <sigh> Literary references are always lost on you. Always.
>>
>

> I was refering to physics, not science fiction which has it's literary
> references inaccurate to the real world.

The reference wasn't exactly science fiction:

http://www.learner.org/jnorth/tm/robin/CockRobinRhyme.html


--
Dan Tilque

[T Guy]

On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 05:29:41 UTC+1, The Starmaker wrote:
> Dan Tilque wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Dan Tilque wrote:
> > >> The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Isn't the correct...usage, ""Me" said I"?
> >
> > <sigh> Literary references are always lost on you. Always.
> >
> > --
> > Dan Tilque
>
> I was refering to physics, not science fiction which has it's literary
> references inaccurate to the real world.
>
>
> It's me that killed the martians, not I.

You should stick to Physics. See also 'it's literary references' supra.

[The Starmaker]

For example...

"I think, therefore I am."

should be

"Me think, therefore I am."

[Kevrob]

This makes more sense:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHGeCF1aS-o

[ Wbanguna Evpuzna & Gur Zbqrea Ybiref -
Urer Pbzr Gur Znegvna Znegvnaf ]

Kevin R

[Dan Tilque]

I think I figured out Starmaker's problem. It's possible others have
posted this before, but I usually don't read the threads he starts.

He's autistic. As evidence, notice how in the thread below all he can
pay attention to is my misuse of a pronoun. He's ignored everything else
(I doubt he even read the link I provided) and just keeps harping on
that. A sure sign of autism.

The Starmaker wrote:
> Dan Tilque wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Dan Tilque wrote:
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Dan Tilque wrote:
>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>> What Killed The Martians on Mars?
>>>>>> "I" said me
>>>>>> "With my bow and arrow, I killed the Martians."
>>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't the correct...usage, ""Me" said I"?
>>>> <sigh> Literary references are always lost on you. Always.
>>>>
>>> I was refering to physics, not science fiction which has it's literary
>>> references inaccurate to the real world.
>> The reference wasn't exactly science fiction:
>>
>> http://www.learner.org/jnorth/tm/robin/CockRobinRhyme.html
>
>

> For example...
>
> "I think, therefore I am."
>
> should be
>
> "Me think, therefore I am."

--
Dan Tilque

[Kevrob]

So, spelling errors set him off?

For me, it's top-posting. Yuck!

Kevin R

[Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy]

Dan Tilque <dti...@frontier.com> wrote in
news:ni325s$o69$1...@dont-email.me:

> I think

The evidence suggests otherwise.

> I figured out Starmaker's problem. It's possible others
> have posted this before, but I usually don't read the threads he
> starts.
>
> He's autistic. As evidence, notice how in the thread below all
> he can pay attention to is my misuse of a pronoun. He's ignored
> everything else (I doubt he even read the link I provided) and
> just keeps harping on that. A sure sign of autism.

No. He's a troll. He posts for the sole purpose of provoking
response, and gets bonus points when you change the Subject: line to
include his name. You are now a little fishie, dangling helplessly on
his hook.

I suspect you enjoy that as much as he does.

[Dan Tilque]

Kevrob wrote:
>
> So, spelling errors set him off?

It wasn't a spelling error.

>
> For me, it's top-posting. Yuck!

It was not a top-posting; it was a new thread. I included the old thread
as evidence, not because I was replying to it.

--
Dan Tilque

[Robert Carnegie]

On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 03:24:26 UTC+1, Dan Tilque wrote:
> I think I figured out Starmaker's problem. It's possible others have
> posted this before, but I usually don't read the threads he starts.
>
> He's autistic. As evidence, notice how in the thread below all he can
> pay attention to is my misuse of a pronoun. He's ignored everything else
> (I doubt he even read the link I provided) and just keeps harping on
> that. A sure sign of autism.

That isn't in itself a reason for hir to post.
Hir purpose as I see it is lightly disguised
anti-Semitism. For instance, that Albert Einstein
invented the atom bomb and then killed the Martians
with it. (If that hasn't been said yet this time
around, it's because I came in early.)

[Kevrob]

On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 5:25:03 AM UTC-4, Dan Tilque wrote:
> Kevrob wrote:
> >
> > So, spelling errors set him off?
>
> It wasn't a spelling error.
>

So, a grammatical choice he saw as an error. OK.

> >
> > For me, it's top-posting. Yuck!
>
> It was not a top-posting; it was a new thread. I included the old thread
> as evidence, not because I was replying to it.

There's a "reply to" attribution in the header. You renamed
the thread, but it isn't a new one.

[quote]

X-Received: by 10.157.8.184 with SMTP id 53mr932161otf.32.1464143066481;

Tue, 24 May 2016 19:24:26 -0700 (PDT)

X-BeenThere: rec.arts....@googlegroups.com

Received: by 10.157.17.52 with SMTP id g49ls327435ote.31.gmail; Tue, 24 May

2016 19:24:23 -0700 (PDT)

X-Received: by 10.157.4.119 with SMTP id 110mr939007otc.34.1464143063960;

Tue, 24 May 2016 19:24:23 -0700 (PDT)

Path: k10ni3960igv.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail

From: Dan Tilque <dti...@frontier.com>

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy

Subject: Starmaker's real problem (was Re: What Killed The Martians?

Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:47:17 -0700

Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

Lines: 40

Message-ID: <ni325s$o69$1...@dont-email.me>

References: <573E0B...@ix.netcom.com> <nhva12$5s4$1...@dont-email.me> <574351...@ix.netcom.com> <ni0a24$p5o$1...@dont-email.me> <5743D9...@ix.netcom.com> <ni1769$79d$1...@dont-email.me> <5744A9...@ix.netcom.com>

Mime-Version: 1.0

Injection-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 02:20:45 -0000 (UTC)

Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="38349e607c4ba3e0cc6b154caed703de";

logging-data="24777"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++UcgJbJs4i9ZXbEN969vM"

User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100912)

In-Reply-To: <5744A9...@ix.netcom.com>

Cancel-Lock: sha1:+Ov1WsGERugoYABN9vgkBUbOTRM=

Bytes: 2560

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I think I figured out Starmaker's problem. It's possible others have

[/quote]

Kevin R

[Dan Tilque]

Robert Carnegie wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 03:24:26 UTC+1, Dan Tilque wrote:
>> I think I figured out Starmaker's problem. It's possible others have
>> posted this before, but I usually don't read the threads he starts.
>>
>> He's autistic. As evidence, notice how in the thread below all he can
>> pay attention to is my misuse of a pronoun. He's ignored everything else
>> (I doubt he even read the link I provided) and just keeps harping on
>> that. A sure sign of autism.
>
> That isn't in itself a reason for hir to post.

No, it just shows why his style is the way it is. Has anyone actually
had a meaningful exchange with him? He seems to only have conversations
with himself, as far as I can tell. That's another sign of autism.

> Hir purpose as I see it is lightly disguised
> anti-Semitism. For instance, that Albert Einstein
> invented the atom bomb and then killed the Martians
> with it.

You're going to have come up with more evidence than that. To most
people the name Einstein connotes "super-smart scientist", not Jew.
Considering his blatant anti-science views, any denigration of Einstein
should first be considered as part of that. You'll have to show some
kind of pattern where he mostly singles out Jewish scientists, and not
just Einstein, to support that hypothesis.


--
Dan Tilque

[Robert Carnegie]

Well, it is mostly Albert Einstein, presented as
the Jew who invented the atom bomb. But often he's
accompanied in Marstaker's output by the other
Jew scientist, Leo Szilard, who aided and/or
abetted him in doing it. Regardless, it's pretty
clear in my opinion that it's Jews all the way down
with Ramstaker. Picking on Einstein especially
is just a cover.

[Dimensional Traveler]

He's always struck me as more of a Christian Anti-Science Fanatic but
being Anti-Semitic would be consistent with that.

--
Privacy IS Security

[The Starmaker]

Pay no mind to this Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy, ...he's just a
cyber bully and an internet terroist.

[Kevrob]

GUCS plays a little rough on the keyboard, but no sticks or stones
are thrown. Terrorist is way out of line.

What he isn't is a bigoted nutbar. Terry is the Life Cereal
"Mikey" of USENET. He'll slag anybody.

Duck's back, meet water.

Kevin R

[Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy]

The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in

news:57460E...@ix.netcom.com:

You're just jealous that I'm better at it than you are. Largely
because you're very, very stupid. And have a tiny penis, and
desperately need to show it to the world.

You perv, you.

[Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy]

Kevrob <kev...@my-deja.com> wrote in
news:d1162461-7610-4c1d...@googlegroups.com:

I guess it struck a nerve that he *finally* got someone dangling on
his hook, and I swooped in and took it away.

He usually knows better than the tangle with the master. It's about
hte only thing he knows.