> Greg Goss <
go...@gossg.org> wrote in
>
news:c1jfnd...@mid.individual.net:
>
>> Lynn McGuire <
l...@winsim.com> wrote:
>>>On 7/1/2014 7:17 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:25:49 -0400, Walter Bushell
>>>> <
pr...@panix.com>
>>
>>>>> But Canadians recognized early that dissolution would lead to
>>>>> the parts being assimilated into the US.
>>>>
>>>> I have sometimes wondered what the USA would do with
>>>> Quebec.
>>>
>>>The same that the USA does with New Orleans.
>>
>> France uses a slightly different legal theory and system
>> developed from that theory than England does. Canada uses a
>> merged system that's primarily "British Common Law" but Quebec
>> retains some elements of "Napoleonic Law". I'm uncertain of the
>> details, but because of this, three members of our 9-member
>> Supreme Court must always be from Quebec.
>>
>> Does Louisiana and other French-descended jurisdictions in the
>> States retain any of the Napoleonic law structure?
>
> It came from commons ources, apparently, mainly Spanish and Roman. Or
> so Wikipedia says.
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Louisiana
>
> Note, however, that the differences are almost entirely in the civil
> code, as criminal codes must comply with the federal constitution.